Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:03:27.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficiency, Environmental Quality, and Oil Field Brines: The Success and Failure of Pollution Control by Self-Regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2017

Hugh S. Gorman
Hugh S. Gorman
Affiliation:
HUGH S. GORMAN is an assistant professor of environmental history and policy atMichigan Technological University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the first half of the twentieth century, most firms sought to reduce emissions, effluents, and other pollution-causing discharges only when it resulted in the recovery of valuable material or decreased the amount of money spent on damage and nuisance suits. However, this did not necessarily mean that engineers and technical managers saw themselves—or the firms that employed them—as polluters. Rather, they assumed that as they made industrial operations more efficient, they would also address pollution concerns. This article illustrates the initial success and ultimate failure of this efficiency-based ethic of self-regulation by examining efforts to eliminate the pollution associated with the disposal of oil field brines. Until the 1950s, it argues, efforts to address problems associated with the disposal of oil field brines reinforced the notion that economic incentives to increase the efficiency of industrial operations overlapped with efforts to fight pollution. However, by the late 1950s, economic incentives proved incapable of encouraging further reductions in brine contamination. Yet pollution concerns remained. Since then, the efficiency-based ethic of self-regulation has gradually been replaced by an ethic that most people—and most firms—now treat as legitimate: reaching consensus on environmental objectives and then regulating pollution-causing discharges to meet those objectives.

Type
Articles
Information
Business History Review , Volume 73 , Special Issue 4: Business and the Environment , Winter 1999 , pp. 601 - 640
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Major pieces of legislation included: the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969; the Clean Air Act of 1970; the Federal Water Pollution Control Amendments of 1972; the Feder al Insecticide, Fungicides, and Rodenticides Act of 1972; the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974: the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976; and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980.

2 References to numerous studies that discuss such conflicts can be found in the bibliographic essay, Stine, Jeffrey K. and Tarr, Joel A., “At the Intersection of Histories: Technology and the Environment,” Technology and Culture 39 (Oct. 1998): 601–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar However, most of the studies that deal with industrial pollution view the issue from the eves of workers, health officials, and the general public, not from the eyes of engineers and technical managers making decisions within industrial firms.

3 Colten, Craig E. and Skinner, Peter N., The Road to Love Canal: Managing Industrial Wastes before EPA (Austin, Tex., 1996).Google Scholar

4 Hays, Samuel P., Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890–1920 (Cambridge, Mass., 1959).Google Scholar

5 Chase, Stuart, The Tragedy of Waste (New York, 1927).Google Scholar Also see Westbrook, Robert B., “Tribune of the Technostructure: The Popular Economics of Stuart Chase,” American Quarterly 32 (1980): 387–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Hays, Samuel P., Beauty, Health, and Permanence: Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955–1985 (Cambridge, U.K., 1987), 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Williamson, Harold F. and Daum, Arnold R., The American Petroleum Industry: The Age of Illumination, 1859–1899 (Evanston, Ill., 1959), 14–81.Google Scholar

8 Herald, Stanley C., Oil Well Drainage (Stanford, Calif., 1941), 325.Google Scholar

9 For the timing associated with the westward shift of oil production, see Rister, Carl Coke, Oil! Titan of the Southwest (Norman, Okla., 1949).Google Scholar

10 Pulaski Oil Co. v. Edwards, No. 11334, 31 July 1923, Oklahoma Reports: Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma, v. 91, 56–58.

11 Williamson, Harold F., Andreano, Ralph L., Daum, Arnold R., and Klose, Gilbert C., The American Petroleum Industry: The Age of Energy, 1899–1959 (Evanston, Ill., 1963), 299–300.Google Scholar

12 Nash, Gerald D., United States Oil Policy, 1890–1964: Business and Government in the Twentieth Century (Pittsburgh, 1968), 42–48.Google Scholar

13 Carlisle, Rodney P. and Giebelhaus, August W., Bartlesville Energy Center: The Federal Government in Petroleum Research, 1918–1983 (Washington, D.C., 1984).Google Scholar

14 Aldrich, Mark, “Preventing ‘the Needless Peril of the Coal Mine’: The Bureau of Mines and the Campaign against Coal Mine Explosions, 1910–1940,” Technology and Culture 36 (July 1995): 483–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Graebner, William, Coal-Mining Safety in the Progressive Period (Lexington, Ky., 1976).Google Scholar

15 “Report of the Work Done by the Petroleum Experiment Station,” Nov. 1921, box 2, 017.41, Bartlesville Records, Bureau of Mines, RG 70–2, NARS, Fort Worth.

16 “Conservation Saves Millions Says Wiggins,” Petroleum Age 17 (15 Mar. 1926): 42, 49.

17 Glenn Marston, ed., Principles and Ideas for Doherty Men: Papers, Addresses, and Letters by Henruy L. Doherty, vol. 5, printed for the use of Doherty organizations, 1923, 242, box 19, Cities Service Collection, Western History Collection, University of Oklahoma.

18 J. H. Wiggins, “Evaporation Losses of Petroleum in the Mid-Continent Field,” Bureau of Mines, Bulletin no. 200 (Washington, D.C., 1921); Wiggins, J. H., Methods of Decreasing Evaporation Losses of Petroleum, Bureau of Mines, Technical Paper no. 318, (Washington, D.C., 1923).Google Scholar

19 For example, research by Standard Oil of N.J. is described in “Tank Roofs to Stand One Pound Pressure Cut Evaporation Loss to 21 Per Cent,” National Petroleum News 18 (21 Julv 1926): 27.

20 Swigart, Theodore E., “Handling Gas and Oil in the Field” in History of Petroleum Engineering (New York, 1961), 940–945.Google Scholar

21 Pratt, Joseph A., “Letting the Grandchildren Do It: Environmental Planning During the Ascent of Oil as a Major Energy Source,” The Public Historian 2 (Summer 1980): 28–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Drake, Douglas, “Herbert Hoover, Ecologist: The Politics of Oil Pollution Control, 1921–1926,” Mid-America 55 (1973): 207–228.Google Scholar

22 U.S. Bureau of Mines, Pollution by Oil of the Coast Waters of the United States: Preliminary Report (Washington, D.C., 1923).Google Scholar

23 Federal Oil Conservation Board, Complete Record of Public Hearings, February 10 and 11 (Washington D.C., 1926).Google Scholar

24 Baker, Rex G. and Hardwicke, Robert E., “Conservation,” in History of Petroleum Engineering (New York, 1961), 1117–1126.Google Scholar

25 Sherburne Rogers, G., Chemical Relations of the Oil-Field Waters in San Joaquin Valley, California (Washington, D.C., 1917), 18–19.Google Scholar

26 R. D. Bush, “Conservation of Gas in the Production of Oil,” Oil Bulletin (Sept. 1927), box 128, Bartlesville Records, Bureau of Mines, RG 70–4; NARS, Fort Worth. The role of dissolved natural gas in reducing the viscosity of petroleum was suspected but not established until 1926.

27 Federal Oil Conservation Board, Public Hearings, February 10 and 11, 48–65.

28 Doherty's comments in writing, Federal Oil Conservation Board, Record of Public Hearings, May 27 (Washington D.C., 1926), 51.Google Scholar Doherty, who had been active in the founding of the A.P.I., continued to disagree with other industry leaders even after they accepted unitization. In 1931, proclaiming himself “out of step” with the other A.P.I. directors, he resigned from the organization. See New York Times, 27 Dec. 1939, 1.

29 Ise, John, The United States Oil Policy (New Haven, Conn., 1926), 162–163, 281Google Scholar; Logan, Leonard M. Jr, Stabilization of the Petroleum Industry (Norman, Okla., 1930), 6, 137–150, 153Google Scholar; Giebelhaus, August W., Business and Government in Industry: A Case Study of Sun Oil, 1876–1945 (Greenwich, Conn., 1980), 124–126.Google Scholar

30 “Conservation,” an address by Mark Requa to the A.P.I., 19 Nov. 1920, box 454, Oil Pamphlets, Oil, Commerce Papers, Herbert Hoover Presidential Library.

31 Schmidt, Ludwig and Devine, J. M., The Disposal of Oil Field Brines, Bureau of Mines Report of Investigation no. 2945 (Washington, D.C., 1929)Google Scholar; “Disposal of Oil-Field Waste Studied by Bureau Engineers,” Oil and Gas Journal (22 Aug. 1929): 110; Young, L. R., “The Latest in Salt Water Disposal,” Oil Bulletin (April 1929): 360–362Google Scholar; “Disposal of Brine in Oil Fields,” Petroleum Times (19 Oct. 1929): 756; Oberg, S. W., “Methods of Waste Water Disposal,” Oil and Gas Journal (5 Sept. 1929): 76Google Scholar; Ferry, H. C., “Problems of Waste Water Solved by Southern California Operators,” Oil and Field Engineering 56 (Mar. 1929): 46–47Google Scholar; “Solving Oil-Field Waste-Disposal Problem,” Engineering New Record (16 May 1929): 795–798; Humphreys, Walter, “Disposal of Oil-Field Waste,” Petroleum Engineer (Apr. 1930): 120, 122, 125.Google Scholar

32 Ludwig Schmidt, “Report of Inspection Trip through West Texas Fields,” 10 Oct. 1928, box 106, Bartlesville Records, Bureau of Mines, RG 70–4, NARS, Fort Worth.

33 J. G. Pew to M. B. Sweeney, 1 July 1930, East Texas Water Encroachment, box 29, series 3, Sun Oil Records. For a similar example involving rice growers, see Cloud, Wilbur F., Petroleum Production (Norman, Okla., 1937), 501.Google Scholar

34 J. E. Pew to J. G. Pew, 1 Aug. 1930, East Texas Water Encroachment.

35 Pew to Sweeney, 1 July 1930.

36 Wiebe, A. H., Burr, J. G., and Faubion, H. E., “The Problem of Stream Pollution in Texas with Special Reference to Salt Water from the Oil Fields,” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 64 (1934): 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar The authors were all with the Texas Game, Fish, and Oyster Commission.

37 Jones, Ogden S., Fresh Water Protection from Pollution Arising in the Oil Fields (Lawrence, Kans., 1950), 7–9, 69–71.Google Scholar

38 Shhanahan, M.H., “Texas Salt Water Problem Discussed,” Oil and Gas Journal (16 Apr. 1931): 65, 90Google Scholar; Bignell, L. G. E., “Salt Water Situation Already Serious in Texas Field,” Oil and Gas Journal (9 July 1931): 17, 120Google Scholar; Stormont, D. H., “East Texas Operators to Consider Disposal Plan,” Oil and Gas Journal 40 (11 Dec. 1931): 24.Google Scholar

39 The Section of Mineral Law, American Bar Association, Legal History of Conservation of Oil and Gas (Chicago, 1938), 232–233Google Scholar; interview, Judge F. W. Fischer by R. W. Hayes, 21 May 1955, tape no. 172, Oral History of the Petroleum Industry, Center for American History, University of Texas at Austin.

40 Fanning, Leonard M., The Story of the American Petroleum Institute: A Study and Report (With Personal Reminiscences) (New York, 1959), 101–125.Google Scholar

41 “An Interstate Compact to Conserve Oil and Gas,” attachment, J. G. Pew to J. N. Pew, Jr., 20 Feb. 1935, box 3, series 4, Sun Oil Records.

42 Ibid.; American Bar Association, Legal History of Conservation of Oil and Gas, 180–184, 232–235; Williamson et al., Age of Energy, 537–561; Prindle, David F., Petroleum Politics and the Texas Railroad Commission (Austin, Tex., 1981), 32.Google Scholar Also see Nash, United States Oil Policy; Pettengill, Samuel B., Hot Oil: The Problem of Petroleum (New York, 1936)Google Scholar; “Chronology of U.S. Oil Conservation Movement” Federal Oil Conservation Board, Report of the Federal Oil Conservation Board to the President of the United States, Report no. 5 (Washington, D.C., 1932); Childs, William R., “The Transformation of the Railroad Commission of Texas, 1917–1940: Business-Government Relations and the Importance of Personality, Agency Culture, and Regional Differences” Business History Review 65 (Summer 1991): 284–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43 H. K. Arnold (Humble Oil) to Members of the Anti-Pollution Committee, 28 June 1933, folder 7, box 12, George A. Hill, Jr. Collection, Houston Metropolitan Research Center; letter with attachments, Arnold to George Hill (Houston Oil), 2 Aug. 1933.

44 Con R. Gladney (Chairman, Anti-Pollution Committee) to Contributors to East Texas Anti-Pollution Work, 28 June 1935, folder 7, box 12, George A. Hill, Jr. Collection.

45 “East Texas Salt Water Disposal Plan Considered,” no date, folder 7, box 12, George A. Hill, Jr. Collection.

46 Ibid.

47 Caplinger, Michael W. and Ross, Philip W., The Historic Petroleum Industry in the Allegheny National Forest, prepared for the USDA Forest Service (Morgantown, W. Va., 1993), 69–70.Google Scholar

48 Taliaferro, D. B. and Logan, David M., History of Water Flooding of Oil Sands in Oklahoma, Bureau of Mines Report of Investigation no. 3728 (Washington, D.C., 1943), 5Google Scholar; Herold, Oil Well Drainage, 316; Bossier, Robert S., Oil Fields Rejuvenated, Bulletin no. 56 (Harrisburg, Pa., 1922).Google Scholar

49 John R. Suman, “Evolution by Companies,” in History of Petroleum Engineering, 81.

50 E. DeGolyer, “Concepts on the Occurrence of Oil and Gas,” in History of Petroleum Engineering, 30.

51 David Trax, “Repressurizing Practice in the Mid-Continent,” presented to a meeting of the Mid-Continent District of the A.P.I., Oct. 7–8, 1929, box 38, series 7, Sun Oil Records; Osgood, Wentworth H., Increasing the Recoveny of Petroleum, 2 vols. (New York. 1930).Google Scholar

52 Edward Constant, II, “Cause or Consequence: Science, Technology, and the Regulatory Change in the Oil Business in Texas, 1930–1975” Technology and Culture 30 (Apr. 1989): 426–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

53 H. K. Arnold to George Hill, 7 Nov. 1933, folder 7, box 12, George A. Hill, Jr. Collection.

54 Progress report, East Texas Joint Salt Water Disposal Experiment, 14 Feb. 1936, folder 7. box 12, George A. Hill, Jr. Collection.

55 “General History of the Bartlesville Station, 1934–1935,” box 17, Bartlesville Records, Bureau of Mines, RG 70–2, NARS, Forth Worth; N.C. Smith to Sam O. Battles, 8 Oct. 1936, box 21; Jones, Fresh Water Protection, 7; Bignell, L. G. E., “Salt Water Disposal Wells Solution of Problems for Operators in Kansas,” Oil and Gas Journal (5 Sept. 1935).Google Scholar

56 Ludwig Schmidt to F. R. Frye, 28 January 1936, box 21, Bartlesville Records, Bureau of Mines, RG 70–2, NARS, Fort Worth; status reports, Lloyd Christianson to Sam Taylor; Taylor, S., Wilhelm, C. J., and Holliman, W. C., Typical Oil-Field Brine Conditioning Systems for Preparing Brine for Subsurface Injection, Report of Investigation no. 3434 (Washington, D.C., 1939).Google Scholar

57 “Supplemental Progress Report of Brine Disposal,” ca. 1935. box 22, Bartlesville Records, Bureau of Mines, RG 70–4, NARS, Fort Worth. Of the 325 wells used in water flooding operations, only 136 re-injected brine; the rest injected fresh water.

58 Ludwig Schmidt to R.A. Cattell, 15 Now 1938, box 21, Bartlesville Records, Bureau of Mines, RG 70–4, NARS, Fort Worth.

59 Data on Production and Number of Wells—East “Texas Field,” East Texas Water Encroachment, box 29, series 3, Sun Oil Records. The increase in salt water was probably higher because some companies, fearing that the Railroad Commission would eventually shut down wells producing mostly water, purposely kept their figures low; see F. E. Heath to J. Edgar Pew, 27 September 1937, box 29, series 3, Sun Records.

60 M. B. Sweeney to J. Edgar Pew, 3 Aug. 1937, East Texas Water Encroachment, box 29, series 3, Sun Oil Records; “East Texas Water Disposal Plant Attracts Interest,” Oil and Gas journal(8 Dee. 1938): 50, 52.

61 East Texas Salt Water Disposal Corporation, Salt Water Disposal in the East Texas Field,(Austin, Tex., 1953), 3Google Scholar; King, H. H., “East Texas Experiment Shows Feasibility of Returning Salt to Producing Formation,” Oil Weekly (28 Nov. 1938): 23–34Google Scholar; Leahy, M. J., “Disposal of Oil Field Brines Acute Problem in East Texas,” Oil Weekly (8 Jan. 1940): 19–20, 22–24.Google Scholar

62 East Texas Salt Water Disposal Corporation, Salt Water Disposal, 3–4.

63 “Plans for Creation and Operation of the East Texas Salt Water Disposal Company,” ca. Dec. 1941, box 8, series 2, Sun Oil Records; Ingran, R., “Financing of East Texas Salt Water Disposal Plan Complete,” Oil and Gas Journal 41 (Aug. 1942): 31.Google Scholar

64 East Texas Salt Water Disposal Corporation, Salt Water Disposal, 7–8.

65 Carlisle and Giebelhaus, Bartlesville, 52.

66 Leon W. Dupuy to H. C. Fowler, May 7, 1951, box 18, Bartlesville Records, Bureau of Mines, RG 70–2, NARS, Fort Worth; Fancher, George H. and Mackay, Donald K., Secondary Recovery of Petroleum in Arkansas—A Survey (El Dorado, Ark., 1946).Google Scholar

67 Anderson, Robert O., Fundamental's of the Petroleum Industry (Norman, Okla., 1984), 25.Google Scholar Also see Miller, Keith L., “Plucking the Apple without Rooting Up the Tree: Environmental Concern in the Production of Prairie State Petroleum,” Illinois Historical Journal 84 (Autumn 1991): 161–172.Google Scholar

68 Jones, Fresh Water Protection, 45–67.

69 J. H. Hedges to R. E. Tarbett (Senior Sanitary Engineer, U.S. Public Health Service), 11 Aug. 1938, Box 21, Bartlesville Records, Bureau of Mines, RG 70–2, NARS, Fort Worth.

70 Williams, Charles C. and Bayne, Charles K., Ground-Water Conditions in Elm Creek Valley, Barber County, Kansas, Bulletin 64 (Topeka, Kans., 1946).Google Scholar

71 Research Committee, Interstate Oil Compact Commission, Production and Disposal of Oilfield Brines in the United States of America (Oklahoma City, 1960), 64.Google Scholar

72 Olin Culberson, “Speech to Oil Compact Commission,” Sept. 1952, Speeches, Oil and Gas Resources of Texas, Box 3G313, Olin Culberson Papers, Center for American History, University of Texas at Austin.

73 Brown et al. v. Lundell, Texas Court of Civil Appeals, Amarillo, no. 6925, 21 Mar. 1960, Oil and Gas Reporter, v. 15, 1960.

74 Cotton, William M., “Some Legal Problems Encountered in Lease Operations After Discovery of Oil,” West Texas Oil Lifting Short Course (Lubbock, Tex., 1959), 228–234.Google Scholar

75 Lewelling, Henry and Kaplan, Monte, “What to do about Salt Water,” in Frontiers in Petroleum Engineering (Dallas, Tex., 1960), 57.Google Scholar

76 R. A. Krieger and G. E. Hendrickson, Effects of Greensburg Oil field Brines on the Streams, Wells, and Springs of the Upper Green River Basin, Kentucky, prepared for the Kentucky Geological Survey, Report of Investigations 2 (Lexington, Ky., 1960).

77 McMillion, L. G., “Hydrological Aspects of Disposal of Oil-Field Brines in Texas.” Ground Water 3 (Oct. 1965): 36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

78 Page, Roy D., “Pollution Control for Oil Field Brines” Drill Bit 15 (Dec. 1967): 32–36.Google Scholar

79 “Crack Down on Oil Country Pollution,” Petroleum Engineer 39 (July 1967): 33–38.

80 See Raschke, A. et al., “Let Engineering Solve Salt-Pollution Problems,” Oil and Gas Journal 63 (9 Aug. 1965): 75–79Google Scholar; “Salt Water Disposal and Oil field Water Conservation,” Petroleum Engineering and Services 30 (No. 4, 1967): 22–28; Payne, Roy D., “Salt Water Pollution Problems in Texas,” Journal of Petroleum Technology (Nov. 1966): 1401–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Salt Water Disposal Pits,” Drill Bit 40 (Nov. 1967): 18–19.

81 Edward W. Constant II, “Seience In Society: Petroleum Engineers and the Oil Fraternity in Texas, 1925–65,” Social Studies of Science 19 (Aug. 1989): 461.Google Scholar

82 Hays, Beauty, Health, and Permanence, 11–39.

83 Statement of C. A. Clark, Railroad Commission Hearing, June 30, 1967, “Pollution, Railroad Commission Correspondence,” Box 3G69, Farenthold Papers, Center for American History, University of Texas at Austin; Special Study by the Bay Drilling Committee On Disposal of Oil and Gas Well Produced Salt Water from Saxet Area; letter, Mrs. James Scott to Lenford Williams, October 28, 1968, Box 3G69, Farenthold Papers.

84 “Rail Panel OK'd Discharges of Brine, Parks Man Testifies,” Houston Chronicle, 16 Feb. 1972, clipping, folder 16, box 26, J. M. Heiser Environmental Collection, Houston Metropolitan Research Center.

85 Tofflemire, T.J., “Deep Well Injection,” Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 42 (June 1970), 1231–1235.Google Scholar

86 “EPA Keeps Eye on Waste Wells, Official Says,” December 8, 1971, clipping, injection well binder, Emmot Environmental Collection, box 2, Houston Metropolitan Research Center.

87 Safe Drinking Water Act, 1974, P. L. 93–523, sections 1421–1425.

88 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, prepared by the Office of Water Supply and the Office of Solid Waste Management Programs, The Report to Congress: Waste Disposal Practices and their Effect on Ground Water (1977); George W Reid et al., prepared for the Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Brine Disposal Treatment Practices Relating to the Oil and Gas Industry (Washington, D.C., 1974).Google Scholar

89 “EPA: 18 States Need Revised UIC Regs,” Oil and Gas Journal (19 Dec. 1977): 26–27.

90 “API Study Sees Big Costs in UIC Implementation,” Oil and Gas Journal 78 (4 Aug. 1978): 34–35.

91 “IOCC Renews Attack on Injection Regs,” Oil and Gas Journal 75 (24 Jan. 1977).

92 “GAO Finds Brine Still Contaminate Aquifers,” Oil and Gas Journal 87 (16 Oct. 1989): 38.

93 Barcelona, Michael et al, Handbook of Groundtcater Protection (New York, 1988), 5.Google Scholar

94 Eberts, Sandra M., “Geohydrology and Water Quality in Northern Portage Count). Ohio in Relation to Deep-Well Brine Injection,” Water Resources Investigation, report 90–4158 (U.S. Geological Survey, 1990).Google Scholar

95 Texas Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Land and Water Contamination From Injection Wells, Disposal Pits, and Abandoned Wells Used in Oil and Gas Production (Austin, Tex., 1985).Google Scholar

96 Ibid., 10.

97 Stewart-Gordon, Tom, “Industry Eyes New Standards for Injection Wells,” The Oil Daily (26 June 1992).Google Scholar

98 Editorial, “EPA Drafts Tougher Injection Well Rules,” Oil and Gas Journal 91 (14 June 1993): 11.

99 Speller, Frank N., Corrosion—Causes ami Prevention (New York, 1926), 1.Google Scholar

100 For example, see Chemical & Metallurgical Engineering 26 (31 Aug. 1921); this issue was devoted to the elimination of waste in industry and included several articles, such as “Human Waste in Industry.”