Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T09:04:06.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Evolution of Municipal Accounting in the United States: 1900–1935

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

James H. Potts
James H. Potts
Affiliation:
Chairman, Department of Accounting, East Tennessee State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The American city, following a half-century of rapid and choatic growth, was the subject of much attention after 1900. Efforts to reform its political structure and to improve and expand its service facilities demanded improvements in municipal accounting procedures as well. Professor Potts discusses the relative merits of commercial accounting, as applied to cities, and of new philosophies of accounting advanced in the light of the city's unique place in society. He explains how cities have oscillated between the two approaches, and concludes that the problem may be more adaptable to accounting philosophies designed for profit-making enterprises than has been generally supposed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Business History Review , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , Winter 1978 , pp. 518 - 536
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Chase, Harvey S., “A Brief History of the Movement Towards Uniform Municipal Reports and Accounts in the United States,” The Accountant (October 15, 1904), 375.Google Scholar “Report of the Committee on Uniform Accounting and Statistics,” Proceedings of the National Municipal League (Philadelphia, The National Municipal League, 1905), 210. Kilpatrick, Wylie, “State Supervision of Municipal Accounts,” National Municipal Review (May 1923), 248.Google Scholar “Report of Committee on Uniform Accounting and Statistics” (1905), 211. Chase, “A Brief History,” 375. Hartwell, Edward M., “The Financial Reports of Municipalities with Special Reference to the Requirement of Uniformity,” Proceedings of the National Municipal League (Philadelphia, The National Municipal League, 1899), 124–125. Chase, “A Brief History,” 275.Google Scholar

2 Stewart, Frank Mann, A Half Century of Municipal Reform (Los Angeles, 1950), 21.Google Scholar

3 Ibid. 127.

4 Rowe, L.S., “Public Accounting Under the Proposed Municipal Program,” Proceedings of the National Municipal League (Philadelphia, 1899), 105–123.Google Scholar

5 Henderson, Harry B., “Uniform Accounting and State Examination of Public Accounts,” Proceedings of the National Municipal League (Philadelphia, 1900), 254–255.Google Scholar

6 “Report of the Committee on Uniform Municipal Accounting,” National Municipal Review (1901), 251.

7 “Report of the Committee on Uniform Accounting and Statistics,” Proceedings of the National Municipal League (Philadelphia, 1902), 311.

8 Chase, Harvey, “Uniform Accounting Applied to Boston, Baltimore and Other Municipalities,” Proceedings of the National Municipal League (Philadelphia, 1902), 318–321.Google Scholar

9 “Report of the Committee on Uniform Municipal Accounting and Statistics,” Proceedings of the National Municipal League (Philadelphia, 1903), 249.

10 “Report of the Committee on Uniform Municipal Accounting and Statistics,” Proceedings of the National Municipal League (Philadelphia, 1904), 200.

11 Harvey S. Chase, “A Brief History,” 375.

12 Cleveland, Frederick A., “The Nomenclature and Phraseology of Municipal Administration and Accounts,” Proceedings of the National Municipal League (Philadelphia, 1905), 237–238.Google Scholar

13 Cleveland, Frederick A., “What Constitutes Reasonable Uniformity in Municipal Accounts and Reports,” Proceedings of the National Municipal League (Philadelphia, 1904), 213–214.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., 215.

15 “State Supervision of Municipal Accounts,” National Municipal Review (1913), 522–525.

16 Cleveland, Frederick A., Municipal Administration and Accounting (New York, 1909), 158–161.Google Scholar

17 Gosselin, Louis E., “Operation of the Revenue and Expense Method of Municipal Accounting,” Proceedings of the National Association of Comptrollers and Accounting Officers (1906), 107–108.Google Scholar

18 Betz, Louis, “Receipts and Disbursements Method of Municipal Accounting,” Proceedings of the National Association of Comptrollers and Accounting Officers (1906), 109–110.Google Scholar

19 Ibid., 111.

20 Cleveland, Municipal Administration and Accounting, 144.

21 Ibid.

22 Ibid., 131.

23 Dahlberg, Jane S., The New York Bureau of Municipal Research (New York, 1966), 10–16.Google Scholar

24 Ibid., 202–203.

25 Ibid., 7–8.

26 Ibid., 116–135.

27 Metz, Herman A., “The Reorganization of Accounts and Methods of Transacting Municipal Business in New York City,” The Government Accountant (May 1909), 10–12.Google Scholar

28 Oakey, Francis, Principles of Government Accounting and Reporting (New York, 1921), 279.Google Scholar

29 Walker, R. G., “The Municipal Balance Sheet,” The Journal of Accountancy (March 1923), 193–195.Google Scholar

30 Ibid., 197.

31 Ibid.

32 Morey, Lloyd, “Finding Correct Principles of Public Accounts” (A speech presented to the American Association of University Instructors in Accountng, December 1926), in Manual of Municipal Accounting (New York, 1927), 151–159.Google Scholar

33 Ibid., 151.

34 Morey, , Introduction to Governmental Accounting (New York, 1932), 199.Google Scholar

35 Morey, , “Progress in Municipal Accounting,” The Comptroller (February 1933), 1.Google Scholar

36 Morey, , “Fundamentals of Municipal Accounting,” Municipal Finance (August 1933), 1.Google Scholar

37 Morey, , “Municipal and Government Accounting,” The Journal of Accountancy (November 1933), 362–363.Google Scholar

38 Flanagan, Frank J., “National Committee on Municipal Accounting,” Municipal Finance (February 1934), 4.Google Scholar

39 Ibid., 5.

40 Chatters, Carl H., “Municipal Accounting Progresses,” The Certified Public Accountant (February 1934), 101.Google Scholar

41 Ibid.