Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T23:51:34.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFECTS OF CROWDING ON SUPLHURETYLENCHUS SPP. (NEMATODA: ALLANTONEMATIDAE) IN THE HAEMOCOEL OF THEIR BARK BEETLE HOSTS (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Marek Tomalak ,
Harold E. Welch  and
Terry D. Galloway
Marek Tomalak
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
Harold E. Welch
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
Terry D. Galloway*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
*
2 Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Nematode parasites of bark beetles are taxonomically diverse, and may, in some cases, cause serious pathological and behavioural changes in their hosts (Kaya 1984). Their potential as biological control agents has long been recognized, but to date there is a shortage of elementary information on host-parasite interactions. Though the effects of superparasitism and subsequent crowding on the parasite have been studied for some mermithids (Petersen 1972) and steinernematids (Sandner and Stanuszek 1971), no such observations have been reported for bark beetle parasites. During a survey of nematode parasites of bark beetles in Manitoba, we encountered two examples where nematodes were detrimentally affected at the higher infection rates observed. It was our objective, therefore, to examine the relationship between intensity of infection, and impact on growth and reproduction of the parasites.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 121 , Issue 9 , September 1989 , pp. 821 - 822
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Christie, J.R. 1929. Some observations on sex in the Mermithidae. J. Exp. Zool. 53: 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaya, H.K. 1984. Nematode of bark beetles. pp. 727–754in Nickle, W.R. (Ed.), Plant and Insect Nematodes. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
Massey, C.L. 1974. Biology and taxonomy of nematode parasites and associates of bark beetles in the United States. U.S. For. Serv. Agric. Handb. No. 446.Google Scholar
Molyneux, A.S., Bedding, R.A., and Akhurst, R.J.. 1983. Susceptibility of larvae of the sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina to various Heterorhabditis spp., Neoaplectana spp. and an undescribed steinernematid (Nematoda). J. Invert. Pathol. 42: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, J.J. 1972. Factors affecting the sex ratios of mermithid parasites of mosquitoes. J. Nematol. 4: 83–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Sandner, H., and Stanuszek, S.. 1971. Comparative research on the effectiveness and production of Neoaplectana carpocapsae s.l. Zesz. probl. Postep. Nauk. roln 121: 209–226.Google Scholar