Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:38:48.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Writing, Literacy, and Performance in the New and Old Worlds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2009

Joyce Marcus
Joyce Marcus
Affiliation:
Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , October 1995 , pp. 325 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ascher, M. & Ascher, R., 1981. Code of the Quipu: a Study in Media, Mathematics, and Culture. Ann Arbor (MI): The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Baines, J., 1983. Literacy and ancient Egyptian society. Man 18, 572–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumann, G. (ed.), 1986. The Written Word: Literacy in Transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boone, E.H., 1991. Migration histories as ritual performance, in To Change Place: Aztec Ceremonial Landscapes, ed. Carrasco, D.. Niwot (CO): University Press of Colorado, 121–51.Google Scholar
Brown, C.H., 1991. Hieroglyphic literacy in ancient Mayaland: inferences from linguistic data. Current Anthropology 32, 489–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1950. The urban revolution. Town Planning Review 21, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFrancis, J., 1989. Visible Speech: the Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems. Honolulu (HI): University of Hawaii Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diringer, D., 1962. Writing. New York (NY): Praeger.Google Scholar
Dorr, A., 1994. What constitutes literacy in a culture with diverse and changing means of communication?, in Literacy: Interdisciplinary Conversations, ed. Keller-Cohen, D.. Cresskill (NJ): Hampton Press, 129–53.Google Scholar
Ekvall, R.B., 1964. Religious Observances in Tibet: Patterns and Function. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Finnegan, R.H., 1988. Literacy and Orality: Studies in the Technology of Communication. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Furst, J., 1978. Codex Vindobonensis Mexicanus I: a Commentary. Albany (NY): Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Gelb, I.J., 1963. A Study of Writing. Revised edition. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gillespie, S., 1989. The Aztec Kings: the Construction of Rulership in Mexican History. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J. (ed.), 1968. Literacy in Traditional Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J., 1986. The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, J., 1987. The interface between the Written and the Oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, D.D., 1994. Literacy, culture, and authority, in Literacy: Interdisciplinary Conversations, ed. Keller-Cohen, D.. Cresskill (NJ): Hampton Press, 177–91.Google Scholar
Harris, W.V., 1989. Ancient Literacy. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havelock, E.A., 1963. Preface to Plato. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havelock, E.A., 1966. Preliteracy and the presocratics. Institute of Classical Studies Bulletin 13, 44–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havelock, E.A., 1973. Prologue to Greek literacy. University of Cincinnati Classical Studies II, 331–91.Google Scholar
Havelock, E.A., 1976. Origins of Western Literacy. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A., 1980. The oral composition of Greek drama. Quaderni Urbanati di Cultura Classica 35, 61–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havelock, E.A., 1982. The Literate Revolution in Greece and its Cultural Consequences. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Havelock, E.A., 1984. The orality of Socrates and the literacy of Plato, in New Essays on Socrates, ed. Kelly, E.. Washington (DC): University Press of America, 67–93.Google Scholar
Havelock, E.A., 1986. The Muse Learns to Write: Reflections on Orality and Literacy from Antiquity to the Present. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Keller-Cohen, D. (ed.), 1994. Literacy: Interdisciplinary Conversations. Cresskill (NJ): Hampton Press.Google Scholar
King, M.B., 1982. Historical Metaphor and the Communication of Legitimacy in the Mixteca 500 BC–AD 1500. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
King, M.B., 1988. Mixtec Political Ideology: Historical Metaphors and the Poetics of Political Symbolism. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
King, M.B., 1990. Poetics and metaphor in Mixtec writing. Ancient Mesoamerica 1, 141–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
León-Portilla, M., 1969. Pre-Columbian Literatures of Mexico. Norman (OK): University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1968. Tristes Tropiques. (English trans.) New York (NY): Atheneum.Google Scholar
Lizana, B. de, 1893 [1633]. Historia de Yucatan. Mexico: Imprenta del Museo Nacional.Google Scholar
Locke, L.L., 1923. The Ancietil Quipu or Peruvian Knot Record. New York (NY): American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Lord, A.B., 1953. Homer's originality: oral dictated texts? Transactions of the American Philological Association 84, 124–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, A.B., 1960. The Singer of Tales. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lord, A.B., 1967. Homer as an oral poet. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 72, 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, J., 1976. The origins of Mesoamerican writing. Annual Review of Anthropology 5, 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, J., 1992. Mesoamerican Writing Systems: Propaganda, Myth, and History in Four Ancient Civilizations. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Michalowski, P., 1994. Writing and literacy in early states: a Mesopotamianist perspective, in Literacy: Interdisciplinary Conversations, ed. Keller-Cohen, D.. Cresskill (NJ): Hampton Press, 49–70.Google Scholar
Mignolo, W.D., 1994. Literacy and the colonization of memory: writing histories of people without history, in Literacy: Interdisciplinary Conversations, ed. Keller-Cohen, D.. Cresskill (NJ): Hampton Press, 91–113.Google Scholar
Monaghan, J., 1990. Performance and the structure of the Mixtec codices. Ancient Mesoamerica 1, 133–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murra, J.V. & Morris, C., 1976. Dynastic oral tradition, administrative records and archaeology in the Andes. World Archaeology 7(3), 269–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, W.J., 1967. The Presence of the Word. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ong, W.J., 1977. Interfaces of the Word: Studies in the Evolution of Consciousness and Culture. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ong, W.J., 1982. Orality and Literacy. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, W.J., 1986. Writing is a technology that restructures thought, in The Written Word: Literacy in Transition, ed. Baumann, G.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 23–50.Google Scholar
Parry, M., 1930. Studies in the epic technique of oral verse-making I: Homer and the Homeric style. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 41, 73–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, M., 1932. Studies in the epic technique of oral verse-making II: The Homeric language as the language of an oral poetry. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 43, 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohl, J.M.D., 1994. The Politics of Symbolism in the Mixtec Codices. (Vanderbilt Publications in Anthropology, No. 46.) Nashville (TN): Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
Schousboe, K. & Larsen, M.T. (eds.), 1989. Literacy and Society. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Smith, M.E., 1994. Why the second Codex Seiden was painted, in Caciques and their People: a Volume in Honor of Ronald Spores, eds. Marcus, J. & Zeitlin, J.. (Anthropological Paper 89.) Ann Arbor (MI): Museum of Anthropology, 111–41.Google Scholar
Street, B.V., 1984. Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Street, B.V. (ed.), 1993. Cross-cultural Approaches to Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, R., 1989. Oral Tradition and Written Record in Classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R., 1992. Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D.J., 1994. Conquest and literacy: the case of Ptolemaic Egypt, in Literacy: Interdisciplinary Conversations, ed. Keller-Cohen, D.. Cresskill (NJ): Hampton Press, 71–89.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.E.S., 1972. A Commentary on the Dresden Codex: a Maya Hieroglyphic Book. Philadelphia (PA): American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.E.S., 1973. The Maya glyph for capture or conquest and an iconographie representation of Itzam Na on Yucatecan façades. Contributions to the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 18, 203–7.Google Scholar
Tozzer, A.M., 1941. Landa's Relación de las Cosas de Yucatan: a Translation. (Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology 18.) Cambridge (MA): Harvard University.Google Scholar
Vansina, J., 1985. Oral Tradition as History. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Wrolstad, M.E. & Fisher, D.F. (eds.), 1985. Toward a New Understanding of Literacy. New York (NY): Praeger.Google Scholar