Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:09:39.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Culture of Entomophagous Insects1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Stanley E. Flanders
Stanley E. Flanders
Affiliation:
University of California Citrus Experiment Station, Riverside
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“When we consider what immense services hymenopteron insects render to agriculture, it is surprising that those states that have spent already such large sums of money to fight noxious insects and that have lost still more through their depredation have never tried to raise ichneumon flies by the million and let them loose wherever there are any insect pests to destroy.” Felix Gillet., Hort. Comm., El Dorado, California, 1882.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 81 , Issue 11 , November 1949 , pp. 257 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature

Allen, H. W., and Brimson, M. H.. 1947. Control of Nosema disease of potato tuber worm, a host used in the mass production of Macrocentrus ancylivorus. Science 105: 394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, H. W., Holloway, J. K., and Haeussler, A. J.. 1940. Importations, rearjng and colonization of parasites of the Oriental Fruit Moth. U.S.D.A. Cir. 561. 61 pp.Google Scholar
Baker, W. A., and Jones, L. G.. 1934. Studies of Exeristes roborator (Fab.), a parasite of the European corn borer in the Lake Erie Area. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bul. 460. 26 pp.Google Scholar
Bartlett, B. R., and Martin, C. H.. 1945. A mechanical method for freeing cocoons of Macrocentrus ancylivorus from potato moth cocoons, Jour. Econ. Ent. 38: 120.Google Scholar
Bradley, W. G. 1941. Methods of breeding Chelonus annulips on the Mediterranean flour moth for use agilinst the European corn borer. U. S. Dept. Agr. Cir. 616. 22 pp.Google Scholar
Branigan, E. J. 1916. A satisfactory method of rearing mealybugs for use in parasite work. Calif. Comm. Hort. Monthly Bul. 5(8): 304–306.Google Scholar
Coppel, H., and House, H.. 1947. A description of cages used for the large-scale breeding of Sturmia sp., a tachinid parasite of sawflies. Canati. Ent. 79(4): 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossman, S. S. 1925. Two imported egg parasites of the gypsy moth, Anastatus bifasciatus Fonsc. and Schedius kuvanae Howard, Jour. Agr. Res. 30: 643–675.Google Scholar
Doutt, Richard L., and Finney, Glenn L.. 1947. Mass-culture technique for Dibrachys cavus. Jour. Econ. Ent. 40: 577.Google Scholar
Eyre, J. R. 1921. Rearing anthomyid root maggots on artificial media (Dipt.). Ent. News 32: 215–216.Google Scholar
Finney, Glenn L. 1948. Culturing Chrysopa californica and obtaining eggs for field distribution. Jour. Econ. Ent. 41: 719–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, Glenn L., Flanders, Stanley E., and Smith, Harry S.. 1947. Mass culture of Macrocentrus ancylivorus and its host, the potato tuber moth. Hilgardia 17(13): 437–483.Google Scholar
Finney, Glenn L., Martin, Charles H., and Flanders, Stanley E.. 1945. Influence of moisture on the mass propagation of Macrocentrus ancylivorus. Jour. Econ. Ent. 38: 319–323.Google Scholar
Flanders, Stanley E. 1929. The mass production of Trichogramma minutum Riley and observations on the natural and artificial parasitism of the codling moth egg. Fourth Internatl. Cong. Ent. Trans. 2: 110–130.Google Scholar
Flanders, Stanley E. 1930a. Mass production of egg parasites of the genus Trichogramma. Hilgardia 4(16): 465–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, Stanley E. 1930b. Evaluation of Trichogramma liberations. Jour. Econ. Ent. 886–887.Google Scholar
Flanders, Stanley E. 1934. Sitotroga production. Jour. Econ. Ent. 27(6): 1197.Google Scholar
Flanders, Stanley E. 1942a. Oosorption and ovulation in relation to oviposition in the parasitic Hymenoptera. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 35: 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, Stanley E. 1942. Propagation of black scale on potato sprouts. Jour. Econ. Ent. 35(5): 687–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, Stanley E. 1943a. Mass production of the California red scale, and its parasite Comperiella bifasciata. Jour. Econ. Ent. 36(2): 233–235.Google Scholar
Flanders, Stanley E. 1943b. The role of mating in the reproduction of parasitic Hymenoptera. Jour. Econ. Ent. 36(5): 802–803.Google Scholar
Flanders, Stanley E. 1943c. The potato tuber worm, a host suitable for mass production of Macrocentrus ancylivorus. Jour. Econ. Ent. 36(5): 807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, Stanley E. 1944a. Observations on Prospaltella perniciosi and its mass production. Jour. Econ. Ent. 31(1): 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, Stanley E. 1944b. Biological control of the potato mealybug. Jour. Econ. Ent. 37(2): 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, Stanley E. 1944c. Olfactory responses of parasitic Hymenoptera in relation to their mass production. Jour. Econ. Ent. 31(5): 711–712.Google Scholar
Flanders, Stanley E. 1945a. The role of the spermatophore in the mass propagation of Macrocentrus ancylivorus. Jour. Econ. Ent. 38: 323–327.Google Scholar
Flanders, Stanley E. 1945c. Mass production of Trichogramma using eggs of potato tuber worm. Jour. Econ. Ent. 38(3): 394–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, Stanley E. 1947. Use of potato tubers in mass culture of diaspine scale insects. Jour. Econ. Ent. 40(5): 746–747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flanders, Stanley E. 1948. A host-parasite community to demonstrate balance. Ecology 29: 123.Google Scholar
Frankenfeld, J. C., and Barnes, O. L.. 1933. The equipment and methods used in rearing the New Mexico range caterpillar Anastatus semiflavidus Gahan. Jour. Econ. Ent. 26: 799–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getzendaner, C. W. 1936. Parasitizing European earwig with Bigonicheta setipennis Fall. Recent developments in methods and equipment. Jour. Econ. Ent. 29: 1105–1114.Google Scholar
Hase, Albrecht. 1925. Beiträge zur Lebensgeschichte der Schlupfwespe Trichogramma evanescens Westwood. Arb. Biol. Reichsanstalt f. Land- u. Forstwirtschaft 14: 171–224.Google Scholar
Haug, G. W. 1936. Frozen aphids as a food for coccinellids, particularly Hippodamia convergens Guer. Manual of Ent. Equip, and Methods. Pt. 2, p. 103. Alvah Peterson, 1937. John S. Swift Co., St. Louis.Google Scholar
Jenni, W. 1947. Beziehung zwischen Geschlechtsuechältnis und Parasitierungsgrad einer Drosophilalarven schmarotzenden Gallwespe (Eucoila spec.). Rev. Suisse Zool. 54: 252–258.Google Scholar
Lund, Horace O. 1938. Studies on longevity and productivity in Trichogramma evanescens. Jour. Agr. Res. 56: 421–439.Google Scholar
Martin, Chas. H. 1946a. The effect of humidity on the oviposition activity of Macrocentrus ancylivorus. Jour. Econ. Ent. 39: 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Chas. H. 1946b. Influence of characteristics of the puncture in potatoes on parasitism of potato tuber moth by Macrocentrus ancylivorus. Jour. Econ. Ent. 39: 516–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Chas. H., and Finney, Glenn L.. 1946. Factors involved in the separation of Macrocentrus ancylivorus cocoons from tuber worm pupae. Jour. Econ. Ent. 39: 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Chas. H., and Finney, Glenn L.. 1946b. Control of the sex ratio in Macrocentrus ancylivorus. Jour. Econ. Ent. 39: 296–299.Google Scholar
Merritt Hawkes, Onèra A. 1920. Observations on the life history, biology and genetics of the lady-bird beetle Adalia bipunctata (Mulsant). Zool. Soc. Land. Proc. 1920: 475–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. F. 1940. Insect cultures inbred for 200 generations. Science 92: 147–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, Frank E. 1940. A rearing method for the mass production of Microplectron fuscipennis (Zett.), cocoon parasite of the European sawfly Gilpinia polytoma (Htg.). U.S. Dept. Agr. Bur. Ent. Mimeo. Ser. ET 161. 5 p.Google Scholar
Morton, Fred A. 1929. Quantity production of tick parasites. Montana State Bd. Ent. Bien. Rept. 7 (1927–28): 32–35.Google Scholar
Moursi, A. A. 1946. The effect of temperature on development and reproduction of Mormoniella vitripennis (Walker). Bul. Soc. Fouad 1er Ent. 30: 39–61.Google Scholar
Pospielov, V. 1913. Experiments on the artificial infection of Euxoa segetum Schiff., by its parasites in the government of Kiev. Reprint. Journal Herald of the Sugar Industry Kiev. 11 p.Google Scholar
Quayle, H. J. 1910. Aphelinus diaspidis Howard. Jour. Econ. Ent. 3: 398–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripley, L. B., Hepburn, G. A., and Dick, J.. 1939. Mass breeding of the false codling moth, Argyroploce leucotreta Meyr. in artificial media. Union So. Africa, Dept. Agr. and Forestry 207: 3–18.Google Scholar
Schmieder, R. G., and Whiting, P. W.. 1947. Reproductive economy in the chalcidoid wasp Melittobia. Genetics 32: 29–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schread, J. C., and Garman, Philip. 1933. Studies on parasites of the oriental fruit moth. I. Trichogramma. Conn. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 353: 687–756.Google Scholar
Simmonds, F. J. 1944. The propagation of insect parasites on unnatural hosts. Bul. Ent. Res. 35: 219–226.Google Scholar
Simmonds, F. J. 1947. Improvement of the sex-ratio of a parasite by selection. Canad. Ent. 79(3): 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Harry S., and Armitage, H. M.. 1931. The biological control of mealybugs attacking citrus. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 509. 74 p.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert, Brown, Luther, and Phillips, Arthur M.. 1935. New equipment for obtaining host material for the mass production of Trichogramma minutum, an egg parasite of various insect pests. U. S. Dept. Agr. Cir. 376. 17 p.Google Scholar
Speyer, E. R. 1928. Entomological Report. [Cheshunt] Exp. and Res. Sta. Ann. Rept. (1927) 13: 60–80.Google Scholar
Theron, P. P. A. 1945. The artificial conditioning of Lepidoptera larvae for attack by ectoparasitic ichneumonid larvae. So. African Jour. Econ. 8: 111–116.Google Scholar
Theron, P. P. A. 1947. Studies on the provision of hosts for the mass-rearing of codling moth parasites. Fruit Research (Tech. ser. 4) Union of S. Afr. Dept. Agr. Sc. B. 262. 45 pp.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. R. 1913. La specificite des parasites entomophages. C. R. de la Soc. Biol. 75: 559–560.Google Scholar
Van Steenburgh, W. E., and Boyce, H. R.. 1937. The simultaneous propagation of Macrocentrus ancylivorous Rohwer and Ascogaster carpocapsae Vier, on the peach moth (Laspeyresia molesta Busck), a study in multiple parasitism. Ent. Soc. Ontario, Ann. Rept. 68: 24–26.Google Scholar
Wilkes, A. 1947. The effects of selective breeding on the laboratory propagation of insect parasites. Roy. Soc. London, Proc. Ser. B. 134: 227–245.Google Scholar
Woglum, R. S. 1947. The mealybug problem. California Fruit Growers Exch. Pest Control Cir. 153: 597.Google Scholar