Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:21:49.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Semi-Peripheral Novel: Narrating the Neoliberal Present from Southern India and Southern Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2020

Gabriele Lazzari Open the ORCID record for Gabriele Lazzari [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This articles intervenes in current debates about the configuration of the contemporary literary system and argues that works coming from the intermediate formation of the semi-periphery can most lucidly register how neoliberalism has transformed the social, economic, and affective structures of the historical present. Drawing on postcolonial criticism, world-systems theory, and theories of combined and uneven development, I propose a comparative study of two novels originating from southern India and southern Italy, Vivek Shanbhag’s Ghachar Ghochar (2013) and Nicola Lagioia’s La Ferocia (2014). By analyzing how residual forces—patriarchy, gender violence, and familism—interact with processes of market neoliberalization and environmental destruction, this article further suggests that only the formal study of novels from semi-peripheral areas can problematize current critical paradigms based on binary oppositions (center/periphery, North/South). To do so, I develop a systemic approach that is attentive to how contextual specificities produce formal outcomes that can best diagnose global socioeconomic inequalities.

Keywords

semi-peripheryIndiaItalyneoliberalismworld-systemcontemporary novelspace
Type
Articles
Information
Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 39 - 59
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Esty and Lye’s introductory essay to a special issue of Modern Language Quarterly on peripheral realism. Esty, Jed and Lye, Colleen, “Peripheral Realisms Now,” Modern Language Quarterly 73.3 (2012): 269–88 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Esty, and Lye, , “Peripheral Realisms Now,” 273.Google Scholar

3 For a thorough recapitulation of these divergent positions, see Palumbo-Liu, David, Robbins, Bruce, and Tanoukhi, Nirvana, eds., Immanuel Wallerstein and the Problem of the World. System, Scale, Culture (Durham: Duke University Press, 2011), 1–26.Google Scholar

4 Shanbhag, Vivek, Ghachar Ghochar, trans. Perur, Srinath (New York: Penguin, 2017)Google Scholar; Lagioia, Nicola, Ferocity, trans. Shugaar, Anthony (New York: Europa Editions, 2017).Google Scholar

5 In a 1976 article tellingly titled “Semi-Peripheral Countries and the Contemporary World Crisis,” Wallerstein had intuited that it was in those intermediate spaces that new configurations of the world-system could emerge. As US hegemony was waning and the Socialist bloc was breaking apart, Wallerstein saw in semiperipheral nations a dynamism that was absent elsewhere: because of the distinctiveness of “their internal politics and their social structure,” Wallerstein argued, “their ability to take advantage of the flexibilities offered by the downturns of economic activity is in general greater than that of either the core or the peripheral countries.” Wallerstein, Immanuel, “Semi-Peripheral Countries and the Contemporary World Crisis,” Theory and Society 3.4 (1976): 463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Warwick Research Collective (WReC), Combined and Uneven Development: Towards a New Theory of World-Literature (Liverpool, England: Liverpool University Press, 2015), 123–24 (italics in original).Google Scholar

7 Dainotto, Roberto, Europe (In Theory) (Durham: Duke University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

8 On the peculiarities of India’s literary field, see Orsini, Francesca, “India in the Mirror of World Fiction,” New Left Review 13 (2002): 75–88.Google Scholar

9 Dainotto, Roberto, “Does Europe Have a South?” The Global South 5.1 (2011): 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 For an exhaustive review of the most important contributions to this field of study, see Lombardi-Diop, Cristina and Romeo, Caterina, eds., Postcolonial Italy: Challenging National Homogeneity (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Gramsci, Antonio, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, eds. and trans. Hoare, Quentin and Smith, Geoffrey Nowell (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1971): 269.Google Scholar

12 Gramsci, , Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 233.Google Scholar

13 Verdicchio, Pasquale, “The Preclusion of Postcolonial Discourse in Southern Italy,” in Revisioning Italy: National Identity and Global Culture, eds. Beverly Allen and Mary Russo (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997): 197.Google Scholar

14 Lombardi-Diop, and Romeo, , Postcolonial Italy, 4.Google Scholar

15 Lombardi-Diop, and Romeo, , Postcolonial Italy, 5.Google Scholar

16 From Pascale Casanova’s seminal work to the Warwick Research Collective’s theory of combined and uneven development. See Casanova, Pascale, The World Republic of Letters, trans. DeBevoise, M. B. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

17 Moretti, Franco, Modern Epic: The World-System from Goethe to García Márquez, trans. Hoare, Quintin (London, England: Verso, 1996), 50.Google Scholar

18 Esty, and Lye, , “Peripheral Realisms Now,” 280.Google Scholar

19 Jameson, Fredric, “Antinomies of the Realism-Modernism Debate,” Modern Language Quarterly, 73.3 (2012): 480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Jameson, , “Antinomies of the Realism-Modernism Debate,” 480.Google Scholar

21 Johansen, Emily and Karl, Alissa G., “Introduction: Reading and Writing in the Economic Present,” Textual Practice 29.2 (2008): 203.Google Scholar

22 For a discussion of the geographically uneven effects of neoliberalism, see Harvey, David, A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), chap. 4.Google Scholar

23 Elliot, Jane and Harkin, Gillian, “Introduction: Genres of Neoliberalism,” Social Text 115.31 (2013): 2.Google Scholar

24 Kotsko, Adam, Neoliberalism’s Demons: On the Political Theology of Late Capitalism (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2018), 6. Discussing Silvia Federici’s work on the consequences of the World Bank’s Structural Adjustment Program in Nigeria, Kotsko adds that neoliberalism is “not an economic as opposed to social process, nor is it a process that seeks only to destroy society and get it out of the way. Rather, it is an equally economic and social process that actively seeks to reshape society into a form that can support and reproduce capitalist relations, using coercive as well as discursive forces (such as moral exhortation or scapegoating)” (76).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Huehls, Mitchum and Smith, Rachel Greenwald, eds., Neoliberalism and Contemporary Literary Culture (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

26 On the contrary, as David Harvey argues, neoliberalism is an economic, political, and conceptual apparatus developed in globally diffused institutional and academic circles, and first concretely enforced in Chile, after Pinochet’s coup in 1973. When it was exported to the United States in the 1980s, “a brutal experiment carried out in the periphery became a model for the formulation of policies in the centre” (9).

27 Brouillette, Sarah, “Neoliberalism and the Demise of the Literary,” in Neoliberalism and Contemporary Literary Culture, eds. Huehls, Mitchum and Smith, Rachel Greenwald (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2017), 277.Google Scholar

28 Kuruvilla, Elizabeth and Shanbhag, Vivek, “Translating Ananthamurthy Is a Political Act: Vivek Shanbhag,” Livemint, February 25, 2016 [www.livemint.com/Leisure/0GIJaFUFuqqTxpmAkRhUBJ/Translating-Ananthamurthy-is-a-political-act-Vivek-Shanbhag.html].Google Scholar

29 Deepa Ganesh writes that Shanbhag’s “control over style and technique … open up his vision of life” (Deepa Ganesh, “To See Beyond Sense,” The Hindu, January 8, 2013 [www.thehindu.com/features/metroplus/to-see-beyond-sense/article4286789.ece 2013]) and adds that Shanbhag “marks the quiet human aspiration to move towards a cosmopolitan identity, but at the same time longs to reclaim the creative energies embedded in the past” (Ganesh, Deepa, “Beyond Space and Self,” The Hindu, March 29, 2013 [www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-fridayreview/beyond-space-and-self/article4560197.ece 2013]).Google Scholar

30 Shanbhag, , Ghachar Ghochar, 69.Google Scholar

31 Sehgal, Parul, “A Great Indian Novel Reaches American Shores,” New York Times, April 6, 2017, 27.Google Scholar

32 Rajan, Sujeet, “ Ghachar Ghochar Book Review: Tightly-Woven Novel Is a Terrific Read,” News India Times, March 10, 2017, 24.Google Scholar

33 In one of the most ideologically explicit passages, the narrator pontificates: “It’s true what they say—it’s not we who control money, it’s the money that controls us. When there’s only a little, it behaves meekly; when it grows, it becomes brash and has its way with us. Money had swept us up and flung us in the midst of a whirlwind” (Shanbhag, , Ghachar Ghochar, 53).Google Scholar

34 Shanbhag, , Ghachar Ghochar, 61.Google Scholar

35 Harvey, , A Brief History of Neoliberalism, 2.Google Scholar

36 Kotsko, Adam, Neoliberalism’s Demons: On the Political Theology of Late Capitalism (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2018), 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37 Shanbhag, , Ghachar Ghochar, 60.Google Scholar

38 On the intersections of gender, sexuality, and nation-building, see Parker, Andrew, Russo, Mary, Sommer, Doris, and Yaeger, Patricia, Nationalisms and Sexualities (New York: Routledge, 1991)Google Scholar; McClintock, Anne, Imperial Leather. Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest (New York: Routledge, 1995)Google Scholar; and Yuval-Davis, Nira, Gender and Nation (New York: Sage Publications, 1997).Google Scholar

39 Contemporary feminist scholarship on South Asia has shown how current political formations and social movements are, not without profound contradictions, challenging hegemonic constructions of gender. See, in particular, Loomba, Ania and Lukose, Ritty A., eds., South Asian Feminisms: Contemporary Interventions (Durham: Duke University Press, 2015)Google Scholar; and Roy, Srila, ed., New South Asian Feminisms. Paradoxes and Possibilities (London, England: Zed Books, 2012).Google Scholar

40 Oza, Rupal, The Making of Neoliberal India: Nationalism, Gender, and the Paradoxes of Globalization (New York: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

41 Shanbhag, , Ghachar Ghochar, 11.Google Scholar

42 Shanbhag, , Ghachar Ghochar, 39.Google Scholar

43 Shanbhag, , Ghachar Ghochar, 17.Google Scholar

44 Shanbhag, , Ghachar Ghochar, 17.Google Scholar

45 Relatedly, Anita Loomba and Ritty A. Lukose note that scholarship on contemporary communal violence in South East Asia “has shown that women are not just targets of violence but also passionate advocates of the ideology of community, honor, shame, revenge, and masculinity that shape such violence” (Loomba, and Lukose, , South Asian Feminisms, 10).Google Scholar

46 Shanbhag, , Ghachar Ghochar, 18.Google Scholar

47 The notion of structure of feeling, developed by Raymond Williams, is particularly adequate here because it stresses the “specifically affective elements of consciousness and relationship” (Williams, Raymond, Marxism and Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1977, 132) as they are actively experienced in social practices—in Ghachar Ghochar’s case, within the microdynamics of the narrator’s family. Williams considers this notion—rather than “more formal concepts” (132) such as worldview or ideology—key to his understanding of social experience as something that is affectively lived in a nonfixed, dynamic, and contradictory process.Google Scholar

48 Shanbhag, , Ghachar Ghochar, 99.Google Scholar

49 Shanbhag, , Ghachar Ghochar, 100.Google Scholar

50 Shanbhag, , Ghachar Ghochar, 100.Google Scholar

51 Giorgi, Gabriel, “Improper Selves: Cultures of Precarity,” Social Text 115.31 (2013): 71.Google Scholar

52 Shanbhag, , Ghachar Ghochar, 23.Google Scholar

53 Shanbhag, , Ghachar Ghochar, 90.Google Scholar

54 Lagioia, , Ferocity, 17.Google Scholar

55 For an analysis of Lagioia’s cinematic style, see Quattrocentoquattro, “#Strega 2015. Nicola Lagioia, La ferocia ,” 404: file not found, June 19, 2015 (quattrocentoquattro.com/2015/06/19/strega2015-nicola-lagioia-la-ferocia/).Google Scholar

56 Sebastian Sarti, “Modern Italy Is a Corrupt Dystopia in ‘Ferocity,’” Chicago Review of Books, November 10, 2017 (chireviewofbooks.com/2017/11/10/ferocity-nicola-lagioia-review/); Deborah E. Kennedy, “Paving Paradise: The Beauty and Terror of Nicola Lagioia’s ‘Ferocity,’” Los Angeles Review of Books, October 18, 2017 (lareviewofbooks.org/article/paving-paradise-the-beauty-and-terror-of-nicola-lagioias-ferocity/#).

57 On the ways in which contemporary authors of literary fiction use tropes and plot devices from popular genres while being deeply invested in signaling the literariness of their own creations, see Rosen, Jeremy, “Literary Fiction & the Genres of Genre Fiction,” Post45, August 7, 2018 (post45.research.yale.edu/2018/08/literary-fiction-and-the-genres-of-genre-fiction/). Rosen argues that “as formal experimentation, stylish writing that avoids cliché, and social acumen are prized in the subfield of literary fiction, writers who want to adopt popular genres but gain literary prestige can strategically deploy these features, along with other literary markers such as high degree of allusiveness, a thematizing of readers and reading, and other self-reflexive attempts to distance ‘serious’ literary production from commerce.”Google Scholar

58 WReC, Combined and Uneven Development, 11.Google Scholar

59 WReC, Combined and Uneven Development, 68.Google Scholar

60 WReC, Combined and Uneven Development, 65.Google Scholar

61 Huehls, and Smith, , Neoliberalism and Contemporary Literary Culture, 9.Google Scholar

62 For an introduction to the history of Ilva and to the environmental impact of its activities, see the dossier commissioned by the European Parliament’s Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (Grazia Maria Vagliasindi and Christiane Gerstetter, “The Ilva Industrial Site in Taranto,” European Parliament’s Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, 2015 [http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2015/563471/IPOL_IDA(2015)563471_EN.pdf. 2015]). Ilva’s violations of environmental laws and their effects on the local population had been denounced for years by Italian journalist Alessandro Leogrande, whose articles on this issue have been recently collected. See Leogrande, Alessandro, Dalle macerie. Cronache sul fronte meridionale (Milano, Italy: Feltrinelli, 2018).Google Scholar

63 Lagioia, , Ferocity, 350.Google Scholar

64 Kurnick, David, “More Talk: A Response,” ASAP Journal, July 23, 2017 (asapjournal.com/more-talk-a-response-david-kurnick/).Google Scholar

65 Lagioia, , Ferocity, 14.Google Scholar

66 Corso, Raffaele, “Omertà,” Enciclopedia Italiana Treccani, 1935 (http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/omerta_%28Enciclopedia-Italiana%29/).Google Scholar

67 Oxford English Dictionary, “Omertà,” OED Third Edition, March 2004.Google Scholar

68 Lagioia, , Ferocity, 440.Google Scholar

69 Auerbach, Eric, Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, trans. Willard R. Trask (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1954), 473.Google Scholar

70 Auerbach, , Mimesis, 473.Google Scholar

71 Lagioia, , Ferocity, 39-40.Google Scholar

72 Auerbach, , Mimesis, 473.Google Scholar

73 Lagioia, , Ferocity, 323.Google Scholar

74 Lagioia, , Ferocity, 327.Google Scholar

75 Lagioia, , Ferocity, 445.Google Scholar

76 Nilges, Mathias, “Fictions of Neoliberalism: Contemporary Realism and the Temporality of Postmodernism’s Ends,” in Neoliberalism and Contemporary Literary Culture, eds. Huehls, Mitchum and Smith, Rachel Greenwald (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2017), 108.Google Scholar

77 I took the liberty to translate incubo mafioso as “criminal nightmare”; the literal translation would be “Mafia nightmare” because Cassano is here specifically thinking about the Italian South and using the Mafia as the paradigmatic criminal organization. Cassano, Franco, Il pensiero meridiano (Bari, Italy: Laterza, 2005), 6.Google Scholar

78 Cassano, , Il pensiero meridiano, 6.Google Scholar

79 Dainotto, Roberto, “South by Chance: Southern Questions on the Global South,” The Global South 11.2 (2017): 49.Google Scholar

80 Lagioia, Ferocity, 386. When presenting his novel, Lagioia has reiterated the same concept, this time linking La Ferocia’s narrative spaces to “any South of the world” and citing the literary Souths of William Faulkner, Gabriel García Márquez, and Malcolm Lowry. See Lagioia, Nicola, “Nicola Lagioia racconta La ferocia ,” Letteratiudinenews, October 11, 2014 (letteratitudinenews.wordpress.com/2014/10/11/nicola-lagioia-racconta-la-ferocia/).Google Scholar

81 Dainotto, , “South by Chance,” 46.Google Scholar

82 Levander, Caroline and Mignolo, Walter, “Introduction: The Global South and World Dis/Order,” The Global South 5.11 (2011): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

83 Lagioia, , Ferocity, 352–53.Google Scholar