Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:54:54.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Business Ethics and Stakeholder Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Wesley Cragg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Stakeholder theorists have typically offered both a business case and an ethics case for business ethics. I evaluate arguments for both approaches and find them wanting. I then shift the focus from ethics to law and ask: “Why should corporations obey the law?” Contrary to what shareholder theories typically imply, neoclassical or profit maximization theories of the firm can offer answers based only on instrumental justifications. Instrumental justifications for obeying the law, however, are pragmatically and normatively incoherent. This is because the modern corporation is a legal artifact. It exists because communities create the legal framework necessary for its existence. Individual corporations can therefore be said to owe their existence to a partnership (what might be called a social contract) between shareholders and governments, a partnership that is itself built on the shared though often implicit understanding that corporations have an unconditional (categorical) obligation both to obey the law and to treat their stakeholders ethically while generating wealth for their shareholders.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , April 2002 , pp. 113 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baier, Annette. 1989. “Doing Without Moral Theory,” in Clarke and Simpson, 1989.Google Scholar
Blair, Margaret. 1998. “Whose Interests Should Corporations Serve?” in Clarkson, 1998.Google Scholar
Clarke, Stanley G., and Evan, Simpson (eds.). 1989. Anti Theory in Ethics and Moral Conservatism. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Clarkson, M. B. E., Deck, M. C., and Shiner, N. I. 1992. “The Stakeholder Management Model in Practice.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management. Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
Clarkson, Max B. E. (ed.). 1998. The Corporation And Its Stakeholders: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Cragg, Wesley. 1976. “Functional Words, Facts and Values.” The Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol 6(1).Google Scholar
Cragg, Wesley. 2000. “Bribery, Business and the Problem of Dirty Hands,” in Cruelty and Deception: The Controversy over Dirty Hands in Politics, Paul, Rynard and David, Shugarman, eds. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press, 175–187.Google Scholar
Cragg, Wesley. 2000. “Human Rights and Business Ethics: Fashioning a New Social Contract.” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 27(1/2): 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 1982. Corporations and Morality. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas and Dunfee, Thomas W. 1999. Ties That Bind. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas and Preston, L. E. 1998. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications,” in Clarkson, , 1998.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1998. “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits,” in Poff, and Waluchow, , 1987.Google Scholar
Goodpaster, Kenneth. 1998. “Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis,” in Clarkson, , 1998.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1967. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howse, R. and Mutua, M. 2000. Protecting Human Rights in a Global Economy: Challenges for the World Trade Organization. Montreal: Rights and Democracy (International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development).Google Scholar
Livitt, Theodore. 1986. The Marketing Imagination. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
OECD. 1996. OECD Trade, Employment, and Labour Standards: A Study of Core Workers’ Rights and International Trade.Google Scholar
Poff, Deborah and Waluchow, Wilfrid (eds.). 1987. Business Ethics in Canada. Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice-Hall Canada.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1989. “The Diversity of Goods,” in Clarke, and Simpson, , 1989.Google Scholar
Wolff, Robert Paul. 1973. The Autonomy of Reason: A Commentary on Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar