Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T13:54:36.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A. A. Berle, Jr. Student of the Corporation 1917–1932*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2012

Richard S. Kirkendall
Richard S. Kirkendall
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of History at theUniversity of Missouri
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the intellectual career of one precocious scholar may be traced the course of jurisprudence and philosophy that joined law with economics, dealt with the fundamental problem of democratic restraints upon corporate power, and influenced in basic ways the direction of the New Deal program.

Type
Research Article
Information
Business History Review , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , Spring 1961 , pp. 43 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rosenman, Samuel I., ed., The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt (New York, 1938), vol. 1, p. 752Google Scholar.

2 McCarten, John, “Atlas with Ideas,” New Yorker, vol. 18 (Jan. 16–23, 1943), pp. 23–24Google Scholar, 22, 23. Berle, A. A. Jr., Power without Property; A New Development in American Political Economy (New York, 1959), p. 2Google Scholar.

3 Kirkendall, R. S., “Evolving Evaluations of the Legal Thinking of Mr. Justice Holmes; A Study in the Reception of Ideas” (M. S. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, 1953), esp. pp. 14–16, 88–91, 97–101, 105–106Google Scholar.

4 Mason, A. T., Brandeis, A Free Man's Life (New York, 1946), pp. 163Google Scholar, 481, 615. Berle, Power without Property, pp. 13–14.

5 An editorial in the Harvard Law Review in the year that Berle graduated observed that many Harvard law students of that period had gained from Holmes their “first real appreciation of law as a genuine human science.” Vol. 29 (1916), p. 617. Kirkendall, “Evolving Evaluations,” p. 88.

6 McCarten, “Atlas with Ideas,” New Yorker, Jan. 23, 1943, pp. 23–24.

7 See, for examples, Dodd, E. Merrick Jr., University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 81 (April, 1933), p. 782CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Payne, Phillip M., Virginia Law Review, vol. 20 (Nov., 1933), pp. 132–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Rohrlich, Chester, United States Law Review, vol. 66 (Nov., 1932), pp. 629–630Google Scholar. Fagg, Fred D. Jr., Illinois Law Review, vol. 27 (Feb., 1933), p. 707Google Scholar.

8 Virginia Law Review, vol. 17 (April, 1931), pp. 625–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also James, Daniel, Indiana Law Journal, vol. 8 (May, 1933), pp. 514–516Google Scholar, and reviews of Berle's work in many other law journals from 1928 to 1933.

9 Hopkins, Bert, Idaho Law Journal, vol. 3 (June, 1933), p. 268Google Scholar.

10 Yale Law Journal, vol. 37 (Jan., 1928), p. 403CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Dorfman, Joseph, The Economic Mind in American Civilization (New York, 1946–1959), vol. 4, p. 160Google Scholar.

12 Columbia Law Review, vol. 31 (Dec., 1931), p. 1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Berle, A. A. Jr., Liquid Claims and National Wealth (New York, 1934)Google Scholar, Preface. Berle, A. A. Jr., Twentieth Century Capitalist Revolution (New York, 1954), p. 6Google Scholar. Berle, A. A. Jr., “Corporate Devices for Diluting Stock Participation,” Columbia Law Review, vol. 31 (Dec., 1931), p. 1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Berle, A. A. Jr., and Means, Gardiner C., The Modern Corporation and Private Property (New York, 1932)Google Scholar, Preface. McCarten, “Atlas with Ideas,” New Yorker, Jan. 23, 1943, p. 23. Another pioneer in the field of institutional economics, Wesley Clair Mitchell, also encouraged Berle's studies of the corporation. Berle, Twentieth Century Capitalist Revolution, p. 6.

14 See for examples, Grayson, Theodore J., University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 77 (May, 1929), p. 940Google Scholar. Levy, Irving J., New York University Law Quarterly Review, vol. 7 (Dec., 1929), p. 553Google Scholar. Masson, Robert L., Michigan Law Review, vol. 28 (Jan., 1930), p. 358CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Kline, Joseph V., Harvard Law Review, vol. 42 (March, 1929), p. 714CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Stocking, George W., Saturday Review of Literature, vol. 37 (Nov. 27, 1954), p. 22Google Scholar.

15 Freidel, Frank, Franklin D. Roosevelt (Boston, 1952—), vol. 1, p. 60Google Scholar. Fusfeld, Daniel R., The Economic Thought of Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Origins of the New Deal (New York, 1956), pp. 25–34Google Scholar.

16 Dorfman, Economic Mind, vol. 5, pp. 577, 755.

17 Ibid., vol. 4, pp. 160–164. Chase, Stuart, “Ticker Tapeworms,” New Republic, vol. 73 (Jan. 25, 1933), pp. 299–301Google Scholar.

18 Current Biography, 1940, p. 78.

19 McCarten, “Atlas with Ideas,” New Yorker, Jan. 23, 1943, pp. 24–26.

20 Holmes, Oliver Wendell, The Common Law (Boston, 1881), p. 1Google Scholar.

21 “Expansion of American Administrative Law,” Harvard Law Review, vol. 30 (March, 1917), pp. 430–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 “How Labor Could Control,” New Republic, vol. 28 (Sept. 7, 1921), pp. 37–39Google Scholar.

23 “Non-cumulative Preferred Stock,” Columbia Law Review, vol. 23, (April, 1923), pp. 358–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar. “Problems of Non-Par Stock,” ibid., vol. 25 (Jan., 1925), pp. 43–63. “Participating Preferred Stock,” ibid., vol. 26 (March, 1926), pp. 303–317. “Non Voting Stock and Bankers Control,” Harvard Law Review, vol. 39 (April, 1926), pp. 673–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar. “Subsidiary Corporations and Credit Manipulation,” ibid., vol. 41 (May, 1928), pp. 874–893. “Convertible Bonds and Stock Purchase Warrants,” Yale Law Journal, vol. 36 (March, 1927), pp. 649–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar. “Publicity of Accounts and Directors' Purchases of Stock,” Michigan Law Review, vol. 25 (June, 1927), pp. 827–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Studies in the Law of Corporation Finance (Chicago, 1928), p. vi.Google Scholar (Italics in the original.)

25 Ibid., pp. 26–39.

26 Ibid., pp. 189 ff.

27 “Compensation of Bankers and Promoters through Stock Profits,” Harvard Law Review, vol. 42 (April, 1929), pp. 748–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Ibid., vol. 43 (Jan., 1930), pp. 507–509. Ibid., vol. 44 (Jan., 1931), pp. 486–489. “Promoters Stock in Subsidiary Corporations,” Columbia Law Review, vol. 29 (Jan., 1929), pp. 35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar. “Investors and the Revised Delaware Corporation Act,” ibid., vol. 29 (May, 1929), pp. 563–581. “Liability for Stock Market Manipulation,” ibid., vol. 31 (Feb., 1931), pp. 264–279; vol. 31 (Nov., 1931), pp. 1225–1227. “Corporate Devices for Diluting Stock Participations,” ibid., vol. 31 (Dec, 1931), pp. 1239–1265. “Elements of the Law of Business Accounting,” ibid., vol. 32 (April, 1932), pp. 573–600. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 80 (Nov., 1931), pp. 145–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar. “The Organization of the Law of Corporation Finance,” Tennessee Law Review, vol. 9 (April, 1931), pp. 125–145Google Scholar.

28 Berle with Gardiner Means, “Corporations and the Public Investor,” American Economic Review, vol. 20 (March, 1930), p. 71Google Scholar.

29 Ibid., pp. 68–69.

30 Harvard Law Review, vol. 44 (May, 1931), pp. 1049–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 McGinnis, Karl, Texas Law Review, vol. 10 (Dec., 1931), pp. 122–123Google Scholar. Levy, Irving J., New York University Law Quarterly Review, vol. 7 (Dec., 1929), pp. 552–554Google Scholar.

32 Kline, Joseph V., Harvard Law Review, vol. 42 (March, 1929), pp. 714–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also, Sayre, Paul L., Iowa Law Review, vol. 18 (May, 1933), pp. 581–585Google Scholar. James, Laylin K., Illinois Law Review, vol. 26 (Feb., 1932), pp. 712–714Google Scholar. Hoshour, HarveyMinnesota Law Review, vol. 14 (Dec., 1929), pp. 105–107Google Scholar. Wood, F. S., “The Status of Management Stockholders,” Yale Law Journal, vol. 38 (Nov., 1928), pp. 57–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Robert T. Swaine, ibid., vol. 38 (May, 1929), pp. 1003–1004. Wilbur G. Katz, ibid., vol. 40 (May, 1931), pp. 1125–1128.

33 “For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees,” Harvard Law Review, vol. 45 (May, 1932), pp. 1145–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 “For Whom Corporate Managers are Trustees: A Note,” Harvard Law Review, vol. 45 (June, 1932), pp. 1365–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Berle and Means, “Corporations and the Public Investor,” p. 71.

36 Gruchy, Allen B., Modern Economic Thought; The American Contribution (New York, 1947), pp. 473–475Google Scholar, 539, 533–534. For attempts to define institutional economics see Preface, Gruchy's and Witte, Edwin E., “Institutional Economics as Seen by an Institutional Economist,” Southern Economic Journal, vol. 21 (Oct., 1954), pp. 132–137Google Scholar.

37 Berle and Means, The Modern Corporation, pp. 117–118.

38 Ibid., p. 278.

39 Ibid., p. 276.

40 Ibid., see especially the Preface and pp. 325–337.

41 For brief discussions of the book see Dorfman, , Economic Mind, vol. 5, pp. 753–754Google Scholar, and Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr., The Age of Roosevelt; The Crisis of the Old Order, 1919–1933 (Boston, 1957), pp. 190–193Google Scholar. For a more lengthy discussion of Gardiner Means see Gruchy, Economic Thought, pp. 473–539.

42 Wormser, I. M., American Bar Association Journal, vol. 19 (Feb., 1933), pp. 113–114Google Scholar. James, Daniel, Indiana Law Journal, vol. 8 (May, 1933), pp. 514–516Google Scholar.

43 Hopkins, Bert, Idaho Law Journal, vol. 3 (June, 1933), p. 270Google Scholar.

44 Frank, Jerome, Yale Law Journal, vol. 42 (April, 1933), pp. 989–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Chase, , “Ticker Tapeworms,” New Republic, vol. 73, pp. 299–301Google Scholar. Laidler, Harry W., Survey Graphic, vol. 22 (June, 1933), pp. 330–331Google Scholar. Gruening, Ernest, Nation, vol. 136 (Feb. 1, 1933), pp. 116–117Google Scholar. Cf. Fusfeld, Economic Thought of FDR, p. 214.

45 Tugwell, Rexford Guy, The Democratic Roosevelt; A Biography of Franklin D. Roosevelt (Garden City, 1957), p. 215Google Scholar.

46 Fusfeld, Economic Thought of FDR, p. 212.

47 Schlesinger, Crisis of the Old Order, p. 419.

48 For discussions of Berle and the Brain Trust see Schlesinger, ibid., pp. 399–402, 419–420, and The Coming of the New Deal (Boston, 1959), p. 184Google Scholar; Freidel, FDR, vol. 3, pp. 263–264, 326, 335, and Tugwell, Democratic Roosevelt, pp. 218, 234.

49 Publishers' Weekly, vol. 127 (Aug. 27, 1932), p. 706Google Scholar.

50 Tugwell, Democratic Roosevelt, p. 246.

51 Schlesinger, Crisis of the Old Order, p. 426.

52 Rosenman, , ed., Public Papers, vol. 1, pp. 742–756Google Scholar.

58 Schlesinger, Coming of the New Deal, pp. 183–184. See also Crisis of the Old Order, pp. 192–193, 415.

54 Berle, A. A. Jr., “The Trend of the Turn,” Saturday Review of Literature, vol. 9 (April 15, 1933), pp. 533–535Google Scholar. “On our Way but Where are We Going,” ibid., vol. 10 (April 14, 1934), pp. 625–626. “High Road for Business,” Scribner's Magazine, vol. 93 (June, 1933), pp. 325–332Google Scholar. “What's Behind the Recovery Laws,” ibid., vol. 94 (Sept., 1933), pp. 129–135. “Private Business and Public Opinion,” ibid., vol. 95 (Feb., 1934), pp. 81-87. “Business and Government; Toward a Common Ground,” ibid., vol. 96 (Nov., 1934), pp. 257–265. “Law and the Social Revolution,” Survey Graphic, vol. 22 (Dec., 1933), pp. 592–594Google Scholar. Wilcox, Clair et al. , America's Recovery Program (New York, 1934), pp. 252–253Google Scholar.