Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:40:00.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence for divergence in cuticular hydrocarbon sex pheromone between California and Mississippi (United States of America) populations of bark beetle parasitoid Roptrocerus xylophagorum (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2014

Brian T. Sullivan  and
Nadir Erbilgin
Brian T. Sullivan*
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 2500 Shreveport Hwy, Pineville, Louisiana 71360, United States of America
Nadir Erbilgin
Affiliation:
Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, 4-42 Earth Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3
*
1 Corresponding author (email: briansullivan@fs.fed.us).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Roptrocerus xylophagorum (Ratzeburg) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) is a common Holarctic parasitoid of the larvae and pupae of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scotytinae). In no-choice laboratory bioassays, we found that male wasps derived either from northern California or southwestern Mississippi, United States of America more frequently displayed sexual behaviours (including mounting, wing fanning, and copulation attempts) to glass bulb decoys treated with hexane cuticular washes of females derived from the same parasitoid population rather than the distant population. This result suggests that the composition of the cuticular hydrocarbon sex pheromone has diverged between eastern and western populations and is consistent with previous data indicating that R. xylophagorum may consist of more than one species.

Type
Biodiversity & Evolution – NOTE
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 147 , Issue 4 , August 2015 , pp. 472 - 475
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Jianghua Sun

References

Bushing, R.W. 1965. A synoptic list of the parasites of Scolytidae (Coleoptera) in North America north of Mexico. The Canadian Entomologist, 97: 449–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, K.A., White, B.E., Sztepanacz, J.L., Bewick, E.R., and Rundle, H.D. 2014. Reproductive character displacement of epicuticular compounds and their contribution to mate choice in Drosophila subquinaria and Drosophila recens . Evolution, 68: 1163–1175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espelie, K.E., Berisford, C.W., and Dahlsten, D.L. 1996. Use of cuticular hydrocarbons in bark beetle parasitoid taxonomy: a study of Roptrocerus xylophagorum (Ratzeburg) (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) from the United States, Europe and Australia. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology (B), 113: 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedina, T.Y., Kuo, T.H., Dreisewerd, K., Dierick, H.A., and Yew, J.Y. 2012. Dietary effects on cuticular hydrocarbons and sexual attractiveness in Drosophila . Public Library of Science One, 7: e49799.Google ScholarPubMed
Groot, A.T., Inglis, O., Bowdridge, S., Santangelo, R.G., Blanco, C., and Lopez, J. 2009. Geographic and temporal variation in moth chemical communication. Evolution, 63: 1987–2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingleby, F.C., Hosken, D.J., Flowers, K., Hawkes, M.F., Lane, S.M., Rapkin, J., et al. 2014. Environmental heterogeneity, multivariate sexual selection and genetic constraints on cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila simulans . Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 27: 700–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jennings, J.H., Etges, W.J., Schmitt, T., and Hoikkala, A. 2014. Cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila montana: geographic variation, sexual dimorphism and potential roles as pheromones. Journal of Insect Physiology, 61: 16–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, N.J. 1983. The natural enemies of scolytids infesting conifer bark in Europe in relation to biological control of Dendroctonus spp. in Canada. Biocontrol News and Information, 4: 305–328.Google Scholar
Piston, J.J. and Lanier, G.N. 1974. Pheromones of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): response to interpopulational hybrids and relative attractiveness of males boring in two host species. The Canadian Entomologist, 106: 247–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruther, J., Döring, M., and Steiner, S. 2011. Cuticular hydrocarbons as contact sex pheromone in the parasitoid Dibrachys cavus . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 140: 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samson, P.R. 1984. The biology of Roptrocerus xylophagorum (Hym.: Torymidae), with a note on its taxonomic status. Entomophaga, 29: 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, T.L. 1998. Roles of hydrocarbons in the recognition systems of insects. American Zoologist, 38: 294–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stökl, J., Dandekar, A.T., and Ruther, J. 2014. High chemical diversity in a wasp pheromone: a blend of methyl 6-methylsalicylate, fatty alcohol acetates and cuticular hydrocarbons releases courtship behavior in the drosophila parasitoid Asobara tabida . Journal of Chemical Ecology, 40: 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, B.T. 2002. Evidence for a sex pheromone in the bark beetle parasitoid Roptrocerus xylophagorum . Journal of Chemical Ecology, 28: 1045–1063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, S.L. 1982. The bark and ambrosia beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a taxonomic monograph. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs, 6: 1–1359.Google Scholar