Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:59:07.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Remarks on Inclusive Comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2018

Abstract

At the center of Joseph Slaughter’s important address is the question of inclusion. It appears in the phrase “inclusive comparison.” The remark he makes in a footnote about “non-privileged (generally minor and/or minority) commentators in the world of letters who compared literature from marginal places to the literature from Europe” is particularly interesting as it speaks of pioneers of sort who dared to take seriously the “exhortation to compare” beyond established and conventional borders and bring into the literary conversation other literatures. I would like to develop a few reflections inspired to me by the notion of “inclusive comparison” by examining first the very concept of “comparison” and by considering the lessons to be drawn from the works of a couple of pioneers of “inclusive comparison” bringing in African literature: Abbé Grégoire and Blaise Cendrars.

Type
Opinion Papers (Paradigm Response)
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Of course, I have in mind here, the well-known declaration by Etiemble that “comparative literature is humanism.”

2 The narrative, told by Sainte-Beuve, is reported in Pageaux, Daniel-Henri, La littérature générale et comparée (Paris: Armand Colin, 1994)Google Scholar.