Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:59:48.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Privacy Rights on the Internet: Self-Regulation or Government Regulation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Abstract:

Consumer surveys indicate that concerns about privacy are a principal factor discouraging consumers from shopping online. The key public policy issue regarding privacy is whether the US should follow its current self-regulation course (where the FTC encourages websites to obtain private “privacy web-seals”), or whether a European style formal legal regulation approach should be adopted in the US.

We conclude that the use of assurance seals has worked reasonably well and websites should be free to decide whether they have a privacy seal or not. Given the narrow scope and the wide variety among these seals, we do argue that the seals should commit themselves to the key features of a good privacy policy and that an opt-in provision be required. We believe that insufficient evidence exists to propose formal Government mandated Internet privacy regulation.

Type
Special Forum Marketing and Technology
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowie, N. E., and Simon, R. L.. 1998. The Individual and the Political Order, 3rd ed. (Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield).Google Scholar
Brenkert, G. G. 1981. “Privacy, Polygraphs and Work.” Business and Professional Ethics Journal 1(1).Google Scholar
Caudill, Eva M., and Murphy, Patrick E.. 2000. “Consumer Online Privacy: Legal and Ethics Issues.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 19 (Spring).Google Scholar
Charters, D. 2002. “Electronic Monitoring and Privacy Issues in Business-Making: The Ethics of the Double-Click Experience.” Journal of Business Ethics 35(4): 24354.Google Scholar
Duh, R. R., Jamal, K., and Sunder, S.. 2002. “Control and Assurance in E-Commerce: Privacy, Integrity and Security at eBay.” Taiwan Accounting Review 3(1).Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. 1999. The Limits of Privacy (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Federal Trade Commission. 2000. Privacy Online: Fair Information Practices in the Electronic Marketplace: A Report to Congress.Google Scholar
Hwa, A. P. 2001. “The Role of Self-Regulation and the Internet.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 1(2) (Spring).Google Scholar
Jamal, K., Maier, M., and Sunder, S.. 2003. “Privacy in E-Commerce: Development of Reporting Standards, Disclosure and Assurance Services in an Unregulated Market.” Journal of Accounting Research 41(2).Google Scholar
Jamal, K., Maier, M., and Sunder, S.. 2005. “Enforced Standards versus Evolution by General Acceptance: A Comparative Study of E-Commerce Privacy Disclosure and Practice in the U.S. and the U.K.” Journal of Accounting Research 43(2): 7396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupfer, J. 1987. “Privacy, Autonomy, and Self-Concept.” American Philosophical Quarterly 24(1).Google Scholar
Nijhawan, R. 2003. “The Emperor Has No Clothes: A Critique of Applying the European Union Approach to Privacy Regulation in the United States.” Vanderbilt Law Review 56(3) (April).Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora. 1989. Constructions of Reason (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1980. OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data. Available from http://www.oecd.org//dsti/sti/it/secur/prod/PRIV-EN.HTM.Google Scholar
Rodger, W. 2000. “Activists Charge DoubleClick Double Cross.” USA Today (February 21), available at usatoday.com.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, R. 2000. “Sellers Hire Auditors to Verify Privacy Policies and Increase Trust.” New York Times (September 18).Google Scholar