Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:04:43.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Structural Origins of Conflicts of Interest in the Accounting Profession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Colin Boyd
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This paper describes the professional ethical context behind the failure of Arthur Andersen’s audit of Enron. It is argued that the evolution of extreme industrial concentration in the accounting profession, and the subsequent unrestrained diversification of the “Big Five” accounting firms were the sources of multiple conflicts of interest that were unresolved by the time of the Enron debacle. In the post-Enron era, the problems of commercial conflicts of interest and of highly concentrated power in the profession remain important issues.

Accountancy is believed by its practitioners to be a profession, not a commercial venture. (Magill, Previts, and Robinson 1998: 4)

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , July 2004 , pp. 377 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, R., and Glater, J. D.. 2002. “Who’s Keeping the Accountants Accountable?” New York Times (January 15): 1.Google Scholar
Accountancy Age. 2003. “Raising Audit Fees Will Help Cash-Strapped Firms Survive” (March 4), leader article. Available at http://www.accountancyage.com/Comment/1133077.Google Scholar
Accounting Today. 1997. “The 1997 Accounting Today Top 100 Tax and Accounting Firms” (March 17–April 6) (reproduced in Magill et al. 1998: 25).Google Scholar
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 2003. Code of Professional Conduct. Available at http://www.aicpa.org/members/div/ethics/BAI/CodeofConduct.htm (note that this website lists the current code, which has been amended since the Enron scandal. The 1992 Code is available in Magill et al., 1998: 209–27.)Google Scholar
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1998. CPA Vision Project. Summary available at http://www.aicpa.org/vision/index.htm. See also the CPA Vision web site at http://www.cpavision.org/.Google Scholar
Andrew, R. 1998. “High Stakes.” CA Magazine (September): 23–28.Google Scholar
Auditing Practices Board (U.K.). 1992. The Future Development of Auditing. Discussion Paper, London: CCAB Ltd./Accountancy Books.Google Scholar
Barefield, R. M. 1991. “A Critical View of the AECC and the Converging Forces of Change.” Issues in Accounting Education 6(2): 312.Google Scholar
Boyd, C. 1999. The Transformation of the Accounting Profession: The History Behind the Big 5 Accounting Firms Diversifying into Law. A report prepared for The International Practice of Law Committee on Multi-Disciplinary Practices and the Legal Profession, Canadian Bar Association, (May).Google Scholar
Bryan-Low, C. 2003. “Accounting Firms Earn More From Consulting—Despite SEC Crackdown, Buying Non-Audit Services By Companies Stays High.” Wall Street Journal (April 16): C9.Google Scholar
Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. 1996. CICA Inter-Institute Vision Task Force Report (February). Available at http://www.cica.ca/index.cfm/ci_id/7768/la_id/1.htm.Google Scholar
Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. 2000. CICA Conflict of Interest Task Force Report (September). Available at http://www.cica.ca/index.cfm/ci_id/7751/la_id/1.htm.Google Scholar
Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. 2001. Protecting The Public Interest: The Role of the Chartered Accountancy Profession. A Report Prepared by Kroll Associates (August). Available at http://www.cica.ca/index.cfm/ci_id/7760/la_id/1.htm.Google Scholar
Coffee, J. C. 2002. “Understanding Enron: It’s About the Gatekeepers, Stupid.” Columbia Law & Economics Working Paper No. 207. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=325240.Google Scholar
Conrod, M. 1994. “The Bottom Line Top 30 Accounting Firms.” The Bottom Line (April): 1.Google Scholar
Craswell, A., Stokes, D. J. and Laughton, J.. 2002. “Auditor Independence and Fee Dependence.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 33: 253–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daily Telegraph. 1997. “‘100 Group’ of Finance Directors Protest Accounting Mergers” (October 20): 31.Google Scholar
Davis, M. 1982. “Conflict of Interest.” Business and Professional Ethics Journal 1: 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist 1988. “Accountant, Consult Thyself” (September 10): 89–90Google Scholar
Economist. 1990. “Blowing the Whistle on Accountancy” (December 22): 17.Google Scholar
Economist. 1991. “Civil War at Arthur Andersen” (August 17): 67–68.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. J., and McAllister, J. P. 1993. “Enhancing Audit Efficiency With New Technologies.” CPA Journal 63(11): 58.Google Scholar
Gaa, J. C. 1994. The Ethical Foundations of Public Accounting. Research Monograph No.22, CGA-Canada Research Foundation, Certified General Accountants Association of Canada.Google Scholar
Griffin, C. H. 1977. “The Beleaguered Accountants: A Defendant’s Viewpoint.” Journal of Accountancy 143(1): 81–85.Google Scholar
Jacob, R. 1991. “Can You Trust That Audit?” Fortune Magazine (November 18): 191–98.Google Scholar
Kliegman, E. J. 1999. “The Demise of the Profession.” Accounting Today (January 27): 6, 12–13.Google Scholar
KPMG Canada. 2003. “About KPMG” History Web Page. Available at http://www.kpmg.ca/english/about/history.html.Google Scholar
Labaton, S. 2002a. “Auditing Firms Exercise Power In Washington.” New York Times (January 19): 1.Google Scholar
Labaton, S. 2002b. “Now Who, Exactly, Got Us Into This?” New York Times (February 3): 1.Google Scholar
Levitt, A. 2002a. Take On the Street. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Levitt, A.. 2002b. “Who Audits the Auditors?” New York Times (January 17): 29.Google Scholar
Magill, H. T., and Previts, G. J.. 1991. CPA Professional Responsibilities: An Introduction. Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing.Google Scholar
Magill, H. T., Previts, G. J., and Robinson, T. R.. 1998. The CPA Profession: Opportunities, Responsibilities and Services. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
New York State Bar Association. 1999. Report of Special Committee on Multi-Disciplinary Practice and the Legal Profession (January 8). Accessed April 19, 1999 at http://www.nysba.org/whatsnew/multidiscrpt.html.Google Scholar
Previts, G. J. and Merino, B. D.. 1979. A History of Accounting in America. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Previts, G. J. and Merino, B. D.. 1998. A History of Accountancy in the United States. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
PricewaterhouseCoopers Canada. 1998. Statement by David W. Smith (the new Chair of PricewaterhouseCoopers Canada following the merger of Price Waterhouse and Coopers & Lybrand). Press Release (archived originally on the PricewaterhouseCoopers Canada web site, but no longer available).Google Scholar
Spacek, L. 1989. The Growth of Arthur Andersen & Co., 1928–1973: An Oral History. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Stevens, M. 1991. The Big Six. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R. W., and Gerth, J.. 2002. “Web of Safeguards Failed as Enron Fell.” New York Times (January 20): 1.Google Scholar
Temkin, R. H. 1986. “Automating Auditing: Auditing Will Never Be the Same.” Corporate Accounting 4(4): 56–59.Google Scholar
Texas State Board of Public Accountancy. 2003. Chapter 501: Rules of Professional Conduct. Available via a link from http://www.tsbpa.state.tx.us/rulemain.htm.Google Scholar
Toffler, B. L. 2003. Final Accounting: Ambition, Greed, and the Fall of Arthur Andersen. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives, 107th Congress 2d Session, Report 107–610. 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Available from the Senate Banking Committee web site at http://banking.senate.gov/pss/acctrfm/conf_rpt.pdf.Google Scholar
Van Natta, D. Jr, Schwartz, J., and Yardley, J.. 2002. “In Houston, the Lines Dividing Politics, Business, and Society Are Especially Blurry.” New York Times (January 20): 25.Google Scholar
Wise, R. 1994. “Litigation Support Risky for U.S. Accountants.” Bottom Line (July 14): 1Google Scholar
Wooton, C. W., and Tonge, S. D.. 1993. “Where Do Clients Go When an Accounting Firm Goes Bankrupt? The Case of Laventhol and Horwath.” Abacus 29(2): 149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, A. R. 2003. “Accounting Professionalism—They Just Don’t Get It!” American Accounting Association Meeting, Honolulu, Hawaii (August 4). Available at http://aaahq.org/AM2003/WyattSpeech.pdf.Google Scholar