Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:39:52.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

STRUCTURAL DAMAGE AND GALL INDUCTION BY PEGOMYA CURTICORNIS AND PEGOMYA EUPHORBIAE (DIPTERA: ANTHOMYIIDAE) WITHIN THE STEMS OF LEAFY SPURGE (EUPHORBIA × PSEUDOVIRGATA) (EUPHORBIACEAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Andre Gassmann  and
Joseph D. Shorthouse
Andre Gassmann
Affiliation:
CAB International Institute of Biological Control, European Station, CH-2800, Delémont, Switzerland
Joseph D. Shorthouse
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada P3E 2C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Leafy spurge (Euphorbia × pseudovirgata [Schur]) is an herbaceous perennial and serious weed of European origin that has been accidently introduced into North America. The European anthomyiid flies Pegomya curticornis (Stein) and Pegomya euphorbiae (Kieffer) are found on several spurge species in Europe and also attack leafy spurge. The two flies induce identical galls on the subterranean stems of their host plants, and the shoots wilt and die. Eggs are laid on the shoot tip, and the larvae bore into the stem by eating pith which is later replaced by callus. This is a rare example of an insect with both boring and gall-inducing feeding strategies. Galls are induced when larvae feed on the ring of vascular tissue. There is no proliferation of nutritive cells but instead thick layers of gall parenchyma are produced. The vascular connections are broken at the gall level and concentric vascular bundles appear in the cortical and gall parenchyma. After pupation an inner periderm differentiates around the chamber surface.

Résumé

Accidentellement introduite d’Europe, l’euphorbe feuillue (Euphorbia × pseudovirgata [Schur]), est en Amérique du Nord, une importante mauvaise herbe vivace. En Europe, plusieurs espèces d’euphorbes, en l’occurrence l’euphorbe feuillue, sont attaquées par les mouches anthomyiides indigènes, Pegomya curticornis (Stein) et Pegomya euphorbiae (Kieffer). Ces deux espèces entraînent la formation de galles identiques sur les tiges souterraines de leur plantes hôtes, causant ainsi la flétrissure et la mort des pousses. Les oeufs sont placés à l’extrémité de la pousse et la larve creuse dans la tige dévorant la moelle qui sera remplacée par une callosité. Ceci constitue un rare cas de comportement alimentaire où un insecte creuse une tige et entraine la formation d’une callosité. Les galles se forment lorsque les larves se nourrissent dans la zone de tissus vasculaires. Dans la galle, il n’y a pas de prolifération de cellules nutritives mais plutôt production de couches épaisses de parenchyme. Des liens vasculaires sont brisés au niveau de la galle et des bourlets vasculaires concentriques apparaîssent dans le parenchyme cortical et celui de la galle. Après la nymphose, un périderme interne se différencie autour de la surface de la chambre.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 122 , Issue 3 , June 1990 , pp. 429 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bunning, E. 1965. Die Entstehung von Mustern in der Entwicklung von Pflanzen. In Ruhland, W.. Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie 15: 383–408.Google Scholar
Esau, K. 1977. Anatomy of Seed Plants. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 550 pp.Google Scholar
Gassmann, A. 1987. Investigations on the Pegomya argyrocephala complex of species (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) to select candidate biological control agents for leafy and cypress spurge in North America. Final Report. CAB International, CIBC European Station, Delémont, Switzerland. 40 pp.Google Scholar
Harris, P. 1981. Stress as a strategy in the biological control of weeds. pp. 333–340in Papavizas, G.C. (Ed.), Biological Control in Crop Production. BARC Symposium 5.Google Scholar
Huckett, H.C. 1987. Anthomyiidae. pp. 1099–1114 in Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Vol. 2. Canadian Government Publishing Centre, Hull, Quebec. pp. 675–1332.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1973. Anthomyiidae. In Lindner, E. (Ed.), Die Fliegen der Palearctischen Region. Vol. 63 a. Part I: IIX–LVIII, Part II: 523–527.Google Scholar
Hering, E.M. 1951. Biology of the Leaf Miners. Junk, The Hague. 420 pp.Google Scholar
Hering, E.M. 1968. Briefe uber Blattminierer. Edited and annotated by Spencer, K.A.. Junk, The Hague. 54 pp.Google Scholar
Jensen, W.A. 1962. Botanical Histochemistry. Freeman, San Francisco. 408 pp.Google Scholar
Kahl, G. 1982. Molecular biology of wound healing: the conditioning phenomenon. pp. 211–267 in Kahl, G., and Schell, J.S. (Eds.), Molecular Biology of Plant Tumors. Academic Press, New York. 617 pp.Google Scholar
Lalonde, R.G., and Shorthouse, J.D.. 1984. Developmental morphology of the gall of Urophora cardui (Diptera: Tephritidae) in the stems of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Can. J. Bot. 62: 1372–1384.Google Scholar
Lipetz, J. 1970. Wound healing in higher plants. Int. Rev. Cytol. 27: 1–28.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. 1969. Irrigation vasculaire dans les galles. Mem. Soc. Bot. Fr. 75–97.Google Scholar
Meyer, J., and Maresquelle, H.J.. 1983. Anatomie des Galles. Borntraeger, Berlin. 662 pp.Google Scholar
Michelsen, V. 1988. Taxonomy of the species of Pegomya (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) developing in the shoots of spurges (Euphorbia spp.). Ent. Scand. 18: 425–435.Google Scholar
Moss, E.H., and Gorham, A.L.. 1953. Interxylary cork and fission of stems and roots. Phytomorphology 3: 285–294.Google Scholar
Rathcke, B.J. 1976. Insect–plant patterns and relationships in the stem-boring guild. Am. Midl. Nat. 96: 98–117.Google Scholar
Rohfritsch, O., and Shorthouse, J.D.. 1982. Insect galls. pp. 131–152 in Kahl, G., and Schell, J.S. (Eds.), Molecular Biology of Plant Tumors. Academic Press, New York. 617 pp.Google Scholar
Shorthouse, J.D. 1982. Resource exploitation of gall wasps of the genus Diplolepis. pp. 193–198in Proc. 5th Int. Symp. Insect–Plant Relationships, Wageningen. Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Shorthouse, J.D. 1986. Significance of nutritive cells in insect galls. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 88: 368–375.Google Scholar
Shorthouse, J.D., and Lalonde, R.G.. 1984. Structural damage by Rhinocyllus conicus Froel. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) within the flowerheads of nodding thistle. Can. Ent. 1165: 1335–1343.Google Scholar
Smith, A.R., and Tutin, T.G.. 1968. Euphorbia L. pp. 213–226 in Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M., and Webb, S.A. (Eds.), Flora Europaea. Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, Great Britain. 455 pp.Google Scholar
Struckmeyer, B.E., and Ricker, A.J.. 1951. Wound periderm formation in white-pine trees resistant to blister rust. Phytopathology 41: 276–281.Google Scholar
Swain, T. 1977. Secondary compounds as protective agents. A. Rev. Plant Physiol. 28: 479–501.Google Scholar
Watson, A.K. 1985. Introduction — the leafy spurge problem. pp. 1–6 in Watson, A.K. (Ed.), Leafy Spurge. Monograph Series of the Weed Science Society of America, Number 3. 104 pp.Google Scholar