Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:18:20.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Marketing and the Vulnerable

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2020

Extract

Contemporary marketing is commonly characterized by the marketing concept which enjoins marketers to determine the wants and needs of customers and then to try to satisfy them. This view is standardly developed, not surprisingly, in terms of normal or ordinary consumers. Much less frequently is attention given to the vulnerable customers whom marketers also (and increasingly) target. Though marketing to normal consumers raises many moral questions, marketing to the vulnerable also raises many moral questions which are deserving of greater attention.

This paper has three objectives. First, it explores the notion of vulnerability which a target audience might (or might not) have. I argue that we must distinguish those who are specially vulnerable from normal individuals, as well as the susceptible and the disadvantaged - two other groups often distinguished in marketing literature. Second, I contend that marketing to the specially vulnerable requires that marketing campaigns be designed to ensure that these individuals are not treated unfairly, and thus possibly harmed. Third, I maintain that marketing programs which violate this preceding injunction are unethical or unscrupulous whether or not those targeted are harmed in some further manner. Accordingly, social control over marketing to the vulnerable cannot simply look to consumer injury as the measure of unfair treatment of the vulnerable.

Type
Section I
Copyright
Copyright © Business Ethics Quarterly 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreasen, A. R. 1975. The Disadvantaged Consumer (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
Andreasen, A. R. 1993. “Revisiting the Disadvantaged: Old Lessons and New Problems,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12: 270275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assael, H. 1993. Marketing: Principles & Strategy, second edition (Fort Worth, TX: The Dryden Press).Google Scholar
Bailey, J. M. 1987. “The Persuasibility of Elderly Consumers,” Current Issues in Research in Advertising, 10, 1: 213247.Google Scholar
Barnhill, J. A. 1972. “Market Injustice: The Case of the Disadvantaged Consumer,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 6, 1: 7883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnhart, C. L. (ed). 1956. American College Dictionary (New York: Random House).Google Scholar
Cohen, D. 1974. “The Concept of Unfairness as It Relates to Advertising Legislation,” Journal of Marketing, 38: 813.Google Scholar
DeGeorge, R. T. 1982. Business Ethics (New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.).Google Scholar
Ferrar, R. 1996. “Bill Seeks to Reduce ‘Ambulance Chasing’,” Knoxville News Sentinel (January 18, 1996): A3.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Gentry, J. W., Kennedy, P. F., Paul, K., and Hill, R. P.. 1994. “The Vulnerability of Those Grieving the Death of a Loved One: Implications for Public Policy,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 13, 2: 128142.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. 1985. Protecting the Vulnerable (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Guber, S. S., and Berry, J. 1993. Marketing to and Through Kids (New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.).Google Scholar
McNeal, J. U. 1987. Children as Consumers (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books).Google Scholar
Morgan, F. W., Schuler, D. K., and Stoltman, J. J. 1995. “A Framework for Examining the Legal Status of Vulnerable Consumers,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 14, 2: 267277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, F. W., and Riordan, E. A. 1983. “The Erosion of the Unusual Susceptibility Defense: The Case of the Disadvantaged Consumer,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 11, 2: 8596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnapper, R. 1967. “Consumer Legislation and the Poor,” The Yale Law Journal, 16, 4, 1967: 745792.Google Scholar