Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:59:07.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships, Authority, and Reasons: A Second-Personal Account of Corporate Moral Agency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2021

Alan D. Morrison Open the ORCID record for Alan D. Morrison [Opens in a new window] ,
Rita Mota  and
William J. Wilhelm Jr.
Alan D. Morrison
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Rita Mota
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
William J. Wilhelm Jr.
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present a second-personal account of corporate moral agency. This approach is in contrast to the first-personal approach adopted in much of the existing literature, which concentrates on the corporation’s ability to identify moral reasons for itself. Our account treats relationships and communications as the fundamental building blocks of moral agency. The second-personal account rests on a framework developed by Darwall. Its central requirement is that corporations be capable of recognizing the authority relations that they have with other moral agents. We discuss the relevance of corporate affect, corporate communications, and corporate culture to the second-personal account. The second-personal account yields a new way to specify first-personal criteria for moral agency, and it generates fresh insights into the reasons those criteria matter. In addition, a second-personal analysis implies that moral agency is partly a matter of policy, and it provides a fresh perspective on corporate punishment.

Keywords

corporate moral agencyholding responsiblereactive attitudesauthoritysecond-personal competence
Type
Article
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 322 - 347
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Business Ethics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, John Langshaw. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björnsson, Gunnar, and Hess, Kendy. 2017. “Corporate Crocodile Tears? On the Reactive Attitudes of Corporate Agents.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (2): 273–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 2001. “Intention versus Reactive Fault.” In Intention in Law and Philosophy, edited by Naffine, Ngaire, Owens, Rosemary, and Williams, John, 345–57. Oxford: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Cochrane, Glynn. 2017. Anthropology in the Mining Industry: Community Relations after Bougainville’s Civil War. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen L. 2006. The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen L. 2007. “Reply to Korsgaard, Wallace, and Watson.” Ethics 118 (1): 52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen L. 2012. “Bipolar Obligation.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, edited by Shafer-Landau, Russ, vol. 7, 333–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen L. 2013. Morality, Authority, and Law: Essays in Second-Personal Ethics I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delfin, Jeffrey. 2018. “Surge in Bad Yelp Reviews for US Bakery Whose Owner Turned Away Gay Couple.” Guardian, June 5. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jun/04/yelp-colorado-bakery-jack-phillips-supreme-court.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 1982. Corporations and Morality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Doris, John M. 2002. Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John Martin, Kane, Robert, Pereboom, Derk, and Vargas, Manuel. 2009. Four Views on Free Will. Malden, MA: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Fisse, Brent. 1983. “Reconstructing Corporate Criminal Law: Deterrence, Retribution, Fault, and Sanctions.” Southern California Law Review 56 (6): 1141–246.Google Scholar
Fisse, Brent, and Braithwaite, John. 1993. Corporations, Crime and Accountability. Theories of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
French, Peter A. 1979. “The Corporation as a Moral Person.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (3): 207–15.Google Scholar
French, Peter A. 1984. “The Principle of Responsive Adjustment in Corporate Moral Responsibility: The Crash on Mount Erebus.” Journal of Business Ethics 3 (2): 101–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Margaret. 2000. Sociality and Responsibility: New Essays in Plural Subject Theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Goodpaster, Kenneth E. 1983. “The Concept of Corporate Responsibility.” Journal of Business Ethics 2 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasnas, John. 2012. “Reflections on Corporate Moral Responsibility and the Problem Solving Technique of Alexander the Great.” Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2): 183–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasnas, John. 2017. “The Phantom Menace of the Responsibility Deficit.” In The Moral Responsibility of Firms, edited by Orts, Eric W. and Smith, N. Craig, 89–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, Kendy. 2010. “The Modern Corporation as Moral Agent: The Capacity for ‘Thought’ and a ‘First-Person Perspective.’” Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (1): 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, Kendy. 2017. “The Unrecognized Consensus about Firm Moral Responsibility.” In The Moral Responsibility of Firms, edited by Orts, Eric W. and Smith, N. Craig, 169–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, Waheed, and Sandberg, Joakim. 2017. “Pluralistic Functionalism about Corporate Agency.” In The Moral Responsibility of Firms, edited by Orts, Eric W. and Smith, N. Craig, 66–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, Michael. 1981. “Organizations as Non-persons.” Journal of Value Inquiry 15 (2): 149–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Muhtar. 2015. “Coca-Cola: We’ll Do Better.” Wall Street Journal, August 20, Eastern ed.Google Scholar
Lail, Bradley, MacGregor, Jason, Stuebs, Martin, and Thomasson, Timothy. 2015. “The Influence of Regulatory Approach on Tone at the Top.” Journal of Business Ethics 126 (1): 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, William S. 1996. “Corporate Culpability and the Limits of Law.” Business Ethics Quarterly 6: 311–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, Christian, and Pettit, Philip. 2011. Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitland, Ian. 2017. “How Insiders Abuse the Idea of Corporate Personality.” In The Moral Responsibility of Firms, edited by Orts, Eric W. and Smith, N. Craig, 106–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, Rita C. 1984. “Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Personhood.” Journal of Business Ethics 3 (1): 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, Michael. 2006. “Collective Responsibility and an Agent Meaning Theory.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30: 16–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Geoff. 1999. “Corporate Moral Agency: Review and Implications.” Journal of Business Ethics 21 (4): 329–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozar, David T. 1985. “Do Corporations Have Moral Rights?” Journal of Business Ethics 4 (4): 277–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patelli, Lorenzo, and Pedrini, Matteo. 2015. “Is Tone at the Top Associated with Financial Reporting Aggressiveness?” Journal of Business Ethics 126 (1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2002. “Collective Persons and Powers.” Legal Theory 8 (4): 443–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2007. “Responsibility Incorporated.” Ethics 117 (2): 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2017. “The Conversable, Responsible Corporation.” In The Moral Responsibility of Firms, edited by Orts, Eric W. and Smith, N. Craig, 15–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip, and Smith, Michael. 1996. “Freedom in Belief and Desire.” Journal of Philosophy 93 (9): 429–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Michael J. 1992. “Corporate Moral Personhood and Three Conceptions of the Corporation.” Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (4): 435–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rönnegard, David. 2013. “How Autonomy Alone Debunks Corporate Moral Agency.” Business and Professional Ethics Journal 32: 77–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rönnegard, David. 2015. The Fallacy of Corporate Moral Agency. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rönnegard, David, and Velasquez, Manuel. 2017. “On (Not) Attributing Moral Responsibility to Organizations.” In The Moral Responsibility of Firms, edited by Orts, Eric W. and Smith, N. Craig, 123–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepinwall, Amy J. 2011. “Guilty by Proxy: Expanding the Boundaries of Responsibility in the Face of Corporate Crime.” Hastings Law Journal 63 (2): 411–54.Google Scholar
Sepinwall, Amy J. 2015. “Crossing the Fault Line in Corporate Criminal Law.” Journal of Corporation Law 40: 439–82.Google Scholar
Sepinwall, Amy J. 2016. “Corporate Moral Responsibility.” Philosophy Compass 11 (1): 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepinwall, Amy J. 2017. “Blame, Emotion, and the Corporation.” In The Moral Responsibility of Firms, edited by Orts, Eric W. and Smith, N. Craig, 143–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, David. 2007. “Moral Address, Moral Responsibility, and the Boundaries of the Moral Community.” Ethics 118 (1): 70–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, David. 2011. “Attributability, Answerability, and Accountability: Toward a Wider Theory of Moral Responsibility.” Ethics 121 (3): 602–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, David. 2019. “Blameworthy but Unblamable: A Paradox of Corporate Responsibility.” Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy 17: 897.Google Scholar
Silver, David. 2005. “A Strawsonian Defense of Corporate Moral Responsibility.” American Philosophical Quarterly 42 (4): 279–93.Google Scholar
Stern, Lawrence. 1974. “Freedom, Blame, and Moral Community.” Journal of Philosophy 71 (3): 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1962) 1974. “Freedom and Resentment.” In Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays, 1–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1968. “Freedom and Resentment.” In Studies in the Philosophy of Thought and Action, 71–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tadelis, Steven. 1999. “What’s in a Name? Reputation as a Tradeable Asset.” American Economic Review 89 (3): 548–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollefsen, Deborah Perron. 2003. “Participant Reactive Attitudes and Collective Responsibility.” Philosophical Explorations 6 (3): 218–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollefsen, Deborah Perron. 2015. Groups as Agents. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Velasquez, Manuel. 1983. “Why Corporations Are Not Morally Responsible for Anything They Do.” Business and Professional Ethics Journal 2 (3): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velasquez, Manuel. 2003. “Debunking Corporate Moral Responsibility.” Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (4): 531–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, R. Jay. 1994. Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Gary. 1987. “Responsibility and the Limits of Evil—Variations on a Strawsonian Theme.” In Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology, edited by Schoeman, Ferdinand, 119–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan. 1985. “The Legal and Moral Responsibility of Organizations.” Criminal Justice: Nomos 27: 267–86.Google Scholar