Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:35:09.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commentary: What Price Freedom?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2017

SARAH CHAN
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Section: Enhancement and Goodness
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , July 2017 , pp. 377 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author gratefully acknowledges the support of the Arts and Humanities Research Council in funding an International Placement Scheme Fellowship (grant AH/N000579/1) at the National Institute for Humanities Japan; research conducted during this period contributed to the writing of this article.

References

Notes

1. Persson, I, Savulescu, J. The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity. Journal of Applied Philosophy 2008;25(3):162–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Persson, I, Savulescu, J. Getting moral enhancement right: The desirability of moral bioenhancement. Bioethics 2013;27(3):124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

3. Chan, S, Harris, J. Moral enhancement and pro-social behaviour. Journal of Medical Ethics 2011;37(3):130–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

4. Harris, J, Chan, S. Moral behavior is not what it seems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010;107(50):E183,CrossRefGoogle Scholar author reply at E4.

5. Harris, J. Moral enhancement and freedom. Bioethics 2011;25(2):102–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

6. Harris, J. Wicked or dead? Reflections on the moral character and existential status of God. In: Blackwell, R, Schüklenk, U, eds. 50 Voices of Disbelief: Why We Are Atheists. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2009:33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. For example, Harris, J. Enhancing Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2007.Google Scholar

8. Sandel, M. The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Harvard: Harvard University Press; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Warren, MA. On the moral and legal status of abortion. The Monist 1973;57(1):43–61, at 53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

10. Tooley, M. Abortion and Infanticide. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1972;2(1):37–65.Google Scholar

11. Chan, S, Harris, J. Post-what? (And why does it matter?). In: Lippert-Rasmussen K, Thomsen MR, Wamberg J, eds. The Posthuman Condition: Ethics, Aesthetics and Politics of Biotechnological Challenges. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press; 2012:77–89.

12. See note 5, Harris 2011.

13. See note 5, Harris 2011.

14. Savulescu, J, Persson, I. Moral enhancement, freedom and the God machine. The Monist 2012;95(3):399–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

15. Douglas, T. Moral enhancement. Journal of Applied Philosophy 2008;25(3):228–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

16. DeGrazia, D. Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour. Journal of Medical Ethics 2014;40(6):361–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

17. Savulescu and Persson make a similar point using the legend of Ulysses to illustrate how overriding a person’s present wishes can facilitate his long-term autonomy; see note 14, Savulescu, Persson 2012.