Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T06:39:16.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Management's Responsibility to Society: The Growth of an Idea*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2012

Morrell Heald
Morrell Heald
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of History At Case Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Even in laissez-faire days there was a “corporate conscience,” well defined and with active, if limited, manifestations. Over the course of years not only criticism but changing social forces and modifications of the economic system itself exerted a broadening influence on the attitude of American business toward its public responsibilities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Business History Review , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , Winter 1957 , pp. 375 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Editors of Fortune in collaboration with Davenport, Russell W., U.S.A. The Permanent Revolution (New York, 1951), pp. 88, 67.Google Scholar

2 Ghent, W. J., Our Benevolent Feudalism (New York, 1902), pp. 9–47, 59–64, 182ff., passim.Google Scholar

3 Carnegie, Andrew, The Gospel of Wealth (Garden City, 1933 ed.), p. 11.Google Scholar

4 Williams, Pierce and Croxton, Frederick E., Corporation Contributions Organized Community Welfare Services (New York, 1930), pp. 50–53, 76–79.Google Scholar

5 Ghent, op. cit., p. 61.

6 Long, Norton E., “Public Relations Policies of the Bell System,” Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. I (Oct., 1937), pp. 6–19.Google Scholar

7 From the 1913 Annual Report, quoted in “Report of the Structure of the Bell System and Some of its Fundamental Principals” (New York, 1922), p. 38Google Scholar.

8 Tarbell, Ida M., The Life of Elbert H. Gary: The Story of Steel (New York, 1925), pp. 138–144Google Scholar; Cotter, Arundel, United States Steel, A Corporation with a Soul (New York, 1922), pp. 7, 106, 178Google Scholar.

9 , Ralph W. and Hidy, Muriel E., Pioneering in Big Business, 1882–1911 (New York, 1955), pp. 209–218, 652–663Google Scholar.

10 Perkins, George W., “The Modern Corporation” (New York, 1908)Google Scholar.

11 Williams and Croxton, op. cit., pp. 56–93.

12 Rockefeller, John D. Jr., The Personal Relation in Industry (New York, 1928), pp. 11–21Google Scholar.

13 Elbert H. Gary, “Principles and Policies of the United States Steel Corporation” (n.p., n.d., 1921), pp. 5–6. See also Alfred P. Sloan, Jr., “Modern Ideals of Business,” World's Work (Sept., 1926), pp. 694ff.

14 Quoted in Glover, J. D., The Attack on Big Business (Boston, 1954), p. 338.Google Scholar

15 Henry Ford in collaboration with Crowther, Samuel, My Life and Work (New York, 1922), pp. 20, 206, 208–210Google Scholar.

16 Filene, Edward A., “A Simple Code of Business Ethics,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, Vol. CI (May, 1922), pp. 223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Successful Living in This Machine Age (New York, 1932), pp. 79ff., 196Google Scholar.

17 Quoted in Glover, op. cit., pp. 338–339.