Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:22:37.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Managing bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) with semiochemicals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2020

Steven J. Seybold  and
Christopher J. Fettig Open the ORCID record for Christopher J. Fettig [Opens in a new window]
Steven J. Seybold
Affiliation:
Pacific Southwest Research Station, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Davis, California, 95618, United States of America
Christopher J. Fettig*
Affiliation:
Pacific Southwest Research Station, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Davis, California, 95618, United States of America
*
*Corresponding author. Email: chris.fettig@usda.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On 14 November 2018, a symposium Managing bark and ambrosia beetles with semiochemicals was held in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, at the Joint Meeting of the Entomological Society of America, the Entomological Society of Canada, and the Entomological Society of British Columbia. The focus was on the application of behavioural chemicals for management of bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in conifers and hardwoods in North America and Europe. Contributors included nine invited speakers from Canada, Slovakia, and the United States of America who summarised the current state of knowledge and latest technologies and shared career-long experiences and insights. This special issue features publications derived from those presentations.

Type
Forum
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 153 , Issue 1: Managing bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) with semiochemicals , February 2021 , pp. 4 - 12
Check for updates
Creative Commons
As a work owned by the United States Government, this Contribution is not subject to copyright within the United States. Outside of the United States, Cambridge University Press is the non-exclusively licensed publisher of the Contribution.
Copyright
© U.S Government Dept 2020 outside of the United States of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Deceased

Subject editor: Andrew Graves

References

Audley, J.P., Dallara, P.L., Francke, W., and Seybold, S.J. 2016. Behavioral chemical disruption of the host selection behavior of the walnut twig beetle: a chemical ecological approach [online]. Available from https://doi.org/10.1603/ICE.2016.114667 [accessed 12 November 2019].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedard, W.D., Tilden, P.E., Wood, D.L., Silverstein, R.M., Brownlee, R.G., and Rodin, J.O. 1969. Western pine beetle: field response to its sex pheromone and a synergistic host terpene, myrcene. Science, 164: 1284–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentz, B.J., Allen, C.D., Ayres, M., Berg, E., Carroll, A., Hansen, E.M., et al. 2009. Bark beetle outbreaks in western North America: causes and consequences. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.Google Scholar
Bentz, B.J., Bonello, E., Delb, H., Fettig, C.J., Poland, T., Pureswaran, D., and Seybold, S.J. 2020. Advances in understanding and managing insect pests of forest trees. In Achieving sustainable forestry volume 1: boreal and temperate forests. Edited by Stanturf, J.. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing Limited, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Pp. 515–585.Google Scholar
Bentz, B.J., Régnière, J., Fettig, C.J., Hansen, E.M., Hayes, J.L., Hicke, J.A., et al. 2010. Climate change and bark beetles of the western US and Canada: direct and indirect effects. BioScience, 60: 602–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, M.C., Light, D.M., Wood, D.L., Browne, L.E., Silverstein, R.M., Bergot, B.J., et al. 1980. Pheromonal attraction and allomonal interruption of Ips pini in California by the two enantiomers of ipsdienol. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 6: 703–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J.H., Chong, L., McLean, J.A., Slessor, K.N., and Mori, K. 1976. Gnathotrichus sulcatus: synergistic response to enantiomers of the aggregation pheromone sulcatol. Science, 192: 894–896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bright, D.E. 2014. A catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera), supplement 3 (2000–2010), with notes on subfamily and tribal reclassifications. Insecta Mundi, 356: 1–336.Google Scholar
Byers, J.A., Wood, D.L., Craig, J., and Hendry, L.B. 1984. Attractive and inhibitory pheromones produced in the bark beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis, during host colonization: regulation of inter- and intraspecific competition. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 10: 861–877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, T.W., Poloni, A.L., Chen, Y., Thu, P.-Q., Li, Q., Sun, J.-H., et al. 2019. Hardwood injury and mortality associated with two shot hole borers, Euwallacea spp., in the invaded region of southern California, USA, and the native region of Southeast Asia. Annals of Forest Science, 76: article 61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0847-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J.P., Scheffers, B.R., and Hess, M. 2014. Effect of laurel wilt invasion on redbay populations in a maritime forest community. Biological Invasions, 16: 1581–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fettig, C.J., Borys, R.R., Dabney, C.P., McKelvey, S.R., Cluck, D.R., and Smith, S.L. 2005. Disruption of red turpentine beetle attraction to baited traps by the addition of California fivespined ips pheromone components. The Canadian Entomologist, 137: 748−752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fettig, C.J. and Hilszczański, J. 2015. Management strategies for bark beetles in conifer forests. In Bark beetles: biology and ecology of native and invasive species. Edited by Vega, F.E. and Hofstetter, R.W.. Springer, London, United Kingdom. Pp. 555–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furniss, R.L. and Carolin, V.M. 1977. Western forest insects. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, M.A., Smith, J.A., Ploetz, R.C., Kendra, P.E., Mayfield, A.E., Hanula, J.L., et al. 2015. Recovery plan for laurel wilt on redbay and other forest species caused by Raffaelea lauricola and disseminated by Xyleborus glabratus . Plant Health Progress, 16: 173–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulcr, J. and Dunn, R.R. 2011. The sudden emergence of pathogenicity in insect–fungus symbioses threatens naive forest ecosystems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278: 2866–2873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jakoby, O., Lischke, H., and Wermelinger, B. 2019. Climate change alters elevational phenology patterns of the European spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus). Global Change Biology, 25: 4048–4063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, T.E., Fettig, C.J., Ayres, M.P., Bentz, B.J., Hicke, J.A., Mathiasen, R., et al. 2016. Observed and anticipated impacts of drought on forests insects and diseases in the United States. Forest Ecology and Management, 380: 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, B.S. 1983. A multiple funnel trap for scolytid beetles (Coleoptera). The Canadian Entomologist, 115: 299−302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marini, L., Ayres, M.P., Battisti, A., and Faccoli, M. 2012. Climate affects severity and altitudinal distribution of outbreaks in an eruptive bark beetle. Climatic Change, 115: 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marini, L., Økland, B., Jönsson, A.M., Bentz, B., Carroll, A., Forster, B., et al. 2017. Climate drivers of bark beetle outbreak dynamics in Norway spruce forests. Ecography, 40: 1426–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, X., Sobel, L., Conover, D., Mafra-Neto, A., and Smith, J. 2019. Verbenone reduces landing of the redbay ambrosia beetle, vector of the laurel wilt pathogen, on live standing redbay trees. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 22: 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, A.M. and Rieske, L.K. 2015. Potential host and range expansion of an exotic insect-pathogen complex: simulating effects of sassafras mortality from laurel wilt disease invasion in the central hardwoods region. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 142: 292–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbay, L., McLean, J.A., Sauder, B.J., and Cottell, P.L. 1994. Economic losses resulting from ambrosia beetle infestation of sawlogs in coastal British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 24: 1266–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, T.D. and Hanlon, C.C. 1991. Response of Dendroctonus brevicomis and Ips paraconfusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to combinations of synthetic pheromone attractants and inhibitors verbenone and ipsdienol. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 17: 2163–2176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Progar, R.A., Gillette, N., Fettig, C.J., and Hrinkevich, K. 2014. Applied chemical ecology of the mountain pine beetle. Forest Science, 60: 414–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renwick, J.A.A. 1967. Identification of two oxygenated terpenes from the bark beetles Dendroctonus frontalis and Dendroctonus brevicomis . Contributions of the Boyce Thompson Institute, 23: 355–360.Google Scholar
Seybold, S.J., Bentz, B.J., Fettig, C.J., Lundquist, J.E., Progar, R.A., and Gillette, N.E. 2018. Management of western North American bark beetles with semiochemicals. Annual Review of Entomology, 63: 407−432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seybold, S.J., Dallara, P.L., Hishinuma, S.M., and Flint, M.L. 2013. Detecting and identifying the walnut twig beetle: monitoring guidelines for the invasive vector of thousand cankers disease of walnut. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program, Oakland, California, United States of America. Available from www.ipm.ucanr.edu/PDF/PESTNOTES/WTB_trapping.pdf [accessed 20 November 2019].Google Scholar
Seybold, S.J., Dallara, P.L., Nelson, L.J., Graves, A.D., Hishinuma, S.M., and Gries, R. 2015. Methods of monitoring and controlling the walnut twig beetle, Pityophthorus juglandis. United States Patent Publication Number 2013/0014428A1. United States Patent and Trademark Office, United States Department of Commerce, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.Google Scholar
Seybold, S.J., Klingeman, W.E., Hishinuma, S.M., Coleman, T.W., and Graves, A.D. 2019. Status and impact of walnut twig beetle in urban forest, orchard, and native forest ecosystems. Journal of Forestry, 117: 152−163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seybold, S.J., Penrose, R.L., and Graves, A.D. 2016. Invasive bark and ambrosia beetles in California Mediterranean forest ecosystems. In Insects and diseases of Mediterranean forest systems. Edited by Paine, T.D. and Lieutier, F.. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. Pp. 583–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, R.M. 1981. Pheromones: background and potential for use in insect pest control. Science, 213: 1326–1332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverstein, R.M., Rodin, J.O., and Wood, D.L. 1966. Sex attractants in frass produced by male Ips confusus in ponderosa pine. Science, 154: 509–510.Google Scholar
Tumlinson, J.H. and Wood, D.L. 2011. Robert Milton Silverstein, 1916–2007: a biographical memoir. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.Google Scholar
Wood, D.L. 1982. The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles. Annual Review of Entomology, 27: 411–446 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D.L., Browne, L.E., Bedard, W.D., Tilden, P.E., Silverstein, R.M., and Rodin, J.O. 1968. Response of Ips confusus to synthetic sex pheromones in nature. Science, 159: 1373–1374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, D.L., Browne, L.E., Ewing, B., Lindahl, K., Bedard, W.D., Tilden, P.E., et al. 1976. Western pine beetle: specificity among enantiomers of male and female components of an attractant pheromone. Science, 192: 896–898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, D.L., Stark, R.W., Silverstein, R.M., and Rodin, J.O. 1967. Unique synergistic effects produced by the principal sex attractant compounds of Ips confusus (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Nature, 215: 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, S.L. and Bright, D.E. 1992. A catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera), part 2: taxonomic index. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs, 13: 1–155.Google Scholar