Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:17:15.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

INTERACTIONS OF THE AMBROSIA BEETLE, XYLEBORUS DISPAR (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE), WITH ITS SYMBIOTIC FUNGUS AMBROSIELLA HARTIGII (FUNGI IMPERFECTI)12

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Abstract

Two bioassays were used to study the effects of the various life stages of a Temperate Zone ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus dispar (F.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), on the induction of the ambrosial form of its symbiotic fungus, Ambrosiella hartigii Batra (Fungi Imperfecti).Postdiapause adults and pupae of X. dispar cause a change from the mycelial to the ambrosial form of A. hartigii in culture.

Larvae feed on the mycelial form in vitro, but ambrosia is required by larvae to develop and pupate. One of the main factors inducing the ambrosial form of A. hartigii is probably a secretory product of X. dispar.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batra, L. R. 1963. Ecology of ambrosia fungi and their dissemination by beetles. Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 66: 213236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batra, L. R. 1967. Ambrosia fungi: A taxonomic revision, and nutritional studies of some species. Mycologia 59: 9761017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batra, L. R. and Michie, M. Downing. 1963. Pleomorphism in some ambrosia and related fungi. Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 66: 470481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brader, L. 1964. Etude de la relation entre le scolyte des rameaux du caféier, Xyleborus compactus Eichh. (X. morstati Hag.) et sa plante-hôte. Meded. LandbHoogesch. Wageningen 64: 1109.Google Scholar
French, J. R. J. and Roeper, R. A.. 1972. In vitro culture of the ambrosia beetle Xyleborus dispar (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) with its symbiotic fungus Ambrosiella hartigii (Fungi Imperfecti). Ann. eni. Soc. Am. 65: 719721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartig, T. 1844. Ambrosia des Bostrichus dispar. Allg. Forst-Jagdztg. 13: 7374.Google Scholar
Hubbard, H. C. 1897. The ambrosia beetles of the United States. U.S. Dep. Agric. Div. Ent. Bull. 7: 935.Google Scholar
Linscott, D. 1964. The use of a vacuum tweezer system for handling small insects. Br. Wood Preserv. Assoc. 44. 2 pp.Google Scholar
Retnakaran, A. and French, J.. 1971. A method for separating and surface sterilizing the eggs of the spruce budworm, Chorisioneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 712716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidberger, J. 1836. Naturgeschicte des Apfelborkenkafers Apate dispar. Beitr. Obstbaumzucht Naturgesch. Obstbaumen schadlichen Insekten. 4: 213230.Google Scholar
Whitney, H. S. 1971. Association of Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) with blue stain fungi and yeasts during brood development in lodgepole pine. Can. Ent. 103: 14951503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, H. F. 1913. The shot hole borer of the Northwest; or the pear blight beetle of the East (Xyleborus dispar Fabricius). Bien. Crop Pest Hort. Rep. 1911–12. Oreg. Agric. Coll. exp. Stn. pp. 97107.Google Scholar