No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 July 2012
One of the recurring problems in the study of management theory concerns the authority relationships between stockholders, officers, and directors of corporations. The power centers in the corporate form of enterprise are quite different from those that obtain in an individual proprietorship and in a partnership. In addition, many differences between these types of legal organizations may be noted as one considers them from the point of view of the source of executive authority or from the viewpoint of statute law and its interpretations.
1 On this point see Radin, Max, Legislation of the Greeks and Romans on Corportions (New York, 1909), p. 97.Google Scholar
2 Lappenberg, J. M., A History of England under the Anglo-Saxon Kings, trans. Thorpe, Benjamin (London, 1845), vol. i, p. 36.Google Scholar
3 Cooke, C. A., Corporation Trust and Company (Manchester, 1950), p. 19.Google Scholar
4 Davies, R. T., A Sketch of the History of Civilisation in Medieval England, 1066–1500 (London, 1924), p. 336.Google Scholar
5 Cf. Besant, Walter, Survey of London (London, 1908), vol. i, pp. 206–207.Google Scholar
6 Cf. Lambert, J. Malet, Two Thousand Years of Gild Life (Hull, 1891), especially chap. vi.Google Scholar
7 The stages by which a true corporation emerges have been well stated by Max Radin, op. cit., p. x, as follows: “We have first the individual persons, then a loose association of several of them to accomplish a temporary and definite end. As the end grows in importance and permanence the association becomes more fixed in its forms. Ultimately the end transcends the lives of the individual persons, becomes more important than the latter, and where these facts are recognized by the law, is invested with a distinct and new personality. Then and not till then, the true corporation arises.”
8 See Unwin, George, The Gilds and Companies of London (London, 1908).Google Scholar
9 Davis, Joseph S., Essays in the Earlier History of American Corporations (Cambridge, 1917), pp. 112–113Google Scholar.
10 Quoted by Cheyney, Edward P., An Introduction to the Industrial and Social History of England (New York, 1919), p. 150.Google Scholar
11 5 and 6 William and Mary, c. 20.
12 Hakluyt, Richard, The Principal Navigations, Voyages, Traffiques, and Discoveries of the English Nation (Glasgow, 1903), vol. ii, p. 240.Google Scholar
13 Cf. Kaye, John W., The Administration of the East India Company (London, 1853), p. 123.Google Scholar
14 Clark, M. St. Clair and Hall, D. A. (ed.s), Legislative and Documentary History of the Bank of the United States (Washington, 1832), p. 12.Google Scholar
15 Ibid., p. 32. (Italics in quotation are mine.)
16 Quoted by J. M. Lambert, op. cit., p. 105.
17 Gerson, A. J., Vaughn, E. V., and Deardorff, N. R., Studies in the History of English Commerce in the Tudor Period (New York, 1912), pp. 25 ff.Google Scholar
18 Reid, C. L., Commerce and Conquest, the Story of the Honourable East India Company (London, 1947), p. 50n.Google Scholar
19 Gerson et al., op. cit., p. 29.