Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:37:16.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

William Morris, Cultural Leadership, and the Dynamics of Taste

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2011

Charles Harvey ,
Jon Press  and
Mairi Maclean
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This examination of the social processes that inform cultural production asks how tastes are formed, transmitted, embedded, and reproduced across generations. These questions are explored through a study of William Morris, his working methods and products, and their impact on the decorative arts in Victorian Britain and beyond. Through the exercise of cultural leadership, Morris gave physical expression to the ideals and sentiments of Romanticism, and this in turn gave rise to a community of taste reaching across class boundaries and generations. Morrisian products and designs, through the agency of his disciples, became institutionally embedded, emblematic of refinement and good taste. A process model of taste formation is deployed to explore the economic and social dynamics at work in the Morris case and more generally.

Type
Research Article
Information
Business History Review , Volume 85 , Issue 2 , Summer 2011 , pp. 245 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gronow, Jukka, “Taste and Fashion: The Social Function of Fashion and Style,” Acta Sociologica 36 (1993): 89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Elias, Norbert, The Civilizing Process (Oxford, 1994)Google Scholar; Holt, Douglas B., “Does Cultural Capital Structure American Consumption?” Journal of Consumer Research 25 (1998): 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Thorstein, Veblen, The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions (London, 1970Google Scholar; originally published in 1899); Gronow, Jukka, The Sociology of Taste (London, 1997), 31–48Google Scholar.

3 Mayer, Heinz–Dieter, “Taste Formation in Pluralistic Societies: The Role of Rhetorics and Institutions,” International Sociology 15 (2000): 33–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Muniz, Albert M. and O'Guinn, Thomas C., “Brand Community,” Journal of Consumer Research 27 (2001): 412–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 McKendrick, Neil, Brewer, John, and Plumb, John H., The Birth of Consumer Society: The Commercialization of Eighteenth-Century England (London, 1982)Google Scholar; Richards, Thomas, The Commodity Culture of Victorian England: Advertising and Spectacle, 1851–1914 (Stanford, 1991)Google Scholar; Berg, Maxine, A Nation of Shoppers: How Georgian Britain Discovered the Delights of Luxury (Oxford, 2005)Google Scholar; Brewer, John and Trentmann, Frank eds., Consuming Cultures, Global Perspectives: Historical Trajectories, Transnational Exchanges (Oxford, 2006)Google Scholar.

6 Trentmann, Frank, ed., The Making of the Consumer: Knowledge, Power and Identity in the Modern World (Oxford, 2006), 1–27Google Scholar; Trentmann, Frank, “The Modern Genealogy of the Consumer: Meanings, Identities and Political Synapses,” in Consuming Cultures, Global Perspectives: Historical Trajectories, Transnational Exchanges, ed. Brewer, John and Trentmann, Frank (Oxford, 2006), 19–69Google Scholar.

7 Harvey, Charles and Press, Jon, “The Marketing of Art,” Business History 28 (1986): 36–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Harvey, Charles and Press, Jon, William Morris: Design and Enterprise in Victorian Britain (Manchester, 1991)Google Scholar; Harvey, Charles and Press, Jon, “John Ruskin and the Ethical Foundations of Morris & Company,” Journal of Business Ethics 14 (1995): 181–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Harvey, Charles and Press, Jon, Art, Enterprise and Ethics: Essays on the Life and Work of William Morris (London, 1996)Google Scholar.

8 Gere, Charlotte and Whiteway, Michael, Nineteenth Century Design: From Pugin to Mackintosh (London, 1993)Google Scholar; Lochnan, Kathleen A., Schoenherr, Douglas E., and Silver, Carole, eds., The Earthly Paradise (Toronto, 1993)Google Scholar; MacCarthy, Fiona, William Morris: A Life for Our Time (London, 1994)Google Scholar; Victorian & Albert Museum, William Morris, 1834–1896 (London, 1996)Google Scholar.

9 Naylor, Gillian, The Arts and Crafts Movement: A Study of Its Sources, Ideals and Influence on Design Theory (Cambridge, Mass., 1980)Google Scholar; Stansky, Peter, Redesigning the World: William Morris, the 1880s and the Arts and Crafts (Princeton, N.J., 1985)Google Scholar; Cumming, Elizabeth and Kaplan, Wendy, The Arts and Crafts Movement (London, 1991)Google Scholar.

10 Wolff, Kurt, ed., The Sociology of Georg Simmel (New York, 1950)Google Scholar; Veblen, Leisure Class; Bourdieu, Pierre, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (London, 1984)Google Scholar.

11 On the relation of Romanticism to consumption, see Campbell, Colin, The Romantic Ethic and the Spirit of Modern Consumerism (Oxford, 1987)Google Scholar; Holbrook, Morris B., “Romanticism and Sentimentality in Consumer Behavior: A Literary Approach to the Joys and Sorrows of Consumption,” Research in Consumer Behavior 5 (1991): 105–80Google Scholar; “Romanticism, Introspection and the Roots of Experiential Consumption: Morris the Epicurean,” in Consumption and Marketing: Macro Dimensions, ed. Belk, Russell W., Dholakia, Nikhilesh, and Venkatest, Alladi (Cincinnati, Oh., 1995), 20–82Google Scholar.

12 Fine, Ben, “Addressing the Consumer,” in The Making of the Consumer: Knowledge, Power and Identity in the Modern World, ed. Trentmann, Frank (Oxford, 2006), 291–311Google Scholar.

13 Bourdieu, Distinction, 97–256; Swartz, David, Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu (Chicago, 1997), 117–88Google Scholar.

14 Bourdieu, Pierre, The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power (Oxford, 1996), 261–339Google Scholar; Bourdieu, Pierre, The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field (Oxford, 1996), 47–112Google Scholar.

15 Erickson, Bonnie H., “What Is Good Taste Good For?” Canadian Review of Anthropology and Sociology 28 (1991): 256Google Scholar.

16 Bubolz, Margaret M., “Family as Source, User and Builder of Social Capital,” Journal of Socio-Economics 30 (2001): 129–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Bourdieu, Pierre, The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature (Oxford, 1993), 74–141Google Scholar.

18 Allen, Douglas E. and Anderson, Paul F., “Consumption and Social Stratification: Bourdieu's Distinction,” Advances in Consumer Research 21 (1994): 70–74Google Scholar.

19 Bourdieu, Distinction, 170; Bourdieu, Pierre, “On the Family as a Realized Category,” Theory, Culture and Society 13 (1996): 26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Bourdieu, Distinction, 171.

21 Ibid., 232–44.

22 Chaney, David, Lifestyles (London, 1996), 56–70Google Scholar.

23 Bourdieu, Distinction, 1–8, 257–396.

24 Ibid., 53–96.

25 Ibid., 55.

26 Wolff, ed., The Sociology of Georg Simmel; Packard, Vance, The Status Seekers: An Exploration of Class Behaviour in America (London, 1960)Google Scholar; Veblen, Leisure Class.

27 Simmel, Georg, “Fashion,” International Quarterly 10 (1904): 137Google Scholar.

28 Turner, Brian S. and Edmunds, June, “The Distaste of Taste: Bourdieu, Cultural Capital and the Australian Postwar Elite,” Journal of Consumer Culture 2 (2002): 231CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Ibid., 232.

30 Bourdieu, Distinction, 226–56; Bourdieu, Rules of Art, 141–73.

31 Bourdieu, Cultural Production, 259–66.

32 Ibid., 318–23; Deleuze, Gilles, Différence et Répétition (Paris, 1969, 2nd ed. 1972), 7Google Scholar.

33 McCracken, Grant, “Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movement of the Cultural Meaning of Goods,” Journal of Consumer Research 13 (1986): 71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Batchelor, Robert, “On the Movement of Porcelains: Rethinking the Birth of Consumer Society as Interactions of Exchange Networks, 1600–1750,” in Consuming Cultures, Global Perspectives: Historical Trajectories, Transnational Exchanges, ed. Brewer, John and Trentmann, Frank (Oxford, 2006), 95–121Google Scholar.

34 Faulkner, Peter, Against the Age: An Introduction to William Morris (London, 1980)Google Scholar.

35 Campbell, Romantic Ethic, 173–201.

36 Harvey and Press, William Morris, 38–42.

37 The Church of England alone spent more than £25 million between 1840 and 1874. U.K. Parliament, House of Commons Papers, Return Showing the Number of Churches (including Cathedrals) in Every Diocese in England, which had been Built or Restored at a Cost Exceeding £500 since the Year 1840 (London, 1876, vol. 58), 553–658Google Scholar; Cornish, F. Warre, The English Church in the Nineteenth Century, 2 vols. (London, 1910), 1Google Scholar: 110–17; Clarke, Basil Fulford Lowther, Church Builders of the Nineteenth Century: A Study of the Gothic Revival in England (London, 1939), 24–30Google Scholar; Brooks, Christopher and Saint, Andrew, eds., The Victorian Church: Architecture and Society (Manchester, 1995)Google Scholar. Nonconformists also invested extensively in building and restoration, and so did the Roman Catholic Church as it moved from emancipation to the reestablishment of an episcopal hierarchy: Cubitt, James, A Popular Handbook of Nonconformist Church Building (London, 1892)Google Scholar; Little, Brian D., Catholic Churches since 1623: A Study of Roman Catholic Churches in England and Wales from Penal Times to the Present Day (London, 1966)Google Scholar; Norman, Edward R., The English Catholic Church in the Nineteenth Century (Oxford, 1984)Google Scholar.

38 In all, the number of residential properties in England and Wales almost doubled between 1851 and 1901, from 3,432,000 to 6,710,000. Mitchell, Brian and Deane, Phyllis, Abstract of British Historical Statistics (Cambridge, U.K., 1971), 6, 239Google Scholar; Powell, Christopher G., An Economic History of the British Building Industry, 1815–1979 (London, 1980)Google Scholar; Best, Geoffrey, Mid-Victorian Britain, 1851–75 (London, 1971)Google Scholar; Thompson, F. Michael L., The Rise of Respectable Society: A Social History of Victorian Britain, 1830–1900 (London, 1988), 166–96Google Scholar; Floud, Roderick, The People and the British Economy, 1830–1914 (Oxford, 1997), 59–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Richards, Commodity Culture, 17–72.

40 We estimate that by the 1870s there were between 4,000 and 5,000 country houses associated with large estates: Wilson, Richard G. and Mackley, Alan L., “How Much did the English Country House Cost to Build, 1660–1880?” Economic History Review 52 (1999): 436–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wilson, Richard G. and Mackley, Alan L., Creating Paradise: The Building of the English Country House, 1160–1880 (London, 2000)Google Scholar; Thompson, Respectable Society, 152–63; Franklin, Jill, The Gentleman's Country House and its Plan, 1835–1914 (London, 1981), 1, 24–38Google Scholar.

41 This statement was made when giving evidence before the British Royal Commission on Technical Instruction, which reported in 1884. In answer to a question on the commercial importance of design, Morris replied that “beauty is a marketable quality, and… the better the work is all round, both as a work of art and in its technique, the more likely it is to find favour with the public.” Parliamentary Papers, c3981, Second Report of the Royal Commissioners on Technical Instruction, Q1580 (London, 1884, vol. 3)Google Scholar.

42 On family and social networking and its importance in American business history, see Laird, Pamela Walker, Pull: Networking and Success since Benjamin Franklin (Cambridge, Mass., 2006), 44–48 and 81–85Google Scholar.

43 Papers relating to the redecoration of St. James's Palace, 1866, WORK 19/129, U.K. Public Record Office; Sheppard, James Edgar, Memorials of St. James's Palace (London, 1894), 126, 370Google Scholar; Mitchell, Charles, “William Morris at St. James's Palace,” Architectural Review 42 (1947): 37–39Google Scholar; Bourgeois, John Y. Le, “Morris & Company at St. James's Palace: A Sequel,” Journal of the William Morris Society 3 (1974): 8Google Scholar.

44 Georgiana Mount-Temple, Memorials [of William Francis Cowper–Temple, Baron Mount–Temple] (London, 1890), 64–65Google Scholar.

45 Erickson, “What Is Good Taste Good For?” 255–78.

46 Diary of Rosalind Howard, J23/102/12, Castle Howard Archives, Yorkshire; Morris & Co. business papers, box 15a/15b, William Morris Gallery, Walthamstow, London; Lethaby, Richard William, Philip Webb and His Work (London, 1935), 88–89Google Scholar; Morris, May, William Morris: Artist, Designer, Socialist (Oxford, 1936), 57Google Scholar; Parry, Linda, William Morris Textiles (London, 1983), 137Google Scholar; Surtees, Victoria, The Artist and the Autocrat: George and Rosalind Howard, Earl and Countess of Carlisle (Wilton, 1988), 89Google Scholar; Dakers, Caroline, Clouds: The Biography of a House (New Haven, Conn., 1993), 43–44Google Scholar.

47 Abdy, Jane and Gere, Christine, The Souls (London, 1984), 82–101Google Scholar.

48 Girouard, Mark, The Victorian Country House (New Haven, Conn., 1979), 80–81Google Scholar; Dakers, Clouds, 63–64.

49 Morris & Co. business papers, box 15a/15b, William Morris Gallery, Walthamstow, London; Lethaby, Philip Webb, 93–95; Morris, William Morris, 58–59; Hopkinson, Diana, “A Passion for Building: The Barings at Membland,” Country Life 29 (1982): 1736–40Google Scholar; Parry, William Morris Textiles, 137–38; Reynolds, Jan, Birket Foster (London, 1984), 84–96Google Scholar; Richard, and Myers, Hilary, William Morris Tiles: Tile Designs of Morris and his Fellow-Workers (Shepton Beauchamp, U.K., 1996), 27–32Google Scholar.

50 Mrs. Barrington, Russell, Life of Walter Bagehot (London, 1914), 412Google Scholar.

51 Bourdieu, Distinction, 230–32.

52 Bourdieu, Cultural Production, 74–111; Bourdieu, Rules of Art, 166–73.

53 On social identity and consumption, see Miller, Daniel, Material Culture and Mass Consumption (Oxford, 1987)Google Scholar. On emotional satisfactions, see Holbrook, Morris B. and Hirschman, Elizabeth C., “The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings and Fun,” Journal of Consumer Research 9 (1982): 132–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 Bourdieu, Distinction, 6.

55 Walter Bagehot to Eliza Bagehot, 20 Nov. 1872, in The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot, vol. 13: Letters, ed. Norman St. John Stevas (London, 1986), 640. For an original discussion of consuming as play, see Holt, Douglas B., “How Consumers Consume: A Typology of Consumption Practices,” Journal of Consumer Research 22 (1995): 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Sir Hardinge, Arthur H., The Life of Henry Howard Molyneux Herbert, Fourth Earl of Carnarvon, 1831–1890, vol. 2 (London, 1925), 323–24Google Scholar.

57 DiMaggio, Paul J., “Classification in Art,” American Sociological Review 52 (1987): 443–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 Erickson, “What is Good Taste Good For?” 275–76.

59 Calhoun, Craig and Wacquant, Loïc, “Social Science with a Conscience: Remembering Pierre Bourdieu (1930–2002),” Thesis Eleven 70 (2002): 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 Bourdieu, Pierre, The Logic of Practice (Cambridge, U.K., 1990), 208Google Scholar.

61 Lazarus, Emma, “A Day in Surrey with William Morris,” Century Magazine 32 (1886): 390–94Google Scholar; Lloyd, Henry Demarest, “A Day with William Morris,” in Mazzini and Other Essays, ed. Lloyd, Henry Demarest (New York, 1910), 42–70Google Scholar.

62 Kelvin, Norman, The Collected Letters of William Morris, vol. 2: 1881–1884 (Princeton, N.J., 1987), 229Google Scholar.

63 Victoria & Albert Museum, Morris & Company brochure (London, 1882).

64 Wardle, George, The Morris Exhibit at the Foreign Fair (Boston, Mass., 1883), 20–21Google Scholar; Harvey and Press, Art, Enterprise and Ethics, 132.

65 Thompson, Edward P., William Morris: Romantic to Revolutionary (London, 1977)Google Scholar.

66 Morris, William, Hopes and Fears for Art (London, 1882)Google Scholar. The volume has been reprinted on numerous occasions down to the present. It contains five essays: “The Lesser Arts,” “The Art of the People,” “The Beauty of Life,” “Making the Best of It,” and “The Prospects of Architecture in Civilization.” Each contributes to Morris's internationally and enduringly influential philosophy of the decorative arts.

67 Rhoda, and Garrett, Agnes, Suggestions for Home Decoration in Painting, Woodwork and Furniture (London, 1876), 7–8Google Scholar.

68 Orrinsmith, Lucy F., The Drawing Room (London, 1877), 1Google Scholar.

69 Forty, Adrian, Objects of Desire: Design and Society, 1750–1980 (London, 1986), 111–12Google Scholar.

70 Conway, Moncure, Travels in South Kensington (London, 1882), 199–210Google Scholar.

71 Harvey, Charles and Press, Jon, “The Ionides Family and 1 Holland Park,” Journal of the Decorative Arts Society 18 (1994): 2–14Google Scholar. Lemere's photographs can be found in London in the collections of the National Monuments Record and the Victoria & Albert Museum. References to the Morris business were by no means confined to treatises on interior design, or to British publications. George du Maurier and Linley Sambourne satirized Morris interiors in Punch, but were themselves clients of the firm. The “Morris look” was entering into contemporary novels: one of the earliest was a sentimental American novel of 1872, Annie Hall Thomas's Maud Mahon, in which one of the characters advised a friend to “make your walls artistic without the aid of pictures” by turning to “Morris Papers.” Faulkner, Against the Age, 73. Enthusiastic endorsements also appeared in more serious American works like Harriet Prescott Spofford's Art Decoration Applied to Furniture (New York, 1877), 147Google Scholar.

72 Trigg, Andrew B., “Veblen, Bourdieu, and Conspicuous Consumption,” Journal of Economic Issues 35 (2001): 113CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

73 DiMaggio, Paul J., “Cultural Entrepreneurship in Nineteenth Century Boston, Part 1: The Creation of an Organizational Base for High Culture in America,” Media, Culture and Society 4 (1982): 33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar; DiMaggio, Paul J., “Cultural Entrepreneurship in Nineteenth Century Boston, Part 2: The Classification and Framing of American Art,” Media, Culture and Society 4 (1982): 303–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74 Kaplan, Wendy and Crawford, Alan, The Arts and Crafts Movement in Europe and America: Design for the Modern World, 1880–1920 (London, 2004)Google Scholar.

75 Naylor, Arts and Crafts Movement; Stansky, Redesigning the World; Cumming and Kaplan, Arts and Crafts Movement.

76 MacDonald, Stuart, The History and Philosophy of Art Education (London, 1970), 292–93Google Scholar; Rubens, Godfrey, William Richard Lethaby: His Life and Work, 1857–1931 (London, 1986), 173–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

77 Watkinson, Ray, William Morris as Designer (London, 1967), 75Google Scholar.

78 Bourdieu, “On the Family,” 285–312.

79 Giddens, Anthony, The Constitution of Society (Cambridge, U.K., 1984), 16–28Google Scholar; DiMaggio, Paul J. and Powell, Walter W., “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review 48 (1983): 47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar; DiMaggio, “Classification in Art.”

80 Pevsner, Nikolaus, Pioneers of Modern Design: From William Morris to Walter Gropius, revised ed. (London, 2005), 12–57Google Scholar.

81 Chaney, David, Lifestyles (London, 1996): 155–57Google Scholar.

82 Our argument is consistent with that of Campbell, Colin, “Conspicuous Confusion? A Critique of Veblen's Theory of Conspicuous Consumption,” Sociological Theory 13 (1995): 37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

83 This echoes the observations made with respect to Parisian fashion by Blumer, Herbert, “Fashion: From Class Differentiation to Collective Selection,” Sociological Quarterly 10 (1969): 275–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84 The erosion of personal agency in cultural theory is held by some to be at its most pronounced in the work of Pierre Bourdieu; see Gartman, David, “Culture as Class Symbolization or Mass Reification? A Critique of Bourdieu's Distinction,” American Journal of Sociology 97 (1991): 421–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

85 Pevsner, Pioneers of Modern Design, 12–33.