Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:06:34.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Business and Environmental Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

W. Michael Hoffman
W. Michael Hoffman*
Affiliation:
Center for Business Ethics, Bentley College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores some interconnections between the business and environmental ethics movements. The first section argues that business has obligations to protect the environment over and above what is required by environmental law and that it should cooperate and interact with government in establishing environmental regulation. Business must develop and demonstrate environmental moral leadership. The second section exposes the danger of using the rationale of “good ethics is good business” as a basis for such business moral leadership in both the business and environmental ethics movements. The third section cautions against the moral shallowness inherent in the position or in the promotional strategy of ecological homocentrism which claims that society, including business, ought to protect the environment solely because of harm done to human beings and human interests. This paper urges business and environmental ethicists to promote broader and deeper moral perspectives than ones based on mere self-interest or human interest. Otherwise both movements will come up ethically short.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , April 1991 , pp. 169 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

This paper was originally presented as the Presidential Address to the Society for Business Ethics, August 10, 1990, San Francisco, CA.

1 Gore, Albert, “What is Wrong With Us?” Time (January 2, 1989), 66.Google Scholar

2 Bowie, Norman, “Morality, Money, and Motor Cars,” Business, Ethics, and the Environment: The Public Policy Debate, edited by Hoffman, W. Michael, Frederick, Robert, and Petry, Edward S. Jr., (New York: Quorum Books, 1990), p. 89.Google Scholar

3 See Friedman, Milton, “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits,” The New York Times Magazine (September 13, 1970).Google Scholar

4 Bowie, p. 91.

5 Bowie, p. 94.

6 Robert Frederick, Assistant Director of the Center for Business Ethics, and I have developed and written these points together. Frederick has also provided me with invaluable assistance on other points in this paper.

7 Goodpaster, Kenneth E., “Can a Corporation have an Environmental Conscience,” The Corporation, Ethics, and the Environment, edited by Michael Hoffman, W., Frederick, Robert, and Petry, Edward S. Jr., (New York: Quorom Books, 1990).Google Scholar

8 Sagoff, Mark, “At the Shrine of Our Lady of Fatima, or Why Political Questions Are Not All Economic,” found in Business Ethics: Readings and Cases in Corporate Morality, 2nd edition, edited by Michael Hoffman, W. and Moore, Jennifer Mills (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990), pp. 494–503.Google Scholar

9 Bowie, p. 94.

10 Shea, Cynthia Pollock, “Doing Well By Doing Good,” World-Watch (November/December, 1989), p. 30.Google Scholar

11 Corporate Ethics: A Prime Business Asset, a report by The Business Roundtable, February, 1988, p. 4.

12 Blanchard, Kenneth, and Peale, Norman Vincent, The Power of Ethical Management (New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc., 1988).Google Scholar

13 Frederick, Robert, “Individual Rights and Environmental Protection,” presented at the Annual Society for Business Ethics Conference in San Francisco, August 10 and 11, 1990.Google Scholar

14 Frederick.

15 Routley, Richard, and Routley, Val, “Human Chauvinism and Environmental Ethics,” Environmental Philosophy, Monograph Series, No. 2, edited by Mannison, Don, McRobbie, Michael, and Routley, Richard (Australian National University, 1980), pp. 121ff.Google Scholar

16 See Taylor, Paul W., “The Ethics of Respect for Nature,” found in People, Penguins, and Plastic Trees, edited by Van De Veer, Donald and Pierce, Christine (Belmont, California: Wadsworth, 1986), pp. 178–83.Google Scholar Also see R. and Routley, V., “Against the Inevitability of Human Chauvinism,” found in Ethics and the Problems of the 21st Century, edited by Goodpaster, K. E. and Sayre, K. M. (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1979), pp. 36–59.Google Scholar

17 Naess, Arne, “Identification as a Source of Deep Ecological Attitudes,” Deep Ecology, edited by Tobias, Michael (San Marcos, California: Avant Books, 1988), p. 266.Google Scholar

18 de Spinoza, Benedict, “On the Improvement of the Understanding,” found in Philosophy of Benedict de Spinoza, translated by Elwes, R. H. M. (New York: Tudor Publishing Co., 1936), p. 5.Google Scholar

19 Stone, Christopher D., “Should Trees Have Standing?—Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects,” found in People, Penguins, and Plastic Trees, pp. 86–87.Google Scholar

20 See Van De Veer, Donald, “Interspecific Justice,” People, Penguins, and Plastic Trees, pp. 51–66.Google Scholar

21 Tribe, Lawrence H., “Ways Not to Think about Plastic Trees: New Foundations for Environmental Law,” found in People, Penguins, and Plastic Trees, p. 257.Google Scholar

22 Stone, pp. 83–96.

23 Rolston, Holmes III, Environmental Ethics (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988), pp. 301–13.Google Scholar