Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:40:54.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Kantian Perspective on the Characteristics of Ethics Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Scott J. Reynolds  and
Norman E. Bowie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The literature contains many recommendations, both explicit and implicit, that suggest how an ethics program ought to be designed. While we recognize the contributions of these works, we also note that these recommendations are typically based on either social scientific theory or data and as a result they tend to discount the moral aspects of ethics programs. To contrast and complement these approaches, we refer to a theory of the right to identify the characteristics of an effective ethics program. We draw from Kant’s ethical theory to identify three guiding principles of a moral ethics program and then apply those principles to the specific components of ethics programs as discussed in the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Doing so provides insights as to how an ethics program ought to be designed from a moral point of view and sparks discussion of the moral aspects of ethics programs.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 275 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beauchamp, D. 1998. “The Canadian Defense Ethics Program and the ‘Corporate Model.’” Business and Society Review 100: 71.Google Scholar
Beugré, C. D. 1998. Managing Fairness in Organizations. London: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
Bird, F. B., and Waters, J. A.. 1989. “The Moral Muteness of Managers.” California Management Review 32: 73–88.Google Scholar
Bowie, N. E. 1988. “The Paradox of Profit.” In Papers on the Ethics of Administration, ed. Dale Wright, N.. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press.Google Scholar
Case, J. 1995. Open Book Management. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. 1996. “Values in Tension: Ethics Away From Home.” Harvard Business Review 74(5): 48–57.Google Scholar
Dyrud, M. A. 1998. “Ethics a la Dilbert.” Business Communication Quarterly 61: 113–118.Google Scholar
Ferrell, O. C., LeClair, D. T., and Ferrell, L.. 1998. “The Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations: A Framework for Ethical Compliance.” Journal of Business Ethics 17: 353–363.Google Scholar
Frank, R. H. 1988. Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. 2001. “A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation.” In Ethical Theory and Business, 6th edition, edited by Beauchamp, T. L. and Bowie, N. E.. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, Inc.: 56–65.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom (with the assistance of Rose Friedman). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gert, B. 1966. The Moral Rules. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.Google Scholar
Gioia, D. A. 1992. “Pinto Fires and Personal Ethics: A Script Analysis of Missed Opportunities.” Journal of Business Ethics 11: 379–91.Google Scholar
Herman, B. 1993. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, T. E. Jr. 1992. Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Theory. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, K. T. 1997. “Globalizing Corporate Ethics Programs: Perils and Prospects.” Journal of Business Ethics 16: 1227–35.Google Scholar
James, W. 1943. “The Dilemma of Determinism.” Essays on faith and morals, ed. Perry, R. B.. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M. 1991. “Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review 16: 366–95.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1785/1990. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, 2nd ed., trans. Lewis, White Beck.New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1785/1994. “Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals.” In Ethical Philosophy, 2nd ed., trans. Ellington, J. W.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1797/1999. Metaphysical Elements of Justice, 2nd ed. (Part 1 of the Metaphysics of Morals). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Knouse, S. B., and Giacalone, R. A.. 1996. “The Six Components of Successful Ethics Training.” Business and Society Review 98, 10–13.Google Scholar
Martens, L. T., and Day, K.. 1999. “Five Common Mistakes in Designing and Implementing a Business Ethics Program.” Business and Society Review 104: 163.Google Scholar
Navran, F. 1997. “Twelve Steps to Building a Best-Practices Ethics Program.” Workforce 76: 117–120.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O. 1989. Constructions of Reason. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paine, L. S. 1994. “Managing for Organizational Integrity.” Harvard Business Review 72(2): 106–17.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rest, J. R. 1986. Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. J. 2002. “Identifying Ethical Issues: The Roles of Issue Characteristics, Individual Differences, and Context in Managerial Sensemaking.” Doctoral Dissertation. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Ross, D. L., and Benson, J. A.. 1995. “Cultural Change in Ethical Redemption: A Corporate Case Study.” The Journal of Business Communication 32: 345–62.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., and Weaver, G. R.. 2001. “Organizational Justice and Ethics Program “Follow-Through”: Influences on Employees’ Harmful and Helpful Behavior.” Business Ethics Quarterly 11: 651.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., Gibson, D. G., and Toffler, B. L.. 1999. “Managing Ethics and Legal Compliance: What Helps and What Hurts.” California Management Review 41: 131–151.Google Scholar
Weaver, G. R., and Treviño, L. K.. 1994. “Normative and Empirical Business Ethics: Separation, Marriage of Convenience, or Marriage of Necessity?” Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 129–143.Google Scholar
Weaver, G. R., and Treviño, L. K.. 1999. “Compliance and Values Oriented Ethics Programs: Influences on Employees’ Attitudes and Behavior.” Business Ethics Quarterly 9: 315.Google Scholar
Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., and Cochran, P. L.. 1999a. “Corporate Ethics Practices in the Mid-1990s: An Empirical Study of the Fortune 1000.” Journal of Business Ethics 18: 283–294.Google Scholar
Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., and Cochran, P. L.. 1999b. “Corporate Ethics Programs as Control Systems: Influences of Executive Commitment and Environmental Factors.” Academy of Management Journal 42: 41–57.Google Scholar
Werhane, P. H. 1999. Moral Imagination and Management Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar