Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:46:52.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Associationalism, Statism, and Professional Regulation: Public Accountants and the Reform of the Financial Markets, 1896-1940

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

Paul J. Miranti Jr.
Paul J. Miranti Jr.
Affiliation:
Paul J. Miranti, Jr., Is assistant professor of accounting at the School of Business ofRutgers University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article Projessor Miranti contrasts the differing reactions of leaders in the public accounting profession to the structure of national economic regulation that emerged in America during the first decades of the twentieth century. Specifically, he focuses on the actions taken by two national professional organizations, the American Association of Public Accountants and its successor, the American Institute of Accountants, at two important junctures in the history of financial reform: the establishment of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Trade Commission and the organization of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In assessing these experiences, his article concentrates on identifying the changing circumstances and political contexts that gave rise first to an associationalist response and then to a statist response to the problem of ordering the nation's financial markets.

Type
Articles
Information
Business History Review , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1986 , pp. 438 - 468
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Beard, Charles A., ed., A Century of Progress ([1932]; reprint, Freeport, N.Y., 1960)Google Scholar; Parrington, Vernon Louis, “Vernon Louis Parrington Recalls the Spirit of the Age,” in The Progressives, ed. Resek, Carl (New York, 1960), 3–19.Google Scholar More recent examples of this tradition include Hofstadter, Richard, The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F.D.R. (New York, 1956)Google Scholar and Schlesinger, Arthur Jr,The Age of Roosevelt, 3 vols. (Boston, 1956-1960).Google Scholar See also the following commentators on Progressive historiography: Hofstadter, Richard, The Progressive Historians: Turner, Beard and Parrington (Chicago, 1979)Google Scholar; Link, Arthur S. and McCormick, Richard L., Progressivism (Arlington Heights, III., 1983)Google Scholar; and Mann, Arthur, ed., The Progressive Era: Major Issues of Interpretation (Hinsdale, III., 1975).Google Scholar

2 See Galambos, Louis, America at Middle Age: A New History of the United States (New York, 1972)Google Scholar; Hawley, Ellis W., “Herbert Hoover, the Commerce Secretariat and the Vision of-the Associative State,” journal of American History 61 (June 1974): 116–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Keller, Morton, “The Pluralist State: American Economic Regulation in Comparative Perspective, 1900-1930,” in Regulation in Perspective: Historical Essays, ed. McCraw, Thomas K. (Cambridge, Mass., 1981)Google Scholar; Lurie, Jonathan, The Chicago Board of Trade, 1895-1905: The Dynamics of Self-Regulation (Urbana, III., 1979)Google Scholar; McCraw, Thomas K., “With the Consent of the Governed: SEC's Formative Years.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1:3 (1982): 341–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Wiebe, Robert K., The Segmented Society: An Introduction to the Meaning of America (New York, 1975).Google Scholar See also Kolko, Gabriel, The Triumph of Conservatism: A Reinterpretation of American History (New York, 1963) for a markedly different conclusion about the significance of pluralism.Google Scholar

3 Boyd, Ralph Lester, “A Study of CPA Legislation in the United States, 1896-1940” (Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois, 1941), 26-35, 46-70, 77-80, and 192–200.Google Scholar

4 Edwards, James Don, The History of Public Accountancy in the United States (East Lansing, Mich., 1960), 70–72Google Scholar; Previts, Gary I. and Merino, Barbara D., A History of Accounting in America: An Historical Interpretation of the Cultural Significance of Accounting (New York, 1979), 142–44Google Scholar; Webster, Norman E., comp., The American Association of Public Accountants: Its First Twenty Years, 1886-1906 (New York, 1954), 291–96Google Scholar; Wilkinson, George, “The Genesis of the CPA Movement, “ The Certified Public Accountant 8 (Oct. 1928); 297–300Google Scholar, and Wilkinson, “Public Accountants in the States,” The Accountant, 12 Dee. 1903, 1508-10.

7 Miranti, Paul J., “From Conflict to Consensus: The American Institute of Accountants and the Professionalization of Public Accountancy. 1886-1940” (Ph.D. diss., Johns Hopkins University, 1985)Google Scholar, chaps. 2 and 3; Previts and Merino, History of Accounting, 139-43. For practitioner backgrounds, see Cyclopedia of National Biography, s.v. “Charles W. Haskins”; Jordan, William George, Charles Waldo Haskins: An American Pioneer in Accounting (New York, 1921).Google Scholar For Dickinson's background, see DeMond, C. W., Price Waterhouse and Company in America: A History of a Public Accounting Firm (New York, 1951), 47-49, 50–51Google Scholar; and also Burns, Thomas J. and Coffman, Edward N., The Accounting Hall of Fame (Columbus, Ohio, 1967), 18–19.Google Scholar

6 DeMond, Price Waterhouse, 10-12; Edwards, History of Public Accountancy, 77-78; Grady, Paul, ed., Memoirs and Accounting Thought of George O. May (New York, 1962)Google Scholar, chap. 2; Miranti, “From Conflict to Consensus,” 37-47; Previts and Merino, History of Accounting, 178-79.

7 Boyd, “Study of CPA Legislation, “ 6-15; Edwards, History of Public Accountancy, 136-41; Miranti, “From Conflict to Consensus,” 232-34, 238-39. See also Highain, John, Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism (New Brunswick, N.J., 1963)Google Scholar, for discussion of nativist reaction to new immigration from southern and eastern Europe.

8 AAPA Minutes of Board of Trustees, New York, 10 April 1916, 1–63Google Scholar; AAPA Year Book of Annual Meeting, 1916 (New York, 1916), 108–16.Google Scholar

9 AAPA Minutes of Board of Trustees, New York, 10 April 1916, 44–46Google Scholar; Boyd, “Study of CPA Legislation,” 77-80, 192-200; Miranti, “From Conflict to Consensus,” 175.

10 AAPA Year Book 1915, 81-85; and see also American Institute of Accountants, Annual Year Book, 1918 (New York, 1918), 100–101Google Scholar; AIA Year Book 1919, 75, 102; AIA Year Book 1920, 127; AIA Year Book 1921, 70-71; AIA Minutes of Council, 20 Sept. 1921, 39-85. Sec also Ernst & Ernst: A History of the Firm (Cleveland, Ohio, 1960), 3-6, 20-23, 36-40, 57–58Google Scholar; Miranti, “From Conflict to Consensus,” 137-41, 210-17; and Previts and Merino, History of Accounting, 205-11.

11 Merino, Barbara D., “The Professionalization of Public Accountancy in America: A Comparative Analysis of the Contributions of Selected Practitioners, 1900-1925” (Ph.D. diss., University of Alabama, 1975), 115, 379–80Google Scholar, and 140nn180-82, relating to Joseph Sterrett's involvement with the Journal of Accountancy, Miranti, “From Conflict to Consensus,” 180-83; Sells, Elijah Watt, “A Plan for Peace,” Journal of Accountancy 19 (Feb. 1915): 85–89.Google Scholar Also see in the same edition of the journal an editorial entitled, “A Practical Plan for Peace.”

12 AAPA Year Book 1916, 108-16.

13 Jones, Edgar, Accountancy and the British Economy, 1840-1980: The Evolution of Ernst & Whinney (London, 1981), 19-37, 51-57, 67-73, 111–16.Google Scholar

14 AAPA Year Book 1007, 29-31; AAPA Year Book 1908, 90-91 and 146-58; Burns and Coffman, Accounting Hall of Fame, 76-77 for Sterrett biography; DeMond, Price Waterhouse, 85-86; “A Federal Income Tax,” Journal of Accountancy 15 (Jan. 1913); 60Google Scholar; Haskins, Charles W. and Sells, Elijah W., Report on the Methods of Accounting of the City of Chicago (New York, 1901)Google Scholar; Jordan, Haskins, 15-49.

15 AAPA Year Book 1906, 110-11; AAPA Year Book 1907, 12; Carey, John L., The Rise of the Public Accounting Profession, 2 vols. (New York, 1969-1970), 1:57–60Google Scholar; Crady, George O. May, 29.

16 Dictionary of American Biography, s.v. “Henry Carter Adams”; Dorfman, Joseph, “Henry Carter Adams: The Harmonizer of Liberty and Reform,” in Relations of the State to Industrial Action, and Economics and Jurisprudence, ed. Dorfman, Joseph (New York, 1954), 11.Google Scholar See also ICC,Twentieth Annual Report of the Statistics of Railways (Washington, D.C., 1909), 9–21Google Scholar, for details of aceounting reports brought about by the Hepburn Act. See ICC, Twenty-Fifth Annual Report (Washington, D.C., 1912), 7–19Google Scholar, for an example of the work of this agency's Division of Inquiry. For the insurance industry, see the following: Buley, R. C., The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 2 vols. (New York, 1967), 1: 539–698Google Scholar; Keller, Morton, The Life Insurance Enterprise, 1885-1910: A Study of the Limits of Power (Cambridge, Mass., 1963), 245–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Carraty, John A., Right Hand Man: The Life of George W. Perkins (New York, 1957), 163–86.Google Scholar

17 For criticism of uniform accounting, sec May, George O., “Nature of Accounting,” in Twenty-Five Years of Accounting Responsibility, ed. Hunt, B. C. (New York, 1936), 2: 305–18Google Scholar; Dickinson, A. L., Accounting Practice and Procedure (New York, 1913), 31–33Google Scholar, for need of practitioner judgment in accounting; and also the comments of Homer A. Dunn of Haskins & Sells in AAPA Year Book 1908, 166-67. And see discussions in Previts and Merino, History of Accounting, 185-90 and in Merino, Barbara D. and Coe, T., “Uniformity in Accounting: An Historical Perspective,” Journal of Accountancy 145 (Aug. 1978): 62–69.Google Scholar

18 See the following articles published in the Journal of Accountancy: “Certificates of Borrower Statements” 18 (Aug. 1914): 128–29Google Scholar; Colby, K. G., “Borrowers Certified Statements as a Basis for National Currency” 18 (Dec. 1914): 418–26Google Scholar; Hamlin, Charles S.. “The Federal Reserve Act” 22 (Nov. 1916): 329–37.Google Scholar See also Willis, Henry P., The Federal Reserve System: Legislation, Organization and Operation (New York, 1923), 905–11.Google Scholar

19 See the following articles in the Journal of Accountancy: Peple, Charles A., “Statements of Borrowers from the Viewpoint of the Federal Reserve Bank” 21 (June 1916): 410–23Google Scholar; and “Registration of Accountants” 23 (Aug. 1917): 185–89.Google Scholar See also Carey, , Rise of the Public Accounting Profession, 1: 129–34Google Scholar; Cyclopedia of National Biography, s.v. “Frederic Delano,” “Edwin N. Hurley, “and “Joseph E. Davies.” For the rejection of statement certification by the FRB, see Willis, Federal Reserve, 905-19, 936-37.

20 Brandeis, Louis D., Other People's Money and How the Bankers Use It ([1913-14]; reprint, New York, 1967)Google Scholar; Link, Arthur S., Wilson: The New Freedom (Princeton, N.J., 1958), 202, 219Google Scholar; and McCraw, Thomas K., Prophets of Regulation: Charles Francis Adams, Louis D. Brandeis, James M. Landis, Alfred E. Kahn (Cambridge, Mass., 1984), 114–18.Google Scholar See also Dictionary of American Biography, s.v. “Louis Dembitz Brandeis” and “Samuel Untermyer.”

21 AAPA Trustees' Minutes, 18 Sept. 1916, 108-30: FTC, Annual Report 1916 (Washington, D.C., 1916), 14–18Google Scholar; and Parker, Federal Reserve, 909-19.

22 Link, Wilson: The New Freedom, chaps. 13 and 14; McCraw, Prophets of Regulation, 118-35.

23 AAPA Year Book 1916, 107-8; Davis, G. C., “The Federal Trade Commission; Promise and Practice, 1900-1929” (Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois, 1969)Google Scholar, chaps. 6-8; FTC, Annual Report 1916, 14-18, and Annual Report 1917, 21-23; Grady, George O. May, 36-37.

24 Carey, , Rise of the Public Accounting Profession, 1: 141Google Scholar; and Cuff, Robert D., The War Industries Board: Business-Government Relations during World War I (Baltimore, Md., 1979).Google Scholar

25 For credit men, see AAPA Year Book 1914, 234-35; and AAPA Year Book 1915, 211-12. See also “Uniform Accounting,” Journal of Accountancy 22 (June 1917): 410–33Google Scholar; AAPA Year Book 1916, 107-8; Carey, , Rise of the Public Accounting Profession, 1: 132–35Google Scholar; Grady, George O. May, 36; and Previts and Merino, History of Accounting, 187-90.

26 AAPA Year Book 1915, 147-50, 207; AAPA Year Book 1916, 41-43, 108-16; Carey, , Rise of the Public Accounting Profession, 1: 122–26.Google Scholar

27 AIA Year Book 1918, 112-13; Grady, George O. May, 36-37.

28 See AIA Year Book 1917, 132 and 147 for establishment of the research library; Year Book 1920, 114-15, for states participating in uniform licensing examination; and in that and in that same number, 132-33, for discussion of new bibliographic service. For contemporary discussions of broadening the scope of ethics rules, see AIA Year Book 1920, 118-19; and Year Book 1921, 70-74. See also “Ethics,” The Certified Public Accountant 1 (March 1920): 20Google Scholar; and Miranti, “From Conflict to Consensus,” 210-17.

29 “The Aims of the Society,” The Certified Public Accounant 3 (Jan. 1920): 1–5Google Scholar; and Carey, , Rise of the Public Accounting Profession, 1: 230-34, 325–27.Google Scholar

30 AIA Council Minutes, 10 April 1922, 11; and Miranti, “From Conflict to Consensus,” 183-86, 241-42.

31 AIA Year Book 1923, 167-70.

32 Kohler, E. L., “A Nervous Profession,” Accounting Review 9 (Dec. 1934): 4Google Scholar; Mautz, R. K. and Previts, G. J., “Eric Kohler: An Accounting Original,” in Eric Louis Kohler: Accounting's Man of Principles (Reston, Va., 1979), 20–25Google Scholar; Zeff, Stephen A., American Accounting Association: Its First Fifty Years (Evanston. III., 1966), 30–35.Google Scholar

33 Ripley, W. Z., Main Street and Wall Street (Boston, 1936), 132-34, 151–52.Google Scholar For reaction of public accountants, see G. O. May, “Liability of Accountants,” reprint of letter to the editor of the New York Times, 27 April 1916, in May, , Twenty-Five Years, 1: 49–52Google Scholar; and also “Corporate Publicity and the Auditor,” an address presented at the AIA's annual meeting, 22 Sept. 1926, reprinted in ibid., 53-59.

34 AIA Year Book 1927, 169-71.

35 Grady, George O. May, 57-74, 47-50; Dictionary of Anwriran Biography, s.v. “Edwin V. Gay”; Heaton, Herbert, A Scholar in Action: Edwin F. Gay (Cambridge, Mass., 1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36 Berle, Beatrice B. and Jacobs, Travis B., eds., Navigating the Rapids, 1918-1971: From the Papers of Adolph A. Berle (New York, 1973). 20–21Google Scholar; Berle, Adolph A. and Means, Gardiner C., The Modern Corporation and Private Property ([1932]; revised ed., New York, 1968).Google Scholar

37 See Cyclopedia of National Biography, s.v., “Isaiah L. Sharfman.” Sharfman worked for H. C. Adams after he left the ICC and helped to reorganize the Chinese railroad system. See Who's Who in America, vol. 18, s.v. “James C. Bonbright.” Bonbright, a protégé of Felix Frankfurter, was appointed a member of the Power Authority of the State of New York in 1931 by Governor Franklin D. Roosevelt. See Freidel, Frank, Franklin D. Roosevelt: The Triumph (Bosten, 1956), 102–17.Google Scholar

38 See Grady, George O. May, 37-38, 44 for Nicholas Kelley. See also Who's Who in America, vol. 15, s.v. “Waddill Catchings”; vol. 18. s.v. “James C. Bonbright” and “Henry G. Dalton”; and vol. 24, “Nicholas Kelley.”

39 Berle and Means, The Modern Corporation, 264-85.

40 Ibid., 271-77, and Parrish, Securities Regulation, 5-36 for limitations of “blue skies” laws.

41 Carey, , Rise of the Public Accounting Profession, 1:163–64Google Scholar; Parrish, Securities Regulation, 35-41.

42 AIA Year Book 1934, 275-76, and 276-79.

43 Parrish, Securities Regulation, 47-72.

44 Carey, , Rise of the Public Accounting Profession, 1:182–84Google Scholar; see also letter to G. O. May from Lewis Ashman, 19 Dec. 1934, in file “AIA's Special Committee on Development of Accounting Principles, 1934 (1),” in G. O. May Papers, Price Watrrhouse & Co., New York. For a description of the Senate Banking and Currency Committee's investigation, see Schlesinger, Arthur M., The Coming of the New Deal (Boston, 1958)Google Scholar, chap. 27. For a recent summary of the collapse of the Ivar Krueger international match manufacturing enterprise, see Flesher, Dale I. and Flesher, Tony A. K., “Ivar Krueger's Contribution to U.S. Financial Reporting,” Accounting Review 61 (July 1986): 421–34.Google Scholar

45 U.S., Congress, Senate Committee on Banking and Currency. Hearings on Stock Exchange Practices, Pts. 1-6, 1932-1933, 875-92. May also testified later at this hearing, providing details about the Swedish Match bankruptcy, 1259-74.

46 Parrish, Securities Regulation, 48-51, 65-67.

47 Carey, , Rise of the Public Accounting Profession, 1: 183–84Google Scholar: and Cyclopedia of National Biography, s.v. “J. Harry Covington”; quoted in Carey, , Rise of the Public Accounting Profession, 1:182–90.Google Scholar

48 Parrish, Securities Regulation, 53-67.

49 Securities Act of 1933, An Act of May 27, 1933, 48 Stat. 74.

50 Parrish, Securities Regulation. 66-70.

51 May, , Twenty-Five Years, 2:69Google Scholar; see also Dickinson, Accounting Practice and Procedure, 230-31 for thoughts of May's partner about the liability of public accountants.

52 Carey, , Rise of the Public Accounting Profession, 1:197–98Google Scholar; McCraw, Prophets of Regulation, 169-92; McCraw, “Consent of the Governed,” 341-70; Miranti, “From Conflict to Consensus,” chaps. 15-16; Parrish, Securities Regulation, 200-206; Watson, Albert J., “Practice under the Securities Acts,” Journal of Accountancy 59 (June 1935): 445.Google Scholar

53 Carey, , Rise of the Public Accounting Profession, 1: 178, 313; Miranti, “From Conflict to Consensus,” chaps. 15-16.Google Scholar

54 Carey, , Rise of the Public Accounting Profession. 2: 12-16, 33-35, 38-41, 60–65Google Scholar; Miranti, “From Conflict to Consensus,” 298-307.

55 Keller, “The Pluralist State,” 92-94.

56 Figures on certified accountants estimated from tables in Edwards, History of Public Accountancy, 362-63. See Previts and Merino. History of Public Accounting, 260-78, for a discussion of the changes in accounting.