Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:46:05.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Evaluation of Journal Quality: The Perspective of Business Ethics Researchers 1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Andrew C. Wicks  and
Robbin Derry
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The subject of journal quality has received little attention in the business ethics literature. While there are reasons for this past neglect, there are important new considerations which make it vital that researchers now address this topic. First, virtually all business school departments use evaluations of journal quality as an important indicator of scholarly achievement, yet business ethics has no such studies. Second, as many schools are beginning to ask ethicists to publish in the wider management literature, it is important to find a way to compare journal quality across these domains. In the absence of such studies, performance review committees (including tenure decisions) may well make incorrect inferences about journal quality within business ethics or assume that ethics journals are not prestigious unless a candidate can provide evidence to the contrary (i.e. as in a study like this one). This study addresses these two issues. It relies on an opinion-based survey to establish journal quality by incorporating a list of journals within business ethics and the wider management literature. The target population is active business ethics researchers within the Society for Business Ethics (SBE). We present the results of the study and discuss their implications.

Type
Two Special Reports
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , July 1996 , pp. 359 - 371
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, W. and McKenzie, P. 1978. “Leading Accounting Departments Revisited.” AccountingReview. vol. 53, pp. 135‐38.Google Scholar
Astley, G. 1985. “Administrative Science as Socially Constructed Truth.” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 30, pp. 497‐513.Google Scholar
Brown, L. and Huefner, R. 1994. “The Familiarity with and Perceived Quality of Accounting Journals: Views of Senior Accounting Faculty in Leading U.S. MBA Programs.” Contemporary AccountingResearch, pp. 223‐50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coe, R. and Weinstock, I. 1984. “Evaluating the Management Journals: A Second Look.” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 27, pp. 660‐66.Google Scholar
Croom, D. 1970. “Dangers in the Use of Citation Analysis.” Nature. (September 12), pp. 377‐90.Google Scholar
Extejt, M. and Smith, J. 1990. “The Behavioral Sciences and Management: An Evaluation of Relevant Journals.” Journal of Management, vol. 16, pp. 539‐51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flew, A. 1979. A Dictionary of Philosophy. 2nd edition. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Franke, R., Edlund, T. and Oster, F. 1990. “The Development of Strategic Management: Journal Quality and Article Impact.” Strategic Management Journal. vol. 11, pp. 243‐53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez-Mejia, L. and Balkin, D. 1992. “Determinants of Faculty Pay: An Agency Theory Perspective.” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 35, pp. 921‐55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, D. 1973. “Faculty Salaries, Promotions and Productivity at a Large University.” American Economic Review, vol. 63, pp. 469‐77.Google Scholar
Macmillan, I. 1989. “Delineating a Forum for Business Policy Scholars.” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 10, pp. 391‐95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, J. 1967. “Citation Indexing and Evaluation of Scientific Papers.” Science. (March), pp. 1213‐1219.Google Scholar
May, K. 1967. “Abuses of Citation Indexing.” Science. (May), p. 890.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. and Fitzgerald, M. 1977. “Recognition and Production among Political Science Departments.” Western Political Quarterly, vol. 30, pp. 342‐50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vocino, T. and Elliott, R. 1984. “Public Administrative Journal Prestige: A Time Series Analysis.” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 29, pp. 43‐51.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. and Henson, S. 1976. “Citations to Review Serials.” Journal of Documentation. (December), pp. 290‐93.Google Scholar