Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T23:57:53.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FORECASTING CODLING MOTH PHENOLOGY BASED ON PHEROMONE TRAP CATCHES AND PHYSIOLOGICAL-TIME MODELS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Helmut Riedl ,
B. A. Croft  and
A. J. Howitt
Helmut Riedl
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing
B. A. Croft
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing
A. J. Howitt
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship of pheromone trap catch to emergence and oviposition of the codling moth was defined for the two-generation climate of Michigan. Catch anticipated emergence and oviposition during spring flight when the trap displayed greatest efficiency, but lagged behind emergence and closely followed oviposition during the second generation. Trapping efficiency declined towards the end of the first generation and was generally lower during summer flight. Factors which possibly relate to this efficiency loss are discussed. First catch and the catch peaks in both generations were evaluated as reference points for the prediction of phenological events (particularly egg hatch) in both generations Of four forecasting methods, degree day and developmental unit summations, starting from first catch, for the preoviposition and incubation period were most reliable in predicting the beginning of spring brood egg hatch.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 108 , Issue 5 , May 1976 , pp. 449 - 460
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, H. 1942. The relation between bait-trap catches and codling moth emergence and egg laying. Bien. Rep. Kans. Hort. Soc. 46: 31–35.Google Scholar
Baskerville, G. L. and Emin, P.. 1969. Rapid estimation of heat accumulation from maximum and minimum temperatures. Ecology 50(3): 514–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batiste, W. C., Berlowitz, A., and Olson, W. H.. 1970. Evaluation of insecticides for control of codling moth on pears in California and their usefulness in an integrated control program. J. econ. Ent. 63: 1457–1462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batiste, W. C., Berlowitz, A., Olson, W. H., DeTar, J. E., and Joos, J. E.. 1973. Codling moth: estimating time of first egg hatch in the field — a supplement to sex-attractant traps in integrated control. Environ. Ent. 2: 387–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, B. A., Tummala, R. L., Riedl, H., and Welch, S. M.. Modeling and management of 2 prototype apple arthropod pest subsystems. In Tummula, R. L. et al. , (Eds.), Modeling for pest management: Concepts, techniques and applications. Proc. 2nd Ann. USSR/USA Symp. on Integrated Pest Management, Michigan St. Univ., E. Lansing (1974) (in press).Google Scholar
Glenn, P. A. 1922. Relation of temperature to development of codling moth. J. econ. Ent. 15: 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagley, E. A. C. 1973. Timing sprays for codling moth (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) control on apple. Can. Ent. 105: 1085–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. A. 1929. Six years' study of the life history and habits of the codling moth (Carpocapsa pomonella L.). A. Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. 59(1928): 96–105.Google Scholar
Haynes, D. L., Brandenburg, R. K., and Fisher, P. D.. 1973. Environmental monitoring network for pest management systems. Environ. Ent. 2: 889–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headlee, T. J. 1931. Performance of the thermal constant as an indicator of the time to apply cover sprays for codling moth. J. econ. Ent. 24: 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLellan, C. R. 1972. Sex ratio in three stages of field collected codling moth. Can. Ent. 104: 1661–1664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, H. F. and Vakenti, J. M.. 1972. Codling moths: female-baited and synthetic pheromone traps as population indicators. Environ. Ent. 1: 554–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, H. F. and Vakenti, J. M.. 1973. Codling moth: use of Codlemone-baited traps and visual detection of entries to determine need of sprays. Environ. Ent. 2: 677–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, E., Wildbolz, Th. and Riggenbach, W.. 1972. Die Männchenfalle, eine neue Prognosemethode für den Apfelwickler; Resultate 1969–1971. Schweiz. Z. Obst-u. Weinb. 108: 337–344.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. and Fulton, W. C. 1970. Models for the development and survival of Hyphantria cunea in relation to temperature and humidity. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 70. 60 pp.Google Scholar
Peterson, A. 1928. Determination of the spring brood emergence of oriental peach moths and codling moths by various methods. J. agric. Res. 37(7): 399–417.Google Scholar
Riedl, H. and Croft, B. A.. 1974. A study of pheromone trap catches in relation to codling moth (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) damage. Can. Ent. 106: 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, W. L., Glass, E. H., Tette, J., and Comeau, A.. 1970. Sex pheromone trapping for red-banded leaf roller control: theoretical and actual. J. econ. Ent. 63: 1162–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, W. L., Comeau, A., Hill, A., and Milicevic, G.. 1971. Sex attractant of the codling moth: characterization with electroantennogram technique. Science 174: 297–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelford, V. E. 1927. An experimental investigation of the relations of the codling moth to weather and climate. Ill. nat. Hist. Surv., Vol. XVI, Art. V.Google Scholar
Tadic, M. 1963. The biology of the codling moth (Carpocapsa pomonella L.) as the basis for its control. U.S. Dep. Commerce, Office of Technical Services; OTS 60-21681, 97 pp. (Translation of 1957 paper: University of Belgrade.).Google Scholar