Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T21:49:29.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relationship of Records Management Activities to the Field of Business History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

Maynard Brichford
Maynard Brichford
Affiliation:
University Archivist, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A leading archivist describes the nature and functions of professional records management and suggests some relationships between those activities and business history. If future historians are to have useful records for research, present-day scholars need to be informed about and interested in the work of records managers.

Type
Articles
Information
Business History Review , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , Summer 1972 , pp. 220 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Haber, Samuel, Efficiency and Uplift (Chicago, 1964), 89, 103–114Google Scholar; Pinkett, Harold T., “Investigations of Federal Recordkeeping, 1887–1906,” The American Archivist, XXI (April, 1958), 180–192Google Scholar; Glenn, Bess, “The Taft Commission and the Government's Record Practices,” The American Archivist, XXI (July, 1958), 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Krauskopf, Robert W., “The Hoover Commissions and Federal Recordkeeping,” The American Archivist, XXI (October, 1958), 374–386.Google Scholar

3 Ibid., 387–394.

4 National Archives and Records Service, Records Management Handbooks on Plain Letters (1955), Form Letters (1954), Guide Letters (1955), and Managing the Mail (1971).

5 Brichford, Maynard, “Forms Management in State Government,” in Management Analysis for State Budget Officers (Lexington, Ky., 1969), 50–57.Google Scholar

6 Maynard Brichford, “Documentary Systems to Improve Communications Management: Management Control of Files and Documentation Flow,” in Management Analysis for State Budget Officers, 38–43; White, Gerald T., “The Business Historian and His Sources,” The American Archivist, XXX (January, 1967), 19–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Brichford, “Documentary Systems to Improve Communications Management,” 50–57.

8 National Archives and Records Service, Records Management Handbooks on Files Operations (1964), File Stations (1966), and Subject Filing (1966).

9 “The 500 Largest Industrial Corporations,” Fortune (May, 1971), 174Google Scholar; Board of Trustees Agenda Items, April 15, 1970, Document 26, 16, Record Series 1/1/0/2, University of Illinois Archives (Urbana, Ill.).

10 White, “The Business Historian and His Sources,” 19–31.

11 Overton, Richard C., “Remarks in Response to Dr. Bahmer's Paper: ‘Preserving Business Records for Management and Historians,’” Proceedings of the First Annual Conference on Records Management (New York, 1953), 53Google Scholar; Brichford, Maynard, “Preservation of Business Records,” History News, XI (August, 1956), 77.Google Scholar

12 ARMA Professipnal Development and Program Committee, “Records Personnel Survey,” Records Management Quarterly, V (July, 1971), 28–38Google Scholar; Maedke, Wilmer, “The Records Management Profession: A Profile Survey,” Records Management Quarterly, II (July, 1968), 29–36.Google Scholar

13 Cole, Arthur H., “Business Manuscripts: A Pressing Problem,' The Journal of Economic History, V (May, 1945), 51Google Scholar; Lovett, Robert W., “The Librarian, the Historian and Business Archives,” Records Management Quarterly, II (April, 1968), 9–11Google Scholar; Lovett, Robert W., “The Status of Business Archives,” The American Archivist, XXXII (July, 1969), 247–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lovett, Robert W., ed., Directory of Business Archives in the United States and Canada (Cambridge, Mass., 1969)Google Scholar; Evans, Frank B. and Warner, Robert M., “American Archivists and their Society: A Composite View,” The American Archivist, XXXIV (April, 1971), 161–171Google Scholar; manuscript statistical report of SAA analysis of personnel questionnaire in the possession of the author, October, 1970; White, “The Business Historian and His Sources,” 20; Shiff, Robert A., “A Technique to Preserve the Memory of Business,” The Office, XLI (January, 1955), 121, 125, 186–88Google Scholar; Shiff, Robert A., “Can Your Records Go to Washington,” The Controller, XXX (November, 1962), 552–58, 583.Google Scholar

14 Brichford, Maynard, “Business Use of Business History,” Records Management Quarterly, IV (October, 1970), 15.Google Scholar

15 Lovett, Robert W. and Bishop, Eleanor C., comps., List of Business Manuscripts in Baker Library (Boston, 1969)Google Scholar is a well indexed listing of 1,300 collections; Applegate, Howard L. and Squair, Lyall D., eds., Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company (Syracuse Manuscript Collections Register No. 6, Syracuse, N.Y., 1964)Google Scholar, is a typical manuscripts register of a collection; Zabrosky, Frank A., “The Archives of Industrial Society at the University of Pittsburgh,” Records Management Quarterly, III (April, 1969), 8–11Google Scholar; Jackson, Elisabeth C. and Curtis, Carolyn, comps., Guide to the Burlington Archives in the Newberry Library, 1851–1901 (Chicago, 1949)Google Scholar, and Mohr, Carolyn C., comp., Guide to the Illinois Central Archives in the Newberry Library, 1851–1906 (Chicago, 1951)Google Scholar; Lovett, “The Librarian, the Historian and Business Archives,” 11.

16 Lovett, “The Librarian, the Historian and Business Archives,” 10–11; Layton, Edwin T., ed., A Regional Union Catalog of Manuscripts Relating to the History of Science and Technology Located in Indiana, Michigan and Ohio (Cleveland, 1971).Google Scholar

17 Galambos, Louis, American Business History (Washington, 1967), 2–30Google Scholar; Larson, Henrietta M., Guide to Business History (Cambridge, Mass., 1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lovett, Robert W., American Economic and Business History Information Sources (Detroit, 1971).Google Scholar

18 Kipp, Laurence J., ed., Source Materials for Business and Economic History (Cambridge, Mass., 1967), 10–19Google Scholar; Galambos, Louis, “The Emerging Organizational Synthesis in Modern American History,” Business History Review, XLIV (Autumn, 1970), 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Fishbein, Meyer H., “Business History Resources in the National Archives,” Business History Review, XXXVIII (Summer, 1964), 232–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kolko, Gabriel, The Triumph of Conservatism (New York, 1963), 3Google Scholar; Kipp, ed., Source Materials for Business and Economic History, 62–71.

20 Jenkinson, Hilary, A Manual of Archive Administration (London, 1937), 149.Google Scholar

21 Brichford, Maynard, “A University Archivist Looks at Business Archives,” in Bateman, Fred and Foust, James D., eds., Papers of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Business History Conference (Bloomington, Ind., 1968), 106–108Google Scholar; Cole, “Business Manuscripts: A Pressing Problem,” 54–57; Vaught, Temple W., “Contractor Records Study — A Joint Government-Industry Effort,” Records Management Journal, VI (Winter, 1968), 17–20Google Scholar; Ernst, Joseph W., “The Business Archivist: Problems and Perspectives,” Business History Review, XLIV (Winter, 1970), 536–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brown, Gerald F., “The Archivist and the Records Manager: A Records Manager's Viewpoint,” Records Management Quarterly, V (January, 1971), 21, 22, 38.Google Scholar