Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:09:25.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Moral Weight of Thinking Thin - Moral Imagination and Management Decision MakingPatricia H. Werhane New York: Oxford University Press, 1999

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Dennis J. Moberg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , April 2001 , pp. 373 - 377
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brady, F. N., and Logsdon, J. M. 1988. “Zimbardo’s ‘Stanford Prison Experiment’ and the Relevance of Social Psychology for Teaching Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 7: 703–710.Google Scholar
Kekes, J. 1991. “Moral Imagination, Freedom, and the Humanities.” American Philosophical Quarterly 28: 101–111.Google Scholar
Kincheloe, J. L., and Steinberg, S. R. 1993. “A Tentative Description of Post-Formal Thinking: The Critical Confrontation with Cognitive Theory.” Harvard Educational Review 63: 296–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, F A., and Commons, M. L. 1982. “Systematic, Metasystematic, and Cross-Paradigmatic Reasoning: A Case for Stages of Reasoning Beyond Formal Operations.” In Beyond Formal Operations: Late Adolescent and Adult Cognitive Development, ed. Commons, M. L., Richards, F., and Armon, C., pp. 92–119. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Trevino, L. 1986. “Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-situation Interactionist Model.” Academy of Management Review 11: 601–617.Google Scholar