Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:06:19.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Entrepreneurial Stewardship: Why Some Profits Should Be Used to Benefit Others

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2020

Jooho Lee*
Affiliation:
Pepperdine University

Abstract

Entrepreneurs should act as stewards of entrepreneurial rent. Entrepreneurial rent is the difference between the ex post value of a venture and its ex ante costs. It is the result of competition among buyers and sellers within the market process rather than the sole efforts of the entrepreneur. As a result, entrepreneurs should allocate entrepreneurial rent for the benefit of other market participants rather than consuming it for themselves. The moral obligation to steward entrepreneurial rent is consistent with traditional bases of property rights and the norm of social welfare maximization, and it applies to corporations and their shareholders, as well as individual entrepreneurs.

Type
Article
Copyright
© 2020 Business Ethics Quarterly

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arneson, R. J. 1991. Lockean self-ownership: Towards a demolition. Political Studies, 39(1): 3654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, N. S. 1987. Why profits are deserved. Ethics, 97(2): 387402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, L. C. 1977. Property rights: Philosophic foundations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boatright, J. R. 2006. What’s wrong—and what’s right—with stakeholder management. Journal of Private Enterprise, 21(2): 106130.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. E. 1985. Ethics, efficiency, and the market. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Casson, M. 1982. The entrepreneur: An economic theory. Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble Books.Google Scholar
Christman, J. 1991. Self-ownership, equality, and the structure of property rights. Political Theory, 19(1): 2846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christman, J. 1994. The myth of property: Toward an egalitarian theory of ownership. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1995. Self-ownership, freedom, and equality. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. 1997. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 2047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. 1999. Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 6591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, D. K. 2000. Recent developments in the labor theory of value. Review of Radical Political Economics, 32(1): 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. 2010. Managing for stakeholders: Trade-offs or value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(1): 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E., & Phillips, R. A. 2002. Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3): 331349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times magazine , September 13, 1970: 3233, 122–126.Google Scholar
Gauthier, D. 1986. Morals by agreement. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. 1988. Ownership of the firm. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4(2): 267304.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. 1975. Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality? A critique of John Rawls's theory. American Political Science Review, 69(2): 594606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4): 519530.Google Scholar
Heath, J. 2006. Business ethics without stakeholders. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4): 533557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, J. 2018. On the very idea of a just wage. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 11(2): 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, J., & Norman, W. 2004. Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management: What can the history of state-run enterprises teach us in the post-Enron era? Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3): 247265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindermann, F., & Krueger, D. 2014. High marginal tax rates on the top 1%? Lessons from a life cycle model with idiosyncratic income risk. NBER Working Paper no. w20601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirzner, I. M. 1973. Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. M. 1995. The nature of profits: Some economic insights and their ethical implications. In Cowan, R. & Rizzo, M. J. (Eds.), Profits and morality: 2247. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. M. 1997. Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1): 6085.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. M. 2019. The ethics of pure entrepreneurship: An Austrian economics perspective. Review of Austrian Economics, 32: 8999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, F. H. 1921. Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Hart, Schaffner and Marx.Google Scholar
Lee, J. 2017. The entrepreneurial responsibilities test. Tulane Law Review, 92(4): 777835.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1690. Two treatises of government. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lucy, W. N. R., & Mitchell, C. 1996. Replacing private property: The case for stewardship. Cambridge Law Journal, 55(3): 566600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, E. 1992. Gauthier on rights and economic rent. Social Philosophy & Policy, 9(1): 171200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcoux, A. M. 2003. A fiduciary argument against stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1): 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. 1867. Das kapital: Kritik der politischen ökonomie. Hamburg: Meissner.Google Scholar
Miller, D. 1990. Market, state, and community: Theoretical foundations of market socialism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moriarty, J. 2012. Justice in compensation: A defense. Business Ethics: A European Review, 21(1): 6476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mygind, N. 2009. Stakeholder ownership and maximization. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 9(2): 158174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narveson, J. 1995. Deserving profits. In Cowan, R. & Rizzo, M. J. (Eds.), Profits and morality: 4887. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Narveson, J. 1996. John Christman, The myth of property. Reason Papers, 21(8): 7781.Google Scholar
Naughton, M. J., & Cornwall, J. R. 2006. The virtue of courage in entrepreneurship: Engaging the catholic social tradition and the life-cycle of the business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(1): 6993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Otsuka, M. 1998. Self‐ownership and equality: A Lockean reconciliation. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 27(1): 6592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, C. 2002. Self‐ownership and property in the person: Democratization and a tale of two concepts. Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(1): 2053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R. A. 1997. Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1): 5166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1817. The principles of political economy and taxation. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Roe, M. J. 2000. The shareholder wealth maximization norm and industrial organization. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 149: 20632081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelt, R. P. 1987. Theory, strategy, and entrepreneurship. In Teece, D. J. (Ed.), The competitive challenge: Strategies for industrial innovation and renewal: 137–158. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Schneider, M., & Valenti, A. 2011. A property rights analysis of newly private firms: Opportunities for owners to appropriate rents and partition residual risks. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(3): 445471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoemaker, P. J. 1990. Strategy, complexity, and economic rent. Management Science, 36(10): 11781192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, S., Locke, E. A., & Collins, C. J. 2003. Entrepreneurial motivation. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2): 257279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 217226.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.Google Scholar
Sobel, D. 2012. Backing away from libertarian self-ownership. Ethics, 123(1): 3260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollars, G. G., & Tuluca, S. A. 2018. Fiduciary duty, risk, and shareholder desert. Business Ethics Quarterly, 28(2): 203218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. C. 2004. The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3): 350363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, R. S. 2005. Self-ownership and the limits of libertarianism. Social Theory and Practice, 31(4): 465482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrasher, J. 2020. Self-ownership as personal sovereignty. Social Philosophy & Policy, forthcoming. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3246469.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P. 1995. Real freedom for all: What (if anything) can justify capitalism? New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Velasco, J. 2010. Shareholder ownership and primacy. University of Illinois Law Review, 2010(3): 897956.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. 1988. The right to private property. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wessel, R. H. 1967. A note on economic rent. The American Economic Review, 57(5): 12211226.Google Scholar