Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:33:10.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Speaking With the Other and Not Only About the Other: Reflections for a Postcolonial Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2020

Luana Carla Martins Campos Akinruli Open the ORCID record for Luana Carla Martins Campos Akinruli [Opens in a new window]
Luana Carla Martins Campos Akinruli*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Inovação Social e Diversidade Cultural (INSOD), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil & Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Laboratório de Arqueologia Histórica, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas (FAFICH), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil E-mail: luanacampos@insod.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This text proposes to provoke an interdisciplinary reflection on alterity as challenged through investigations in archaeology. It intends to analyse the process of archaeological practice in a contemporary Latin American context. Archaeological practice configures criteria for selecting a specific cultural heritage collection, and in turn, this reflects what should be forgotten or what has the right to be remembered by the society. It also aims to contribute to the speech practice and audience of the subjects, in order to problematize the experience of research and the researcher through ethnography and discussions in the postcolonial archaeology; these could promote a point of schism where paradigms for archaeological studies may reach a breaking point.

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , November 2020 , pp. 571 - 586
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akinruli, L.C.M.C., 2018a. A desconstrução do esquecimento em contexto de conflito ambiental: arqueologia e etnografia da comunidade de Miguel Burnier, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais [The deconstruction of amnesia in environmental conflict context: archaeology and ethnography of the community of Miguel Burnier, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais]. PhD thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google Scholar
Akinruli, L.C.M.C., 2018b. Palimpsestos da memória: arqueologia da mineração e da siderurgia em Minas Gerais, Brasil (séculos XVIII–XXI) [Palimpsests of memory: mining and steel archaeology in Minas Gerais, Brazil (18th–21st Centuries)], in Memoria del 56° Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, eds Alcántara, M., García Montero, M. & Sánchez López, F.. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, 1160–75.Google Scholar
Akinruli, S.A., 2017. Geoprocessamento para a análise das dinâmicas geoespaciais e temporais do patrimônio cultural do distrito de Miguel Burnier, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais [Geographic Information System for the analysis of geospatial and temporal dynamics of the cultural heritage of Miguel Burnier district, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais]. Postgraduate monograph, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A., 1997. Soberania sem territorialidade: notas para uma geografia pós-nacional [Sovereignty without territoriality: notes for a postnational geography]. Novos Estudos Cebrap 49, 7–32.Google Scholar
Arango, V.M., 2007. El mapa de lo invisible. Silencios y gramática del poder en la cartografía [The map of the invisible. Silences and grammar of power in cartography]. Universitas Humanística 63, 155–79.Google Scholar
Asad, T. (ed.), 1973. Anthropology & The Colonial Encounter. New York (NY): Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Atalay, S., Clauss, L.R., McGuire, R.H. & Welch, J.R. (eds), 2014. Transforming Archaeology: Activist practices and prospects. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Ballestrin, L., 2013. América Latina e o giro decolonial [Latin America and the decolonial turn]. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política 11, 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhabha, H.K., 2001. O Local da Cultura [The location of culture]. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Canuto, M.-A. & Yaeger, J. (eds), 2000. Archaeology of Communities: A New World perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Costa, S., 2006. Dois Atlânticos: Teoria social, anti-racismo e cosmopolitismo [Two Atlantics: social theory, anti-racism and cosmopolitanism]. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Crapanzano, V., 1977. On the writing of ethnography. Dialectical Anthropology 1–4(2), 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E.E., 1956. Nuer Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fabian, J., 2002. Time and the Other: How anthropology makes its object (2nd edn). New York (NY): Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Funari, P.P.A., Orser, C.E. Jr & Schiavetto, S.N.O. (eds), 2001. Identidades, discurso e poder: Estudos da arqueologia contemporânea [Identities, discourse and power: studies of contemporary archaeology]. São Paulo: Annablume/FAPESP.Google Scholar
Geertz, C., 2001. Nova Luz sobre a Antropologia [Available light: anthropological reflections on philosophical topics]. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editora.Google Scholar
Gillings, M., Hacıgüzeller, P. & Lock, G. (eds), 2018. Re-Mapping Archaeology: Critical perspectives, alternative mappings. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Given, M., 2004. The Archaeology of the Colonized. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnecco, C., 2002. La indigenización de las arqueologías nacionales [The indigenization of national archaeologies]. Convergencia 27, 133–49.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Ruibal, A., 2012. Hacia otra arqueología. Diez propuestas [Towards another archaeology. Ten proposals]. Complutum 23(2), 103–16.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Ruibal, A., 2018. An Archaeology of the Contemporary Era. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordillo, G.R., 2014. Rubble: The afterlife of destruction. Durham/London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Haber, A.F., 2011. La casa, las cosas y los dioses: arquitectura doméstica, paisaje campesino y teoria local [House, things and gods: domestic architecture, peasant landscape and local theory]. Córdoba: Encuentro Grupo Editor.Google Scholar
Haber, A.F., 2013. Anatomía disciplinaria y arqueología indisciplinada [Disciplinary anatomy and undisciplined archaeology]. Arqueología 19, 53–60.Google Scholar
Hall, S., 2003. Da Diáspora: identidades e mediações culturais [From the Diaspora: identities and cultural mediations]. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 2000. The Perception of the Environment. Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kopenawa, D. & Albert, B., 2013. The Falling Sky: Words of a Yanomami shaman. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lydon, J. & Rizvi, U.Z. (eds), 2010. Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B., [1922] 1978. Argonautas do Pacífico Ocidental: um relato do empreendimento e da aventura dos nativos nos arquipélagos da Nova Guiné [Argonauts of the Western Pacific: an account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea]. São Paulo: Abril.Google Scholar
Marín-Aguilera, B., 2018. Distorted narratives: Morocco, Spain, and the colonial stratigraphy of cultural heritage. Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress 14(3), 472–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignolo, W.D., 2008. Desobediência epistêmica: a opção descolonial e o significado de identidade em política (Epistemic disobedience: the decolonial option and the meaning of identity in politics). Cadernos de Letras da UFF – Dossiê: Literatura, língua e identidade 34, 287–324.Google Scholar
Oland, M., Hart, S.M. & Frink, L. (eds), 2012. Decolonizing Indigenous Histories: Exploring prehistoric/colonial transitions in archaeology. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Oliveira, J.E. de, 2016. Descolonizando a arqueologia no Brasil: contribuições da etnoarqueologia para a compreensão e preservação de cemitérios indígenas no estado de Mato Grosso do Sul [Decolonizing archaeology in Brazil: ethnoarcheology's contributions to the understanding and preservation of indigenous cemeteries in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul]. Cuadernos del Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano – Series Especiales 2, 217–30.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A.R., 2013. Estrutura e Função na Sociedade Primitiva [Structure and function in primitive society] (2nd edn). Petrópolis: Vozes.Google Scholar
Read, K.E., 1965. The High Valley. New York (NY): Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rocha, B.C. da, Jácome, C., Mongeló, G.Z., Stuchi, F.F. & Valle, R., 2013. Arqueologia pelas gentes: um manifesto. Constatações e posicionamentos críticos sobre a Arqueologia brasileira em tempos de PAC [Archaeology for the people: a manifesto. Critical findings and positions about Brazilian archaeology in PAC times]. Revista de Arqueologia 26(1), 130–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabloff, J.A., 2016. Archaeology Matters. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, M., 1997a. O ‘pessimismo sentimental’ e a experiência etnográfica: por que a cultura não é um ‘objeto’ em via de extinção (Parte I) [‘Sentimental pessimism’ and ethnographic experience: why culture is not an endangered ’object’ (Part I)]. Mana 3(1), 41–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, M., 1997b. O ‘pessimismo sentimental’ e a experiência etnográfica: por que a cultura não é um ‘objeto’ em via de extinção (Parte II) [‘Sentimental pessimism’ and ethnographic experience: why culture is not an endangered ’object’ (Part II)]. Mana 3(1), 103–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, M., 2004. Esperando o Foucault, ainda [Waiting for Foucault]. São Paulo: Cosac & Naify.Google Scholar
Said, E., 1990. Orientalismo: o Oriente como invenção do Ocidente [Orientalism]. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
Schmidt, P.R. & Pikirayi, I., 2018. Will historical archaeology escape its western prejudices to become relevant to Africa? Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress 14(3), 443–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, M. & Mcguire, R.H., 2000. The craft of archaeology, in Interpretive Archaeology: A reader, ed. Thomas, J.. London: Leicester University Press, 56–70.Google Scholar
Smith, L.T., 2012. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York (NY): Zed Books.Google Scholar
Spivak, G.C., 2010. Pode o Subalterno Falar? [Can the subaltern speak?]. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Steeves, P.F., 2015. Decolonizing the past and present of the western hemisphere (the Americas). Archaeologies 11(1), 42–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yúdice, G., 2004. A conveniência da cultura: usos da cultura na era global [The convenience of culture: uses of culture in the global age]. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar