Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:40:03.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How to Relate the Empirical to the Normative

Toward a Phenomenologically Informed Hermeneutic Approach to Bioethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2012

CHRISTOPH REHMANN-SUTTER ,
ROUVEN PORZ  and
JACKIE LEACH SCULLY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Section: Empirical Ethics
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , October 2012 , pp. 436 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Hare, RM.The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1952.Google Scholar

2. Shelton, W. The role of empirical data in bioethics: A philosopher’s view. In: Jacoby, L, Siminoff, LA, eds. Empirical Methods for Bioethics: A Primer. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2008:13–20.Google Scholar

3. Bok, S.Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. New York: Pantheon Books; 1978:54.Google Scholar

4. Butler, J.Kritik der ethischen Gewalt: Adorno Vorlesungen. Frankfurt aM: Suhrkamp; 2003.Google Scholar

5. Fox, R, Swazey, JP.Medical morality is not bioethics—medical ethics in China and the United States. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 1984;27:337–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

6. Jacoby, L, Siminoff, LA. Introduction. In: Jacoby, L, Siminoff, LA, eds. Empirical Methods for Bioethics: A Primer. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2008:1–10.Google Scholar

7. Parker, M.Two concepts of empirical ethics. Bioethics 2009;23:202–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

8. Holm, S, Jonas, MF, eds. Engaging the World: The Use of Empirical Research in Bioethics and the Regulation of Biotechnology. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2004.Google Scholar

9. Kon, AA.The role of empirical research in bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics 2009;9:59–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

10. De Vries, R, Gordijn, B.Empirical ethics and its alleged meta-ethical fallacies. Bioethics 2009;23:193–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

11. McMillan, J, Hope, T. The possibility of empirical psychiatric ethics. In: Widdershoven, G, McMillan, J, Hope, T, van der Scheer, L, eds. Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:9–22, at 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. See note 11, McMillan, Hope 2008.

13. See note 11, McMillan, Hope 2008.

14. Scully, JL, Rippberger, C, Rehmann-Sutter, C.Non-professionals’ evaluations of gene therapy ethics. Social Science & Medicine 2004;58:1415–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

15. Charmaz, K.Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2006.Google Scholar

16. Silverman, D.Doing Qualitative Research. 2nd ed.London: SAGE; 2005.Google Scholar

17. Smith, J, Flowers, P, Larkin, M, eds. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2009.Google Scholar

18. Rehmann-Sutter, C, Müller, HJ.Ethik und Gentherapie: Zum praktischen Diskurs um die molekulare Medizin. Tübingen: Attempto; 1995.Google Scholar

19. Haimes, E, Porz, R, Scully, JL, Rehmann-Sutter, C. “So, what is an embryo?” A comparative study of the views of those asked to donate embryos for hESC research in the UK and Switzerland. New Genetics and Society 2008;27:113–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

20. Haimes, E, Taylor, K.The contribution of empirical evidence to socio-ethical debates on fresh embryo donation for hESC research. Bioethics 2011;25(6):334–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21. Mitzkat, A, Haimes, E, Rehmann-Sutter, C.How reproductive and regenerative medicine meet in a Chinese fertility clinic: Interviews with women about the donation of embryos to stem cell research. Journal of Medical Ethics 2010;36:754–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22. Scully, JL, Rehmann-Sutter, C, Porz, R. Human embryos: Donors’ and non-donors’ perspectives on embryo moral status. In: Nisker, J, Baylis, F, Karpin, I, McLeod, C, eds. The “Healthy” Embryo: Social, Biomedical, Legal and Philosophical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010:16–31.Google Scholar

23. Rehmann-Sutter, C. Human embryos at the IVF-stem cell interface: Towards a hermeneutic approach to bioethics. In: Wüstenberg, RK, Heuser, S, Hornung, E, eds. Bonhoeffer and the Biosciences. Frankfurt aM: Lang; 2010:27–50.Google Scholar

24. Porz, R, Bürkli, P, Barazzetti, G, Scully, JL, Rehmann-Sutter, C.A challenged choice: Donating spare embryos to stem cell research in Switzerland. Swiss Medical Weekly 2008;136:551–6.Google Scholar

25. See note 3, Bok 1978.

26. Gadamer, H-G.Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. 5th ed.Tübingen: Mohr; 1986:299.Google Scholar

27. See note 10, de Vries, Gordijn 2009.

28. Dodd, J, Stern-Gillet, S.The is/ought gap, the fact/value distinction and the naturalistic fallacy. Dialogue 1995;34:727–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29. O’Neill, O, ed. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.Google Scholar

30. Walker, MU.Naturalizing, normativity, and using what “we” know in ethics. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1996;26:75–101.Google Scholar

31. Rehmann-Sutter, C. Wie kann Ethik orientieren? Überlegungen zur Orientierungsfunktion der Ethik am Beispiel der Life Sciences. In: Rusterholz, P, Schweizer, RM, Zwahlen, SM, eds. Aktualität und Vergänglichkeit der Leitwissenschaften. Bern: Lang; 2009:163–84.Google Scholar

32. Scully, JL.Disability Bioethics: Moral Bodies, Moral Difference. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2008.Google Scholar

33. See note 30, Walker 1996:78.

34. Walker, MU. Introduction: Groningen naturalism in bioethics. In: Lindemann, H, Verkerk, M, Walker, MU. Naturalized Bioethics: Toward Responsible Knowing and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009:1–20, at 5.Google Scholar

35. Husserl, E.Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. London: Allen & Unwin; 1931.Google Scholar

36. Ricoeur, P. Phenomenology and hermeneutics. In: From Text to Action. New York: Continuum; 1991:23–50, at 30.Google Scholar

37. Widdershoven, G. Interpretation and dialogue in hermeneutic ethics. In: Ashcroft, R, Lucassen, A, Parker, M, Verkerk, M, Widdershoven, G, eds. Case Analysis in Clinical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005:57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

38. Scully, JL, Porz, R, Rehmann-Sutter, C. “You don’t make genetic test decisions from one day to the next”—using time to preserve moral space. Bioethics 2007;21:208–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

39. Haimes, E.What can the social sciences contribute to the study of ethics? Bioethics 2002;16:89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40. Haimes, E, Williams, R.Sociology, ethics, and the priority of the particular. British Journal of Sociology 2007;58:457–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

41. Wilson, D.Creating the “ethics industry”: Mary Warnock, in vitro fertilization and the history of bioethics in Britain. BioSocieties 2011;6:121–41, at 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar