Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:31:12.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attraction of Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) to synthetic volatile pheromone lures during field bioassays in western Idaho, United States of America, community analysis, and a method to design region-specific multicomponent volatile pheromone lures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2022

Claudia D. Lyons-Yerion Open the ORCID record for Claudia D. Lyons-Yerion [Opens in a new window] ,
Stephen P. Cook  and
Christopher J. Williams
Claudia D. Lyons-Yerion*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Nematology, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, MS2329, Moscow, Idaho, United States of America, 83844-2329
Stephen P. Cook
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Nematology, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, MS2329, Moscow, Idaho, United States of America, 83844-2329
Christopher J. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Idaho, P.O. Box 441104, Moscow, Idaho, United States of America, 83844-1104
*
*Corresponding author. Email: yeri5309@alumni.uidaho.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The identification of volatile pheromones attractive to and produced by many species within the family Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) has spurred development of synthetic pheromone lures that can be used to assess cerambycid populations and to monitor for invasive and rare species. We applied this method of trapping to examine cerambycid attraction to pheromone compounds and to initiate an analysis of the cerambycid communities within western Idaho, United States of America. A total of 8195 cerambycids, representing 67 species, 17 tribes, and 42 genera within six subfamilies of the Cerambycidae, were captured. Thirteen volatile pheromone lures were tested over three years, and a significant treatment effect was detected for nine cerambycid species. No significant differences were found among sites for species richness, diversity, or evenness. No significant differences were found among lures for species richness or diversity, but a significant difference was detected among lures for species evenness. We propose a method for designing a multicomponent lure, based on data from the target region, to maximise the number of species captured and to target specific cerambycid species within a targeted region.

Type
Research Paper
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 154 , Issue 1 , 2022 , e46
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Entomological Society of Canada

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Rob Johns

References

Allison, J.D. and Redak, R.A. 2017. The impact of trap type and design features on survey and detection of bark and woodboring beetles and their associates: a review and meta-analysis. Annual Review of Entomology, 62: 127–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbour, J.D., Millar, J.G., Rodstein, J., Ray, A.M., Alston, D.G., Rejzek, M., et al. 2011. Synthetic 3,5-dimethyldodecanoic acid serves as a general attractant for multiple species of Prionus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 104: 588–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezark, L.G. 2020. Checklist of the Oxypeltidae, Vesperidae, Disteniidae and Cerambycidae, (Coleoptera) of the Western Hemisphere. 2020 Edition (updated through 31 December 2019) [online]. Available from http://bezbycids.com/byciddb/wdocuments.asp?w=n [accessed 05 January 2020].Google Scholar
Bousquet, Y., Laplante, S., Hammond, H.E.J., and Langor, D.W. 2017. Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of Canada and Alaska: identification guide with nomenclatural, taxonomic, distributional, host-plant, and ecological data. Nakladatelství Jan Farkač, Prague, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
Cervantes, D.E., Hanks, L.M., Lacey, E.S., and Barbour, J.D. 2006. First documentation of a volatile sex pheromone in a longhorned beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) of the primitive subfamily Prioninae. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 99: 718–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collignon, R.M., Swift, I.P., Zou, Y., McElfresh, J.S., Hanks, L.M., and Millar, J.G. 2016. The influence of host plant volatiles on the attraction of longhorn beetles to pheromones. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 42: 215–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diesel, N.M., Zou, Y., Johnson, T.D., Diesel, D.A., Millar, J.G., Mongold-Diers, J.A., and Hanks, L.M. 2017. The rare North American cerambycid beetle Dryobius sexnotatus shares a novel pyrrole pheromone component with species in Asia and South America. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 43: 739–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodds, K.J., Allison, J.D., Miller, D.R., Hanavan, R.P., and Sweeney, J. 2015. Considering species richness and rarity when selecting optimal survey traps: comparisons of semiochemical baited flight intercept traps for Cerambycidae in eastern North America. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 17: 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, J.T., Denux, O., Courtin, C., Bernard, A., Javal, M., Millar, J.G., et al. 2019. Multi-component blends for trapping native and exotic longhorn beetles at potential points-of-entry and in forests. Journal of Pest Science, 92: 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fierke, M.K., Skabeikis, D.D., Millar, J.G., Teale, S.A., McElfresh, J.S., and Hanks, L.M. 2012. Identification of a male-produced aggregation pheromone for Monochamus scutellatus scutellatus and an attractant for the congener Monochamus notatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 105: 2029–2034.Google Scholar
Graham, E.E., Mitchell, R.F., Reagel, P.F., Barbour, J.D., Millar, J.G., and Hanks, L.M. 2010. Treating panel traps with a fluoropolymer enhances their efficiency in capturing cerambycid beetles. Journal of Economic Entomology, 103: 641–647.Google ScholarPubMed
Graham, E.E. and Poland, T.M. 2012. Efficacy of Fluon conditioning for capturing cerambycid beetles in different trap designs and persistence on panel traps over time. Journal of Economic Entomology, 105: 395–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, E.E., Poland, T.M., McCullough, D.G., and Millar, J.G. 2012. A comparison of trap type and height for capturing cerambycid beetles (Coleoptera). Journal of Economic Entomology, 105: 837–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, R.A., Keena, M.A., and Eyre, D. 2017. Life history and population dynamics of cerambycids. In Cerambycidae of the world: Biology and pest management. Edited by Wang, Q.. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Florida, United States of America. Pp. 71–103.Google Scholar
Hammond, H.E.J. and Williams, D.J. 2013. Casey’s conundrum: a review of the genus Semanotus Mulsant (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae: Callidiini) in North America. Zootaxa, 3670: 101–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handley, K., Hough-Goldstein, J., Hanks, L.M., Millar, J.G., and D’amico, V. 2015. Species richness and phenology of cerambycid beetles in urban forest fragments of northern Delaware. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 108: 251–262.Google Scholar
Hanks, L.M. and Millar, J.G. 2013. Field bioassays of cerambycid pheromones reveal widespread parsimony of pheromone structures, enhancement by host plant volatiles, and antagonism by components from heterospecifics. Chemoecology, 23: 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, L.M. and Millar, J.G. 2016. Sex and aggregation-sex pheromones of cerambycid beetles: basic science and practical applications. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 42: 631–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanks, L.M., Millar, J.G., and Paine, T.D. 1996. Mating behavior of the eucalyptus longhorned borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and the adaptive significance of long “horns”. Journal of Insect Behavior, 9: 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, L.M., Millar, J.G., Mongold-Diers, J.A., Wong, J.C.H., Meier, L.R., Reagel, P.F., and Mitchell, R.F. 2012. Using blends of cerambycid beetle pheromones and host plant volatiles to simultaneously attract a diversity of cerambycid species. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 42: 1050–1059.Google Scholar
Hanks, L.M., Mongold-Diers, J.A., Atkinson, T.H., Fierke, M.K., Ginzel, M.D., Graham, E.E., et al. 2018. Blends of pheromones, with and without host plant volatiles, can attract multiple species of cerambycid beetles simultaneously. Journal of Economic Entomology, 111: 716–724.Google ScholarPubMed
Hanks, L.M., Mongold-Diers, J.A., Mitchell, R.F., Zou, Y., Wong, J.C.H., Meier, L.R., et al. 2019. The role of minor pheromone components in segregating 14 species of longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) of the subfamily Cerambycinae. Journal of Economic Entomology, 112: 2236–2252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanks, L.M., Reagel, P.F., Mitchell, R.F., Wong, J.C.H., Meier, L.R., Silliman, C.A., et al. 2014. Seasonal phenology of the cerambycid beetles of east–central Illinois. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 107: 211–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, R.A., Griffiths, M.W., Nahrung, H.F., Arnold, P.A., Hanks, L.M., and Millar, J.G. 2016. Optimizing generic cerambycid pheromone lures for Australian biosecurity and biodiversity monitoring. Journal of Economic Entomology. 109: 1741–1749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoch, G., Connell, J., and Roques, A. 2020. Testing multi-lure traps for surveillance of native and alien longhorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) at ports of entry and in forests in Austria. Management of Biological Invasions, 11: 677–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbel, S.P. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.Google Scholar
Johnson, L.P. 2010. A survey of production and pest management strategies used for gooseberry production throughout three regions of the United States, and masters gooseberry project presentation. Produced in association with online master’s degree, Virginia Tech University, Virginia, United States of America [online]. Available from https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/51500 [accessed 22 November 2020].Google Scholar
Lacey, E.S., Ginzel, M.D., Millar, J.G., and Hanks, L.M. 2004. Male-produced aggregation pheromone of the cerambycid beetle Neoclytus acuminatus acuminatus . Journal of Chemical Ecology, 30: 1493–1507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laplante, S. 2017. Description of a new Nearctic species of Tragosoma Audinet-Serville (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Prioninae), with species validations, new synonymies and a lectotype designation. Insecta Mundi, 0578: 1–17.Google Scholar
Larsson, M.C. 2016. Pheromones and other semiochemicals for monitoring rare and endangered species. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 42: 853–868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leech, H.B. 1963. Centrodera spurca (LeConte) and two new species resembling it, with biological and other notes (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, Fourth Series, 32: 149–218.Google Scholar
Linsley, E.G. 1959. Ecology of Cerambycidae. Annual Review of Entomology, 4: 99–138.Google Scholar
Linsley, E.G. 1961. The Cerambycidae of North America. Part I: Introduction. Volume 18. University of California Publications in Entomology. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, United States of America.Google Scholar
Linsley, E.G. 1962a. The Cerambycidae of North America. Part II: Taxonomy and classification of the Parandrinae, Prioninae, Spondylidinae, and Aseminae. Volume 19. University of California Publications in Entomology. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, United States of America.Google Scholar
Linsley, E.G. 1962b. The Cerambycidae of North America. Part III: Taxonomy and classification of the subfamily Cerambycinae, tribes Opsimini through Megaderini. Volume 20. University of California Publications in Entomology. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, United States of America.Google Scholar
Linsley, E.G. 1963. The Cerambycidae of North America. Part IV: Taxonomy and classification of the subfamily Cerambycinae, tribes Elaphidionini through Rhinotragini. Volume 21. University of California Publications in Entomology. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, United States of America.Google Scholar
Linsley, E.G. 1964. The Cerambycidae of North America. Part V: Taxonomy and classification of the subfamily Cerambycinae, tribes Callichromini through Ancylocerini. Volume 22. University of California Publications in Entomology. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, United States of America.Google Scholar
Linsley, E.G. and Chemsak, J.A. 1972. The Cerambycidae of North America. Part VI, Number 1: Taxonomy and classification of the subfamily Lepturinae. Volume 69. University of California Publications in Entomology. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, United States of America.Google Scholar
Linsley, E.G. and Chemsak, J.A. 1976. The Cerambycidae of North America. Part VI, Number 2: Taxonomy and classification of the subfamily Lepturinae. Volume 80. University of California Publications in Entomology. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, United States of America.Google Scholar
Linsley, E.G. and Chemsak, J.A. 1984. The Cerambycidae of North America. Part VII, Number 1: Taxonomy and classification of the subfamily Lamiinae, tribes Parmenini through Acanthoderini. Volume 102. University of California Publications in Entomology. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, United States of America.Google Scholar
Linsley, E.G. and Chemsak, J.A. 1995. The Cerambycidae of North America. Part VII, Number 2: Taxonomy and classification of the subfamily Lamiinae, tribes Acanthocinini through Hemilophini. Volume 114. University of California Publications in Entomology. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, United States of America.Google Scholar
Lyons-Yerion, C.D., Barbour, J.D., Merickel, F.W., and Cook, S.P. 2020a. First report of Centrodera dayi Leech, 1963 and Phymatodes vulneratus (LeConte, 1857) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), in Idaho, U.S.A. Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 96: 91–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons-Yerion, C.D., Barbour, J.D., Mongold-Diers, J.A., Williams, C.J., and Cook, S.P. 2020b. Identification of a male-produced volatile pheromone for Phymatodes dimidiatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and seasonal flight phenology of four Phymatodes species endemic to the North American Intermountain West. Environmental Entomology, 49: 1077–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons-Yerion, C.D., Cook, S.P., Williams, C.J., and Barbour, J.D. 2021. Comparative population dynamics, flight periods and volatile pheromone attraction of Tragosoma harrisii and Tragosoma soror (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Idaho, U.S.A. Northwest Science, 95: 188–200.Google Scholar
Macias-Samano, J.E., Wakarchuk, D., Millar, J.G., and Hanks, L.M. 2012. 2-Undecyloxy-1-ethanol in combination with other semiochemicals attracts three Monochamus species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in British Columbia, Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 144: 821–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magurran, A.E. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science Ltd, Malden, Massachusetts, United States of America.Google Scholar
McIntosh, R.P. 1967. An index of diversity and the relation of certain concepts to diversity. Ecology, 48: 392–404.Google Scholar
Meier, L.R., Millar, J.G., Mongold-Diers, J.A., and Hanks, L.M. 2019. ( S)-sulcatol is a pheromone component for two species of cerambycid beetles in the subfamily Lamiinae. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 45: 447–454.Google ScholarPubMed
Millar, J.G. and Hanks, L.M. 2017. Chemical ecology of cerambycids. In Cerambycidae of the world: Biology and pest management. Edited by Wang, Q.. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, Florida, United States of America.Google Scholar
Millar, J.G., Hanks, L.M., Moreira, J.A., Barbour, J.D., and Lacey, E.S. 2009. Pheromone chemistry of cerambycid beetles. In Chemical ecology of wood-boring insects. Edited by Nakamuta, K. and Millar, J. G.. Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Ibaraki, Japan. Pp. 52–79.Google Scholar
Millar, J.G., Mitchell, R.F., Meier, L.R., Johnson, T.D., Mongold-Diers, J.A., and Hanks, L.M. 2017. (2E,6Z,9Z)-2,6,9-pentadecatrienal as a male-produced aggregation-sex pheromone of the cerambycid beetle Elaphidion mucronatum . Journal of Chemical Ecology, 43: 1056–1065.Google ScholarPubMed
Millar, J.G., Richards, A.B., Halloran, S., Zou, Y., Boyd, E.A., Quigley, K.N., and Hanks, L.M. 2019. Pheromone identification by proxy: identification of aggregation-sex pheromones of North American cerambycid beetles as a strategy to identify pheromones of invasive Asian congeners. Journal of Pest Science, 92: 213–220.Google Scholar
Miller, D.R., Crowe, C.M., Mayo, P.D., Reid, L.S., Silk, L.S., and Sweeney, J.D. 2017. Interactions between ethanol, syn-2,3-hexanediol, 3-hydroxyhexan-2-one, and 3-hydroxyoctan-2-one lures on trap catches of hardwood longhorn beetles in southeastern United States. Journal of Economic Entomology, 110: 2119–2128.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, D.R., Crowe, C.M., Mayo, P.D., Silk, P.J., and Sweeney, J.D. 2015. Responses of Cerambycidae and other insects to traps baited with ethanol, 2,3-hexanediol, and 3,2-hydroxyketone lures in north–central Georgia. Journal of Economic Entomology, 108: 2354–2365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, R.F., Ray, A.M., Hanks, L.M., and Millar, J.G. 2018. The common natural products (S)-α-terpineol and (E)-2-hexenol are important pheromone components of Megacyllene antennata (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Environmental Entomology, 47: 1547–1552.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.F., Reagel, P.F., Wong, J.C.H., Meier, L.R., Silva, W.D., Mongold-Diers, J., et al. 2015. Cerambycid beetle species with similar pheromones are segregated by phenology and minor pheromone components. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 41: 431–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molander, M.A., Winde, I.B., Burman, J., Nyabuga, F.N., Lindblom, T.U., Hanks, L.M., et al. 2019. Common cerambycid pheromone components as attractants for longhorn beetles (Cerambycidae) breeding in ephemeral oak substrates in Northern Europe. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 45: 537–548.Google ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, M.E. and Wargo, P.M. 1983. Ethanol and other host-derived volatiles as attractants to beetles that bore into hardwoods. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 9: 181–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pielou, E.C. 1969. An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley, New York, New York, United States of America.Google Scholar
Pielou, E.C. 1975. Ecological Diversity. Wiley InterScience, New York, New York, United States of America.Google Scholar
Rassati, D., Marchioro, M., Flaherty, L., Poloni, R., Edwards, S., Faccoli, M., and Sweeney, J. 2020. Response of native and exotic longhorn beetles to common pheromone components provides partial support for the pheromone-free space hypothesis. Insect Science, 28: 793–810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ray, A.M., Arnold, R.A., Swift, I., Schapker, P.A., McCann, S., Marshall, C.J., et al. 2014. ( R)-desmolactone is a sex pheromone or sex attractant for the endangered valley elderberry longhorn beetle Desmocerus californicus dimorphus and several congeners (Cerambycidae: Lepturinae). PLOS One, 9: e115498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ray, A.M., Barbour, J.D., McElfresh, J.S., Moreira, J.A., Swift, I., Wright, I.M., et al. 2012a. 2,3-Hexanediols as sex attractants and a female-produced sex pheromone for cerambycid beetles in the prionine genus Tragosoma . Journal of Chemical Ecology, 38: 1151–1158.Google Scholar
Ray, A.M., Lacey, E.S., and Hanks, L.M. 2006. Predicted taxonomic patterns in pheromone production by longhorned beetles. Naturwissenschaften, 93: 543–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ray, A.M., Swift, I.P., McElfresh, J.S., Alten, R.L., and Millar, J.G. 2012b. ( R)-desmolactone, a female-produced sex pheromone component of the cerambycid beetle Desmocerus californicus californicus (subfamily Lepturinae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 38: 157–167.Google ScholarPubMed
Ray, A.M., Žunič, A., Alten, R.L., McElfresh, J.S., Hanks, L.M., and Millar, J.G. 2011. Cis-Vaccenyl acetate, a female-produced sex pheromone component of Ortholeptura valida, a longhorned beetle in the subfamily Lepturinae. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 37: 173–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reagel, P.F., Ginzel, M.D., and Hanks, L.M. 2002. Aggregation and mate location in the red milkweed beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 15: 811–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, M.E., Merickel, F., and MacRae, T.C. 2017. The longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) of Idaho. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 71: 667–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, M.E., Zou, Y., Millar, J.G., and Hanks, L.M. 2020. Complex blends of synthetic pheromones are effective multi-species attractants for longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 113: 2269–2275.Google Scholar
Rodstein, J., McElfresh, J.S., Barbour, J.D., Ray, A.M., Hanks, L.M., and Millar, J.G. 2009. Identification and synthesis of a female-produced sex pheromone for the cerambycid beetle Prionus californicus. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 35: 590–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodstein, J., Millar, J.G., Barbour, J.D., McElfresh, J.S., Wright, I.M., Barbour, K.S., et al. 2011. Determination of the relative and absolute configurations of the female-produced sex pheromone of the cerambycid beetle Prionus californicus . Journal of Chemical Ecology, 37: 114–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandoval, S.J., Cook, S.P., Merickel, F.W., and Osborne, H.L. 2007. Diversity of the beetle (Coleoptera) community captured at artificially created snags of Douglas-fir and grand fir. Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 83: 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute. 2018. User’s Guide, Version 9.4. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.Google Scholar
Schmeelk, T.C., Millar, J.G., and Hanks, L.M. 2016. Influence of trap height and bait type on abundance and species diversity of cerambycid beetles captured in forests of east–central Illinois. Journal of Economic Entomology, 109: 1750–1757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schröder, F.C. 1996. Identizifierung und Synthese neuer Alkaloide, Hydroxyketone und bicyclischer Acetale aus Insekten. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.Google Scholar
Sweeney, J.D., Silk, P.J., and Grebennikov, V.A. 2014. Efficacy of semiochemical-baited traps for detection of longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in the Russian Far East. European Journal of Entomology, 111: 397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, I.P. and Ray, A.M. 2010. Nomenclatural changes in North American Phymatodes Mulsant (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Zootaxa, 2448: 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
University of Illinois Extension. 2020. Hort answers: small fruit gooseberries, Ribes hirtellum; Ribes grossularia [online]. University of Illinois Extension, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America. Available from https://web.extension.illinois.edu/hortanswers/plantdetail.cfm?PlantID=485&PlantTypeID=10 [accessed 22 November, 2020].Google Scholar
Valley, S. 2012. Flower long-horned beetle, Centrodera autumnata Leech, 1963 [online]. Bugwood.org, Oregon Department of Agriculture. Available from https://www.invasive.org/browse/subthumb.cfm?sub=62439 [accessed 19 April 2020].Google Scholar
Wickham, J.D., Harrison, R.D., Lu, W., Chen, Y., Hanks, L.M., and Millar, J.G. 2021. Rapid assessment of Cerambycid beetle biodiversity in a tropical rainforest in Yunnan Province, China, using a multicomponent pheromone lure. Insects, 12: 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, J.C.H., Meier, L.R., Zou, Y., Mongold-Diers, J.A., and Hanks, L.M. 2017. Evaluation of methods used in testing attraction of cerambycid beetles to pheromone baited traps. Journal of Economic Entomology, 110: 2269–2274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed