Article contents
British Marketing Enterprise: The Changing Roles of Merchants, Manufacturers, and Financiers, 1700–1860
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 June 2012
Abstract
The Industrial Revolution, the Napoleonic Wars, the American Revolution, and our emergence as an independent trading nation all worked profound changes upon the British marketing enterprise, but it is an oversimplification, according to Dr. Chapman, to conclude that manufacturers quickly or entirely replaced traditional British merchant banking houses even down to World War I. He develops three phases of a long-drawn-out process of change that served Britain's needs poorly throughout the nineteenth century.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Business History Review , Volume 53 , Issue 2: Featured: Early Commercial Aviaton , Summer 1979 , pp. 205 - 234
- Copyright
- Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 1979
References
1 Buck, N. S., Anglo-American Trade 1800–1850 (New Haven, 1925), esp. 162–170.Google Scholar
2 Checkland, S. G., The Gladstones: A Family Biography (Cambridge, England, 1971)Google Scholar; [Brogan, Colm,] James Finlay & Co. Ltd., 1750–1950 (Glasgow, 1951)Google Scholar; Greenberg, M., British Trade and the Opening of China 1800–1842 (Cambridge, England, 1951)Google Scholar; Marriner, S., Rathbones of Liverpool (Liverpool, 1961)Google Scholar; J. A. Gibbs, The History of Antony and Dorothea Gibbs (1922).
3 Buck, N. S., Anglo-American TradeGoogle Scholar, Tripathi, A., Trade and Finance in the Bengal Presidency 1793–1833 (Calcutta, 1956)Google Scholar; Reports by Mr. T. Worthington on British Trade in South America, P. P., 1899, XCVI; Opinions of H. M. Diplomatic and Consular Officers on British Trade Methods, P. P., 1899, XCVI.
4 Boyson, R., The Ashworth Cotton Enterprise (Oxford, 1970) 60–61, 79–80Google Scholar; Sigsworth, E., Black Dyke Mills (Liverpool, 1958)Google Scholar, Chs. VIII–X.
5 Chapman, S. D., “The International Houses: the Continental Contribution to British Economic Development, 1800–1860,” Journal of European Economic History, VI (1977).Google Scholar
6 N. S. Buck, Anglo-American Trade, Ch. II; Mortimer's Universal Director (1763), introduction; Westerfield, R. B., Middlemen in English Business 1660–1760 (New Haven, 1915).Google Scholar
7 Lüthy, H., La banque protestante en France, II, 1730–94 (Paris, 1961).Google Scholar
8 Chapman, S. D., “The Textile Factory before Arkwright: a Typology of Factory Development,” Business History Review, XLVIII (Winter, 1974), esp. 463.Google Scholar
9 Brandt MSS., Amsterdam Municipal Archives, esp. letters of January 22, 1751, February 26, 1750/1, and September 9 and 18, 1757.
10 Neel, J. L., Phineas Bond (Philadelphia, 1968), 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar, note 19, Stephen Collins's letter books, esp. vol. 64a, 14 June 1794. Library of Congress. Thos Smith, Manchester calico printer, was owed £10,000 from U.S., P.R.O. B1/80.
11 Wadsworth, A. P. and Mann, J. de L., The Cotton Trade and Industrial Lancashire 1600–1760 (Manchester, 1931), 243–244.Google ScholarRowlands, M. B., Masters and Men in the West Midland Metalware Trades (Manchester, 1975) 11–13.Google ScholarHey, D., The Rural Metalworkers of the Sheffield Region (Leicester, 1972), 52.Google ScholarChapman, S. D., The Devon Cloth Industry in the 18th C. (Exeter, 1978).Google ScholarDickenson, M. W., The West Riding Woollen and Worsted Industries 1689–1770 (Ph.D. thesis, Nottingham, 1974), 180–181.Google ScholarChapman, S. D., “The Genesis ot the British Hosiery Industry 1600–1750,” Textile History, III (1972) 41–42Google Scholar, and “Enterprise and Innovation in the British Hosiery Industry,” Textile History, V (1974) 33–35.
12 Stephen Collins Letter Books, 1758–96, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. esp. vols. 22–6, 61, 64a, 158. J. & J. Amory letter book (1781–9), Baker Library, Harvard University.
13 Boulton & Fothergill MSS., Birmingham Ref. Lib., AO E1/20, 22, AO W3/13, AO Garbett Box 1 (references kindly supplied by Dr. J. Tann). Trueman, B., Josiah Wedgwood: an 18th C. Entrepreneur (M. A. thesis, Nottingham, 1960), 314–315.Google ScholarTolley, B. H., The American Trade of Liverpool in the early 19th C. (M.A. thesis, Liverpool, 1967), esp. 86–87.Google ScholarDietz, A., Frankfurter Handelsgeschichte, IV (1) (Frankfurt, 1925), 299–344Google Scholar; Wilson, R. G., Gentleman Merchants (1971), 44–45Google Scholar, for Leeds merchants in Dutch and German ports.
14 B. Trueman, Wedgwood, 297, Boulton & Watt MSS., Birmingham Ref. Lib., letter of August 10, 1795. Lee, C. H., A Cotton Enterprise 1795–1840 (Manchester, 1972), 56.Google ScholarHudson, P., The West Riding Wool Textile Industry: A Catalogue of Business Records (1975) 199, 281.Google Scholar
15 Journais of Joshua Gilpin, Pennsylvania Museum, Harrisburg, vol. 28 (1796).
16 Gilpin Journals, vols. 28 and 29.
17 In Lancashire, the word “manufacturer” meant an organizer of the domestic system (as verlag) at this period. “In general most of the Manufacturers of Manchester have cotton mills; many of these are in the town, and many on streams and places at a distance.” J. Gilpin, vol. 52 (September, 1799). Chapman, S. D., “Fixed Capital Formation in the British Cotton Industry,” Economic History Review, XXIII (1970), 256–260.Google Scholar P.R.O. E 112/1541/589, C 12/685/30 (Lingards). Chapman, S. D., “The Peels in the Early English Cotton Industry,” Business History, XI (1969).Google Scholar
18 Universal British Directory, III (Manchester list); Gilpin's Journals vols. 52, 53. P.R.O. FO 33/1, n. 44, October 23, 1781 (fairs). Radcliffe, W., Origins of Power Loom Weaving (Stockport, 1828), 10, 16, 24Google Scholar; Edwards, M. M., Growth of the British Cotton Trade 1780–1815 (Manchester, 1967), 165–167.Google ScholarWheeler, J., Manchester … History (1836), 244.Google Scholar
19 E.g. Butler, Grant & Wakefield (London) and Andrew Krehmer (Petersburg), P.R.O. E 112/1531/247. Chapman, S. D., “James Longsdon, Farmer and Fustian Manufacturer,” Textile History, I (3) (1970).Google Scholar P.R.O. C 12/1755/23. Killick, J. R., “Bolton, Ogden & Co.: A Case Study in Anglo-American Trade, 1790–1850,” Business History Review, XLVIII (Winter, 1974).Google ScholarHeaton, H., “Yorkshire Cloth Traders in the U.S., 1770–1840,” Thoresby Society Miscellany, XI (1945).Google ScholarBarrett, W., The Old Merchants of New York City (New York, 1885).Google Scholar B. H. Tolley, American Trade, 71.
20 John Scholes, “Foreign Merchants in Manchester, 1780–1870,” MS Manchester P.L.; Wilson, R. G., Gentlemen Merchants (1971), 19–23Google Scholar, for earlier settlements.
21 Gilpin's Journals, vol. 49. Hoskins, W. G., Industry, Trade and People in Exeter 1688–1800 (Manchester, 1935), 45–49.Google ScholarDevine, T., “The Colonial Trades and Industrial Investment in Scotland,” Economic History Review, XXIX (1976).Google Scholar (Dr. Devine's analysis refers to the period 1740–90.) Sketchley's Birmingham Directory (1767). Gilpin, vol. 28. Scholefield, Goodman & Sons records, Birmingham University Library. The trade circular quoted was dated 1795. Further references to Birmingham exporters in the 1790s appear in P.R.O. C 12/246/25 (Wm. & Alex. Walker, Leghorn trade) and C 12/251/40 (Phil. Viendt, W. Indies trade).
22 Gilpin, vol. 4 (Liverpool). B. H. Tolley, American Trade, 67–68, 72–73. Scofield, M. M., “The Virginia Trade of the Firm of Sparling & Bolden of Liverpool, 1788–99,” Trans. Hist. Soc. Lanes, & Chesh., CXVI (1964).Google ScholarHeywood, B.A., Observations … on the Banking System (1812) 36–37.Google Scholar
23 McKendrick, N., “Josiah Wedgwood, an 18th C. Entrepreneur in Salesmanship and Marketing Techniques,” Economic History Review, XII (1960).Google ScholarRobinson, E., “Matthew Boulton's Marketing Techniques,” Economic History Review, XVI (1963).Google Scholar Advertisements of foundry products, e.g. in Gott Mss., Leeds University.
24 Circular to Bankers, July 1, 1836, p. 404; September 2, 1836, p. 51; January 15, 1836, p. 201 for general statements on the change. R. Cmn. on Depression in Trade, 3rd Report, P.P., 1886, pp. 15, 21 (ev. of SirLee, J. C.). S. C. on Handloom Weavers Petitions, P. P., 1834, pp. 51Google Scholar, 100 (ev. of H. Mackenzie, W. Craig).
25 J. L. Neel, Phineas Bond, 23, 29. Several London calico printers also went out of business at this period. Platt, D. C. M., Latin America and British Trade (1972) esp. 25, 49.Google ScholarCrouzet, F., L'Économie britannique et le blocus continental (Paris, 1958), 239f.Google Scholar B. H. Tolley, American Trade, 344–345. Circular to Bankers, August 15, 1828, September 19, 1828. Lévy-Leboyer, M., Les banques européennes (Paris, 1964), 510.Google Scholar M. M. Edwards, British Cotton Trade.
26 S. C. on Manufacturers, P.P., 1833, VI, p. 23 (ev. of L. Loyd, banker). R. G. Wilson, Gentlemen Merchants, Ch. 6.
27 Chapman, S. D., “The International Houses: the Continental Contribution to British Commerce, 1800–1860,” Journal of European Economic History, VI (1977).Google Scholar
28 B. H. Tolley, American Trade, 72. Circular to Bankers, January 1, 1836. Circular to Bankers, October 10, 1834. In 1836 the partnership was recast as Morrison Cryder & Co., merchant bankers, with a large acceptance business in North and South America; see Morrison Cryder letters Guildhall Library, London (subsequently cited as MC and letter date).
29 D. S. Landes, Bankers and Pashas (1958) Ch. 1 for a lively sketch and good bibliography of Continental finance houses. R. Hidy, House of Baring, Ch. 1. Perkins, E. J., The House of Brown (Harvard, 1975)Google Scholar Ch. 1. Chapman, S. D., “Foundation of the English Rothschilds,” Textile History, VIII (1977).Google ScholarDietz, A., Frankfurter Handelsgeschichte (Frankfurt, 1925), IV (1), 331 ff.Google ScholarS.C. on Manufacturers, 1833, ev. of Timothy Wiggin, p. 119, of Gabriel Shaw of Thos. Wilson & Co., p. 94, of Wiggin, pp. 119–120, and Ewart, pp. 251–252. Bank of England Committee of Treasury Minute Books, XXII (1837–8), ev. of Joshua Bates of Barings. MC letters, F. J. Oliver, March 12, 1836, McAuby November 9, 1836, etc.
30 Bank of England Birmingham letters, January 29, 1835. This important source is subsequently cited as B. of E., followed by initials for the town series, as Lp (Liverpool), M (Manchester), Le (Leeds).
MC letters, C. J. Weber (Bourdeaux) May 15, 1836. Gille, B., La Maison Rothschild (Geneva, 1965), I, 403.Google Scholar
MC letters, J. Morrison to R. Alsop, June 9, 1837.
31 S. C. on Manufacturers, 1833, pp. 314, 317, 319. MC letters, Andrew Tennant, December 14, 1836. B. of E. M Ltr Bks, V (1845), 143.
32 V. Nolte, Fifty Years in Both Hemispheres; or Reminiscences of a Merchant's Life (1854). Quotations from pp. 86–90, 282–283, 264–265. See also M. G. Buist, At Spes non Fracta, Ch. 1.
33 Montgomery, J., Theory and Practice of Cotton Spinning (Glasgow, 1836), 254.Google Scholar
34 [Evans, D. M.] The City; or the Physiology of London Business (1845), esp. 102–103, 173–174.Google Scholar For the north, see e.g. John Gladstone sponsored Gillanders, Ogilvy & Co. in 1824 (S. G. Checkland, The Gladstones, 181–182), while the Peels sponsored Peel, Bellairs & Co. (B. of E. M Ltr Bks V [1845], 163). Brandt Circulars, Nottingham University Library (bound volumes of printed circulars sent to Wm. Brandt & Sons, 1829–1914). MC letters, G. D. Blackie of Philadelphia, August 2, 1836. See appendix for ten examples of this practice.
35 Hodgson & Robinson letter books, Rylands Library, Manchester (unlisted). The letter quoted is dated October 30, 1840. B. of E. Lp Ltr Bks, I (1840), 55. See below for Fieldens. Gibbs, J. A., The History of Antony & Dorothea Gibbs (1922), esp. 384, 451.Google Scholar Gibbs Mss., 1823–5 ledger, Guildhall Library Ms 11,053/3a.
36 B. of E. B'ham Ltrs, January 22, 1827.
37 B. of E. B'ham Ltrs, January 29, 1827.
38 B. of E. B'ham Ltrs, February 7, 1827 and Brandt Circulars, 1835 for Chances. B. of E. B'ham Ltrs, February 19 and March 18, 1827; This appears to be the same family of Walkers as that noted above (Note 21) trading in Leghorn in the 1790s. B. of E. B'ham Ltrs, January 1, March 30, and October 1, 1827, B. of E. Le Ltrs, March 28, 1832.
39 Addis, J. P., The Crawshay Dynasty (Cardiff, 1957), 98–99.Google ScholarElsas, M., ed., Iron in the Making: Dowlais Iron Co. Letters (Glamorgan, 1960), 120–128.Google ScholarJohn, A. H., The Industrial Development of South Wales (Cardiff, 1950), 125.Google Scholar
40 Anon., Fortunes made in Business (1887), III, 206–207, and B. of E. M. Ltrs, January 1, 1827, September 7, 1827. B. of E. Lds Ltr Bks, V (1849), 170, and MC, Crafts & Stell, February 29, 1836. B. of E. London to Manchester Letter Book, IV, 289. (Nine second class and six third class houses were also listed.) E. J. Perkins, House of Brown, 237–239, shows that in 1830s Browns were operating on a capital of £700,000, Barings on nearly £500,000.
41 Chapman, S. D., “The International Houses,” Journal of European Economic History, VI (1977).Google Scholar
42 A. Tripathi, Bengal Presidency, 230–238. M. Greenberg, British Trade and … China, 37–38. S. C. on Commercial Distress, P. P., 1848, p. 118. Preston Bank “Character Book,” entries for “Indian houses,” Lanes. R.O. B. of E. Lp Ltr Bks V (1844), 6, VIII (1847), 58. Twenty houses were listed in 1844, twenty-six in 1847.
43 Williams, D., “Liverpool Merchants and the Cotton Trade, 1820–50,” in Harris, J. R., ed., Liverpool and Merseyside (1969).Google Scholar B. of E. Lp Ltrs, November 24, 1827, October 20, 1829, for further details on U.S. connections of leading firms. [C. Brogan] Finlay & Co., p. xvii. S. G. Checkland, Gladstones, 30–31. Evid. of Joshua Bates of Barings, B. of E. Committee of Treasury Books, XXII (1836–7), 112–121. In the clothing districts of the West Riding, U.S. and German agents bought directly from small manufacturers in the cloth halls, B. of E. Leeds Ltrs September 16, 1832. Bigger W. R. manufacturers might deal directly with correspondents of, commission agents in Liverpool.
44 For Holfords see B. of E. M Ltrs, August 5, 1829, November 20, 1830, February 11, 1832, and G. A. Brown's Ms. Diary, L'pool P. L. The firm had a capital of £200,000 in 1830. For De Jersey & Co. see B. of E. M Ltrs May 3, 1828 and Ltr Bks VI (1847), 147. B. of E. M Ltr Bks III (1842), 319, VI (1847) 165.
45 “Statement and Calculation relating to the Works,” Finlay MSS., Glasgow University. Ledgers in Birley MSS., Rylands Library, Manchester. [Anon.,] Fortunes made in Business, I (1887). B. of E. Lp Ltr Bks I (1840), 55, M Ltrs December 10–12, 1839.
46 Records of Horrocks, Miller & Co., trade letters 1818–48, Lanes. R.O. DDHs 78–80. MC letters, Box 2H. Thompson & Chippendall ledgers Lanes. R.O. CYC 3/46. B. of E. Lp Ltr Bks IV (1843), 71. Sigsworth, E. M., Black Dyke Mills (Liverpool, 1958), 290 ff. MC letters, January 25, 1836, Haynes & Cook. B. of E. M Ltr Bks.Google Scholar
47 M. G. Buist, At Spes non Fracta, 39. V. Nolte, Reminiscences, 276–277 and 308–309. B. of E. Lp Ltrs November 24 and 30, 1827, Jeremiah Thompson went bankrupt in 1827.
48 Chapman, S. J., The Lancashire Cotton Industry (Manchester, 1904), 135–140.Google ScholarAllen, G. C., The Industrial Development of Birmingham and the Black Country (1929), 344–354.Google ScholarThe Times, January 17, 1906 (Horrockses). Pigott, S., Hollins, , A Study of Industry (Nottingham, 1949), 103–109.Google ScholarBritish Trade Journal, June, July 1887 (Tootals). Sel. Comm. on Trade Marks Bill, Parl. Papers, 1862, XII, passim. Records of T. M. M. Ltd., details from Terence Rath.
49 See, Collins, M., The Bank of England and the L'pool Money Market, (Ph.D. thesis, London, 1972)Google Scholar, for a fuller treatment.
50 Palmerston's Survey, 1848–50, P.R.O. FO 83/111, 115. Details assembled in S. D. Chapman, “The International Houses.”
51 Worthington Reports, P. P., 1889, XCVI. Wallace, D. Mackenzie, Russia (1877), I, 277.Google Scholar
- 35
- Cited by