Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:26:58.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Body size classification of the egg parasitoid Trichogramma pretiosum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2022

Diego Souza*
Affiliation:
Graduate Program in Entomology, Department of Entomology, Federal University of Lavras, Mailbox 3037, Lavras, Minas Gerais, 37200-900, Brazil
Lucas Del Bianco Faria
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia e Conservação, Institute of Natural Science, Federal University of Lavras, Mailbox 3037, Lavras, Minas Gerais, 37200-900, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. Email: desouza.diego@live.com

Abstract

Parasitoid body size has been used as an indicator of fitness and its capability to parasitise hosts in the field, but studies that have investigated this relationship have disagreed. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between the two most common body parts used in body size classification and tried to select groups of small and large parasitoids by discriminant analysis. We found that groups with small or large individuals differ from each other only when the two body parts were used to classify them. We conclude that using just one body part to estimate the size of Trichogramma pretiosum Riley, 1879 (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) could be misleading and that caution is needed when defining small and large individuals.

Type
Scientific Note
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Entomological Society of Canada

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Katie Marshall

References

Bennett, D.M. and Hoffmann, A.A. 1998. Effects of size and fluctuating asymmetry on field fitness of the parasitoid Trichogramma carverae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Journal of Animal Ecology, 67: 580591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cônsoli, F.L. and Parra, J.R.P. 1996. Biology of Trichogramma galloi and T. pretiosum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) reared in vitro and in vivo . Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 89: 828834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazmer, D.J. and Luck, R.F. 1995. Field tests of the size–fitness hypothesis in the egg parasitoid Trichogramma pretiosum . Ecology, 76: 412425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kölliker-Ott, U.M., Bigler, F., and Hoffmann, A.A. 2004. Field dispersal and host location of Trichogramma brassicae is influenced by wing size but not wing shape. Biological Control, 31: 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kölliker-Ott, U.M., Blows, M.W., and Hoffmann, A.A. 2003. Are wing size, wing shape and asymmetry related to field fitness of Trichogramma egg parasitoids? Oikos, 100: 563573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2022. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Available from https://www.r-project.org/ [accessed 1 July 2021].Google Scholar
Sagarra, L.A., Vincent, C., and Stewart, R.K. 2001. Body size as an indicator of parasitoid quality in male and female Anagyrus kamali (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 91: 363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Souza, D., Monteiro, A.B., and Faria, L.D.B. 2018. Morphometry, allometry, and fluctuating asymmetry of egg parasitoid Trichogramma pretiosum under insecticide influence. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 166: 298303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, M.E. 1994. The importance of being large: the relationship between size and fitness in females of the parasitoid Aphaereta minuta (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Journal of Animal Ecology, 63: 963978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, S.A., Flanagan, K.E., and Godfray, H.C.J. 1996. The relationship between parasitoid size and fitness in the field: a study of Achrysocharoides zwoelferi (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Journal of Animal Ecology, 65: 631639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar