Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:41:06.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commentary: The Problematic Proxy and the Patient’s Best Interests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2014

David Campbell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Ethics Committees and Consultants at Work
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 232 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Jonsen, AR, Siegler, M, Winslade, WJ. Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine. 2nd ed. New York: MacMillan; 1986, at 82.Google Scholar

2. Shalowitz, DI, Garrett-Mayer, E, Wendler, D. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: A systematic review. Archives of Internal Medicine 2006;166:493–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Fagerlin, A, Danks, J, Ditto, PH, Houts, RM, Sucker, WD. Projection in surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments. Health Psychology 2001;20:166–75.Google Scholar

3. Vig, EK, Taylor, JS, Starks, H, Hopely, EK, Fryer-Edwards, K. Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2006;54:1688–93.Google Scholar

4. Fritch, J, Petronio, S, Helft, PR, Torke, A. Making decisions for hospitalized older adults: Ethical factors considered by family surrogates. Journal of Clinical Ethics 2013;24:125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Rhodes, R, Holzman, I. The not unreasonable standard for assessment of surrogates and surrogate decisions. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2004;25:367–86.Google Scholar

6. Brush, DR, Brown, CE, Caleb, AG. Critical care physicians’ approaches to negotiating with surrogate decision makers: A qualitative study. Critical Care Medicine 2012;40:1080–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

7. Baeroe, K. Patient autonomy, assessment of competence and surrogate decision-making: A call for reasonableness in deciding for others. Bioethics 2010;24:87–95.Google Scholar

8. Brock, DW. The ideal of shared decision making between physicians and patients. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1991;1:28–47.Google Scholar