Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:48:48.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of four varieties of Lathyrus sativus (Fabaceae) seeds on the bionomics of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2015

Poulami Adhikary ,
Ujjwal Malik  and
Anandamay Barik
Poulami Adhikary
Affiliation:
Ecology Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan 713 104, West Bengal, India
Ujjwal Malik
Affiliation:
Ecology Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan 713 104, West Bengal, India
Anandamay Barik*
Affiliation:
Ecology Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan 713 104, West Bengal, India
*
1 Corresponding author (e-mail: anandamaybarik@yahoo.co.in)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of four varieties of Lathyrus sativus Linnaeus (Fabaceae) seeds (Bio L 212 Ratan, Nirmal B-1, WBK-14-7, and WBK-13-1) on the bionomics of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) was studied under laboratory conditions. Total larval developmental time was longer on WBK-13-1 than Bio L 212 Ratan. Adult emergence was highest on Bio L 212 Ratan followed by Nirmal B-1, WBK-14-7, and WBK-13-1. The development and fecundity were related with nutrient and antinutritional factors of khesari seeds. Total carbohydrates and proteins were highest in Bio L 212 Ratan and Nirmal B-1 while lipids and nitrogen were highest in Bio L 212 Ratan and least in WBK-13-1. Amino acids were higher in Nirmal B-1 and WBK-13-1. Phenols were greatest in Nirmal B-1 and least in Bio L 212 Ratan and WBK-14-7. β-ODAP was higher in Bio L 212 Ratan and Nirmal B-1. The lower levels of carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, nitrogen, water content, and higher trypsin inhibitor activity of WBK-14-7 and WBK-13-1 may explain the higher developmental time and lower fecundity of C. maculatus on these varieties. These results suggest that infestations of C. maculatus may be easier to manage on WBK-14-7 and WBK-13-1 than on the other varieties of khesari seeds.

Type
Insect Management
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 148 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 102 - 111
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Gilles Boiteau

References

Adhikary, P. and Barik, A. 2012. Effect of temperature on biology of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Indian Journal of Entomology, 74: 261–266.Google Scholar
Appleby, J.H. and Credland, P.F. 2001. Bionomics and polymorphism in Callosobruchus subinnotatus . Bulletin of Entomological Research, 91: 235–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, S.E.J., Stevenson, P.C., and Belmain, S.R. 2012. Odour-mediated orientation of beetles is influenced by age, sex and morph. Public Library of Science One, 7: e49071. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049071.Google ScholarPubMed
Bieri, J. and Kawecki, T.J. 2003. Genetic architecture of differences between populations of cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus) evolved in the same environment. Evolution, 57: 274–287.Google ScholarPubMed
Bray, H.G. and Thorpe, W.V. 1954. Analysis of phenolic compounds of interest in metabolism. Methods of Biochemical Analysis, 1: 27–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briggs, C.J., Parreno, N., and Campbell, C.G. 1983. Phytochemical assessment of Lathyrus species for the neurotoxic agent, β-N-oxalyl-L-α, β-diaminopropionic acid. Planta Medica, 47: 188–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cope, J.M. and Fox, C.W. 2003. Oviposition decisions in the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): effects of seed size on superparasitism. Journal of Stored Products Research, 39: 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Credland, P.F. 1987. Effects of host change on the fecundity and development of an unusual strain of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research, 23: 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Credland, P.F., Dick, K.M., and Wright, A.W. 1986. Relationships between larval density, adult size and egg production in the cowpea seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus . Ecological Entomology, 11: 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Credland, P.F. and Wright, W.A. 1989. Factors affecting female fecundity in the cowpea seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research, 25: 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denlinger, D.L. 1986. Dormancy in tropical insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 31: 239–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downer, R.G.H. and Matthews, J.R. 1976. Patterns of lipid distribution and utilization in insects. American Zoologist, 16: 733–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubios, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A., and Smith, F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry, 28: 350–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folch, J., Lees, M., and Solane-Stanley, G.H. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 226: 497–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, C.W. 1993. The influence of maternal age and mating frequency on egg size and offspring performance in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Oecologia, 96: 139–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, C.W., Bush, M.L., and Messina, F.J. 2010. Biotypes of the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus have differing effects on the germination and growth of their legume hosts. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 12: 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaur, V. and Maloo, S.R. 2011. Genetic divergence in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 80: 172–173.Google Scholar
Giga, D.P. and Smith, R.H. 1983. Comparative life history studies on four Callosobruchus species infesting cowpeas with special reference to Callosobruchus rhodesianus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research, 19: 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girma, D. and Korbu, L. 2012. Genetic improvement of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus) in Ethiopoia: an unfulfilled promise. Plant Breeding, 131: 231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagstrum, D.W. and Milliken, G.A. 1988. Quantitative analysis of temperature, moisture, and diet factors affecting insect development. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 81: 539–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harborne, J.B. 2003. Introduction to ecological biochemistry. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Huignard, J., Leroi, B., Alzouma, I., and Germain, J.F. 1985. Oviposition and development of Bruchidius atrolineatus (Pic) and Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) in Vigna unguiculata (Walp) in cultures in Niger. Insect Science and its Application, 6: 691–699.Google Scholar
Humphries, E.C. 1956. Nitrates. In Modern methods of plant analysis. Edited by K. Peach and M.V. Tracey. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany. Pp. 481–483.Google Scholar
Kakade, M.L., Rackis, J.J., McGhee, J.E., and Puski, G. 1974. Determination of trypsin inhibitor activity of soy products; a collaborative analysis of an improved procedure. Cereal Chemistry, 51: 376–382.Google Scholar
Lenga, A., Thibeaudeau, C., and Huignard, J. 1991. Influence of thermoperiod and photoperiod on reproductive diapauses in Bruchidius atrolineatus (Pic) (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Physiological Entomology, 16: 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liener, I.E. and Kakade, M.L. 1980. Protease inhibitors. In Toxic constituents of plant foodstuffs. Edited by I.E. Liener. Academic Press, New York, New York, United States of America. Pp. 7–71.Google Scholar
Lowry, O.H., Rose Brough, N.G., Farr, A.L., and Randall, R.G. 1951. Protein measurements with folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 183: 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattson, W.J. and Scriber, J.M. 1987. Nutritional ecology of insect folivores of woody plants: nitrogen, water, fiber and mineral conditions. In Nutritional ecology of insects, mites, spikes and related invertebrates. Edited by F.J.R. Slansky and J.G. Rodriguez. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, United States of America. Pp. 105–146.Google Scholar
Messina, F.J. 1987. Genetic contribution to the dispersal polymorphism of the cowpea weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 80: 12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, F.J. 1991. Life-history variation in a seed beetle: adult egg-laying vs. larval competitive ability. Oecologia, 85: 447–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, F.J. and Renwick, J.A.A. 1985a. Dispersal polymorphism of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): variation among populations in response to crowding. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 78: 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, F.J. and Renwick, J.A.A. 1985b. Resistance of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in selected cowpea lines. Environmental Entomology, 14: 868– 872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, F.J. and Slade, A.F. 1999. Expression of a life-history trade-off in a seed beetle depends on environmental context. Physiological Entomology, 24: 358–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R.A. and Stein, W.H. 1948. Photometric ninhydrin method for use in the chromatography of amino acids. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 176: 367–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nation, J.L. 2001. Insect physiology and biochemistry. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, United States of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppert, B., Morgan, T.D., Culbertson, C., and Kramer, K.J. 1993. Dietary mixtures of cysteine and serine proteinase inhibitors exhibit synergistic toxicity toward the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum . Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Comparative Pharmacology, 105: 379–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radha, R. and Susheela, P. 2014. Studies on the life history and ovipositional preference of Callosobruchus maculatus reared on different pulses. Research Journal of Animal, Veterinary and Fishery Sciences, 2: 1–5.Google Scholar
Rao, S.L.N. 1978. A sensitive and specific colorimetric method for the determination of α, β-diaminopropionic acid and the Lathyrus sativus neurotoxin. Analytical Biochemistry, 86: 386–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rao, S.L.N. 2011. A look at the brighter facets of β-N-oxalyl-L-α, β-diaminopropionic acid, homoarginine and the grass pea. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 49: 620–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, N. and Barik, A. 2013. Influence of four host plants on feeding, growth and reproduction of Diacrisia casignetum (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Entomological Science, 16: 112–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sano, I. 1967. Density effect and environmental temperature as the factors producing the active form of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research, 2: 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sano-Fujii, I. 1984. Effect of bean water content on the production of the active form of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research, 20: 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, N., Mukherjee, A., and Barik, A. 2015. Attraction of Epilachna dodecastigma (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to Momordica charantia (Cucurbitaceae) leaf volatiles. The Canadian Entomologist, 147: 169–180. doi:10.4039/tce.2014.37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scriber, J.M. and Feeny, P. 1979. Growth of herbivorous caterpillars in relation to feeding specialization and to the growth form of their food plants. Ecology, 60: 829–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S.S. and Rao, S.L.N. 2013. Lessons from neurolathyrism: a disease of the past and the future of Lathyrus sativus (Khesari dal). Indian Journal of Medical Research, 138: 32–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Slansky, F. and Scriber, J.M. 1985. Food consumption and utilization. In Comprehensive insect physiology biochemistry and pharmacology. Edited by G.A. Kerdut and L.I. Gilbert. Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. Pp. 87–113.Google Scholar
Southgate, B.J. 1979. Biology of the Bruchidae. Annual Review of Entomology, 24: 449–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thanthianga, C. and Mitchell, R. 1990. The fecundity and oviposition behaviour of a south Indian strain of Callosobruchus maculatus . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 57: 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timms, R. 1998. Size-independent effects of larval host on adult fitness in Callosobruchus maculatus . Ecological Entomology, 23: 480–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuda, M., Chou, L.-Y., Niyomdham, C., Buranapanichpan, S., and Tateishi, Y. 2005. Ecological factors associated with pest status in Callosobruchus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): high host specificity of non-pests to Cajaninae (Fabaceae). Journal of Stored Products Research, 41: 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuda, M., Kagoshima, K., Toquenaga, Y., and Arnqvist, G. 2014. Global genetic differentiation in a cosmopolitan pest of stored beans: effects of geography, host-plant usage and anthropogenic factors. Public Library of Science One, 9: e106268. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106268.Google Scholar
Tuda, M., Ronn, J., Buranapanichpan, S., Wasano, N., and Arnqvist, G. 2006. Evolutionary diversification of the bean beetle genus Callosobruchus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): traits associated with stored-product pest status. Molecular Ecology, 15: 3541–3551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Utida, S. 1972. Density dependent polymorphism in the adult of Callosobruchus maculatus . Journal of Stored Products Research, 8: 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utida, S. 1981. Polymorphism and phase dimorphism in Callosobruchus maculatus . In The ecology of bruchids attacking legumes. Edited by V. Labeyrie. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands. Pp. 143–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X.F., Warkentin, T.D., Briggs, C.J., Oomah, B.D., Campbell, C.G., and Woods, S. 1998. Trypsin inhibitor activity in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) and grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry, 46: 2620–2623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, S.S. 1988. Partial paternal inheritance of realized fecundity in a bruchid beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus . Behavioural Genetics, 18: 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zannou, E.T., Glitho, I.A., Huignard, J., and Monge, J.P. 2003. Life history of flight morph females of Callosobruchus maculatus F.: evidence of a reproductive diapause. Journal of Insect Physiology, 49: 575–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, United States of America.Google Scholar