Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:56:06.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diversity and distributional pattern of soil microarthropods (Protura) across a transitional zone in Ukraine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2017

Julia Shrubovych  and
Maria Sterzyńska
Julia Shrubovych
Affiliation:
Institute of Systematics and Evolutions of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-016 Kraków, Sławkowska 17, Poland State Museum of Natural History, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 79000 Lviv, Teatral’na 18, Ukraine
Maria Sterzyńska*
Affiliation:
Museum and Institute of Zoology Polish Academy of Sciences, 00-679 Warsaw, Wilcza 64, Poland
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: majka@miiz.waw.pl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The biodiversity of transitional zones is unique, due to mixing and co-occurrence of biotic elements. Despite this, our basic knowledge on distributional patterns of soil microarthropods in areas where biogeographic regions overlap is insufficient. We studied the biogeographic patterns of Protura across three natural landforms in Ukraine within the Transcarpathia (Transcarpathian Lowland, Transcarpathian foothills, and Volcanic Ukrainian Carpathian), which are influenced by adjacent biogeographic areas (mainly Alpine and Pannonian). We hypothesised that these overlaps have brought about an increase in Protura diversity, due to inclusion of faunal elements from diverse origins and differing in geographical histories. Distinct differences in the species composition of Protura were found among lowland, foothill, and mountain sites within Transcarpathia. Mountain sites mainly have Protura species with a wide continental distribution, while species of the foothills mainly stem from the Pannonian biogeographic region. The highest number of proturan endemics was associated with the Transcarpathian foothills. We conclude that the Transcarpathian region can be defined as a biogeographical transition zone for soil microarthopods, exemplified by Protura, and that foothill sites such as the volcanic-tectonic mountain Chorna Hora is a local hotspot of diversity and endemism, representing the most valuable parts of Transcarpathia with respect to diversity and endemism.

Type
Biodiversity & Evolution
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 149 , Issue 5 , October 2017 , pp. 628 - 638
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Kevin Floate

References

Blesić, B. and Mitrovski-Bogdanović, A. 2012. Protura in Serbia. Kragujevac Journal of Science, 34: 101–106.Google Scholar
Bu, Y., Potapov, M.B., and Yin, W.Y. 2014. Systematic and biogeographical study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East: new data on high endemism of the group. ZooKeys, 424: 19–57.Google Scholar
Christian, E. 2011. Protura (Insecta). In Checklisten der Fauna Osterreichs, No. 5 Protura (Insecta), Opiliones (Arachnida), Pseudoscorpiones (Arachnida), Tipulidae (Insecta: Diptera). Edited by R. Schuster. Biosystematics and Ecology Series. Volume 28. Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, Wienna. Pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Colwell, R.K. 2011. Estimates: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9. Available from http://purl.oclc.org/estimates [accessed 13 November 2011].Google Scholar
Conti, F.D. 2015. Conservation agriculture and soil fauna: only benefits or also potential threats? A review. ECronicon Agriculture, 2: 473–482.Google Scholar
Decaëns, T., Jiménez, J.J., Gioia, C., Measey, G.J., and Lavelle, P. 2006. The values of soil animals for conservation biology. European Journal of Soil Biology, 42: 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drescher, A. and Prots, B. 2005. European floodplain forests: a case study in Transcarpathia (Zakarpattya), Ukraine. In Proceeding of the natural forests in the temperate zone of Europe – values and utilisation conference, Mukachevo, 13–17 October 2003. Edited by B. Commarmot and F.D. Hamor. Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Birmensdorf and Carpathian Biosphere Reserve, Rakhiv, Ukraine. Pp. 440–446.Google Scholar
Drescher, A., Prots, B., and Mountford, O. 2003a. The world of old oxbow lakes, ancient riverine forests and meliorated mires in the Tisza river basin. Fritschiana, 45: 43–69.Google Scholar
Drescher, A., Prots, B., and Mountford, O. 2003b. Project Transcarpathian riverine forests, Ukraine, at the start point. Südosteuropa, Würzburger Geographische Manuscripte, 63: 139–144.Google Scholar
European Environment Commission. 2017. The biogeographical regions. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/sites_hab/biogeog_regions/index_en.htm [accessed 19 June 2017].Google Scholar
Ferro, I. and Morrone, J.J. 2014. Biogeographical transition zones: a search for conceptual synthesis. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 113: 1–12.Google Scholar
Galli, L., Capurro, M., and Torti, K. 2011. Protura of Italy, with a key to species and their distribution. ZooKeys, 146: 19–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, K.J., Chown, S.L., and Evans, K.L. 2008. Ecogeographical rules: elements of a synthesis. Journal of Biogeography, 35: 483–500.Google Scholar
Hetényi, G., Stuart, G.W., Houseman, G.A., Horváth, F., Hegedüs, E., and Brückl, E. 2009. Anomalously deep mantle transition zone below Central Europe: evidence of litospheric instability. Geophysical Research Letter, 36: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbers, D. 2008. The nature guide to the Hortobagy and Tisza River Floodplain, Hungary. Crossbill Guides Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Husemann, M., Schmidt, T., Zachos, F.E., Ulrich, W., and Habel, J.C. 2014. Palearctic biogeography revisited: evidence for the existence of a North African refugium for western Palaearctic biota. Journal of Biogeography, 41: 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaneko, N., Minamiya, Y., Nakamura, O., Saito, M., and Hashimoto, M. 2012. Species assemblage and biogeography of Japanese Protura (Hexapoda) in forest soils. Diversity, 4: 318–333.Google Scholar
Kaprus, I., Shrubovych, J., and Tarashchuk, M. 2006. Catalogue of the Collembola and Protura of Ukraine. State Natural History Museum, Lviv, Ukraine. (In Ukrainian with English summary).Google Scholar
Kseneman, M. 1938. Apterygota z rezervace “Pop Ivan” na Podcarpatske Rusi. Sbornik vyzkumnych ustavu zemedelskych CSR, 152: 451–524.Google Scholar
Lepš, J. and Šmilauer, P. 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using Canoco. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Majcin, D., Kutas, R., Bilčik, D., Bezák, V., and Korchagin, I. 2016. Thermal conditions for geothermal energy exploatation in the Transcarpathian depression and surrounding units. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 46: 33–49.Google Scholar
Marchese, C. 2015. Biodiversity hotspots: a shortcut for a more complicated concept. Global Ecology and Conservation, 3: 297–309.Google Scholar
Nosek, J. 1973. The European Protura. Their taxonomy, ecology and distribution. With keys for determination. Museum d’Histoire naturelle, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Nosek, J. and Vysotskaya, S.O. 1976. Study of Protura from the nests of small mammals of Transkarpathian region. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 55: 808–812.Google Scholar
Pass, G. and Szucsich, N.U. 2011. 100 years of research on the Protura: many secrets still retained. Soil Organisms, 83: 309–334.Google Scholar
Pécskay, Z., Seghedi, J., Downes, H., Prychodko, M., and Mackiv, B. 2000. K/Ar dating of neogene calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from Transcarpathian Ukraine. Geologica Carpathica, 51: 83–89.Google Scholar
Ren, Y., Stuart, G.W., Houseman, G.A., Dando, B., Ionescu, C., Hegedus, E., et al. 2012. Upper mantle structures beneath the Carpathian-Pannonian region: implications for the geodynamics of continental collision. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 349–350: 139–152.Google Scholar
Rusek, J. 1973. Eosentomon pratensis sp. n. (Protura) aus Süd-Mähren. Acta entomologica bohemoslovaca, 70: 55–59.Google Scholar
Shmitt, T. and Varga, Z. 2012. Extra-Mediterranean refugia: the rule and not the exception? Frontiers in Zoology, 9: 1–12.Google Scholar
Shrubovych, J. 2009. Acerentomon szeptyckii sp. n. (Protura: Acerentomidae) from Ukraine. Acta zoological cracoviensia, 52B: 9–15.Google Scholar
Shrubovych, J. 2010. Taxonomical richness and chorological structure of proturan fauna (Protura) in Ukraine. Science Bulletin of the Uzhgorod University (Seria Biologia), 29: 75–81. (In Ukrainian with English summary).Google Scholar
Shrubovych, J. 2011. Redescription of Verrucoentomon montanum new status (=Acerella montana Martynova) (Protura: Acerentomidae, Nipponentominae). Zootaxa, 2743: 63–67.Google Scholar
Shrubovych, J., Bartel, D., Szucsich, N.U., Resch, M.C., and Pass, G. 2016. Morphological and genetic analysis of the Acerentomon doderoi group (Protura: Acerentomidae) with description of A. christiani sp. nov. Public Library of Science One, 11: e0148033.Google Scholar
Shrubovych, J. and Fiera, C. 2016. New records of Protura (Entognatha, Arthropoda) from Romania, with an identification key to Romanian species. ZooKeys, 552: 33–48.Google Scholar
Shrubovych, J., Schneider, C., and D’Haese, C. 2012. Description of a new species of Acerentulus Berlese, 1908 (Protura: Acerentomata: Acerentomidae) with its barcode sequence and a key to the confinis group. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, 48: 1–7.Google Scholar
Shrubovych, J., Schneider, C., and D’Haese, C. 2014. Two new species of Acerentulus Berlese, 1908 (Protura: Acerentomata: Acerentomidae) with its barcode sequence and a key to the cunhai group. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, 50: 129–140.Google Scholar
Shrubovych, J. and Sterzyńska, M. 2015. The fauna of Protura in Ukrainian Carpathians. In Abstract book Uzhhorod entomological readings – 2015, 15th International Conference, 25–27 September 2015, Uzhhorod, Ukraine. Edited by I.P. Studeniak, V.G. Roshko, V.O. Chumak, and V.V. Mirutenko. Uzhhorod National University, Uzhhorod, Ukraine. P. 16.Google Scholar
Sterzyńska, M., Orlov, O., and Shrubovych, J. 2012. Effect of hydrologic disturbance regimes on Protura variability in a river floodplain. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 49: 309–320.Google Scholar
Suda, Y., Yamada, M., Rhyzov, S., and Stepanchyk, V. 2014. Preliminary report on obsidian petrography from the Transcarpathian region in Ukraine. Natural Resource Environment and Humans, 4: 21–37.Google Scholar
Szeptycki, A. 1980. Polish Protura I. Genus Acerentomon Silvestri, 1907. Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne, 50: 311–392.Google Scholar
Szeptycki, A. 1985. Polish Protura II. Eosentomon delicatum Gisin, 1945 and related species. Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne, 55: 531–574.Google Scholar
Szeptycki, A. 1986. Polish Protura IV. Eosentomon “transitorium” group. Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne, 56: 481–530.Google Scholar
Szeptycki, A. 1991. Polish Protura V. Genus Acerentulus Berlese, 1908 (Acerentomidae). Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 34: 1–64.Google Scholar
Szeptycki, A. 2007. Catalogue of the world Protura. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 50B: 1–210.Google Scholar
Szeptycki, A., Stomp, N., and Weiner, W.M. 2003. The Protura of Luxembourg. Ferrantia, 34: 5–44.Google Scholar
Varga, Z. 2003. Post-glacial dispersal strategies of Orthoptera and Lepidoptera in Europe and in the Carpathian basin. In Changes in range: invertebrates on the move. Proceedings of 13th International colloquium European Invertebrate Survey, 2–5 September 2001, Leiden. Edited by M. Reemer, P.J. van Helsdingen, and R.M.J.C. Kleukers. European Invertebrate Survey, Leiden, The Netherlands. Pp. 93–105.Google Scholar
Varga, Z. 2013. Outline of faunal history of southeastern Central Europe: a synthesis of paleoecology and phylogeography. In Biogeography of the Carpathians Kraków 2013. The first interdisciplinary symposium biogeography of the Carpathians: evolution of biodiversity in a spatiotemporal context, 26–28 September 2013, Kraków, Poland. Edited by E. Kuta. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botannica, supplement 1, 55: 17.Google Scholar
Wachter, G.A., Papadopoulou, A., Muster, C., Arthofer, W., Knowles, L.L., Steiner, F.M., and Schlick-Steiner, B.C. 2016. Glacial refugia, recolonisation patterns, and diversification forces in Alpine-endemic Megabunus harvestmen. Molecular Ecology, 25: 2904–2919.Google Scholar
Wolters, V. 2001. Biodiversity of soil animals and its function. European Journal of Soil Biology, 37: 221–227.Google Scholar