No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
An Ethical Case for Medical Scribes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2022
Abstract
This article addresses ethical concerns with the use of electronic health records (EHRs) by physicians in clinical practice. It presents arguments for two claims. First, requiring physicians to maintain patient EHRs for medically unnecessary tasks is likely contributing to increased burnout, decreased quality of care, and potential risks to patient safety. Second, medical institutions have ethical reasons to employ medical scribes to maintain patient EHRs. Finally, this article reviews central objections to employing medical scribes and provides responses to each.
- Type
- Departments and Columns
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Notes
1. United States Government, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. What are the Differences Between Electronic Medical Records, Electronic Health Records, and Personal Health Records? 2019; available at https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-are-differences-between-electronic-medical-records-electronic-health-records-and-personal (last accessed 5 May 2020).
2. New England Journal of Medicine Catalyst. What is Patient-Centered Care? 2017; available at https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.17.0559 (last accessed 5 May 2020).
3. Epstein, R, Street, R. The values and value of patient-centered care. Annals of Family Medicine 2011;9(2):100–3, at 100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. See note 3, Epstein, Street 2011, at 100.
5. Beauchamp, T, Childress, J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013:107.Google Scholar
6. Suchman, AL, Markakis, K, Beckman, HB, Frankel, R. A model of empathic communication in the medical interview. Journal of the American Medical Association 1997;277:678–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Roter, DL, Hall, JA, Merisca, R, Nordstrom, B, Cretin, D, Svarstad, B. Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient compliance: A meta-analysis. Medical Care 1998;36:1138–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Attar, H, Chandramani, S. Impact of physician empathy on migraine disability and migraineur compliance. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology 2012;15: 89–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Rakel, D, Hoeft, T, Barrett, B, Chewning, B, Craig, B, Niu, M. Practitioner empathy and the duration of the common cold. Family Medicine 2009;41:494–501.Google ScholarPubMed
10. Mercer, SW, Neumann, M, Wirtz, M, Fitzpatrick, B, Vojt, G. General practitioner empathy, patient enablement, and patient-reported outcomes in primary care in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland—A pilot prospective study using structural equation modelling. Patient Education and Counseling 2008;73:240–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Fix, GM, Van Deusen Lukas, C, Bolton, RE, Hill, JN, Mueller, N, SL, LaVela, et al. Patient-centred care is a way of doing things: How healthcare employees conceptualize patient-centred care. Health Expectations 2018;21(1):300–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. United States Government, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Office-based Physician Electronic Health Record Adoption; 2017; available at dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/physician-ehr-adoption-trends.php (last accessed 5 May 2020).
13. Sinsky, C, Colligan, L, Li, L, Prgomet, M, Reynolds, S, Goeders, L, et al. Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: A time and motion study in 4 specialties. Annals of Internal Medicine 2016;165(11):753–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Arndt, BG, Beasley, JW, Watkinson, WD, Temte, JL, Tuan, W, Sinsky, CA, et al. Tethered to the EHR: Primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Annals of Family Medicine 2017;15:419–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. United States Government, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Final Report Delivers Strategy to Reduce EHR Burden; 2020; available at https://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/health-it/final-report-delivers-a-strategy-to-reduce-ehr-burden (last accessed 13 July 2020).
16. Some researchers call the positive affect associated with positive job performance “compassion satisfaction.” Gleichgerrcht, E, Decety, J. The relationship between different facets of empathy, pain perception and compassion fatigue among physicians. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 2014;8:1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Friedberg, MW, Chen, PG, Van Busum, KR, Aunon, F, Pham, C, Caloyeras, J, et al. Factors affecting physician professional satisfaction and their implications for patient care, health systems, and health policy. Rand Health Quarterly 2014;4:1.Google Scholar “[F]or many physicians, the current state of EHR technology significantly worsened professional satisfaction in multiple ways. Poor EHR usability, time-consuming data entry, interference with face-to-face patient care, inefficient and less fulfilling work content, inability to exchange health information between EHR products, and degradation of clinical documentation were prominent sources of professional dissatisfaction.”
18. See note 17, Friedberg et al. 2014, at 1.
19. Maslach, C, Schaufeli, WB, Leiter, MP. Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology 2001;52:397–422, at 399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. See note 19, Maslach et al. 2001, at 399.
21. Bates, DW, Landman, AB. Use of medical scribes to reduce documentation burden, are they where we need to go with clinical documentation? Internal Medicine 2018;179(11):1472–3Google Scholar.
22. Shanafelt, TD, Hasan, O, Dyrbye, LN, Sinsky, C, Satele, D, Sloan, J, et al.. Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work–life balance in physicians and the general US working population between 2011 and 2014. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2015;90(12):1600–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Tawfik, DS, Profit, J, Morgenthaler, TI, Satele, DV, Sinsky, CA, Dyrbye, LN, et al. Physician burnout, well-being, and work unit safety grades in relationship to reported medical errors. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2018;93(11):1571–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Shanafelt, TD, Dyrbye, LN, Sinsky, C, Hasan, O, Satele, D, Sloan, J, et al. Relationship between clerical burden and characteristics of the electronic environment with physician burnout and professional satisfaction. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2016;91(7):836–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Cullen J. Member survey results focus on issues that matter to you. Presidents Message; 2018; available at https://www.aafp.org/news/opinion/20181024presmsg-survey.html (last accessed 5 May 2020).
26. Hall, LH, Johnson, J, Watt, I, Tsipa, A, O’Connor, DB. Healthcare staff wellbeing, burnout, and patient safety: A systematic review. PLoS One 2016;11(7):e0159015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Salyers, MP, Bonfils, KA, Luther, L, Firmin, RL, White, DA, Adams, EL, et al. The relationship between professional burnout and quality and safety in healthcare: A meta-analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2016;32(4):475–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Budd K. 7 ways to reduce medical school debt. Special to AAMC NEWS; 2018; available at https://news.aamc.org/medical-education/article/7-ways-reduce-medical-school-debt (last accessed 5 May 2020).
29. Fred, HL, Scheid, MS. Physician burnout: Causes, consequences, and (?) cures. Texas Heart Institute Journal. 2018;45(4):198–202 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. See also Shanafelt T, Goh J, Sinsky G. The business case for investing in physician well-being. JAMA Internal Medicine 2017;177(12):1826–32.
30. Verghese A. How tech can turn doctors into clerical workers. New York Times; 2018; available at https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/05/16/magazine/health-issue-what-we-lose-with-data-driven-medicine.html (last accessed 5 May 2020).
31. See note 12, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 2020.
32. United States Government, Department of Health and Human Services. Hospital Value Based Purchasing; 2017; available at https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/downloads/Hospital_VBPurchasing_Fact_Sheet_ICN907664.pdf (last accessed 5 May 2020).
33. Truog, RD, Brock, DW, Cook, DJ, Danis, M, Luce, JM, Rubenfeld, GD, et al. Rationing in the intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine 2006;34(4):958–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Also see: Scheunemann, LP, White, DB. The ethics and reality of rationing in medicine. Chest 2011;140(6):1625–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
34. The Joint Commission. Documentation Assistance Provided by Scribes; 2020; available at https://www.jointcommission.org/en/standards/standard-faqs/nursing-care-center/record-of-care-treatment-and-services-rc/000002210/ (last accessed 6 Aug 2021).
35. See note 34, The Joint Commission 2020.
36. Shultz, CG, Holmstrom, HL. The use of medical scribes in health care settings: A systematic review and future directions. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 2015;28(3):371–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Esposito, L. Medical scribes ease pressure on doctors and may improve patient care. U.S. News and World Report; 2018; available at https://health.usnews.com/health-care/patient-advice/articles/2018-10-31/medical-scribes-ease-pressure-on-doctors-and-may-improve-patient-care (last accessed 5 May 2020).
38. Dunlop, W, Hegarty, L, Staples, M, Levinson, M, Ben-Meir, M, Walker, K. Medical scribes have no impact on the patient experience of an emergency department. Emergency Medicine Australia 2017;30(1):61–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. See note 36, Shultz, Holmstrom 2015, at 371–81.
40. Here Sattler, A, Rydel, T, Nguyen, C, Lin, S. One year of family physicians observations on working with medical scribes. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 2018;31(1):49–56 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. Also see Tran, BD, Chen, Y, Liu, S, Zheng, K. How does medical scribes’ work inform development of speech-based clinical documentation technologies? A systematic review. Journal American Medical Informatics Association 2020;27(5): 808–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Schiff, GD, Zucker, L. Medical scribes: Salvation for primary care or workaround for poor EMR usability? Journal of General Internal Medicine 2016;31(9):979–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42. Al-Adwan, O, Stanford, J, Hamner, M. Examining the utilization of medical scribes in a hospital emergency department environment. Procedia Computer Science 2017;118:34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43. See note 36, Shultz, Holmstrom 2015, at 371. “Available evidence suggests medical scribes may improve clinician satisfaction, productivity, time-related efficiencies, revenue, and patient–clinician interactions. Because the number of studies is small, and because each study suffered important limitations, confidence in the reliability of the evidence is significantly constrained.”
44. Gellert GA, Ramire R, Webster SL. The rise of the medical scribe industry: Implications for the advancement of electronic health records. JAMA 2015;313:1315–6, at 1316.
45. See note 44, Gellert et al. 2015, at 1316.
46. See note 21, Bates, Landman 2018, at 1473.
47. See note 21, Bates, Landman 2018, at 1473.
48. “ONC” refers to Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (DHS).
49. Ratwani, RM, Benda, NC, Hettinger, AZ, Fairbanks, RJ. Electronic health record vendor adherence to usability certification requirements and testing standards. JAMA 2015;314(10):1070–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50. Ofri D. The patients vs. paperwork problem for doctors. The New York Times; 2017; available at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/14/well/live/the-patients-vs-paperwork-problem-for-doctors.html (last accessed 5 May 2020). Also suggested by Fred and Scheid, see note 29, Fred, Scheid 2018.
51. See note 6, Suchman et al. 1997, at 678–82.
52. See note 8, Attar, Chandramani 2012, at 89–94.
53. See note 44, Gellert et al. 2015, at 1316.
54. See note 44, Gellert et al. 2015, at 1316.
55. See note 34, The Joint Commission 2020.
56. Sulmasy, LS, López, AM, Horwitch, CA, American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee. Ethical implications of the electronic health record: In the service of the patient. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2017;32(8):935–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57. Dunlop, W, Hegarty, L, Staples, M, Levinson, M, Ben-Meir, M, Walker, K. Medical scribes have no impact on the patient experience of an emergency department. Emergency Medicine Australia 2017;30(1):61–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. See also, Imdieke, BH, Martel, ML. Integration of medical scribes in the primary care setting. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management 2017;40(1):17–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58. Mishra, P, Kiang, JC, Grant, RW. Association of medical scribes in primary care with physician workflow and patient experience. JAMA Internal Medicine 2018;178(11):1467–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59. Nambudiri, VE, Watson, AJ, Buzney, EA, Kupper, TS, Rubenstein, MH, Yang, FC. Medical scribes in an academic dermatology practice. JAMA Dermatology 2018;154(1):101–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60. See note 21, Bates, Landman 2018, at 1472.
61. Even if we grant that for some practices, scribes will not be economically feasible, we can still make the case that most institutions have good reason to employ scribes for the numerous clerical tasks in medicine.
62. See note 24, Shanafelt et al. 2017, at 1826–32.
63. Rosenfeld J. Calculating the financial cost of financial burnout. Medical Economics; 2018; available at https://www.medicaleconomics.com/medical-economics-blog/calculating-financial-costs-physician-burnout (last accessed 5 May 2020).
64. Sinsky C, Shanafelt T, Murphy ML. Organizational changes lead to physician satisfaction. AMA Ed Hub; 2017; available at https://edhub.ama-assn.org/steps-forward/module/2702510 (last accessed 5 May 2020).