Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:12:17.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Third Meeting1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2015

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Michaelmas Term, 1906
Information
Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society (First Series) , Volume 73 , 1906 , pp. 15 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 1906

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 17 note 1 Professor Skeat writes to me: “The argument about German zu is not to the point. The u in original German thŭ was short. In English it was made long and became thū; and so it became thou, just as hūs became house. But in German it remained short; else the modern word would be dau, just as hus has become haus.”

page 17 note 2 Note that Rous rhymed out with wrought (lviii 2), and wrought with aloft (xxxiii 3, 4).