Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:27:03.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emerging Ethical Issues in Digital Health Information

ICANN, Health Information, and the Dot-Health Top-Level Domain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2015

ANTHONY E. SOLOMONIDES  and
TIM KEN MACKEY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The problems of poor or biased information and of misleading health and well-being advice on the Internet have been extensively documented. The recent decision by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers to authorize a large number of new generic, top-level domains, including some with a clear connection to health or healthcare, presents an opportunity to bring some order to this chaotic situation. In the case of the most general of these domains, “.health,” experts advance a compelling argument in favor of some degree of content oversight and control. On the opposing side, advocates for an unrestricted and open Internet counter that this taken-for-granted principle is too valuable to be compromised, and that, once lost, it may never be recovered. We advance and provide evidence for a proposal to bridge the credibility gap in online health information by providing provenance information for websites in the .health domain.

Keywords

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)generictop-level domain (gTLD)Internet opennesshealth informationinformation quality
Type
Special Section: Bioethics and Information Technology
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 311 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Fox, S. What Ails America? Dr. Google can tell you. Pew Research Center; 2013 Dec 17; available at http://www.Pewresearch.org/author/sfox/ (last accessed 10 Aug 2014).Google Scholar

2. Fox, S, Duggan, M. Health Online 2013. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project; 2013 Jan 15; available at http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Health-online.aspx (last accessed 10 Aug 2014).Google Scholar

3. Paddock, C. Dr Google and the unwise practice of self-diagnosis. Medical News Today 2012 July 23.Google Scholar This source reports the online publication of a research paper by Yan and Sengupta: Yan, D, Sengupta, J. The influence of base rate and case information on health-risk perceptions: A unified model of self-positivity and self-negativity. Journal of Consumer Research 2013 Feb;39(5):931–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Smith, R. Dr Google was right: Researching your symptoms can help your diagnosis. Daily Telegraph 2012 Oct 25 (London).Google Scholar

5. Colvile, R. If we ignored Dr Google, we’d all be a lot better off: “Cyberchondriacs” don’t just irritate their doctors – they do themselves an injury. Daily Telegraph 2013 Oct 9 (London).Google Scholar

6. Stephens-Davidowitz S. Dr. Google will see you now. New York Times 2013 Aug 9. This source reports on the “big data” finding that patterns of Google searches reveal the day-to-day state of the health of the nation.

7. Adams, SA. Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of “web 2.0”: An inter-disciplinary literature and website review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2010;79:391–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

8. AlGhamdi, KM, Moussa, NA. Internet use by the public to search for health-related information. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2012;81:363–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

9. Dolce, MC. The Internet as a source of health information: Experiences of cancer survivors and caregivers with healthcare providers. Oncology Nursing Forum 2011 May;38(3):353–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

10. Warren, JR, Kvasny, L, Hecht, ML, Burgess, D, Ahluwalia, JS, Okuyemi, KS. Barriers, control and identity in health information seeking among African American women. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice 2010 Winter;3(3):68–90.Google Scholar

11. Neelapala, P, Duvvi, SK, Kumar, G, Kumar, BN. Do gynaecology outpatients use the Internet to seek health information? A questionnaire survey. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2008 Apr;14(2):300–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

12. Coberly, E, Boren, SA, Davis, JW, McConnell, AL, Chitima-Matsiga, R, Ge, B, et al. Linking clinic patients to Internet-based, condition-specific information prescriptions. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2010 Apr;98(2):160–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

13. Goidela, K, Kirzinger, A, DeFleur, M, Turcotte, J. Difficulty in seeking information about health care quality and costs: The field of dreams fallacy. The Social Science Journal 2013;50:418–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. Xiao, N, Sharman, R, Rao, HR, Upadhyaya, S. Factors influencing online health information search: An empirical analysis of a national cancer-related survey. Decision Support Systems 2014;57:417–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15. Anker, AE, Reinhart, AM, Feeley, TH. Health information seeking: A review of measures and methods. Patient Education and Counseling 2011;82:346–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

16. Fagnano, M, Halterman, JS, Conn, KM, Shone, LP. Health literacy and sources of health information for caregivers of urban children with asthma. Clinical Pediatrics 2012 Mar;51(3):267–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

17. Sheng, X, Simpson, PM. Seniors, health information and the Internet: Motivation, ability, and Internet knowledge. CyberPsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 2013 Oct;16(3):740–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

18. Colby, SE, Johnson, AL, Eickhoff, A, Johnson, L. Promoting community health resources: Preferred communication strategies. Health Promotion Practice 2011;12(2):271–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

19. Friedman, D, Tanner, A, Rose, I. Health journalists’ perception of their communities and implications for the delivery of health information in the news. Journal of Community Health 2014 Apr;39(2):378–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

20. Kelly, L, Jenkinson, C, Ziebland, S. Measuring the effects of online health information for patients: Item generation for an e-health impact questionnaire. Patient Education and Counseling 2013;93:433–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

21. Chen, W, Lee, K-H. More than search? Informational and participatory eHealth behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior 2014;30:103–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22. Lederman, R, Fan, H, Smith, S, Chang, S. Who can you trust? Credibility assessment in online health forums. Health Policy and Technology 2014;3:13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23. Luo, C, Luo, X, Schatzberg, L, Sia, CL. Impact of informational factors on online recommendation credibility: The moderating role of source credibility. Decision Support Systems 2013;56:92–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24. Kitchens, B, Harle, CA, Li, S. Quality of health-related online search results. Decision Support Systems 2014;57:454–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25. Ekberg, J, Gursky, EA, Timpka, T. Pre-launch evaluation checklist for online health-promoting communities. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2014;47:11–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

26. Cohen N. Editing Wikipedia pages for med school credit. New York Times 2013 Sept 29.

27. Bould, MD, Hladkowicz, ES, Pigford, AA, Ufholz, LA, Postonogova, T, Shin, E, Boet, S. References that anyone can edit: Review of Wikipedia citations in peer reviewed health science literature. BMJ 2014;348:g1585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

28. Bernstam, EV, Shelton, DM, Walji, M, Meric-Bernstam, F. Instruments to assess the quality of health information on the World Wide Web: What can our patients actually use? IJMI 2005;74(1):13–19.Google Scholar

29. Silberg, WM, Lundberg, GD, Musacchio, RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor—Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 1997 Apr 16;277(15):1244–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

30. Charnock, D, compiler. The DISCERN Handbook Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information on Treatment Choices. Radcliffe Medical Press, Abingdon, Oxon; 1998; available at http://www.discern.org.uk/discern.pdf (last accessed 10 Aug 2014).Google Scholar

31. The DISCERN Instrument; available at http://www.discern.org.uk/discern_instrument.php (last accessed 10 Aug 2014).

32. Minervation Ltd. The LIDA Instrument: Minervation Validation Instrument for Health Care Web Sites; 2005; available at http://uwf.edu/ddawson/d3net/documents/web_usability/minervalidation.pdf (last accessed 10 Aug 2014).

33. McDonough J. Healthcare Policy: The Basics. Boston: The Access Project; 1999; available at http://www.accessproject.org/downloads/the-basics.pdf (last accessed 10 Aug 2014).

34. Pontifical Council for Social Communications. Ethics in Internet. Vatican; available athttp://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/pccs/documents/rc_pc_pccs_doc_20020228_ethics-internet_en.html (last accessed 10 Aug 2014).Google Scholar

35. Floridi, L. Information ethics: On the theoretical foundations of computer ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 1999;1(1):37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36. Marckmann, G, Goodman, KW. Introduction: Ethics of information technology in health care. International Review of Information Ethics 2006 Sept;5:2–5.Google Scholar

37. See note 36, Marckmann & Goodman 2006, at 3.

38. The Hastings Center. From Birth to Death and Bench to Clinic: The Hastings Center Bioethics Briefing Book for Journalists, Policymakers, and Campaigns; available at http://www.thehastingscenter.org/Publications/BriefingBook/Default.aspx (last accessed 10 Aug 2014).Google Scholar

39. Liang, BA, Mackey, TK, Lovett, KM. eHealth ethics: The online medical marketplace and emerging ethical issues. Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 2011;2(3):253–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40. Eysenbach, G. What is e-health? Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001;3(2):e20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

41. Carey, MA. The Internet Healthcare Coalition. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 2001 Aug;101(8):878.Google ScholarPubMed

42. DeNardis, L. Protocol Politics: The Globalization of Internet Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43. DeNardis, L. The Global War for Internet Governance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

44. Greeley B. The U.S. gives up its control of the free-speech Internet [technology column]. Bloomberg Businessweek 2014 17 Mar.

45. Internet governance: An online Risorgimento [Babbage science and technology column]. The Economist 2014 26 Apr.

46. Kampmark B. Liberalising internet governance: ICANN and the role of governments. Index on Censorship 2014 May 1; available at http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2014/05/liberalising-internet-governance-icann-role-governments/ (last accessed 10 Aug 2014).

47. Columbia University, School of International and Public Affairs. Invited panel presentation on “Governance of the Internet”; New York; 2014 Apr 14; available at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rspWgWO3mWM (last accessed 10 Aug 2014).

48. Remarks made in response to questions from the audience at the Centre for International Governance Innovation Panel “Developing a Strategic Vision for Internet Governance” at the 8th Annual IGF Meeting; Bali, Indonesia; 2013 Oct; available at http://www.cigionline.org/events/conference-8th-annual-igf-meeting-bali-indonesia-cigi-panel-developing-strategic-vision-inter (last accessed 10 Aug 2014). [Transcribed from an online video of the panel discussion by the first author.]

49. See note 46, Columbia University 2014. [Transcribed from an online video by the first author.]

50. DeNardis, L. Hidden levers of Internet control: An infrastructure-based theory of Internet governance. Communication & Society 2012;15(5):720–38; available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.659199 (last accessed 10 Aug 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51. Illman, J. WHO’s plan to police health websites rejected. [BMJ News Roundup]. BMJ 2000 Nov 25;321:1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

52. See the BMJ News section “Regulating Health Information on the Internet: International Initiatives,” including the following: Charatan F. “Buyer beware” remains US policy towards information on the net BMJ 2002 Mar 9;324:566; Brown P. WHO calls for a health domain name to help consumers BMJ 2002 Mar 9;324:566; and Eaton L. UK government aims to integrate health information on the internet. BMJ 2002 Mar 9;324:566.

53. Bruzek A. Will Health Make it More Likely That You’ll Get Scammed? NPR.org; Sept 2014; available at http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/09/26/351416992/will-dot-health-make-it-more-likely-that-youll-get-scammed (last accessed 26 March 2015).

54. Letter from Dr. Marie-Paule Kieny, Assistant Director-General of WHO, to Dr. Stephen Crocker, Mr. Fadi Chehadé, and Mr. Cherine Chalaby of ICANN; available at https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/kieny-to-crocker-et-al-16may14-en.pdf (last accessed 10 Aug 2014).

55. WHO. The Health Internet; available at http://www.who.int/ehealth/programmes/governance/en/(last accessed 10 Aug 2014).

56. Mackey, TK, Liang, BA, Attaran, A, Kohler, JC. Ensuring the future of health information online. [The Lancet Correspondence.] The Lancet 2013 Oct 26;382(26):1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

57. Mackey, TK, Liang, BA, Kohler, JC, Attaran, A. Health domains for sale: The need for global health Internet governance. [Viewpoint.] Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(3):e73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

58. Eysenbach, G. The new health-related top-level domains are coming: Will cureforcancer.health go to the highest bidder? [Editorial.] Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(3):e62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

59. ICANN ALAC website; available at http://atlarge.icann.org/alac (last accessed 10 Aug 2014).