Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:02:52.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bumble bees influence berry size in commercial Vaccinium spp. cultivation in British Columbia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Claudia M. Ratti ,
Heather A. Higo ,
Terry L. Griswold  and
Mark L. Winston
Claudia M. Ratti*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Heather A. Higo
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Terry L. Griswold
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), Bee Biology and Systematics Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322, United States of America
Mark L. Winston
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: cratti@alumni.sfu.ca).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We studied the abundance, diversity, and dispersion patterns of managed and wild bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) populations in commercial highbush blueberry and cranberry (Ericaceae: Vaccinium corymbosum L., Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) fields in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia, and assessed their potential as pollinators of these crops by determining which groups of bees had the greatest impact on percent yield and mass of berries. Bumble bees were evenly distributed within both crops. Other wild bee species were well distributed in blueberry fields but generally remained at edges of cranberry fields. Percent berry yield was not related to bee abundance for any group of bees, nor was species diversity correlated with berry mass. Blueberry mass and cranberry mass were related to abundance of bumble bees but not to that of honey bees or other wild bees. Bumble bees are recommended as potential alternative pollinators of these crops.

Résumé

Nous avons étudié l’abondance, la diversité et la distribution d’abeilles mellifères et sauvages (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) dans des champs de bleuets (« highbush ») et de canneberges (Ericaceae: Vaccinium corymbosum L., Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) au sein de la vallée Fraser en Colombie Britannique, et nous avons évalué leur potentiel en tant que pollinisateurs en déterminant quels groupes d’abeilles avaient le plus d’impact sur les récoltes et la masse des baies. Les bourdons se sont bien répartis dans les deux types de culture. Les autres abeilles sauvages se sont aussi bien réparties dans les champs de bleuets mais sont restées le plus souvent en périphérie des champs de canneberges. Le pourcentage des récoltes de baies n’était pas relié à l’abondance d’aucun groupe d’abeille. Aucune corrélation n’a été trouvé entre la diversité des abeilles et la masse des baies. Nous avons parcontre trouvé que la masse des bleuets et des canneberges était relié à l’abondance des bourdons mais non à celle des abeilles mellifères ou autres abeilles sauvages. Les bourdons sont donc recommandés comme pollinisateurs potentiels et alternatifs pour ces deux types de cultures.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 140 , Issue 3 , June 2008 , pp. 348 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aras, P., De Oliveira, D., and Savoie, L. 1996. Effect of honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) gradient on the pollination and yield of lowbush blueberry. Journal of Economic Entomology, 89(5): 1080–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, B., and Schmid-Hempel, P. 1999. Experimental variation in polyandry affects parasite loads and fitness in a bumble-bee. Nature (London), 397: 151–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, J., and Kemp, W.P. 2002. Developing and establishing bee species as crop pollinators: the example of Osmia spp. (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) and fruit trees. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 92: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brewer, J.W., and Dobson, R.C. 1969. Seed count and berry size in relation to pollinator level and harvest date for the highbush blueberry, Vaccinium corymbosum. Journal of Economic Entomology, 62(6): 1353–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Columbia Cranberry Growers Association. 2003. Available from http://www.bccranberrygrowers.com/home.htm [accessed 20 February 2006].Google Scholar
British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries. 2003. Blueberry industry factsheet [online]. Available from http://www.agf.gov.bc.ca/berries/publications/document/bchighbush_updatedfactsheet.pdf [accessed 20 February 2006].Google Scholar
Brown, M.J.F., and Schmid-Hempel, P. 2003. The evolution of female multiple mating in social hymenoptera. Evolution, 57(9): 2067–2081.Google ScholarPubMed
Buchmann, S.L. 1983. Buzz pollination in angiosperms. In Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Edited by Jones, C.E. and Little, J.R.. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. pp. 73–113.Google Scholar
Cane, J.H., and Schiffhauer, D. 1997. Nectar production of cranberries: genotypic differences and insensitivity to soil fertility. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 122(5): 665–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cane, J.H., and Schiffhauer, D. 2001. Pollinator genetics and pollination: do honey bee colonies selected for pollen-hoarding field better pollinators of cranberry Vaccinium macrocarpon? Ecological Entomology, 26: 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cane, J.H., and Schiffhauer, D. 2003. Dose–response relationships between pollination and fruiting refine pollinator comparisons for cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon [Ericaceae]). American Journal of Botany, 90(10): 1425–1432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cane, J.H., MacKenzie, K.E., and Schiffhauer, D. 1993. Honey bees harvest pollen from the porose anthers of cranberries (Vaccinium macrocarpon) (Ericaceae). American Bee Journal, 133: 293–295.Google Scholar
Cane, J.H., Schiffhauer, D., and Kervin, L.J. 1996. Pollination, foraging, and nesting ecology of the leaf-cutting bee Megachile (Delomegachile) addenda (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) on cranberry beds. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 89(3): 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dogterom, M.H., and Winston, M.L. 1999. Pollen storage and foraging by honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in highbush blueberries (Ericaceae), cultivar Bluecrop. The Canadian Entomologist, 131: 757–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dogterom, M.H., Winston, M.L., and Mukai, A. 2000. Effect of pollen load size and source (self, outcross) on seed and fruit production in highbush blueberry cv. ‘bluecrop’ (Vaccinium corymbosum; Ericaceae). American Journal of Botany, 87(11): 1584–1591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eaton, G.W. 1966. The effect of frost upon seed number and berry size in the cranberry. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 46: 87–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrar, C.L., and Bain, H.F. 1946. Honey bees as pollinators of the cranberry. American Bee Journal, 86: 503–504.Google Scholar
Filmer, R.S., and Doehlert, C.A. 1959. Use of honeybees in cranberry bogs. Bulletin of the New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, 588: 4.Google Scholar
Filmer, R.S., Marucci, P.E., and Moulter, H. 1958. Seed counts and size of cranberries. Proceedings of the American Cranberry Growers' Association. 88: 22–23, 26–30.Google Scholar
Free, J.B. 1993. Insect pollination of crops. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
Gathmann, A., and Tscharntke, T. 2002. Foraging ranges of solitary bees. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71: 757–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, B. 1979. Bumblebee economics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Hutson, R. 1925. The honey bee as an agent in the pollination of pears, apples and cranberries. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18: 387–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Javorek, S.K., MacKenzie, K.E., and Vander Kloet, S.P. 2002. Comparative pollination effectiveness among bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) on lowbush blueberry (Ericaceae: Vaccinium angustifolium). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 95: 345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevan, P.G. 1975. Forest application of the insecticide fenitrothion and its effect on wild bee pollinators (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) in the lowbush blueberries (Vaccinium spp.) in southern New Brunswick, Canada. Biological Conservation, 7: 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevan, P.G., Gadawski, R.M., Kevan, S.D., and Gadawski, S.E. 1983. Pollination of cranberries, Vaccinium macrocarpon, on cultivated marshes in Ontario. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario, 114: 45–53.Google Scholar
Kevan, P.G., Greco, C.F., and Belaoussoff, S. 1997. Log-normality of biodiversity and abundance in diagnosis and measuring of ecosystem health: pesticide stress on pollinators of blueberry heaths. Journal of Applied Ecology, 34: 1122–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, A.M., Steffan-Dewenter, I., and Tscharntke, T. 2003 a. Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees. Biological Sciences, 270(1518): 955–961.Google ScholarPubMed
Klein, A.M., Steffan-Dewenter, I., and Tscharntke, T. 2003 b. Pollination of Coffea canephora in relation to local and regional agroforestry management. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40: 837–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Duc, I., and Turcotte, C. 2004. Eastern Canada cranberry IPM manual. Available from http://www.pmra-arla.gc.ca/engish/pdf/spm/ipmcranberries-e.pdf [accessed 16 March 2006].Google Scholar
MacKenzie, K.E., 1994. The foraging behaviour of honey bees (Apis mellifera L) and bumble bees. Apidologie, 25: 375–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, K.E., and Averill, A.L. 1995. Bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity and abundance on cranberry in southeastern Massachusetts. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 88(3): 334–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, K.E., and Winston, M.L. 1984. Diversity and abundance of native bee pollinators on berry crops and natural vegetation in the lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia. The Canadian Entomologist, 116: 965–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marucci, P.E. 1967. Cranberry pollination. American Bee Journal, 107: 212–213.Google Scholar
Marucci, P.E., and Moulter, H.J. 1977. Cranberry pollination in New Jersey. Acta Horticulturae, 61: 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, S.E. 1976. Insect pollination of cultivated crop plants. United States Department of Agriculture Handbook 496.Google Scholar
Mohr, N.A., and Kevan, P.G. 1987. Pollinators and pollination requirements of lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait., and V. myrtilloides Michx.) and cranberry (V. macrocarpon Ait.) in Ontario with notes on highbush blueberry (V. corymbosum L.) and lingonberry (V. vitis-ideae L.). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario, 118: 149–154.Google Scholar
Ratti, C.M. 2006. Bee abundance and diversity in berry agriculture. M.Sc. thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Rigby, B., and Dana, M.N. 1971. Seed number and berry volume in cranberry. Hortscience, 6(5): 495–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roubik, D.W. 1993. Tropical pollinators in the canopy and understory: field data and theory for stratum “preferences”. Journal of Insect Behavior, 6(6): 659–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, B.J. 1993. Pollination of lowbush blueberry, Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton by bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) in Nova Scotia. M.Sc. thesis, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia.Google Scholar
Sarracino, J.M., and Vorsa, N. 1991. Self and cross fertility in cranberry. Euphytica, 58: 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 1999. SAS system for Windows [online]. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Shaw, F.R., Shaw, W.M., and Weidhaas, J. 1956. Observations on sugar concentrations of cranberry nectar. Gleanings in Bee Culture, 84: 150–151.Google Scholar
Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H., and Dickey, D.A. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. 3rd edition. MacGraw–Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Stubbs, C.S., and Drummond, F.A. 2001. Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae): an alternative to Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) for lowbush blueberry pollination. Journal of Economic Entomology, 94: 609–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walther-Hellwig, K., and Frankl, R. 2000. Foraging habitats and foraging distances of bumblebees, Bombus spp. (Hym., Apidae), in an agricultural landscape. Journal of Applied Entomology, 124: 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westrich, P. 1996. Habitat requirements of central European bees and problems of partial habitats. In The conservation of bees. Edited by Matheson, A., Buchmann, S.L., O'Toole, C., Westrich, P., and Williams, I.H.. Academic Press, London. pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Winfree, R., Williams, N.M., Dushoff, J., and Kremen, C. 2007. Native bees provide insurance against ongoing honey bee losses. Ecology Letters, 10: 1105–1113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winston, M.L., and Graf, L.H. 1982. Native bee pollinators of berry crops in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia, 79: 14–20.Google Scholar