Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:15:37.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Causation, Responsibility, and Harm: How the Discursive Shift from Law and Ethics to Social Justice Sealed the Plight of Nonhuman Animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

MATTI HÄYRY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Moral and political philosophers no longer condemn harm inflicted on nonhuman animals as self-evidently as they did when animal welfare and animal rights advocacy was at the forefront in the 1980s, and sentience, suffering, species-typical behavior, and personhood were the basic concepts of the discussion. The article shows this by comparing the determination with which societies seek responsibility for human harm to the relative indifference with which law and morality react to nonhuman harm. When harm is inflicted on humans, policies concerning negligence and duty of care and principles such as the ‘but for’ rule and the doctrine of double effect are easily introduced. When harm is inflicted on nonhumans, this does not happen, at least not any more. As an explanation for the changed situation, the article offers a shift in discussion and its basic terminology. Simple ethical considerations supported the case for nonhuman animals, but many philosophers moved on to debate different views on political justice instead. This allowed the creation of many conflicting views that are justifiable on their own presuppositions. In the absence of a shared foundation, this fragments the discussion, focuses it on humans, and ignores or marginalizes nonhuman animals.

Keywords

nonhuman animalshuman animalsanimal rightsanimal welfareharmsentiencesufferingspecies-typicalpersonhoodresponsibilityjusticeethicsbut for ruledoctrine of double effectnegligenceduty of care
Type
Special Section: Causality and Moral Responsibility
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 246 - 267
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Acknowledgements: The author thanks the Academy of Finland (project SA 307467 ‘Bioeconomy and Justice’) and the Finnish Ministry for Agriculture and Forestry (projects ‘The Role of Justice in Decision Making Concerning Bioeconomy’ and ‘A Just Management Model for a Systemic and Sustainable Shift Towards Bioeconomy’) for their financial support.

References

Notes

1. Häyry, M. Doctrines and dimensions of justice: Their historical backgrounds and ideological underpinnings. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2018;27(1):88–216 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

2. Häyry M. Sopimuksellinen oikeudenmukaisuus ja sen vaihtoehdot [Contractual justice and its alternatives, in Finnish]. In: Häyry M, Takala T, Ahola-Launonen J, eds. Oikeudenmukaisuuden ongelma [The Problem of Justice, in Finnish]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus; 2018:208–21.

3. Häyry, M. Justice and the possibility of good moralism. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2019;28(2):236–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

4. Takala, T, Häyry, M. Research ethics and justice: The case of Finland. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2019;28(3):551–76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

5. Singer, P. Animal Liberation. New York, NY: Random House; 1975 Google Scholar.

6. Regan, T. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1984 Google Scholar.

7. Hursthouse, R. Beginning Lives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1987 Google Scholar.

8. Häyry, H, Häyry, M. Ihmisten ja muiden eläinten oikeuksista. [On the rights of human and nonhuman animals, in Finnish.] In: Häyry, H, Tengvall, H, Vilkka, L, eds. Eläin ihmisten maailmassa [The Animal in the World of Humans]: Helsinki: Gaudeamus; 1989:15–29 Google Scholar.

9. Häyry, H, Häyry, M. Who’s like us? In: Cavalieri, P, Singer, P, eds. The Great Ape Project – Equality Beyond Humanity. London: Fourth Estate; 1993:173–82Google Scholar.

10. Häyry, H, Häyry, M. Om människornas och de andra djurens rättigheter [Of the rights of people and other animals, in Swedish, orig. Finnish, transl. Silfvast J]. In: Gålmark, L, ed. Djur och människor: En antologi i djuretik [Animals and People: An Anthology in Animal Ethics]. Nora: Nya Doxa; 1997:244–56Google Scholar.

11. Häyry, M. Ethics committees, principles and consequences. Journal of Medical Ethics 1998;24:81–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

12. Häyry, M. How to apply ethical principles to the biotechnological production of food – The case of bovine growth hormone. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2000;12:177–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13. Häyry, M. Eläinten vallankumous? Jeremy Bentham vastaan muu maailma [Animal revolution? Jeremy Bentham against the rest of the world, in Finnish]. niin & näin 3/2000:14–17 Google Scholar.

14. The Helsinki Group. Declaration of Rights for Cetaceans: Whales and Dolphins. Helsinki 2013; available at https://www.cetaceanrights.org/pdf_bin/helsinki-group.pdf (last accessed 23 July 2019).

15. Häyry, M, Takala, T. Are some living beings more equal than others? Fritz Jahr’s position in the European debate on what matters morally. In: Muzur, A, Sass, H-M, eds. 1926–2016 Fritz Jahr’s Bioethics: A Global Discourse. Berlin: Lit Verlag; 2017:185–94Google Scholar.

16. See note 6, Regan 1984.

17. See note 7, Hursthouse 1987.

18. See note 5, Singer 1975.

19. Strand P. What is animal welfare and why is it important? The difference between animal rights and animal welfare. National Animal Interest Alliance 10 June 2014; available at http://www.naiaonline.org/articles/article/what-is-animal-welfare-and-why-is-it-important#sthash.rZoM0ENt.dpbs (last accessed 23 July 2019).

20. Animal Rights History 2011; available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20111001083518/http://www.animalrightshistory.org/animal-rights-law/renaissance-legislation/1635-ireland-act-horses-sheep.htm (last accessed 23 July 2019).

21. Bentham, J. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (original 1789). Burns, JH, Hart, HLA, eds. London and New York: Methuen; 1982 Google Scholar.

22. See note 20, Animal Rights History 2011.

23. Animal Welfare Legislation Database; available at https://www.globalanimallaw.org/database/index.html (last accessed 23 July 2019).

24. Potter, VR. Bioethics: Bridge to the Future. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1971 Google Scholar. While not one of the most known classics of environmental ethics, Van Rensselaer Potter’s message for an environmentally conscious bioethics is clear and worth considering.

25. Leopold, A. A Sand County Almanac: And Sketches Here and There. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1949 Google Scholar. Aldo Leopold’s work was an inspiration from which Van Rensselaer Potter drew, as evidenced by the dedication in the latter’s book – see note 24, Potter 1971.

26. Jahr F. Bio-Ethics (orig. German 1927, transl. Sass H-M). In: Jahr F. Essays in Bioethics and Ethics 1927–1947 (transl. Miller IM, Sass H-M). Bochum: Zentrum für Medizinische Ethik; 2011:1–4. Fritz Jahr, according to some the founder of bioethics, argued strongly against harming any living beings.

27. Meyer, M. Reverence for Life: The Ethics of Albert Schweitzer for the Twenty-First Century. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press; 2002 Google Scholar. Albert Schweitzer was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1952 for advocating his reverence for all life and harming no living beings view.

28. Feinberg, J. Harm to Others. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1984, at 34–5Google Scholar.

29. Häyry, M. Measuring the quality of life: Why, how and what? Theoretical Medicine 1991;12:97–116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30. Häyry, M. Liberal Utilitarianism and Applied Ethics. London: Routledge; 1994 Google Scholar.

31. Häyry, M. Mahdollisimman monen onnellisuus: Utilitarismin historia, teoria ja sovellukset [The Happiness of the Greatest Number: The History, Theory, and Applications of Utilitarianism, in Finnish.] Helsinki: WSOY; 2001 Google Scholar.

32. Häyry, M. Cloning, Selection, and Values: Essays on Bioethical Intuitions. Helsinki: Acta Philosophical Fennica 81; 2007 Google Scholar.

33. Häyry, M. Utilitarianism and bioethics. In: Ashcroft, R, Dawson, A, Draper, H, McMillan, J, eds. Principles of Health Care Ethics. Second edition. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2007:57–64 Google Scholar.

34. Häyry, M. Rationality and the Genetic Challenge: Making People Better? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35. Singer, P. Practical Ethics. Third edition (first published 1979). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36. Bekoff, M. The Emotional Lives of Animals: A Leading Scientist Explores Animal Joy, Sorrow, and Empathy – and Why They Matter. Novato, CA: New World Library; 2007 Google Scholar.

37. Bekoff, M, ed. Encyclopedia of Animal Rights and Animal Welfare (first published 1998). Second edition. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Press; 2010 Google Scholar.

38. Proctor, H, Carder, G, Cornish, AR. Searching for animal sentience: A systematic review of the scientific literature. Animals 2013;3:882–906 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

39. Consciousness, more broadly speaking, is not limited to sentience, but may also include dimensions such as creativity, intelligence, sapience, self-awareness, and intentionality.

40. Dawkins, MS. Why Animals Matter: Animal Consciousness, Animal Welfare, and Human Well-Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012 Google Scholar.

41. Low, P, Panksepp, J, Reiss, D, Edelman, D, Van Swinderen, B, Koch, C. The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness. Publicly proclaimed in Cambridge, UK, 7 July 2012Google Scholar; available at http://fcmconference.org/img/CambridgeDeclarationOnConsciousness.pdf (last accessed 23 July 2019).

42. European Commission. Animal Welfare; n.d.; available at: https://ec.europa.eu/food/animals/welfare_en (last accessed 23 July 2019).

43. Haraway, MM, Maples, EG. Species-typical behavior. In Greenberg, G, Haraway, MM, eds. Comparative Psychology: A Handbook. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis; 1998:191–7Google Scholar.

44. Brennan O. “Fit and happy”: How do we measure wild-animal suffering? Wild-Animal Suffering Research 23 May 2018; available at https://was-research.org/paper/fit-happy-measure-wild-animal-suffering/ (last accessed 23 July 2019).

45. Farm Animal Welfare Council (United Kingdom). Five Freedoms. 5 October 2013; available at https://web.archive.org/web/20131005022426/http://www.fawc.org.uk/freedoms.htm (last accessed 23 July 2019).

46. Mickley, LD, Fox, MW. The case against intensive farming of food animals. In: Fox, MW, Mickley, LD, eds. Advances in Animal Welfare Science. Washington, DC: The Humane Society of the United States; 1986:257–72Google Scholar; available at https://animalstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1009&context=acwp_faafp (last accessed 23 July 2019).

47. Hancocks, D. A Different Nature: The Paradoxical World of Zoos and Their Uncertain Future. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48. Bronner, S. Killing Tradition: Inside Hunting and Animal Rights Controversies. Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky; 2008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49. St Leon, M. Circus: The Australian Story. Melbourne: Melbourne Books; 2011, at 3Google Scholar.

50. World Wide Fund for Nature. What Impacts Do Human Activities Have on Habitats and Wildlife. May 2017; available at what impacts do human activities have on habitats and wildlife (last accessed 23 July 2019).

51. Rusche, B. The 3Rs and animal welfare: Conflict or the way forward? ALTEX: Alternatives to Animal Experimentation 2003;20(Suppl.1):63–76 Google ScholarPubMed; available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2fca/482da20680c3349865e8383b9a4d4f18ed18.pdf (last accessed 23 July 2019).

52. See note 35, Singer 2011, at 76–7.

53. See note 30, Häyry 1994, at 109–10.

54. McMahan, J. The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55. For the caveat “against their own will,” see, e.g., note 30, Häyry 1994, at 110–2.

56. Häyry, M. Critical Studies in Philosophical Medical Ethics. Helsinki: Department of Philosophy, University of Helsinki; 1990 Google Scholar.

57. See note 32, Häyry 2007.

58. Kuhse, H, Singer, P. Should the Baby Live? The Problem of Handicapped Infants. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1983 Google Scholar.

59. Häyry, M. Infanticide on request: The dark side of liberal abortion policies? Matthews, E, Menlowe, M, eds. Philosophy and Health Care. Aldershot: Avebury; 1992:92–112 Google Scholar.

60. Maclean, A. The Elimination of Morality: Reflections on Utilitarianism and Bioethics. London: Routledge; 1993 Google Scholar.

61. Oderberg, DS. Applied Ethics: A Non-Consequentialist Approach. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2000 Google Scholar.

62. Häyry, M. Abortion, disability, assent and consent. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2001;10(1):79–87 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

63. Häyry, M. If you must make babies, then at least make the best babies you can? Human Fertility 2004;7:105–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64. Feder Kittay, E. At the margins of moral personhood. Ethics 2005;116:100–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65. Wasserman, D, Asch, A, Blustein, J, Putnam, D. Cognitive disability and moral status. In: Zalta, E, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition)Google Scholar; available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognitive-disability/.

66. Aaltola, E. Varieties of Empathy: Moral Psychology and Animal Ethics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield International; 2018 Google Scholar.

67. Häyry, M. Discoursive humanity as a transcendental basis for cognitive-(dis)ability ethics and policies. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2016;25(2):262–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

68. Turner R. 10 animals with self awareness. World of Lucid Dreaming; n.d.; available at https://www.world-of-lucid-dreaming.com/10-animals-with-self-awareness.html (last accessed 23 July 2019).

69. Cavalieri, P, Singer, P, eds. The Great Ape Project – Equality Beyond Humanity. London: Fourth Estate; 1993 Google Scholar.

70. Grimm, D. Are dolphins too smart for captivity? Science 2011; 332(6029):526–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

71. Grimm, D. An oasis for orcas. Science 2016; 352(6286):641–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

72. Choi CQ. Elephant self-awareness mirrors humans. Live Science 30 October 2006; available at https://www.livescience.com/4272-elephant-awareness-mirrors-humans.html (last accessed 23 July 2019).

73. Morell V. The magpie in the mirror. Science News 19 August 2008; available at: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2008/08/magpie-mirror (last accessed 23 July 2019).

74. Morell V. Monkeys master a key sign of self-awareness: Recognizing their reflections. Science News 13 February 2017; available at https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/02/monkeys-master-key-sign-self-awareness-recognizing-their-reflections (last accessed 23 July 2019).

75. Holden, C. Who’s that swine? Science 2009; 326(5955):919 Google Scholar.

76. Morell V. Your dog remembers more than you think. Science News 23 November 2016; available at https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/11/your-dog-remembers-more-you-think (last accessed 23 July 2019).

77. Bekoff M. After 2,500 studies, it’s time to declare animal sentience proven. Live Science 6 September 2013; available at https://www.livescience.com/39481-time-to-declare-animal-sentience.html (last accessed 23 July 2019).

78. Epstein, RA. A theory of strict liability. Journal of Legal Studies 1973;2:151–204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

79. Hart, HLA, Honoré, T. Causation in the Law. Second edition. Oxford: Clarendon; 1985 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80. Honoré, A, Gardner, J. Causation in the law. In: Zalta, N, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2010; available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/causation-law/ (last accessed 23 July 2019)Google Scholar.

81. Häyry, M, Takala, T. Coercion. In: ten Have, H, ed. Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Cham: Springer; 2016 Google Scholar. Online.

82. Häyry, M. Public health and human values. Journal of Medical Ethics 2006; 32:519–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

83. Peerani A. The reasonable person. Law Now: Relating Law to Life in Canada. 5 July 2017; available at https://www.lawnow.org/the-reasonable-person/ (last accessed 23 July 2019).

84. Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologica 2–2.64.7. In: Sancti Thomae Aquinas Opera Omnia II & III. New York: Musurgia Publishers; 1948.

85. Foot, P. The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. Oxford Review 1967; 5:5–15 Google Scholar.

86. Callahan, C. Abortion: Law, Choice and Morality. London: The Macmillan Company; 1970 Google Scholar.

87. Klein, M. Voluntary active euthanasia and the doctrine of double effect: A view from Germany. Health Care Analysis 2004;12:225–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

88. Häyry, H, Häyry, M. Utilitarianism, human rights and the redistribution of health through preventive medical measures. Journal of Applied Philosophy 1989;6:43–51 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

89. The doctrine of double effect. BBC Ethics Guide; a. n.d. Available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/euthanasia/overview/doubleeffect.shtml (last accessed 23 July 2019).

90. Dostoyevsky F. Conversations and exhortations of Father Zosima. The Brothers Karamazov. Book VI, Chapter 3; available at https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/849319-there-is-only-one-salvation-for-you-take-yourself-up (last accessed 23 July 2019).

91. Häyry, M, Takala, T. Genetic engineering and the risk of harm. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1998;1:61–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

92. Häyry, M. Playing God: Essays on Bioethics. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press; 2001, at 79–88 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

93. Häyry, M. Precaution and solidarity. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2005;14(2):199–206 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

94. Holm, S, Takala, T. High hopes and automatic escalators: A critique of some new arguments in bioethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 2007;33:1–4 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

95. See note 80, Honoré, Gardner 2010.

96. Takala, T. Acts and omissions. In: Ashcroft, R, Draper, H, McMillan, J, eds. Principles of Health Care Ethics. Second edition. Chichester: Wiley 2007;273–6Google Scholar.

97. Gardner, J. Moore on complicity and causality. University of Pennsylvania Law Review PENNumbra 2008;156:432–43Google Scholar.

98. Takala, T, Häyry, M. Benefiting from past wrongdoing, human embryonic stem cell lines, and the fragility of the German legal position. Bioethics 2007;21:150–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

99. Häyry, H, Häyry, M. The nature and role of professional codes in modern society. In: Chadwick, RF, ed. Ethics and the Professions. Aldershot: Avebury; 1994:136–144 Google Scholar.

100. Becht, AC, Millar, FW. The Test of Factual Causation in Negligence and Strict Liability. St. Louis, MO: Committee on Publications, Washington University; 1961 Google Scholar.

101. Spellman, BA, Kincannon, A. The relation between counterfactual (“but for”) and causal reasoning: Experimental findings and implications for jurors’ decisions. Law and Contemporary Problems 2001;64:241–64Google Scholar.

102. But for rule. West’s Encyclopedia of American Law. Second edition. 2008; available at https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/But+for+rule (last accessed 23 July 2019).

103. Häyry, M. A rational cure for pre-reproductive stress syndrome. Journal of Medical Ethics 2004;30:377–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

104. Häyry, M. The rational cure for prereproductive stress syndrome revisited. Journal of Medical Ethics 2005;31:606–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

105. Häyry, M. Is transferred parental responsibility legitimately enforceable? In: Simonstein, F, ed. Reprogen-Ethics and the Future of Gender. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009:135–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

106. Häyry, M. An analysis of some arguments for and against human reproduction. In: Häyry, M, Takala, T, Herissone-Kelly, P, Árnason, G, eds. Arguments and Analysis in Bioethics. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi; 2010:167–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

107. Häyry, M. The negative and indirect global responsibility of philosophers. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 1994;67:69–70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

108. Summers v. Tice, 33 Cal. 2d 80 (Cal. 1948); available at https://casetext.com/case/summers-v-tice (last accessed 23 July 2019).

109. Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 26 Cal. 3d 588 (Cal. 1980); available at https://casetext.com/case/sindell-v-abbott-laboratories?resultsNav=false&tab=keyword (last accessed 23 July 2019).

110. Linzey, A, Linzey, C. The Palgrave Handbook of Practical Animal Ethics. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

111. Lempert P. Why factory farming isn’t what you think. Forbes 15 June 2015; available at https://www.forbes.com/sites/phillempert/2015/06/15/why-factory-farming-isnt-what-you-think/#14f0c7c56065 (last accessed 23 July 2019).

112. Worldwide animal research statistics. Speaking of Research 8 July 2019; available at https://speakingofresearch.com/facts/animal-research-statistics/ (last accessed 23 July 2019).

113. Laufer, P. No Animals Were Harmed: The Controversial Line Between Entertainment and Abuse. Guilford, CT: Lyons Press; 2011 Google Scholar.

114. Feber, RE, Raebel, EM, D’cruce, N, Macdonald, D, Baker, SE. Some animals are more equal than others: Wild animal welfare in the media. BioScience 2017;67:62–72 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; available at https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/67/1/62/2641261 (last accessed 23 July 2019).

115. Kivinen, T. The ethics of international animal law. Master’s thesis. University of Helsinki, Faculty of Law, 2014; available at https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/136413/tero%20kivinen%20the%20ethics%20of%20international%20animal%20law.pdf?sequence=1 (last accessed 23 July 2019).

116. See note 5, Singer 1975.

117. See note 6, Regan 1984.

118. See note 7, Hursthouse 1987.

119. Häyry, H, Häyry, M. Applied philosophy at the turn of the millennium. In: Leaman, O, ed. The Future of Philosophy: Towards the 21st Century. London: Routledge; 1998:90–104 Google Scholar.

120. Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1971 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

121. Nozick, R. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell; 1974 Google Scholar.

122. MacIntyre, A. After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: Indiana University Press; 1981 Google Scholar.

123. Dworkin, R. What Is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1981;10:185–246 Google Scholar.

124. Dworkin, R. What Is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1981;10:283–345 Google Scholar.

125. Sandel, M. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982 Google Scholar.

126. Cohen, GA. On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 1989;99:906–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

127. de Beauvoir, S. Oeil pour oeil (An eye for an eye, in French). In: de Beauvoir, S. L’Existentialisme et la sagesse des nations. Fifth edition. Paris: Gallimard; 1963:109–43Google Scholar.

128. Häyry, H, Häyry, M. Revenge and punishment, common morality and the law. In: Frändberg, Å, Van Hoecke, M, eds. The Structure of Law. Uppsala: Iustus Förlag; 1987:191–203 Google Scholar.

129. de Beauvoir, S. Le deuxiéme sexe I. Paris: Gallimard;1949 Google Scholar.

130. de Beauvoir, S. Le deuxiéme sexe II. Paris: Gallimard;1949 Google Scholar.

131. Wasserstrom, R. Rights, human rights, and racial discrimination. In: Rachels, J, ed. Moral Problems: A Collection of Philosophical Essays. Third edition. New York, NY: Harper and Row; 1979:7–24 Google Scholar.

132. Hare, RM. Rules of war and moral reasoning. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1972;1:166–81Google Scholar.

133. Singer, P. Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1;1972:229–43Google Scholar.

134. Singer, P. Democracy and Disobedience. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1973 Google Scholar.

135. Harris, J. Violence and Responsibility. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1980 Google Scholar.

136. Anscombe, E. Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy 1958;33:1–19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

137. von Wright, GH. The Varieties of Goodness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1963 Google Scholar.

138. Geach, P. The Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1977 Google Scholar.

139. Foot, P. Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell; 1978 Google Scholar.

140. Häyry, H, Häyry, M. Nuclear energy, value conflicts, and the legitimacy of political decisions: The rise and fall of an alleged justification for violent civil disobedience. In: Warner, M, Crisp, R, eds. Terrorism, Protest and Power. Aldershot, Hampshire: Edward Elgar; 1990:96–105 Google Scholar.

141. Häyry, M. The individual’s decision to preserve the natural environment. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 1993; Beiheft 52:171–8Google Scholar.

142. See note 119, Häyry, Häyry 1998, at 93.

143. Jonsen, AR, Toulmin, S. The Abuse of Casuistry. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1988 Google Scholar.

144. Little, MO. Why a feminist approach to bioethics? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1996;6:1–18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

145. Tong, Putnam R. Feminist Approaches to Bioethics: Theoretical Reflections and Practical Applications. London: Routledge; 1997 Google Scholar.

146. Sherwin, S. Whither bioethics? How feminism can help reorient bioethics. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2008;1:7–27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

147. Häyry, M. What the fox would have said, had he been a hedgehog: On the methodology and normative approach of John Harris’s Wonderwoman and Superman. In: Launis, V, Pietarinen, J, Räikkä, J, eds. Genes and Morality: New Essays. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi; 1999:11–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

148. Häyry, M, Takala, T. Biotechnology and the environment: From moral objections to ethical analyses. In: Brinkmann, K, ed. Ethics: The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, volume 1. Bowling Green, OH: Philosophy Documentation Center; 1999:169–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

149. Häyry, M. My way to bioethics – A story of otherness and chance encounters. In: Louhiala, P, Stenman, S, eds. Philosophy Meets Medicine. Acta Gyllenbergiana 1. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press; 2000:149–61Google Scholar.

150. Häyry, M. Utilitarian approaches to justice in health care. In: Rhodes, R, Battin, MP, Silvers, A, eds. Medicine and Social Justice: Essays on the Distribution of Health Care. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002:53–64 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

151. Häyry, M. Applied ethics in Finland. Haaparanta, L, Niiniluoto, I, eds. Analytic Philosophy in Finland. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi; 2003:445–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

152. Häyry, M. Philosophical arguments for and against human reproductive cloning. Bioethics 2003;17:447–59CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

153. Häyry, M. Can arguments address concerns? Journal of Medical Ethics 2005;31:598–600 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

154. Levitt, M, Häyry, M. Overcritical, overfriendly? A dialogue between a sociologist and a philosopher on genetic technology and its applications. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2005;8: 377–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

155. Häyry, M. Academic freedom, public reactions, and anonymity. Bioethics 2014;28: 170–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

156. Häyry, M. What exactly did you claim? A call for clarity in the presentation of premises and conclusions in philosophical contributions to ethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2015;24(1):107–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

157. Häyry, M. What do you think of philosophical bioethics? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2015;24(2):139–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

158. Macklin, R. Against Relativism: Cultural Diversity and the Search for Ethical Universals in Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

159. Häyry, M. A defense of relativism. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2005;14(1):7–12 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

160. Butler, J. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso; 2006 Google Scholar.

161. Butler, J. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso; 2016 Google Scholar.

162. Parenthetically, and as a note to self for further investigation, there is a longer historical cycle in analytic philosophy that could also be relevant here. The phases of that cycle are: from pragmatic concerns to deeper metaphysical reflections (probably as a movement toward “something more philosophical”); from deeper metaphysical reflections to analytic moral epistemology (as a countermeasure to thicker concepts and their observed lack of clarity); from moral epistemology to ideology-oriented political philosophy (the metaphysics and epistemology scholars reaching common ground); and from the diversification of this debate, to bad relativism and a silent acceptance of Fascism (as half of the philosophers have escaped to ivory towers and the other half have accepted positions in government). I can be very wrong here, but my own historical studies suggest this, at least in Europe. The eighteenth- to nineteenth century story proceeded from the utilitarian pragmatism of John Stuart Mill to the idealism of Francis Herbert Bradley and Robin George Collingwood and to the epistemology-inspired theories of George Edward Moore, William David Ross, Alfred Jules Ayer, and Charles Leslie Stevenson in Britain. Meanwhile, in Italy Benedetto Croce’s liberal objective idealism was replaced by Giovanni Gentile’s totalitarian subjective actual idealism, which in its turn formed the theoretical foundation of the Fascist ideology, while the British philosophers, among others, stood idly by. I see, perhaps erroneously, a parallel between this and the development we have seen after the Second World War. From the (very limited) angle that I have studied the progression, I have detected a continuum from Richard Mervyn Hare and Richard Booker Brandt’s utilitarianism to the Aristotelian-inspired thinking of Alisdair MacIntyre and possibly Martha Nussbaum; the simultaneous rise of positional thinking in ‘Continental’ philosophy and moral psychology in the analytic tradition as philosophers of science like Robert Audi started to reclaim the scene of moral and political philosophy; the diversification of the debate of justice to universalist and identity politics and more; to the current threat of some kind of totalitarianism coming back to the Western world.

163. Macleod C. John Stuart Mill. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition). Zalta EN, ed.; available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/mill/ (last accessed 23 July 2019).

164. Candlish S, Basile P. Francis Herbert Bradley. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition). Zalta EN, ed.; available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/bradley/ (last accessed 23 July 2019).

165. D’Oro G, Connelly J. Robin George Collingwood. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 Edition). Zalta EN, ed.; available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/collingwood/ (last accessed 23 July 2019).

166. Baldwin T. George Edward Moore. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2010 Edition). Zalta EN, ed.; available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/moore/ (last accessed 23 July 2019).

167. Skelton A. William David Ross. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2012 Edition). Zalta EN, ed.; available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/william-david-ross/ (last accessed 23 July 2019).

168. Macdonald G, Krishna N. Alfred Jules Ayer. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition). Zalta EN, ed.; available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/ayer/ (last accessed 23 July 2019).

169. Boisvert D. Charles Leslie Stevenson. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). Zalta EN, ed.; available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/stevenson/ (last accessed 23 July 2019).

170. Caponigri AR. Benedetto Croce. Encyclopaedia Britannica; n.d.; available at https://www.britannica.com/biography/Benedetto-Croce (last accessed 23 July 2019).

171. Bellamy R. Gentile, Giovanni (1875–1944). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Taylor and Francis, 1998; available at https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/biographical/gentile-giovanni-1875-1944/v-1 (last accessed 23 July 2019).

172. Price A. Richard Mervyn Hare. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition). Zalta EN, ed.; available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/hare/ (last accessed 23 July 2019).

173. Gale T. Brandt, R. B. (1910–1997). Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2006; available at https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/brandt-r-b-1910-1997 (last accessed 23 July 2019).

174. Bell D. Communitarianism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition). Zalta EN ed.; available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/communitarianism/ (last accessed 23 July 2019).

175. Robeyns I. The capability approach. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). Zalta EN, ed.; available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/capability-approach/ (last accessed 23 July 2019).

176. DePaul M, Hicks A. A Priorism in Moral Epistemology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 Edition). Zalta EN, ed.; available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/moral-epistemology-a-priori/ (last accessed 23 July 2019).

177. Häyry H, Häyry M. Taide, tunne ja turmelus: Kaksi näkökulmaa R. G. Collingwoodin estetiikkaan [Art, emotion, and corruption: Two view to the esthetics of R. G. Collingwood, in Finnish]. Reports from The Department of Philosophy, University of Helsinki 4/1989.

178. Häyry M. Fasismi ja muutoksen metafysiikka: Giovanni Gentilen aktualistinen idealismi Mussolinin Italian valtionfilosofiana [Fascism and the metaphysics of change: Giovanni Gentile’s actual idealism as the state philosophy of Mussolini’s Italy]. In: Halonen I, Häyry H, eds. Muutos [Change]. Helsinki: Philosophical Society of Finland; 1990:179–90.

179. Häyry, M. The Social and Political Thought of R. G. Collingwood, David Boucher (review). Idealistic Studies 1992;22:301–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

180. Häyry, H, Häyry, M. Reason or nation? International Journal of Moral and Social Studies 1993;8:143–54Google Scholar.

181. Häyry H, Häyry M. Hyvä, kaunis, tosi – arvojen filosofiaa [Good, beautiful, true – philosophy of values, in Finnish]. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press; 1997, at 184–98.

182. Häyry, M, Vehmas, S. Disability as a test of justice in a globalising world. Journal of Global Ethics 2015;11:90–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

183. See note 1, Häyry 2018; note 2, Häyry 2018; note 3, Häyry 2019.

184. See note 1, Häyry 2018, at 192; note 2, Häyry 2018, at 209, 219; note 3, Häyry 2019, at 251.

185. Gilligan, C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1982 Google Scholar.

186. Nussbaum, M. Sex and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998 Google Scholar.

187. Nussbaum, M. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2006 Google Scholar.

188. Nussbaum, M. Creating Capabilites: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

189. Smith, A. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (original 1776). Fifth edition, Cannan, E, ed. London: Methuen and Co., Ltd.; 1904 Google Scholar.

190. Mandeville, B. The Fable of the Bees or Private Vices, Publick Benefits, 2 vols. Kaye, FB, ed. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund; 1998 Google Scholar; available at https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/1863 (last accessed 23 July 2019).

191. See note 3, Häyry 2019, at 257.

192. See note 180, Häyry, Häyry 1993.

193. Plassart M. Nationalism and exceptionalism: A study of rural socialism in the 1910s. Revue française d’études américaines 2015;4:89–101; available at https://www.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-etudes-americaines-2015-4-page-89.htm# (last accessed 23 July 2019).

194. Pritchard M. Nationalism is just socialism draped in a flag. The Federalist 17 May 2017; available at https://thefederalist.com/2017/05/17/nationalism-just-socialism-draped-flag/ (last accessed 23 July 2019).

195. Boot M. What comes after Trump may be even worse. The Washington Post 22 July 2019; available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/07/22/what-comes-after-trump-may-be-even-worse/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.4d6b0e262cb2 (last accessed 23 July 2019).

196. See note 120, Rawls 1971.

197. See note 186, Nussbaum 1988, note 187, Nussbaum 2006, and note 188, Nussbaum 2011.

198. Habermas, J. The Future of Human Nature. Rehg, W, Pensky, M, Beister, H, trans. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2003 Google Scholar.

199. Häyry, M. Protecting humanity: Habermas and his critics on the ethics of emerging technologies. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2012;21(2):211–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

200. Cochrane, A. Liberalism and animals. In: Cochrane, A. An Introduction to Animals and Political Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010:50–71 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

201. Cochrane, A. Marxism and animals. In: Cochrane, A. An Introduction to Animals and Political Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010:93–114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

202. Cochrane, A. Animals in the history of political thought. In: Cochrane, A. An Introduction to Animals and Political Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010:10–28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

203. Cochrane, A. Communitarianism and animals. In: Cochrane, A. An Introduction to Animals and Political Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010:72–92 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

204. Nussbaum, M. The capabilities approach and animal entitlements. In: Beauchamp, TL, Frey, RG, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011:228–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

205. See note 175, Robeyns 2016.

206. Sen, A. Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992 Google Scholar.

207. Sen, A. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2011 Google Scholar.

208. See note 186, Nussbaum 1988, note 187, Nussbaum 2006, and note 188, Nussbaum 2011.

209. Cochrane, A. Feminism and animals. In: Cochrane, A. An Introduction to Animals and Political Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010:115–135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

210. Midgley, M. Animals and Why They Matter. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin; 1983 Google Scholar.

211. Cochrane, A. Utilitarianism and animals. In: Cochrane, A. An Introduction to Animals and Political Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010:29–49 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

212. See note 21, Bentham 1982.

213. Mill JS. Whewell on moral philosophy (original 1852). In: Mill JS. Collected Works Vol. X. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul;1969:165–201.

214. Sidgwick, H. The Methods of Ethics (original 1874). Seventh edition. London: Macmillan; 1907, at 414Google Scholar.

215. See note 5, Singer 1975.

216. Harris, J. The Value of Life: An Introduction to Medical Ethics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1985, at 218–9Google Scholar.

217. Matheny, G. Expected utility, contributory causation, and vegetarianism. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 2002;19:293–7Google Scholar.

218. Matheny, G. Utilitarianism and animals. In: Singer, P, ed. In Defence of Animals: The Second Wave. Malden: Blackwell; 2006:13–25 Google Scholar.

219. Moore, GE. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1903 Google Scholar.

220. Moore, GE. Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1912 Google Scholar.

221. Quinton, A. Utilitarian Ethics. Second edition (first published 1973). London: Duckworth; 1989 Google Scholar.

222. See note 54, McMahan 2002.

223. Goldhill O. An Oxford philosopher’s moral crisis can help us learn to question our instincts. Quartz Ideas 15 October 2017; available at https://qz.com/1102616/an-oxford-philosophers-moral-crisis-can-help-us-learn-to-question-our-instincts/ (last accessed 23 July 2019).