Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:57:27.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Special Issue on: Gender, Business Ethics, and Corporate Social Responsibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Kate Grosser ,
Jeremy Moon ,
R. Edward Freeman  and
Julie Nelson
Kate Grosser
Affiliation:
La Trobe University
Jeremy Moon
Affiliation:
Nottingham University
R. Edward Freeman
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Julie Nelson
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Boston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Call for Submissions
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 303 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barrientos, S., Dolan, C., & Tallontire, A. 2003. A gendered value chain approach to codes of conduct in African horticulture. World Development, 31(3): 1511–26.Google Scholar
Burton, B., & Dunn, C. 1996. Feminist ethics as moral grounding for stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(2): 133–47.Google Scholar
Derry, R. 1996. Toward a feminist firm. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(1): 101–09.Google Scholar
Grosser, K., & Moon, J. 2005. Gender mainstreaming and corporate social responsibility: Reporting workplace issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(4): 327–40.Google Scholar
Grosser, K., & Moon, J. 2008. Developments in company reporting on workplace gender equality?: A corporate social responsibility perspective. Accounting Forum, 32(3): 179–98.Google Scholar
Hale, A., & Opondo, M. 2005. Humanising the cut flower chain: Confronting the realities of flower production for workers in Kenya. Antipode, 37(2): 301–23.Google Scholar
Hamington, M., & Sander-Staudt, M. (Eds.). 2011. Applying care ethics to business. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Karam, C., & Jamali, D. 2013. Gendering CSR in the Arab Middle East: An institutional perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1): 31–68.Google Scholar
Kemp, D., Keenan, J., & Gronow, J. 2010. Strategic resource or ideal source? Discourse, organizational change and CSR. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(5): 578–94.Google Scholar
Kilgour, M.A. 2007. The UN global compact and substantive equality for women: Revealing a “well hidden” mandate. Third World Quarterly, 28(4): 751–73.Google Scholar
Knights, D., & Tullberg, M. 2012. Managing masculinity/mismanaging the corporation. Organization, 19(4): 385–404.Google Scholar
Larson, A., & Freeman, R.E. 1997. Women’s studies and business ethics: Towards a new conversation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liedtka, J. 1996. Feminist morality and competitive reality: A role for an ethic of care? Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(2): 179–200.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. 2007. The gendering of leadership in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(2): 165–81.Google Scholar
McBarnet, D., Voiculescu, A., & Campbell, T. 1997. The new accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newell, P. 2005. Citizenship, accountability and community: the limits of the CSR agenda. International Affairs, 81(3): 541–57.Google Scholar
Scherer, A., & Palazzo, G. 2007. Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 1096–1120.Google Scholar
Wicks, A., Gilbert, D.J., & Freeman, E. 1994. A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 475–97.Google Scholar