Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:34:26.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Japanese Spirit of Enterprise, 1867–1970

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

Johannes Hirschmeier
Johannes Hirschmeier
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics, Nanzan University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tradtional Japanese disdain for business was overcome by making industrialization synonymous with the esteemed value of public service in the face of foreign economic competition. The alien corporate form of organization was made palatable by characterizing it as a family group which attracted traditional loyalties. Professor Hirschmeier attributes Japan's rapid industrialization at the turn of the century and her remarkable recovery after World War II to such pragmatic social compromises and uses them to identify and explain a uniquely Japanese “spirit of enterprise.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Business History Review , Volume 44 , Issue 1: Japanese Entrepreneurship , Spring 1970 , pp. 13 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bellah, Robert, Tokugawa Religion (Glencoe, 1957), 115.Google Scholar

2 Miyamoto, Mataji, Osaka (Osaka, 1957), 119.Google Scholar

3 Bendix, Reinhard, Work and Authority in Industry (New York, 1963), 22–34.Google Scholar

4 Horie, Yasuzo, “Confucian Concept of State in Tokugawa Japan,” Kyoto University Economic Review, XXXII (October 1962), 29.Google Scholar

5 Nakane, Chiye, Tate shakai no ningenkankei (human relations in the vertical society), (Tokyo, 1967).Google Scholar Nakane points out the various practices and attitudes that result from the lack of horizontal orientation with almost exclusive stress on the vertical line of group-center, and within the group vertically with heavy stress on hierarchy.

6 Marshall, Byron K., Capitalism and Nationalism in Prewar Japan (Stanford, 1967), 45.Google Scholar

7 Hirschmeier, Johannes, “Eiichi Shibusawa: Industrial Pioneer,” in Lockwood, William W. (ed.), The State and Economic Enterprise in Japan (Princeton University Press, 1965)Google Scholar, The importance of a new public image as well as the approach to achieve it are elaborated in greater detail, as is the leadership role of Eiichi Shibusawa.

8 Jūichi Nakase, “gendai keiei shisō to nationalism” (today's managerial mentality and nationalism), gendai no me (March 1965), and “sengo nihon no keieisha no shisō; shakaietki sekininron to rijun dai ichi-shugi” (Japanese managerial mentality after the War; the theory of social responsibility and the principle of profits-first), keizai hyōron (February 1966).

9 Glazer, Herbert, The International Businessman in Japan (Tokyo, 1968), 72.Google Scholar Glazer gives interesting details gained by practical dealings with Japanese executives which provide ample illustration for the return of Japanese economic nationalism.

10 Sakamoto, Fujiyoshi, Nihon keiei Kyōikushi josetsu (introduction to the history of Japanese management education), (Tokyo, 1964), 16.Google Scholar

11 Horie, Yasuzo, “Nihon keieishi ni okeru iye no mondai” (the problem of the House in Japanese business history), Keieishigaku (Business History Review), II (1967), 128.Google Scholar

12 Hirschmeier, Johannes, The Origins of Entrepreneurship in Meiji Japan (Cambridge, Mass., 1964), 196–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Landes, David S., “French Business and the Businessman: A Social and Cultural Analysis” in Aitken, Hugh G. J. (ed.), Explorations in Enterprise (Cambridge, Mass., 1967).Google Scholar See also Stearns, Peter N., “Individualism and Association in French Industry, 1820–1848,” Business History Review, XL (Autumn 1966).Google Scholar

14 Tsuchiya, Takao, Nihon no keieisha seishin (the Spirit of Japanese managers) (Tokyo, 1959), 63–67.Google Scholar Tsuchiya is very emphatic on the great contribution of the small and medium enterprises where work is done in the spirit of the old merchant houses, quoting as illustration the famous novel by Yamasaki Tomio, Noren, an epic of an Osaka merchant house continuing the business through to present day, in the best of the house traditions.

15 Detailed accounts on the problem of introducing the joint stock enterprise system are furnished in the large volume by Watarō, Kanno, Nihon kaisha kigyō hasseishi no kenkyū (Studies in the emergence of the Japanese company form of enterprise), (Tokyo, reprinted 1966).Google Scholar

16 Hazama, Hiroshi, Nihonteki keiei no keifu (the genealogy of Japanese management), (Tokyo, 1963), 82–85.Google Scholar

17 Marshall, Capitalism and Nationalism in Prewar Japan, 79.

18 Hazama, Nihonteki keiei no keifu, 136–138.

19 Levine, Solomon B., Industrial Relations in Postwar Japan (Champaign, 1958), 102.Google Scholar

20 Hazama, Nihonteki keiei no keifti, 155.

21 Professor Nakamura has followed up this problem in the field of ceramics: Nakamura, Tsutomu, “Nagoya chihō tōjiki kōgyō soshiki ron” (a treatise on the organization of ceramic industry in the Nagoya area), part 2, Academia, Journal of the Nanzan Academic Society, Economics Series No. 17 (July 1967), 75–76.Google Scholar

22 DeVos, George A., “Achievement Orientation, Social Self-Identity, and Japanese Economic Growth,” Asian Survey, V (December 1965).Google Scholar

23 Noda, Kazuo, Nihon no jūyaku (Japanese executives), (Tokyo, 1960), 320.Google Scholar

24 Abegglen, James C., The Japanese Factory: Aspects of its Social Organization (Glencoe, 1958), 111.Google Scholar