Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:29:22.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Globalization of Knowledge-Based Services: Engineering Consulting in Spain, 1953–1975

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2015

Abstract

This article explores the globalization of knowledge-based services and their impact on host-country firms’ organizational capabilities. Two drivers of such globalization—foreign aid and foreign direct investment coming from the United States—contributed to the development of engineering consulting in Spain in the beginning of the new global economy. The largest Spanish engineering firms have been able to integrate imported knowledge into their own organizational capabilities, enabling them to compete successfully in international markets. This imported knowledge was disseminated in two ways: through private companies, via affiliates and strategic alliances between locals and foreigners; and through the technical and military aid the U.S. government provided during the Cold War.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Friedman, Walter A. and Jones, Geoffrey, “Business History: Time for Debate,” Business History Review 85 (Spring 2011): 18Google Scholar; Jones, Geoffrey, “Globalization,” in The Oxford Handbook of Business History, ed. Jones, Geoffrey and Zeitlin, Jonathan (Oxford, 2007), 141–68Google Scholar; Lall, Sanjaya and Narula, Rajneesh, “Foreign Direct Investment and Its Role in Economic Development: Do We Need a New Agenda?European Journal of Development Research 16, no. 3 (2004): 447–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Jones, Geoffrey, Multinationals and Global Capitalism from the Nineteenth to the Twenty-First Century (Oxford, 2005), 3134Google Scholar.

3 Feketekuty, Geza, “Trade in Professional Services: An Overview,” in University of Chicago Legal Forum: Barriers to International Trade in Professional Services (Chicago, 1986)Google Scholar; Aharoni, Yair, “Globalization of Professional Business Services,” in Coalitions and Competition: The Globalization of Professional Business Services, ed. Aharoni, Yair (London, 1993), 2030Google Scholar; Løwendahl, Bente, Strategic Management of Professional Service Firms (Copenhagen, 2005)Google Scholar.

4 Goñi, Manuel García, “La internacionalización de los servicios de ingeniería en España,” Información Comercial Española 844 (Sept.–Oct. 2008): 140Google Scholar. However, in 2010, 93 percent of the Spanish firms had never operated abroad. Tecniberia, , Desarrollo estratégico del sector de la ingeniería de consulta (Madrid, 2011), 79Google Scholar.

5 de España, Banco, Balanza de pagos de España, 2011 (Madrid, 2012), 22Google Scholar.

6 Ibid., 23.

7 Egurbide, Pedro, “El ‘consulting’ en España,” Información Comercial Española 513 (May 1976): 133–37Google Scholar; Molero, José, “Las empresas de ingeniería,” Información Comercial Española 552 (Aug. 1979): 5971Google Scholar.

8 See, for instance, Buckley, Peter J., “Business History and International Business,” Business History 51, no. 3 (2009): 307–33Google Scholar; and Jones, Geoffrey and Khanna, Tarun, “Bringing History (Back) into International Business,” Journal of International Business Studies 37, no. 4 (2006): 453–68Google Scholar.

9 Spitz, Peter, Petrochemicals: The Rise of an Industry (New York, 1988)Google Scholar; Landau, Ralph and Rosenberg, Nathan, “Successful Commercialization in the Chemical Process Industries,” in Technology and the Wealth of Nations, ed. Rosenberg, Nathan, Landau, Ralph, and Mowery, David (Stanford, 1992), 73120Google Scholar.

10 Arora, Ashish and Gambardella, Alfonso, “Evolution of Industry Structure in the Chemical Industry,” in Chemicals and Long-Term Economic Growth: Insights from the Chemical Industry, ed. Arora, Ashish, Landau, Ralph, and Rosenberg, Nathan (New York, 1998), 379413Google Scholar; Ashish Arora and Nathan Rosenberg, “Chemicals: A U.S. Success Story,” in Chemicals and Long-Term Economic Growth, ed. Arora, Landau, and Rosenberg, 71–102.

11 Smith, John K., “Patents, Public Policy and Petrochemical Processes in the Post–World War II Era,” Business and Economic History 27, no. 2 (1998): 413–19Google Scholar.

12 Puig, Núria, Bayer, Cepsa, Repsol, Puig, Shering y La Seda: Constructores de la química española (Madrid, 2003), 183Google Scholar.

13 van Rooij, Arjan and Homburg, Ernst, Building the Plant: A History of Engineering Contracting in the Netherlands (Eidhoven/Zutpen, 2002)Google Scholar; van Rooij, Arjan, Building Plants: Markets for Technology and Internal Capabilities in DSM's Fertiliser Business, 1925–1970 (Aksant, 2004)Google Scholar.

14 Aharoni, “Globalization,” 7–10; Yehia Soubra, “International Competitiveness and Corporate Strategies in the Construction Services Sector,” in Coalitions and Competition, ed. Aharoni, 193–210; Løwendahl, Strategic Management.

15 Van Rooij and Hamburg, Building the Plant; Van Rooij, Building Plants; Dienel, Hans, Linde: History of a Technology Corporation, 1879–2004 (Hampshire, 2004)Google Scholar; Linder, Marc, Projecting Capitalism: A History of the Internationalisation of the Construction Industry (London, 1994)Google Scholar; Hartley, Peter M., Consulting Engineering: Constructing the Future (Hertfordshire, 2000)Google Scholar; Marshall, Thomas, Towards a Management Information System for Use in the Strategic Management of South African Consulting Engineering Firms (Johannesburg, 2009)Google Scholar; Jones, Multinationals, 119.

16 Aharoni, “Globalization,” 7–10.

17 Warf, Barney, “International Engineering Services: 1982–92,” Environment and Planning A 28, no. 4 (1996): 667–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Engineering News-Record, “The Top 150 Global Design Firms,” accessed 4 Oct. 2014, http://enr.construction.com/toplists/GlobalDesignFirms/001-100.asp. Competition is higher, however, in the case of international contractors, which also include construction firms. Engineering News-Record, “The Top 225 International Contractors,” accessed 4 Oct. 2014, http://enr.construction.com/toplists/Top-International-Contractors/001-100.asp.

19 Doblón, 7 June 1975; de Cos Castillo, Manuel, XXV Años de Tecniberia (Madrid, 1990)Google Scholar; Egurbide, “El ‘consulting.’”

20 Adoración Álvaro-Moya, “Inversión directa extranjera y formación de capacidades organizativas locales: Un análisis del impacto de Estados Unidos en la empresa española, 1918–1975,” PhD diss., Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 2010, 309–11.

21 Álvaro-Moya, Adoración, “Los inicios de la internacionalización de la ingeniería española, 1950–1995,” Información Comercial Española 849 (July–Aug. 2009): 99Google Scholar. Today the sector is constituted of almost 3,000 firms—around 90 percent are microbusinesses and small enterprises, while only 1.85 percent are big businesses—and its revenue represents 1.16 percent of Spain's GDP. Tecniberia, Desarrollo estratégico, 4.

22 León, Andrés Masía, “El licenciamiento en procesos químicos,” in III Convención Nacional de la Sección Técnica de la Asociación Nacional de Ingenieros Industriales, Seminario I: Desarrollo de un proyecto (Madrid, 1972), 69Google Scholar; José María Reus Tercero, “Análisis de las actividades de un proyecto,” in III Convención Nacional de la Sección Técnica, 3–4; Egurbide, “El ‘consulting,’” 136; Molero, “Las empresas de ingeniería.”

23 Enderwick, Peter, “Some Economics of Service-Sector Multinational Enterprises,” in Multinational Service Firms, ed. Enderwick, Peter (London, 1989), 2052Google Scholar; Jones, Multinationals, 128.

24 Empresarios Agrupados, http://www.empre.es/principal1.html, accessed 4 Oct. 2014.

25 Aharoni, “Globalization,” 7–10; Jones, Multinationals, 126.

26 Molero, “Las empresas de ingeniería,” 69.

27 Álvaro-Moya, “Inversión directa extranjera,” Appendix 6.2.

28 Particularly in the 1970s and 1980s, several studies were published on this matter. See, for example, Aguilar, Santiago, Las inversiones de capital extranjero en España (Barcelona, 1973)Google Scholar; Roura, Juan R. Cuadrado, Las inversiones extranjeras en España: Una reconsideración (Málaga, 1975)Google Scholar; Maravall, Fernando and Pérez-Prim, José M., Cambio estructural y crecimiento económico: Un análisis del caso español (1962–1970) (Madrid, 1976)Google Scholar; Fanjul, Enrique and Segura, Julio, Dependencia productiva y exterior de la economía española: 1960–1970 (Madrid, 1977)Google Scholar; Muñoz, Juan, Roldán, Santiago, and Serrano, Ángel, La internacionalización del capital en España, 1959–1977 (Madrid, 1978)Google Scholar; and Braña, Francisco J., Buesa, Mikel, and Molero, José, “El fin de la etapa nacionalista: Industrialización y dependencia en España, 1951–59,” Investigaciones Económicas 9 (May–Aug. 1979): 151207Google Scholar. An overview is in Álvaro-Moya, Adoración, La inversión directa estadounidense en España: Un estudio desde la perspectiva empresarial (c. 1900–1975) (Madrid, 2012), 2528Google Scholar, available at: http://www.bde.es/f/webbde/SES/Secciones/Publicaciones/PublicacionesSeriadas/EstudiosHistoriaEconomica/Fic/roja60.pdf.

29 The fiftieth anniversary of the Marshall Plan gave rise to numerous international research projects on the issue, most of them focused on the post–World War II period. See Kipping, Matthias and Bjarvar, Ove, The Americanisation of European Business: The Marshall Plan and the Transfer of U.S. Management Models (New York, 1998)Google Scholar; Gourvish, Terry and Tiratsoo, Nick, Missionaries and Managers: American Influences on European Management Education, 1945–1969 (Manchester, 1998)Google Scholar; Engwall, Lars and Zamagni, Vera, Management Education in Historical Perspective (Manchester, 1998)Google Scholar; Djelic, Marie-Laure, Exporting the American Model: The Postwar Transformation of European Business (Oxford, 1998)Google Scholar; Zeitlin, Jonathan and Herrigel, Gary, Americanization and Its Limits: Reworking U.S. Technology and Management in Post-War Europe and Japan (Oxford, 2000)Google Scholar; Barjot, Dominique, ed., Catching Up with America: Productivity Missions and the Diffusion of American Economic and Technological Influence after the Second World War (Paris, 2002)Google Scholar; Barjot, Dominique and Rèveillard, Christophe, L'américanisation de l'Europe occidentale au XX siècle (Paris, 2002)Google Scholar; Barjot, Dominique, Lescent-Giles, Isabelle, and de Ferriere, Marc, L'Américanisation en Europe au XXe siècle: Économie, culture, politique (Lille, 2002)Google Scholar; Kipping, Matthias and Tiratsoo, Nick, Americanisation in Twentieth Century Europe: Business, Culture, Politics (Lille, 2002)Google Scholar; Puig, Núria and Álvaro-Moya, Adoración, “La guerrafría y los empresarios españoles: La articulación de los intereseseconómicos de Estados Unidosen España, 1950–1975,” Revista de Historia Económica 22, no. 2 (2004): 387424Google Scholar. A valuable synthesis covering the entire twentieth century is in Schröter, Harm, The Americanization of the European Economy: A Compact Survey of American Economic Influence in Europe since the 1880s (Dordrecht, 2005)Google Scholar. For an overview of the literature see Álvaro-Moya, “Inversión directa extranjera,” ch. 2.

30 On this issue, see, for instance, Viñas, Ángel, En las garras del águila: Los pactos con Estados Unidos, de Francisco Franco a Felipe González (1945–1995) (Barcelona, 2003)Google Scholar; Jill Edwards, Anglo-American Relations and the Franco Question (Oxford, 1999)Google Scholar; and Liedtke, Boris, Embracing a Dictatorship: U.S. Relations with Spain, 1945–1953 (London, 1998)Google Scholar.

31 On the nature and composition of the groups sent to the United States, see Álvaro-Moya, “Inversión directa extranjera,” 125 and 322–23. See also Álvaro-Moya, Adoración, “Guerra Fría y formación de capital humano durante el franquismo: Un balance sobre el programa estadounidense de ayuda técnica (1953–1963),” Historia del Presente 17 (2011): 1325Google Scholar.

32 Comisión Nacional de Productividad Industrial (CNPI), La industria del cemento en Estados Unidos (Madrid, 1957), 48Google Scholar; CNPI, Proyectos de viviendas y urbanización en Estados Unidos (Madrid, 1959), 176–78 and 180Google Scholar; CNPI, Construcción de obras (Madrid, 1961), 13Google Scholar; Palomar, Patricio, La historia más que centenaria de un importante sector: La industria del cemento enmarcada en el desarrollo económico e histórico de España (Barcelona, 2003), 140Google Scholar.

33 Vizoso, Ángel, “Construcción de obras,” in Estudios sobre la unidad económica de Europa, ed. Estudios Económicos Españoles y Europeos, vol. 7 (Madrid, 1958), 338–40Google Scholar. See also the previous note.

34 CNPI, La industria del cemento; CNPI, Proyectos de viviendas; CNPI, Construcción de obras; CNPI, Materiales y métodos de construcción en Estados Unidos (Madrid, 1958)Google Scholar; CNPI, Ladrillo cerámico (Madrid, 1958)Google Scholar; Gaceta de la Construcción 752 (1958): 19–20.

35 CNPI, Construcción de obras, 47.

36 CNPI, Construcción de obras; Chapa, Álvaro, La construcción de los Saltos del Duero, 1903–1970: Historia de una epopeya colectiva (Pamplona, 1999), 7779Google Scholar.

37 Enrique de Sendagorta (former president of Sener), interviewed by author, 6 June 2007, Madrid.

38 Dominique Barjot, “Catching Up with America: The Story of Productivity Missions in the French Public Works Industry after the Second World War,” in Catching up with America, ed. Barjot, 365–72.

39 CNPI, Proyectos de viviendas, 36–37; CNPI, Construcción de obras, 47–49.

40 CNPI, Construcción de obras, 13 and 45–48.

41 Delgado, Lorenzo, Viento de Poniente: El Programa Fulbright en España (Madrid, 2009), 6869Google Scholar, 87, and 142.

42 “Base Construction, 1954–55,” Box 3, Entry 1400, Record Group 59; “1956–58, Base Construction,” Box 9, Entry 1400, Record Group 59; “JUSMG Contractors,” Decimal File 1950–54, Box 3189A, File 711.56352/2-954; “JUSMG Contractors,” Box 10, Entry 3094; and “711.56352,” Decimal File 1955–59, Box 2900. All at the National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, D.C. (hereafter NARA).

43 Gaceta de la Construcción 774 (1959): 21Google Scholar; 720 (1958): 16; 522 (1954): 12–13; 524 (1954): 7–8; 544 (1954): 7–9.

44 Fernández, Paloma, Un siglo y medio de trefilería en España: Historia de Moreda (1879–2004) y Rivière (1854–2004) (Barcelona, 2004), 155–56Google Scholar.

45 Gaceta de la Construcción 528 (1954): 89Google Scholar; Puig, Núria and Torres, Eugenio, Banco Urquijo: Un Banco con Historia (1918–2008) (Madrid, 2008), 142Google Scholar; Roldán, Concha, Los americanos en Zaragoza: La presencia de las fuerzas aéreas de los Estados Unidos en la base (Zaragoza, 1998), 62Google Scholar.

46 Gaceta de la Construcción 838 (1960): 15Google Scholar.

47 Gaceta de la Construcción 740 (1958): 16Google Scholar; 760 (1959): 13.

48 Gaceta de la Construcción 607 (1956): 18Google Scholar.

49 Gaceta de la Construcción 554 (1954): 18Google Scholar; 569 (1954): 12; 570 (1954): 9; 572 (1954): 17–18; 578 (1954): 17. On joint ventures, see Gaceta de la Construcción 581 (1954): 19Google Scholar; 673 (1957): 17. On restricted tenders, Gaceta de la Construcción 664 (1957): 14Google Scholar.

50 Fomento de Obras y Construcciones S.A., Annual Report (Madrid, 1955), 11–12. Translated by the author.

51 Roldán, Los americanos en Zaragoza, 62.

52 Gaceta de la Construcción 543 (1954): 15–16; 563 (1954): 12–13; 566 (1954): 11–12; 578 (1954): 15; Constructora Internacional, Annual Report (Madrid, 1954); Constructora Internacional, Annual Report (Madrid, 1955); Boletín Informativo del Sindicato de la construcción, vidrio y cerámica 130 (1955): 55–56.

53 Gaceta de la Construcción 570 (1954): 9Google Scholar; 571 (1954): 17; 577 (1954): 11.

54 Constructora Internacional, Annual Report, 1955; Torres, Eugenio, “La internacionalización de dos grandes empresas constructoras españolas: FCC y Dragados (c. 1960–1996),” Revista de Historia Industrial 40 (2009): 174–75Google Scholar. The information about the bids is in Álvaro-Moya, “Inversión directa extranjera,” Appendix 6.3.

55 Álvaro-Moya, “Inversión directa extranjera,” Appendix 6.3.

56 Gaceta de la Construcción 619 (1956)Google Scholar; Fomento de Obras y Construcciones, Annual Report, 11–12; Construcciones Civiles, Annual Report (Madrid, 1966)Google Scholar.

57 Anuario Financiero y de Sociedades Anónimas (1974/75); ASEINCO, Catálogo de servicios ofertados (Madrid, 1979), 88Google Scholar; “Brown Root Española” (12) 1.03 64/18781 and “Brown Root Española,” File 1036-QC (13) 1.04 71/5225, Archivo General de la Administración, Alcalá de Henares (hereafter AGA).

58 Wheeler, Foster, Foster Wheeler Corporation: A Century of Engineering Achievement (Clinton, N.J., 1992), 7778Google Scholar.

59 “R. Serre to J. Planell,” 12 Aug. 1948, File 17 and “R. Serre to J. Planell,” 13 May 1949, File 26, both in Box 6, ENCASO (1942–1950), Fondo Planell, Centro de Documentación y Archivo Histórico de la Sociedad Estatal de Participaciones Industriales, Archivo Histórico del Instituto Nacional de Industria, Madrid (Archives of the former INI holding; AHINI hereafter); Álvaro-Moya, “Inversión directa extranjera,” 339–40.

60 “Foster Wheeler” (12) 1.03 64/18783, AGA; Foster Wheeler, Foster Wheeler Corporation, 78.

61 Foster Wheeler, Foster Wheeler Corporation, 102.

62 The various technical assistance contracts from the second half of the 1960s: “Foster Wheeler,” Files 1051-QC-1, 1051-SGT-2, 1051-QC-3, and 1051-SM-4; all (13) 1.04 71/5226, AGA; and Foster Wheeler, Foster Wheeler Corporation, 78.

63 See the report on this issue, dated 10 July 1970, File 1051-QC-1 (13) 1.04 71/5226, AGA.

64 “Procon” (12) 1.03 64/18803, AGA; “McKee” (12) 1.03 64/18780, AGA.

65 Foster Wheeler, Foster Wheeler Corporation, 78; and “Foster Wheeler,” File 1051-SGT-2 (13) 1.04 71/5226, AGA.

66 “Foster Wheeler,” 30 Oct. 1968, File 1051-SGT-2 (13) 1.04 71/5226, AGA.

67 Doblón, 7 June 1975, 35.

68 Foster Wheeler, Foster Wheeler Corporation, 80.

69 Álvaro-Moya, “Los inicios de la internacionalización,” 107. The information on engineering services exportation is available, by firm and service provided, only for the period 1976–1995.

70 Actualidad Económica, Ranking 5.000 mayores empresas en España (Madrid, 2011)Google Scholar.

71 José Lladó, former president of Técnicas Reunidas, interviewed by Núria Puig and Eugenio Torres, 28 June 2010, Madrid.

72 “Discurso del señor José Lladó. Junta General Ordinaria de Técnicas Reunidas, S.A. 23 de junio de 2010,” 2–3, Archivo Técnicas Reunidas, Madrid. Thanks to Núria Puig and Eugenio Torres for this material.

73 “Lummus Española,” Files 794-E-1/2 and 4 (13) 1.04 71/5190, AGA.

74 “Discurso del señor José Lladó,” 2–4.

75 “Lummus Española,” Files 794-E-1/2 and 4 (13) 1.04 71/5190, AGA; “Lummus Española,” File 655 (13) 1.04 71/5181, AGA; and Puig and Torres, Banco Urquijo, 195.

76 José Lladó interview.

77 “Discurso del señor José Lladó,” 4.

78 “Lummus” (12) 1.03 64/18772, AGA.

79 Reus, “Análisis de las actividades.”

80 See note 18 and Actualidad Económica, Ranking 5.000.

81 Álvaro-Moya, “Los inicios de la internacionalización”; Sener Corporation, http://www.sener.com, accessed 26 Apr. 2010.

82 More information in Gándara, Alejandro, Sener, la historia de su tiempo (Bilbao, 2006)Google Scholar.

83 Molero, “Las empresas de ingeniería,” 67.

84 Gándara, Sener, 81–82.

85 Sener Corporation, http://www.sener.com, accessed 26 Apr. 2010.

86 Gándara, Sener, 108–17; “Sener,” 1084-EC and 1051-QC-1 (13) 1.04 71/5230, Files, AGA.

87 In particular between 1976 and 1995. See note 69 and Actualidad Económica, Ranking 5.000.

88 Sánchez, Esther M., “La conexión hispano-francesa: Intercambios de energía eléctrica y cooperación nuclear, c. 1950–1990,” Recerques 61 (2010): 101–36Google Scholar.

89 Romero, Ana and Ron, José Manuel Sánchez, De la JEN al CIEMAT: La energía nuclear en España (Madrid, 2001)Google Scholar; Gándara, Sener.

90 Tecnatom, Tecnatom, 1957–2007: Medio siglo de tecnología nuclear en España (Madrid, 2007), 4546Google Scholar.

91 Ibid., 51–53.

92 Ibid., 46–47, 58–72, and 78–81.

93 Ibid., 60–61.

94 Ibid., 66.

95 Álvaro-Moya, “Los inicios de la internacionalización,” 107.

96 Actualidad Económica, Ranking 5.000; and Tecnatom, Annual Report (Madrid, 2012), 47.

97 Doblón, 7 June 1975; Egurbide, “El ‘consulting’”; Molero, “Las empresas de ingeniería.”

98 Núria Puig and Rafael Castro, “Patterns of International Investment in Spain,” Business History Review 83, no. 4 (2009): 505–37Google Scholar. See note 28 about literature on FDI in Spain.

99 According to the investment development path framework, there is a relationship between a nation's level of economic development and its FDI activities. Increasing FDI outflows and decreasing FDI inflows are related to structural changes and economic and social transformations that led to growing levels of development. A recent revision of this framework is in Narula, Rajneesh and Dunning, John H., “Multinational Enterprises, Development and Globalization: Some Clarifications and a Research Agenda,” Oxford Development Studies 38, no. 3 (2010): 263–87Google Scholar. For a recent overview on innovation in business history, see Margaret B. W. Graham, “Technology and Innovation,” in The Oxford Handbook of Business History, ed. Jones and Zeitlin.

100 Lall and Narula, “Foreign Direct Investment”; Narula and Dunning, “Multinational Enterprises.”

101 Amsden, Alice H. and Hikino, Takashi, “Project Execution Capability, Organizational Know-How and Conglomerate Corporate Growth in Late Industrialization,” Industrial and Corporate Change 3, no. 1 (1994): 111–47Google Scholar; Kock, Carl J. and Guillén, Mauro F., “Strategy and Structure in Developing Countries: Business Groups as an Evolutionary Response to Opportunities for Unrelated Diversification,” Industrial and Corporate Change 10, no. 1 (2001): 77113Google Scholar.

102 Puig and Torres, Banco Urquijo.

103 Ibid., 139–40.