Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:48:21.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Bangladesh Sustainability Compact: An Effective Exercise of Global Experimentalist EU Governance?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2017

Jeff KENNER  and
Katrina PEAKE
Katrina PEAKE
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The calamitous Rana Plaza factory collapse in 2013 focused international attention on labour rights’ violations and factory safety in Bangladesh’s dominant ready-made garment industry which is almost wholly dependent on exports to the EU. In response, the EU and the ILO launched the Bangladesh Sustainability Compact, with the core objective of promoting continuous improvement in labour rights and factory safety in the industry. The uniqueness of the Compact stems from its nature as a form of experimentalist governance involving both governmental and non-governmental actors. Being primarily an EU-led initiative based on balancing trade, sustainable development and human rights’ objectives, it is underpinned by the possible option, if the Compact fails, of withdrawing trade preferences. This article will examine the rationale for the Compact, its main features, and its effectiveness as a form of ‘global experimentalist governance’.

Keywords

labour rightstradesustainable developmentEuropean UnionBangladeshCompactready-made garmentsglobal experimentalist governance
Type
Articles
Information
Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies , Volume 19 , December 2017 , pp. 86 - 115
Copyright
© Centre for European Legal Studies, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article further develops research by the authors in a case study published for the EU FP7 project FRAME (Fostering Human Rights among European policies), see Ark et al note 2 below for full reference.

References

1 European Commission, ‘The Trading System and Internationally Recognised Labour Standards’, COM(96) 402 final, p 16.

2 See Schutter, O De, Trade in the Service of Sustainable Development (Hart Publishing, 2015)Google Scholar; Leary, VA and Warner, D (eds), Social Issues, Globalisation and International Institutions (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hepple, B, Labour Laws and Global Trade (Hart Publishing 2005)Google Scholar; Charnovitz, S, Trade Law and Global Governance (Cameron May, 2002)Google Scholar; Dahan, Y et al (eds), Global Justice and International Labour Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chan, A and Ross, RJS, ‘Racing to the Bottom: International Trade Without a Social Clause’ (2003) 24(6) Third World Quarterly 1011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; M Ark et al, ‘The Integration of EU development, trade and human rights policies’, FRAME Work Package No 9 Deliverable No 4 (European Commission, 1 September 2016) http://www.fp7-frame.eu/frame-reps-9-4/ [FRAME Deliverable 9.4], p 16; Alston, P (ed), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; European Commission, ‘The Social Dimension of Globalisation – The EU’s Policy Contribution on Extending the Benefits to All’, COM(2004) 383 final.

3 European Commission, ‘Promoting Core Labour Standards and Improving Social Governance in the Context of Globalisation’, COM(2001) 416 final, p 13.

4 KG Moazzem and A Islam, ‘Moving Beyond the Shadow of the Rana Plaza Tragedy: In Search of a Closure and Restructuring Strategy’ (Fourth Monitoring Report, Centre for Policy Dialogue Bangladesh, 21 April 2015), p 6 http://cpd.org.bd/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Fourth-Monitoring-Report-Rana-Plaza-Tragedy-FINAL-April-2015.pdf.

5 Seabrook, J, The Song of the Shirt (Hurst & Company, 2015), p 21 Google Scholar.

6 Ibid.

7 Just a few months earlier, 112 garment workers had perished in a fire at the Tazreen Fashions factory. See Seabrook, ibid.

8 Delegation of the EU to Bangladesh, ‘Trade and Investment’ http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/delegations/bangladesh/eu_bangladesh/trade/index_en.htm.

9 Langille, BA, ‘Seeking Post-Seattle Clarity–and Inspiration’ in J Conaghan et al, Labour Law in an Era of Globalization: Transformative Practices and Possibilities (Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

10 Commission Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 [2012] OJ L303 (‘GSP Regulation’), ch 5.

11 See Manners, I, ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’ (2002) 40(2) Journal of Common Market Studies 235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 European Commission, ‘Staying Engaged: A Sustainability Compact for Continuous Improvement in Labour Rights and Factory Safety in the Ready-Made Garment and Knitwear Industry in Bangladesh’ (Joint Statement), p 2 http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/july/tradoc_151601.pdf [Compact].

13 De Búrca, G et al, ‘Global Experimentalist Governance’ (2014) 44 British Journal of Political Science 477, p 478 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Möllers, C, ‘European Governance: Meaning and Value of a Concept’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review 313, p 322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Búrca, G de and Scott, J, ‘Introduction: New Governance, Law and Constitutionalism’ in G de Búrca and J Scott (eds), Law and New Governance in the EU and the US (Hart Publishing, 2006), p 2 Google Scholar.

16 Ibid.

17 Ibid.

18 Dewey, J, The Public and its Problems (Originally Published H Holt, 1927; Swallow Press, 1991)Google Scholar as cited in Zeitlin, J, Transnational Transformations of Governance (Amsterdam University Press, 2011), p 7 Google Scholar.

19 Sabel, CF and Zeitlin, J (eds), Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture (Oxford University Press, 2010), p 3 Google Scholar.

20 Ibid.

21 Examples of transnational regulation include the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade Initiative, and the EU’s role in shaping the transnational regulation of GMOs; see Zeitlin, J (ed), Extending Experimentalist Governance? The European Union and Transnational Regulation (Oxford University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Examples of GXG include the Montreal Protocol to the Vienna Convention, see note 13 above, p 478.

22 See note 13 above.

23 Ibid; also note 15 above, p 9.

24 See note 15 above, p 9.

25 See note 13 above, p 479.

26 See note 15 above, p 3.

27 The concept can also be applied to other areas of external EU experimentalist governance. Kilpatrick, C, ‘New EU Employment Governance and Constitutionalism’ in G de Búrca and J Scott (eds), Law and New Governance in the EU and the US (Hart Publishing, 2006), p 135 Google Scholar.

28 González Garibay, M, ‘The Trade-Labour Linkage from the Eyes of Developing Countries: A Euphemism for Protectionist Practices?’ (2009) 5 European Foreign Affairs Review 763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Rosamond, B, Theories of European Integration (Palgrave Macmillan, 2000), p 2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 See note 11 above.

31 Emphasis added.

32 European Commission, ‘Human Rights and Democracy at the Heart of EU External Action – Towards a More Effective Approach’, COM(2011) 886 final.

33 Alston, P and Weiler, JHH, ‘An ‘Ever-Closer Union’ in Need of a Human Rights Policy: The European Union and Human Rights’ in P Alston (ed), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1999), p 6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Ibid.

35 See note 11 above, p 245.

36 See Hepple, B, Labour Laws and Global Trade (Hart Publishing, 2005)Google Scholar.

37 Kerremans, B and Orbie, J, ‘The Social Dimension of European Union Trade Policies’ (2009) 14 European Foreign Affairs Review 629, p 632 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 See note 3 above, p 13.

39 See note 33 above, p 11; European Commission, ‘Promoting Decent Work for All: The EU Contribution to the Implementation of the Decent Work Agenda in the World’, COM(2006) 249 final, p 10.

40 de Búrca, G, ‘EU External Relations: The Governance Mode of Foreign Policy’ in B Van Vooren et al (eds), The EU’s Role in Global Governance: The Legal Dimension (Oxford University Press, 2013), p 42 Google Scholar; COM(2006) 249 final, note 39 above, p 10; European Commission, ‘A Global Partnership for Poverty Eradication and Sustainable Development After 2015’, COM(2015) 44 final, p 3.

41 Wouters, J et al, ‘The European Union’s Participation in United Nations Human Rights and Environmental Governance: Key Concepts and Major Challenges’ in J Wouters et al (eds), The European Union and Multilateral Governance: Assessing EU Participation in United Nations Human Rights and Environmental Fora (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), p 3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 Adopted by the International Labour Conference at its Eighty-sixth Session, Geneva, 18 June 1998 (Annex revised 15 June 2010) http://www.ilo.org/declaration/thedeclaration/textdeclaration/lang--en/index.htm.

43 Johnson, A, ‘EU-ILO Relations: Between Regional and Global Governance’ in J Orbie and L Tortell (eds), The European Union and the Social Dimension of Globalization: How the EU Influences the World (Routledge, 2009), p 92 Google Scholar.

44 Ibid, p 94.

45 European Commission and ILO, ‘Concerning the Establishment of a Strategic Partnership between the International Labour Organisation and the Commission of the European Communities in the field of Development’ (Memorandum of Understanding, 2004) A.1.

46 ILO, ‘Decent Work Agenda’ http://www.ilo.org/global/topics/decent-work/lang--en/index.htm.

47 J Kenner, ‘Economic Partnership Agreements: Enhancing the Labour Dimension of Global Governance?’ in Van Vooren et al, note 40 above, p 321.

48 See note 43 above, p 93.

49 Orbie, J and Babarinde, O, ‘The Social Dimension of Globalization and EU Development Policy: Promoting Core Labour Standards and Corporate Social Responsibility’ (2008) 30(3) European Integration 459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 R Kissack, ‘Writing a New Normative Standard? EU Member States and ILO Conventions’ in Orbie and Tortell, see note 43 above, pp 101–102.

51 Ibid.

52 Orbie, J et al, ‘EU Trade Policy and a Social Clause: A Question of Competences?’ (2005) 17 Politique Européenne 159, pp 166–168 Google Scholar.

53 See COM(2015) 44 final, note 40 above, p 15.

54 COM(2006) 249 final, note 39 above, p 10.

55 GSP Regulation, Art 19; Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1083/2013 [2013] OJ L293/16; see Ark et al note 2 above, p 14; Portela, C and Orbie, J, ‘Sanctions under the EU Generalised System of Preferences and Foreign Policy: Coherence by Accident?’ (2014) 20(1) Contemporary Politics 63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 See note 52 above, p 167.

57 See FRAME Deliverable 9.4, Ark et al note 2 above, p 14.

58 See O De Schutter, note 2 above, ch 4.

59 The new generation FTAs are those recently concluded by the EU which include provisions on Trade and Sustainable Development, see European Commission, ‘Trade: Sustainable Development’ http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/policy-making/sustainable-development/index_en.htm; Van Den Putte, L and Orbie, J, ‘EU Bilateral Trade Agreements and the Surprising Rise of Labour Provisions’ (2015) 31(3) The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 263, p 264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 Orbie, J and Khorana, S, ‘Normative Versus Market Power Europe? The EU-India Trade Agreement’ (2015) 13 Asia Europe Journal 253, p 260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see J Orbie et al, ‘Civil Society Meetings in European Union Trade Agreements: Features, Purposes and Evaluation’ CLEER Papers 2016/3 (ASSER Institute).

61 Bartels, L, Human Rights Conditionality in the EU’s International Agreements (Oxford University Press, 2005), pp 175–176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 European Commission, ‘Policy Coherence for Development: Accelerating Progress Towards Attaining the Millennium Development Goals’, COM(2005) 134 final, p 5.

63 See note 3 above, p 13.

64 Shawki, N, ‘Norm Evaluation and Change: Analysing the Negotiation of the Sustainable Development Goals’ in N Shawki (ed), International Norms, Normative Change, and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (Lexington Books, 2016) p 9 Google Scholar.

65 See COM(2015) 44 final, note 40 above, p 3.

66 Ibid, pp 3, 14.

67 See Van Den Putte and Orbie, note 59 above, p 282; FRAME Deliverable 9.4, see Ark et al note 2 above, p 22.

68 European Commission, ‘A Decent Life for All: Ending Poverty and Giving the World a Sustainable Future’, COM(2013) 92 final, p 3.

69 This section draws on the authors’ contribution to FRAME Deliverable 9.4, see Ark et al note 2 above, pp 5–6. See pp 12–29 of the report for the broader political and socio-economic context post Bangladesh’s independence in 1971; and pp 27–35 for an overview of the development of the RMG sector.

70 World Bank, ‘Bangladesh Overview’ (2015) http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/bangladesh/overview; FRAME Deliverable 9.4, Ark et al note 2 above, pp 60–67; UN, ‘Sustainable Development Goals’ (2015) http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html.

71 See Rahman, M and Rahman, S, ‘Bangladesh-EU Development Relationship: Major Features and Emerging Issues’ (2000) 5 CPD Occasional Paper Series (Centre for Policy Dialogue), p 3 http://www.cpd.org.bd/pub_attach/op5.pdf Google Scholar; and Bartels, L, ‘The Trade and Development Policy of the European Union’ (2007) 18(4) European Journal of International Law 715 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

72 European Commission, ‘Increasing the Impact of EU Development Policy: An Agenda for Change’, COM(2011) 637 final, pp 3, 7.

73 European Commission, ‘EU Development Policy in Support of Inclusive Growth and Sustainable Development: Increasing the Impact of EU Development Policy’, COM(2010) 629 final, p 3.

74 Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and the People’s Republic of Bangladesh on partnership and development [2001] OJ L118/48.

75 Ibid, Art 1.

76 See note 73 above, p 3.

77 European External Action Service and Commission, ‘Development Cooperation Instrument Multi-Annual Indicative Programme 2014-2020’ (30 March 2014) http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/mip-bangladesh-2014-2020_en.pdf.

78 Ibid, point 1.2.

79 Yap, J, ‘One Step Forward: The European Union Generalised System of Preferences and Labour Rights in the Garment Industry in Bangladesh’ in J Wouters et al (eds), Global Governance through Trade: EU Policies and Approaches (Edward Elgar, 2015), pp 214–244 Google Scholar.

80 Zafarullah, H, ‘Globalisation, State and Politics in Bangladesh: Implications for Democratic Governance’ (2003) 26(3) Journal of South Asian Studies 283, pp 283–296 Google Scholar.

81 See note 72 above, p 7.

82 ILO, ‘Bangladesh: Decent Work Country Programme 2012–2015’ (November 2012) http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/program/dwcp/download/bangladesh.pdf.

83 European Commission, ‘Bangladesh Sustainability Compact: Technical Status Report’ (July 2016), p 7 http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/august/tradoc_154841.pdf.

84 For fuller analysis of Bangladesh–EU trade relations and the GSP, see FRAME Deliverable 9.4, Ark et al note 2 above, pp 53–60; GSP Regulation, rec 16.

85 The EU received 47% of Bangladesh’s total exports in 2015. The next largest export market was the US with 14%: Commission, ‘European Union, Trade in goods with Bangladesh’ (21 June 2016), p 8 http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_113349.pdf.

86 European Commission, ‘Report on the Generalised Scheme of Preferences covering the period 2014–2015’, COM(2016) 29 final, p 8. These exports were valued at €11,774,829,000.

87 Grossman, GM and Sykes, AO, ‘A Preference for Development: The Law and Economics of GSP’ in GM Grossman and AO Sykes, WTO Law and Developing Countries (Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp 255, 274Google Scholar.

88 GSP Regulation, Art 19(1)(a).

89 See note 8 above.

90 See Gereffi, G and Fernandez-Stark, K, ‘Global Value Chain Analysis: A Primer’ (Duke Center on Globalization, Governance and Competitiveness, May 2011), p 5 Google Scholar http://www.cggc.duke.edu/pdfs/2011-05-31_GVC_analysis_a_primer.pdf. On subcontracting see FRAME Deliverable 9.4, Ark et al note 2 above, p 33.

91 Fernandez-Stark, K et al, ‘The Apparel Global Value Chain: Economic Upgrading and Workforce Development’ (Duke Center on Globalization, Governance and Competitiveness, November 2011), p 2 http://www.cggc.duke.edu/pdfs/2011-11-11_CGGC_Apparel-Global-Value-Chain.pdf Google Scholar.

92 UNDP, ‘Millennium Development Goals: Bangladesh Progress Report’ (September 2015) http://www.bd.undp.org/content/bangladesh/en/home/library/mdg/mdg-progress-report-2015.html.

93 World Bank, ‘Bangladesh’ http://data.worldbank.org/country/Bangladesh.

94 Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA), ‘Trade Information’ http://bgmea.com.bd/home/pages/TradeInformation; Rahman, MH and Siddiqui, SA, ‘Female RMG Worker: Economic Contribution in Bangladesh’ (2015) 5(9) International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 1 Google Scholar.

95 World Bank, ‘Getting to Equal: Promoting Gender Equality through Human Development’ (2011) http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EDUCATION/Resources/278200-1099079877269/547664-1099080014368/Getting_to_equal.pdf.

96 N Hossain, ‘Exports, Equity, and Empowerment: The Effects of Readymade Garments Manufacturing Employment on Gender Equality in Bangladesh’ (World Development Report 2012) http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2012/Resources/7778105-1299699968583/7786210-1322671773271/Hossain-Export-Equity-employment.pdf.

97 ActionAid, ‘Diversify and Conquer: Transforming Bangladesh Into an Industrialised Country’ (December 2015), p 4 https://www.actionaid.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/diversify-and-conquer-transforming-bangladesh-into-an-industrialised-country.pdf. Bangladesh has a minimum wage of €68 per month ahead of Sri Lanka at €66 per month, ILO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, ‘Global Wage Report 2014/15: Asia and the Pacific Supplement’, (December 2014), p 3 http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---sro-bangkok/documents/publication/wcms_325219.pdf.

98 RD Mariani and F Valenti, ‘Working Conditions in the Bangladeshi Garment Sector: Social Dialogue and Compliance’ (Delft University of Technology and Fair Wear Foundation 2013) http://www3.fairwear.org/ul/cms/fck-uploaded/documents/countrystudies/bangladesh/WorkingconditionsintheBangladeshigarmentsectorSocialdialogueandcompliance.pdf.

99 Ibid.

100 ILO, ‘Report of the High–Level Tripartite Mission to Bangladesh’ (17–20 April 2016), p 5 http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_488339.pdf.

101 Human Rights Watch, ‘Bangladesh: Protect Garment Workers’ Rights’ (6 February 2016) https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/02/06/bangladesh-protect-garment-workers-rights.

102 See note 5 above, pp 33–36. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, ‘Occupational Safety and Health in the Textiles Sector’ (E-fact 30, 2 April 2008) https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/e-facts/efact30/view; Bowden, B, ‘Commentary – Bangladesh Clothing Factory Fires: The Way Forward’ (2014) 1(2) South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management 283 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, p 285.

103 E D’Ambrogio, ‘Workers’ conditions in the textile and clothing sector: just an Asian affair? Issues at stake after the Rana Plaza tragedy’, Briefing, European Parliamentary Research Service (August 2014)Google Scholar.

104 Iqbal, SA et al, ‘Identification of Occupational Injury Among the Workers of Selected Cement Industries in Bangladesh - A Case Study’ (2010) 25 Journal of Chemical Engineering 22 Google Scholar.

105 B Claeson, ‘Deadly Secrets: What companies know about dangerous workplaces and why exposing the truth can save workers’ lives in Bangladesh and beyond’ (International Labor Rights Forum, Washington DC 2012), p 20.

106 FRAME Deliverable 9.4, see Ark et al note 2 above, pp 45–53.

107 Ibid, p 8.

108 ILO, ‘Improving working conditions in the ready made garment industry: Progress and achievements’ (September 2016) http://www.ilo.org/dhaka/Whatwedo/Projects/WCMS_240343/lang--en/index.htm.

109 ILO, ‘National Tripartite Plan of Action on Fire Safety and Structural Integrity in the Ready-Made Garment Sector in Bangladesh’ (25 July 2013) http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---ilo-dhaka/documents/genericdocument/wcms_221543.pdf; see FRAME Deliverable 9.4, Ark et al note 2 above, pp 68–70.

110 Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh http://bangladeshaccord.org/; Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety, http://www.bangladeshworkersafety.org/who-we-are/about-the-alliance; see, FRAME Deliverable 9.4, Ark et al note 2 above, pp 71–75.

111 See note 108 above; FRAME Deliverable 9.4, Ark et al note 2 above, pp 75–76.

112 Compact, p 3; see, FRAME Deliverable 9.4, Ark et al note 2 above, pp 81–91.

113 ILO, ‘Strengthening Workplace Safety and Labour Rights in the Bangladesh Ready-Made Garment Sector’ (September 2016), p 6 http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---ilo-dhaka/documents/publication/wcms_474048.pdf.

114 Compact, p 3. It also covers the knitwear industry.

115 European Commission, ‘Joint Statement by EU Trade Commissioner Karel De Gucht and Bangladesh Foreign Minister Dr. Dipu Moni following recent disasters in the Bangladeshi garment industry’ (Press Release, 28 May 2013) http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-469_en.htm.

116 See note 83 above, p 2.

117 The Governments of the EU Member States were represented by the Commission. See note 113 above, p 6.

118 Compact, p 2.

119 FRAME Deliverable 9.4, see Ark et al note 2 above, pp 83–90.

120 See note 83 above.

121 ITUC, UNI Global Union and IndustriaALL, ‘An Evaluation of the Bangladesh Sustainability Compact: March 2015 Update’ (July 2014), p 2 http://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/ituc-ia-uni_evaulation_of_the_bangladesh_sustainability_compact.pdf.

122 See note 83 above, p 4.

123 ITUC, UNI Global Union and IndustriALL, ‘An Evaluation of the Bangladesh Sustainability Compact’ (January 2016), p 1 http://admin.industriall-union.org/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/Bangladesh/ituc-ia-uni_evaulation_of_the_bangladesh_sustainability_compact_january_2016_final.pdf.

124 ITUC, UNI Global Union and IndustriALL, ‘An Evaluation of the Bangladesh Sustainability Compact’ (March 2015) 1.d http://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/ituc-ia-uni_evaulation_of_the_bangladesh_sustainability_compact_march_final.pdf. See note 100 above, p 1.

125 See note 83 above, p 2.

126 Ibid, p 24.

127 See note 108 above.

128 See note 83 above, p 22.

129 See note 113 above, p 10.

130 See note 123 above, p 13.

131 Compact, p 7.

132 See note 83 above, p 30.

133 See Zeitlin, note 21 above; note 13 above, p 478.

134 See note 13 above, p 478.

135 Office of the US Trade Representative, ‘GSP review of Bangladesh recognizes progress, urges that more be done on worker safety and rights’ (January 2015) https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2015/january/gsp-review-bangladesh-recognizes.

136 See note 115 above.

137 FRAME Deliverable 9.4, see Ark et al note 2 above, p 80.

138 See note 13 above, p 479.

139 Ibid.

140 See Zeitlin, note 21 above, p 11.

141 See note 83 above, p 5.

142 Compact, p 1.

143 Ibid.

144 Ibid.

145 Overdevest, C and Zeitlin, J, ‘Assembling an Experimentalist Regime: Transnational Governance Interactions in the Forest Sector’ (2014) 8 Regulation & Governance 22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

146 Ibid, pp 27–29.

147 See note 13 above, p 478.

148 Soanes, C and Hawker, S, Compact Oxford English Dictionary of Current English, 3rd ed (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar.

149 European Commission, ‘The European Union’s Role in Promoting Human Rights and Democratisation in Third Countries’, COM(2001) 252 final, p 9.

150 Compact, p 2.

151 Ibid.

152 FRAME Deliverable 9.4, see Ark et al note 2 above, p 80; C Malmström, ‘Remembering Rana Plaza: What Next?’ (European Commission, Speech, 22 April 2015) http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/april/tradoc_153350.pdf.

153 Ibid.

154 See note 13 above, p 478.

155 See FRAME Deliverable 9.4, Ark et al note 2 above, p 9.

156 European Commission, ‘The European Union and the External Dimension of Human Rights Policy: From Rome to Maastricht and Beyond’, COM(95) 567 final, para 108.

157 See note 145 above, p 36.

158 See note 123 above, p 6.

159 Ibid, pp 7–9.

160 M Raisul et al, ‘Safety and Labour Conditions: The Accord and the National Tripartite Plan of Action for the Garment Industry of Bangladesh’ (ILO, Global Labour University, 2015) http://www.global-labour-university.org/fileadmin/GLU_Working_Papers/GLU_WP_No.38.pdf; FRAME Deliverable 9.4, see Ark et al note 2 above, pp 49–53.

161 Postnikov, E and Bastiaens, I, ‘Does Dialogue Work? The Effectiveness of Labor Standards in EU Preferential Trade Agreements’ (2014) 21(6) Journal of European Public Policy 923, pp 927–928 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

162 See note 149 above, p 8.

163 See Van Den Putte and Orbie, note 59 above, p 271.

164 Ibid; see FRAME Deliverable 9.4, Ark et al note 2 above, pp 38–40.

165 See FRAME Deliverable 9.4, Ark et al note 2 above, pp 67–76.

166 See note 145 above, p 27.

167 Ibid, p 32.

168 See note 13 above, p 478.

169 Compact, p 3.

170 IndustriALL et al, ‘Bangladesh Sustainability Compact @ 4: Situation Worsening, Time for Action is Now’ (May 2017) http://www.industriall-union.org/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/2017/BANGLADESH/the_failure_of_the_bangladesh_sustainability_compact_2017.pdf.

171 See note 83 above, p 2.

172 See note 123 above, pp 7–9; these initiatives are examined in detail in FRAME Deliverable 9.4, see Ark et al note 2 above, pp 67–75.

173 Clean Clothes Campaign et al, ‘Re: Bangladesh Accord: Brief Progress Report and Proposals for Enhancement’ (Memo, April 2017), p 1 https://cleanclothes.org/resources/publications/accord-update-april-2017.

174 See note 83 above, pp 30–31.

175 See note 145 above, p 35.

176 See note 13 above, p 478.

177 See note 83 above, p 7; Partners of the Bangladesh Sustainability Compact, ‘Joint Conclusions: Second Follow-up Meeting on Bangladesh Sustainability Compact’ (Dhaka, 28 January 2016) http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/january/tradoc_154181.pdf.

178 See note 83 above, pp 2, 4.

179 See note 83 above, p 24.

180 Ibid; http://dife.gov.bd.

181 Ibid.

182 See note 173 above, p 5.

183 Ibid, p 6.

184 See note 83 above, p 16.

185 Ibid.

186 Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety, ‘Protecting and Empowering Bangladesh’s Garment Workers’ (2nd Annual Report, September 2015) p 2 http://www.bangladeshworkersafety.org/files/Alliance%20Second%20Annual%20Report,%20Sept,%202015.pdf

187 Ibid.

188 ILO, ‘Improving Working Conditions in the Ready Made Garment Industry: Progress and Achievements’ (Dhaka, September 2016) http://www.ilo.org/dhaka/Whatwedo/Projects/WCMS_240343/lang--en/index.htm; FRAME Deliverable 9.4, Ark et al note 2 above, p 70.

189 Ibid.

190 See ILO, note 113 above.

191 See note 188 above.

192 Búrca, G De et al, ‘New Modes of Pluralist Global Governance’ (2013) 45(3) New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 723, p 740 Google Scholar.

193 See note 15 above, p 6.

194 Ibid.

195 See note 13 above, p 483.

196 See note 3 above, p 11.

197 See note 123 above, p 2.

198 See Malmström, note 152 above, p 4.

199 See note 170 above.

200 ILO, ‘Conference Committee on the Application of Standards’ (Geneva 2016, 105th Session of the International Labour conference) part 1/32, para 143.

201 Ibid, para 144.

202 See note 170 above.

203 ITUC et al, ‘Joint Union Letter to EU re Bangladesh’ http://www.ituc-csi.org/joint-union-letter-to-eu-re.

204 Uni Global Union et al, ‘EU-Based Affiliated Demand a GSP Investigation for Bangladesh’ (20 February 2017) http://www.uni-europa.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/20170220_-_joint_letter_to_affliates_on_bangladesh.pdf.

205 IH Ovi, ‘EU Warns Bangladesh of GSP Suspension over Labour Rights’ (Dhaka Tribune, 24 March 2017) http://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/2017/03/24/eu-warns-bangladesh-gsp-suspension-labour-rights.

206 Tsogas, G, ‘Labour Standards in the Generalized Systems of Preferences of the European Union and the United States’ (2000) 6(3) European Journal of Industrial Relations 349, p 362 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

207 See note 61 above, pp 42–43.

208 See note 83 above, pp 4–5.

209 FRAME Deliverable 9.4, see Ark et al note 2 above, p 80.

210 See note 62 above, p 14.

211 See note 13 above, p 480.

212 Ibid.

213 Trubek, DM et al, “Soft Law’, ‘Hard Law’ and EU Integration’ in G de Búrca and J Scott (eds), Law and New Governance in the EU and the US (Hart Publishing, 2006), p 78 Google Scholar.

214 FRAME Deliverable 9.4, see Ark et al note 2 above, p 81.

215 Manners, I, ‘The Social Dimension of EU Trade Policies: Reflections from a Normative Power Perspective’ (2009) 14 European Foreign Affairs Review 785, p 803 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

216 See note 213 above, p 78.

217 See note 83 above, p 3; ‘Joint Conclusions, note 177 above.

218 See note 158 above, p 2.

219 See FRAME Deliverable 9.4, Ark et al note 2 above, pp 35–41.

220 FRAME Deliverable 9.4, see Ark et al note 2 above, pp 38–40.

221 See note 83 above, p 4.

222 FRAME Deliverable 9.4, see Ark et al note 2 above, p 81.

223 See note 61 above, pp 42–43.

224 See note 33 above, p 14.

225 Ewing-Chow, M, ‘First Do No Harm: Myanmar Trade Sanctions and Human Rights’ (2007) 5(2) Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights 153, pp 179–180 Google Scholar.