Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:34:38.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Male attraction of Gymnandrosoma aurantianum (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), from Guatemala, to its sex pheromone major component is not affected by the addition of secondary components

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2022

R. Aranda-Arguello ,
J.C. Rojas ,
E.A. Malo ,
G. López-Guillén  and
L. Cruz-López Open the ORCID record for L. Cruz-López [Opens in a new window]
R. Aranda-Arguello
Affiliation:
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Carretera Antiguo Aeropuerto Km. 2.5, C.P. 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, México
J.C. Rojas
Affiliation:
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Carretera Antiguo Aeropuerto Km. 2.5, C.P. 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, México
E.A. Malo
Affiliation:
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Carretera Antiguo Aeropuerto Km. 2.5, C.P. 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, México
G. López-Guillén
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Rosario Izapa, C.P. 30870, Tuxtla Chico, Chiapas, México
L. Cruz-López*
Affiliation:
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Carretera Antiguo Aeropuerto Km. 2.5, C.P. 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, México
*
*Corresponding author. Email: lcruz@ecosur.mx
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The macadamia nut borer, Gymnandrosoma aurantianum Lima (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), is the main pest of Macadamia integrifolia Maiden and Betche (Proteaceae) in Central America. We identified five compounds in female sex pheromone gland extracts, (E)-8-dodecenyl acetate, tetradecyl acetate, dodecyl acetate, (E)-8-dodecenol, and (Z)-8-dodecenyl acetate, in a ratio of 100:44.9:33.4:6.5:1.2, respectively, from Guatemalan populations of this insect. All compounds except tetradecyl acetate elicited electroantennography responses in two- to five-day-old males. In field tests, traps baited with single compounds did not capture males, except for the major component (E)-8-dodecenyl acetate. Mixtures of (E)-8-dodecenyl acetate with secondary components were active in field tests, but the number of G. aurantianum males trapped did not differ between these mixtures and (E)-8-dodecenyl acetate alone. Doses of more than 1 mg (1.5 or 2 mg) of the major component did not significantly increase capture. The gradual loss of the amount of (E)-8-dodecenyl acetate in rubber septa under field conditions indicates that septa should be renewed every four weeks. In conclusion, the addition of secondary components to the major component of the sex pheromone gland contents does not improve capture of G. aurantianum males. Our results demonstrate that 1 mg of (E)-8-dodecenyl acetate could be used as an attractant for monitoring populations of this moth.

Type
Research Paper
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 154 , Issue 1 , 2022 , e51
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Entomological Society of Canada

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Jon Sweeney

References

Anshelevich, L., Kehat, M., Dunkelblum, E., and Greenberg, S. 1993. Sex pheromone traps for monitoring the honeydew moth, Cryptoblabes gnidiella: effect of pheromone components, pheromone dose, field aging of dispenser, and type of trap on male captures. Phytoparasitica, 21: 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arn, H., Tóth, M., and Priesner, E. 1992. List of sex pheromones of Lepidoptera and related attractants. Organisation Internationale de Lutte Biologique Section Régionale Ouest Paléarctique (OILB-SROP), Montfavet, France.Google Scholar
Bédard, C., Gries, R., Gries, G., and Bennett, R. 2002. Sex pheromone and diel periodicity of Cydia strobilella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) pheromonal communication. The Canadian Entomologist, 134: 847–850. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent134847-6.Google Scholar
Blanco-Metzler, H. 1993. Ciclo de vida y comportamiento de oviposición de Ecdytolopha torticornis (Lepidoptera: Torticidae) barrenador de la nuez de macadamia. Manejo Integrado de Plagas, 29: 36–39.Google Scholar
Blanco-Metzler, H. 1994. The biology and ecology of the macadamia nutborer Ecdytolopha torticornis in Costa Rica. University of Edinburgh, Turrialba, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Cardé, R.T., Baker, T.C., and Roelofs, W.L. 1975. Ethological function of components of a sex attractant system for oriental fruit moth males, Grapholitha molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1: 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardé, R.T. and Haynes, K.F. 2004. Structure of the pheromone communication channel in moths. In Advances in the Chemical Ecology of Insects. Edited by R.T. Cardé and J.G. Millar. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Pp. 283–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, D.R. 2003. Comparação de métodos de monitoramento e controle do bichofurão, Ecdytolopha aurantiana (Lima, 1927) (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae), em citros. Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, D.J., Beevor, P.S., Cork, A., and Hall, D.R. 2003. ( E)-8-Dodecenyl acetate: major component of the female sex pheromone of a macadamia nut borer, Ecdytolopha torticornis . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 107: 91–93. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.2003.00035.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Q.H., Zhu, F., Tian, Z., Zhang, W.M., Guo, R., Liu, W., et al. 2018. Minor components play an important role in interspecific recognition of insects: a basis to pheromone based electronic monitoring tools for rice pests. Insects, 9: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9040192.Google ScholarPubMed
Cichón, L.I., Trematerra, P., Coracini, M.D.A., Fernandez, D., Bengtsson, M., and Witzgall, P. 2004. Sex pheromone of Argyrotaenia pomililiana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), a leafroller pest of apples in Argentina. Journal of Economic Entomology, 97: 946–949. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/97.3.946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruz-Esteban, S., Rojas, J.C., Sánchez-Guillén, D., Cruz-López, L., and Malo, E.Á. 2018. Geographic variation in pheromone component ratio and antennal responses, but not in attraction, to sex pheromones among fall armyworm populations infesting corn in Mexico. Journal of Pest Science, 91: 973–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-018-0967-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downham, M.C.A., Hall, D.R., Chamberlain, D.J., Cork, A., Farman, D.I., Tamò, M., et al. 2003. Minor components in the sex pheromone of legume podborer: Maruca vitrata development of an attractive blend. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 29: 989–1011. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022996103147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eizaguirre, M., López, C., Sans, A., Bosch, D., and Albajes, R. 2009. Response of Mythimna unipuncta males to components of the Sesamia nonagrioides pheromone. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 35: 779–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-009-9662-0.Google ScholarPubMed
El-Sayed, A.M. 2022. The pherobase: database of insect pheromones and semiochemicals [online]. Available from http://www.pherobase.com [accessed 18 May 2022].Google Scholar
El-Sayed, A.M., Delisle, J., De Lury, N., Gut, L.J., Judd, G.J.R., Legrand, S., et al. 2003. Geographic variation in pheromone chemistry, antennal electrophysiology, and pheromone-mediated trap catch of North American populations of the obliquebanded leafroller. Environmental Entomology, 32: 470–476. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-32.3.470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elzen, G. and Hardee, D. 2003. Research on managing insect resistance to insecticides. Pest Management Science, 59: 770–776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia, M.S. and Parra, J.R.P. 1999. Comparação de dietas artificiais, com fontes protéicas variáveis, para criação de Ecdytolopha aurantiana (Lima) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil, 28: 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0301-80591999000200004.Google Scholar
Groot, A.T., Marr, M., Schöfl, G., Lorenz, S., Svatos, A., and Heckel, D.G. 2008. Host strain specific sex pheromone variation in Spodoptera frugiperda . Frontiers in Zoology, 5: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-5-20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerin, P.M., Baltensweiler, W., Arn, H., and Buser, H.R. 1984. Host race pheromone polymorphism in the larch budmoth. Experientia, 40: 892–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01952013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D.R., Beevor, P.S., Cork, A., Nesbitt, B.F., Si, E.A., and Croix, L. 1984. ( Z)-8-dodecenyl acetate: the major component of the female sex pheromone of Cryptophlebia batrachopa, a tortricid pest of macadamia in Malawi. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 35: 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehat, M., Anshelevich, L., Dunkelblum, E., Fraishtat, P., and Greenberg, S. 1994. Sex pheromone traps for monitoring the codling moth: effect of dispenser type, field aging of dispenser, pheromone dose and type of trap on male captures. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 70: 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, X.B., Liu, K.W., Wang, H.B., Zhang, S.F., and Zhang, Z. 2012. Identification and behavioral evaluation of sex pheromone components of the Chinese pine caterpillar moth, Dendrolimus tabulaeformis . PLOS One, 7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033381.Google ScholarPubMed
Leal, W.S., Bento, J.M.S., Murata, Y., Ono, M., Parra, J.R.P., and Vilela, E.F. 2001. Identification, synthesis, and field evaluation of the sex pheromone of the citrus fruit borer, Ecdytolopha aurantiana . Journal of Chemical Ecology, 27: 2041–2051. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012242904220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linn, C.E., Campbell, M.G., and Roelofs, W.L. 1986. Male moth sensitivity to multicomponent pheromones: critical role of female-released blend in determining the functional role of components and active space of the pheromone. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 12: 659–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01012100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linn, C.E., Campbell, M.G., and Roelofs, W.L. 1987. Pheromone components and active spaces: what do moths smell and where do they smell it? Science, 237: 650–652.Google Scholar
López-Guillén, G., Ruiz, J.G., Brown, J.W., Cruz-López, L., Metz, M.A., and Alma Solís, M. 2021. First records of Lepidoptera damaging Macadamia integrifolia (Proteaceae) fruits in Guatemala. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 123: 341–349. https://doi.org/10.4289/0013-8797.123.2.341.Google Scholar
Ma, T., Li, Y., Sun, Z., and Wen, X. 2014. ( Z,E)-9,12-tetradecadien-1-ol: a major sex pheromone component of Euzophera pyriella (Lepidoptera: Pyralididae) in Xinjiang, China. Florida Entomologist, 97: 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1896/054.097.0221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malo, E.A., Renou, M., and Guerrero, A. 2000. Analytical studies of Spodoptera littoralis sex pheromone components by electroantennography and coupled gas chromatograph–electroantennographic detection. Talanta, 52: 525–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(00)00401-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozuraitis, R. and Buda, V. 2013. Intra- and interspecific activities of semiochemicals from the sex pheromone gland of the welsh clearwing, Synanthedon scoliaeformis . Journal of Chemical Ecology, 39: 1066–1069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muirhead-Thomson, R.C. 1991. Trap responses of flying insects. Academic Press, San Diego, California, United States of America.Google Scholar
Murakami, Y., Sugie, H., Fukumoto, T., and Mochizuki, F. 2005. Sex pheromone of Grapholita dimorpha Komai (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), and its utilization for monitoring. Applied Entomology and Zoology, 40: 521–527. https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2005.521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navas-Franco, S.D. 2019. Evaluación de atrayentes y comparación de métodos de control del barrenador de la nuez de macadamia (Ecdytholopha torticornis) Meyrick. Diagnóstico y servicios realizados en la finca Buena Vista, San Pablo, San Marcos, Guatemala, C.A. Universidad de San Carlos Guatemala, San Marcos, Guatemala.Google Scholar
Newton, P.J., Thomas, C.D., Mastro, V.C., and Schwalbe, C.P. 1993. Improved two-component blend of the synthetic female sex pheromone of Cryptophlebia leucotreta, and identification of an attractant for C. peltastica . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 66: 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parra, J.R.P., Bento, J.M.S., Garcia, M.S., Yamamoto, P.T., Vilela, E.F., and Leal, W.S. 2004. Development of a control alternative for the citrus fruit borer, Ecdytolopha aurantiana (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae): from basic research to the grower. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 48: 561–567. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0085-56262004000400020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persoons, C.J., Ritter, F.J., and Nooyen, W.J. 1977. Sex pheromone of the false codling moth Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): evidence for a two-component system. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 3: 717–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988070.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2022. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from https://www.r-project.org/ [accessed 05 September 2022].Google Scholar
Sorenson, C.E., Kennedy, G.G., Van Duyn, W., Bradley, J.R., and Walgenbach, J.F. 1992. Geographical variation in pheromone response of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis, in North Carolina. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 64: 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1992.tb01607.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witzgall, P., Kirsch, P., and Cork, A. 2010. Sex pheromones and their impact on pest management. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 36: 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-009-9737-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witzgall, P., Sauter, W., Buser, H.R., Rauscher, S., Arn, H., Charmillot, P.J., and Wildbolz, T. 1989. Use of pheromone chemistry to identify Grapholita lobarzewskii as an occasional pest of apple and plum. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 53: 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, P., Molina, J., Felippe, M., and Nociti, L. 2006. Monitoramento de Ecdytolopha aurantiana (Lima) em laranjeira Valência com feromônio sexual. BioAssay, 1: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.14295/ba.v1.0.42.Google Scholar
Yang, C.Y., Jeon, H.Y., and Boo, K.S. 2005. Geographical variation in sex pheromone composition of Adoxophyes spp. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in pear orchards. Korean Journal of Applied Entomology, 44: 31–36.Google Scholar
Yang, C.Y., Jung, J.K., Han, K.S., Boo, K.S., and Yiem, M.S. 2002. Sex pheromone composition and monitoring of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Naju pear orchards. Journal of Asia–Pacific Entomology, 5: 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1226-8615(08)60153-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar