Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:20:54.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distributive Justice and the Rules of the Corporation: Partial Versus General Equilibrium Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

John H. Beck
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Progressives have advocated reforms of rules governing corporations to achieve greater distributive justice, but Maitland (2001) has argued that corporate rules are distributively neutral and that changing the rules will have no long run impact on distributive justice. These different conclusions stem from the use of two different methods of economic analysis, partial equilibrium and general equilibrium models. A change in the rules governing corporations in a “large” sector of the economy is appropriately analyzed using a general equilibrium analysis, supporting the conclusion that changes in the rules may affect distributive justice in the long run. However, a partial equilibrium analysis of a change in the rules of corporations affecting a “small” part of the economy such as a single firm or even all firms in a small state supports the claim that such changes cannot affect distributive justice.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , July 2005 , pp. 355 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Harberger, Arnold C. 1962. “The Incidence of the Corporation Income Tax.” Journal of Political Economy 70: 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Dwight R. 1996. “Why Workers Should Want Mandated Benefits to Lower Their Wages.” Economic Inquiry 34: 401–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitland, Ian. 2001. “Distributive Justice in Firms: Do the Rules of Corporate Governance Matter?” Business Ethics Quarterly 11(1): 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millon, David. 1995. “Communitarianism in Corporate Law: Foundations and Law Reform Strategies.” In Progressive Corporate Law, ed. Mitchell, Lawrence E.. Boulder Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Lawrence E., ed. 1995. Progressive Corporate Law. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar