Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:05:30.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Casuistry and the Business Case Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Martin Calkins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This article argues for the compatibility of casuistry and the business case method. It describes the salient features of casuistry and the case method, shows how the two methods are similar yet different, and suggests how elements of casuistry might benefit the use of the case method in management education. Toward these ends, it shows how casuistry and the case method are both inductive and practical methods of reasoning focussed on single settings and real-life situations and how both methods stress that real-life decision making is not the exclusive domain of experts. It also shows how casuistry and the case method are not identical processes but have different purposes and emphasize order and problem-resolution differently. In the end, Casuistry and the Business Case Method suggests that, despite their differences, casuistry and the case method might be brought together to benefit business management and the field of business ethics.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , April 2001 , pp. 237 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abell, D. 1997. “What Makes a Good Case?” ECCHO: The Newsletter of the European Case Clearing House, Autumn/Fall, pp. 4–7.Google Scholar
Arras, J. D. 1991. “Getting Down to Cases: The Revival of Casuistry in Bioethics.” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16: 29–51.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T. L., ed. 1998. Case Studies in Business, Society, and Ethics. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. B.; Christensen, C. R.; et al. 1994. Teaching and the Case Method: Texts, Cases, and Readings. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Buchholz, R. A. 1989. Fundamental Concepts and Problems in Business Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, G. F. 1998. American Business Values With International Perspectives. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
COLIS, <http://www.ecch.cranfield.ac.uk>..>Google Scholar
De George, R. T. 1993. “Ethical Responsibilities of Engineers in Large Organizations: The Pinto Case.” In Ethical Theory and Business, ed. Beauchamp, T. L. and Bowie, N. E., pp. 130–137. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
De George, R. T. 1999. Business Ethics. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. and Werhane, P. H., eds. 1999. Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Emmons, W. and Nimgade, A. 1993. Burroughs Wellcome and AZT. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Publishing.Google Scholar
Hoffman, W. M. and Moore, J. M. 1990. Business Ethics: Readings and Cases in Corporate Morality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
IMDb.com. <http://us.imdb.com>..>Google Scholar
Jonsen, A. R. 1991. “Casuistry as Methodology in Clinical Ethics.” Theoretical Medicine 12: 295–307.Google Scholar
Jonsen, A. R. 1993. “Platonic Insults: Casuistical.” Common Knowledge 2: 48–66.Google Scholar
Jonsen, A. R. 1995. “Casuistry: An Alternative or Complement to Principles?” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5: 237–251.Google Scholar
Jonsen, A. R. and Toulmin, S. 1988. The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. F., , S.J. and Shannon, T. A., eds. 1995. The Context of Casuistry. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Klinefelter, D. S. 1990. “How Is Applied Philosophy To Be Applied?” Journal of Social Philosophy 21: 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leenders, M. R. and Erskine, J. A. 1978. Case Research: The Case Writing Process. London, Ontario: The University of Western Ontario Research and Publications Division of the School of Business Administration.Google Scholar
Liedtka, J. M. 1993. Burroughs Wellcome and the Pricing of AZT. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Darden School Foundation. UVA-E-0081.Google Scholar
Maclntyre, A. 1984. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 2nd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
McNair, M. P., ed. 1954. The Case Method at the Harvard Business School: Papers by Present and Past Members of the Faculty and Staff. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Metzger, B. M. and Murphy, R. E., eds. 1977. The New Oxford Annotated Bible. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, R. B. 1996. Casuistry and Modern Ethics: A Poetics of Practical Reasoning. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Quoteland.com. <http://www.quoteland.com/index.html>>Google Scholar
Reisler, M. et al. 1994. Academic Support Handbook 1994–1995. Charlottesville: Colgate Darden Graduate School of Business Administration.Google Scholar
Rotch, W. 1992. Casewriting. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Darden School Foundation. UVA-G-0364.Google Scholar
Rotch, W. 1996. Charlottesville: Unpublished casewriting workshop handout.Google Scholar
Vance, C. M., ed. 1993. Mastering Management Education: Innovations in Teaching Effectiveness. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Velasquez, M. G. 1998. Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Werhane, P. H. 1998. “The Rashomon Effect.” In Perspectives in Business Ethics, ed. Pincus, L. and Hartman, E. M., pp. 189–197. Chicago: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Zimmerer, T. W. and Preston, P. L. 1976. “Plasma International.” In Business and Society: Cases and Text. ed. Hay, R. D., Gray, E. R., and Gates, J. E.Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Co.Google Scholar