Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:13:21.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE RESPONSE OF IPS CONFUSUS (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE) TO MALE ATTRACTANT1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

John H. Borden
John H. Borden
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Sismon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Various aspects of the behavior of I. confusus (LeConte) relating to the production of and response to male attractant were studied. Storage at 8.0 °C and 100% R.H. had no adverse effect on survival, response to male attractant, or predisposition to fly. Low humidity and high temperatures (21 °C) adversely affected behavior and survival. Beetles conditioned either in natural or constant environments responded at high levels throughout a 24-hour period. Female response to male frass reached a low of 24.2% in January and February and rose to a peak of 76.6% in May and June. Response to benzene extract of male frass fell moderately during autumn and winter, indicating a lowered response ability for overwintering populations. Male response was lower and more erratic but followed the same seasonal trends.

After brief exposure periods, even previous nonresponders oriented to male attractant at significantly higher levels than the total original population. Long-term confinement in an atmosphere containing male frass odor caused a reduction in response of both sexes to male frass extract, presumably because of adaptation of olfactory receptors.

Flight attempts by both sexes occurred between 25° and 40 °C but were severely inhibited at these extremes. Light intensities below 431 luxes suppressed flight. Optimal take-off temperatures were 30 °C for males and 32.5 °C for females. Both contact with male frass and with attractive air reduced the take-off attempts of both sexes to near zero. Attractive odor in the air still suppressed flight significantly after beetles had been conditioned up to 4 hours in contact with male frass.

Teneral males produced attractant after a long maturation period. Single, mature males produced attractant up to 18 days, but after mating, productivity declined in direct correlation with the number of females per male. Single males produced frass throughout the day but maximum production was coincident with peak female emergence and flight. Male frass was significantly less attractive 15 minutes after exposure to open air and after 1 hour, very little attraction remained.

No trends in the ability of newly emerged adults to respond to male attractant were noted over a 30-day period. Emerging brood and re-emerging parent adults are responsive to flight stimuli, but darkened callows and parent adults removed from galleries could not be induced to fly. Reproducing females show a greatly reduced response to male attractant.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 99 , Issue 11 , November 1967 , pp. 1164 - 1193
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. F. 1948. Host selection by the pine engraver. J. econ. Ent. 41: 596–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, M. D. 1959. A study of the flight of the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) I. Flight preparation and response. Can. Ent. 91: 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, M. D. 1961. A study of the flight of the Douglas-fir beetle Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) III. Flight capacity. Can. Ent. 93: 467–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, M. D., and Farris, S. H.. 1958. A technique for measuring flight muscle changes in the Douglas-fir beetle Dendroctonus pseudotsugae. Bi-mon. Prog. Rep. Div. Forest Biol., Ottawa, No. 14(4). p. 3.Google Scholar
Atkins, M. D., and Farris, S. H.. 1962. A contribution to the knowledge of flight muscle changes in the Scolytidae (Coleoptera). Can. Ent. 94: 25–32.Google Scholar
Borden, J. H., and Wood, D. L.. 1966. The antennal receptors and olfactory response of Ips confusus (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to male sex attractant in the laboratory. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 59: 253–261.Google Scholar
Cameron, E. A., and Borden, J. H.. 1967. Emergence patterns of Ips confusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) from ponderosa pine. Can. Ent. 99: 236–244.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1956. Flight muscle changes during adult life in a scolytid beetle. Nature, Lond. 177: 1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1957. Flight muscle change during adult life in the Scolytidae. Bi-mon. Prog. Rep. Div. Forest Biol., Ottawa, No. 13(1). pp. 3, 4.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1958. Studies on the physiology of the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron in relation to its ecology. Proc. 10th int. Congr. Ent. (Montreal, 1956). Vol. 4. pp. 375–380.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1966. The effect of attack by the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Olivier) on log attractiveness. Can. Ent. 98: 50–59.Google Scholar
Chararas, C. 1966. Recherches sur l'attractivité chez les Scolytidae. Etudé sur l'attractivité sexuelle chez Carphoborus minimus Fabr. Coléoptère Scolytidae typiquement polygame. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 262: 2492–2495.Google Scholar
Gara, R. I. 1963. Studies on the flight behavior of Ips confusus (LeC.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in response to attractive material. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 22: 51–66.Google Scholar
Gara, R. I., and Vité, J. P.. 1962. Studies on the flight patterns of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in second growth ponderosa pine forests. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 21: 275–289.Google Scholar
Goeden, R. D., and Norris, D. M. Jr., 1964. Atraction of Scolytus quadrispinosus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to Carya spp. for oviposition. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 57: 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, K. 1959. Release by flight exercise of a chemotropic response from photopositive domination in a scolytid beetle. Nature, Lond. 184: 283–284.Google Scholar
Graham, K. 1960. Photic behaviour in the ecology of the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum. Proc. 11th int. Congr. Ent. (Vienna). Vol. 2. p. 226.Google Scholar
Henson, W. R. 1961. Laboratory studies on the adult behavior of Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). I. Seasonal changes in the internal anatomy of the adult. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 54: 698–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henson, W. R. 1962. Laboratory studies on the adult behavior of Conophthorus coniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). III. Flight. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 55: 524–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, M. 1965. Insect sex attractants. Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
Kliefoth, R. A., Vité, J. P., and Pitman, G. B.. 1964. A laboratory technique for testing bark beetle attractants. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 22: 283–290.Google Scholar
Lyon, R. L. 1955. A secondary sex character on the male of the California five-spined engraver, Ips confusus (LeC.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 87: 482–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, R. L. 1961. Studies on the structure and toxicity of insecticide deposits for control of bark beetles. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
McMullen, L. H., and Atkins, M. D.. 1962. On the flight and host selection of the Douglasfir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 94: 1309–1325.Google Scholar
Perttunen, V. 1960. Seasonal variation in the light reactions of Blastophagus piniperda L. (Col., Scolytidae) at different temperatures. Ann. Ent. Fenn. 26: 86–92.Google Scholar
Perttunen, V., and Boman, T.. 1965. Laboratory experiments on the spontaneous take-off activity of Blastophagus piniperda (Col., Scolytidae) in relation to temperature and light intensity at different seasons of the year. Proc. 12th int. Congr. Ent. (London, 1964). Vol. 5. pp. 344–345.Google Scholar
Pitman, G. B., Kliefoth, R. A., and Vité, J. P.. 1965. Studies on the pheromone of lps confusus (LeConte). II. Further observations on the site of production. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 23: 13–17.Google Scholar
Pitman, G. B., Renwick, J. A. A., and Vité, J. P.. 1966. Variatoin in olfactory behavior of Ips confusus (LeC.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) between laboratory and field bioassays. Naturwissenschaften 53: 46–47.Google Scholar
Reid, R. W. 1958. Internal changes in the female mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus monticolae Hopk., associated with egg laying and flight. Can. Ent. 90: 464–468.Google Scholar
Reid, R. W. 1962. Biology of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus monticolae Hopkins, in East Kootenay region of British Columbia II. Behavior in the host, fecundity, and internal changes in the female. Can. Ent. 94: 605–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renwick, J. A. A., Pitman, G. B., and Vité, J. P.. 1966. Detection of a volatile compound in hindguts of male Ips confusus (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Naturwissenschaften 53: 83–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A. 1963. Response of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins to volatile attractants. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 22: 23–38.Google Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A., and Daterman, G. E.. 1964 a. Field studies on flight patterns and olfactory responses of ambrosia beetles in Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon Can. Ent. 93: 1339–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A., and Daterman, G. E.. 1964 b. Response of the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.) to a female-produced pheromone. Z. angew. Ent. 54: 300–303.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. B. 1959. Termination of diapause in the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), as an aid to continuous laboratory rearing. Can. Ent. 91: 520–525.Google Scholar
Schneider, D. 1963. Electrophysiological investigation of insect olfaction. In: 1st Intern. Symposium on Olfaction and Taste (Stockholm 1962) (Zotterman, Y., ed.). Oxford, Pergammon Press.Google Scholar
Schwinck, I. 1954. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über Geruchssin und Strömungswah-renehmung in der Orientierung bei Nachtschmetterlingen. Z. vergl. Physiol. 37: 19–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, R. F. 1966. Factors influencing the orientation and rates of activity of Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 98: 507–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H. H., and Gaston, L. K.. 1964. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. III. Inhibition of male responses to the sex pheromone in Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 57: 775–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H. H., and Gaston, L. K.. 1965. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. V. Circadian rhythm of pheromone responsiveness in males of Autographa californica, Heliothis virescens, Spodoptera exiqua, and Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 58: 597–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, R. M., Rodin, J. O., and Wood, D. L.. 1966. The principal sex attractants in frass produced by male Ips confusus (LeC.) in ponderosa pine. Science 154: 509–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, R. M. et al. , 1966. Identification of two new terpene alcohols from frass produced by Ips confusus in ponderosa pine. Tetrabedron 22: 1929–1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vité, J. P. 1965. Die Wirkung pflanzen- und inseckteneigener Lockstoffe auf Pityophthorus und Pityogenes (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Naturwissenschaften 52: 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vité, J. P., and Gara, R. I.. 1962. Volatile attractants from ponderosa pine attacked by bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 21: 251–274.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P., Gara, R. I., and Kliefoth, R. A.. 1963. Collection and bioassay of a volatile fraction attractive to Ips confusus (LeC.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 22: 39–50.Google Scholar
Wood, D. L. 1961. Stridulation in the genus Ips De Geer. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 37: 187–188.Google Scholar
Wood, D. L. 1962. The attraction created by males of a bark beetle, Ips confusus (LeConte) attacking ponderosa pine. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 38: 141–145.Google Scholar
Wood, D. L., and Bushing, R. W.. 1963. The olfactory response of Ips confusus (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to the secondary attraction in the laboratory. Can. Ent. 95: 1066–1078.Google Scholar
Wood, D. L., and Vité, J. P.. 1961. Studies on the host selection behavior of Ips confusus (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attacking Pinus ponderosa. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 21: 79–95.Google Scholar
Wood, D. L. et al. , 1966. Sex pheromones of bark beetles — I. Mass production, bio-assay, source, and isolation of the sex pheromone of Ips confusus (LeC.). J. Insect Physiol. 12: 523–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed